Let’s carefully break this down.
The passage states:
* Local **phone companies have monopolies** on phone service in their areas.
* They **own the wires** already in place.
* Cable TV can be transmitted via these wires.
* **Cable companies argue**: if phone companies start offering cable TV, they would have an **unfair advantage**, because the **profits from the phone monopoly** could subsidize cable service.
Now, look at the answer choices:
**(A)** Are phone companies as efficient as cable companies in providing reliable and inexpensive service?
👉 Not answered. Nothing in the passage about efficiency or reliability.
**(B)** If phone companies were allowed to provide cable service, would they want to do so?
👉 Not answered. Passage only says cable companies argue about unfair advantage, not about phone companies’ intentions.
**(C)** Do the cable companies believe that the local phone companies make a profit on phone service?
👉 **Yes, this is supported.** The argument of "unfair advantage" depends on the assumption that phone companies are making profits from their monopoly. Otherwise, no subsidies would be possible.
**(D)** Are local phone companies forbidden to offer cable service?
👉 Not answered. Passage doesn’t mention any legal prohibition.
**(E)** Is it expected that phone companies will have a monopoly on cable service?
👉 Not answered. Passage only talks about unfair advantage, not about future monopoly expectations.
✅ **Correct Answer: (C)**