Mar 27 03:00 PM PDT  04:00 PM PDT Join a free live webinar and learn the winning strategy for a 700+ score on GMAT & the perfect application. Save your spot today! Wednesday, March 27th at 3 pm PST Mar 29 06:00 PM PDT  07:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants. Mar 29 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Right now, their GMAT prep, GRE prep, and MBA admissions consulting services are up to $1,100 off. GMAT (Save up to $261): SPRINGEXTRAGMAT GRE Prep (Save up to $149): SPRINGEXTRAGRE MBA (Save up to $1,240): SPRINGEXTRAMBA Mar 30 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Mar 31 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 53831

Question Stats:
65% (02:56) correct 35% (02:56) wrong based on 186 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A farm has chickens, cows and sheep. The number of chickens and cows combined is 3 times the number of sheep. If there are more cows than chickens or sheep, and together, cows and chickens have a total of 100 feet and heads, how many sheep live at the farm? A. 5 B. 8 C. 10 D. 14 E. 17
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 53831

Re M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2014, 00:27
Official Solution:A farm has chickens, cows and sheep. The number of chickens and cows combined is 3 times the number of sheep. If there are more cows than chickens or sheep, and together, cows and chickens have a total of 100 feet and heads, how many sheep live at the farm?A. 5 B. 8 C. 10 D. 14 E. 17 Let \(C\) be a number of chickens, \(W\)  cows, and \(S\)  sheep. Chickens and cows together have 100 feet and heads: \(100=1C+1W+4W+2C\), assuming that 1 is the number of heads per either unit and 4 and 2 are the number of legs per \(C\) and \(W\) accordingly. Therefore: \(100 = 3C + 5W\). It is given that \(W \gt C\), and we also see that \(C\) should be a multiple of 5 for \(3C + 5W\) to add up to 100. Picking a few numbers, we get two pairs: (5, 17) and (10, 14). \(S = \frac{(C+W)}{3}\); \(5 + 17 = 22\) which is not divisible by 3, but \(10 + 14 = 24\) which is divisible by 3, therefore only the second pair will work. So, \(S = 8\). Answer: B
_________________



Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2013
Posts: 6
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GPA: 3.01
WE: Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Dec 2014, 09:02
Could you please explain why C should be a multiple of 5?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 53831

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Dec 2014, 05:03
mat88 wrote: Could you please explain why C should be a multiple of 5? 3C + 5W = 3C + (a multiple of 5) = 100 = (a multiple of 5), thus 3C must also be a multiple of 5, which means that C must be a multiple of 5. WHEN THE SUM OR THE DIFFERENCE OF NUMBERS IS A MULTIPLE OF AN INTEGER1. If integers \(a\) and \(b\) are both multiples of some integer \(k>1\) (divisible by \(k\)), then their sum and difference will also be a multiple of \(k\) (divisible by \(k\)):Example: \(a=6\) and \(b=9\), both divisible by 3 > \(a+b=15\) and \(ab=3\), again both divisible by 3. 2. If out of integers \(a\) and \(b\) one is a multiple of some integer \(k>1\) and another is not, then their sum and difference will NOT be a multiple of \(k\) (divisible by \(k\)):Example: \(a=6\), divisible by 3 and \(b=5\), not divisible by 3 > \(a+b=11\) and \(ab=1\), neither is divisible by 3. 3. If integers \(a\) and \(b\) both are NOT multiples of some integer \(k>1\) (divisible by \(k\)), then their sum and difference may or may not be a multiple of \(k\) (divisible by \(k\)):Example: \(a=5\) and \(b=4\), neither is divisible by 3 > \(a+b=9\), is divisible by 3 and \(ab=1\), is not divisible by 3; OR: \(a=6\) and \(b=3\), neither is divisible by 5 > \(a+b=9\) and \(ab=3\), neither is divisible by 5; OR: \(a=2\) and \(b=2\), neither is divisible by 4 > \(a+b=4\) and \(ab=0\), both are divisible by 4. For more check here: divisibilitymultiplesfactorstipsandhints174998.html
_________________



Current Student
Joined: 02 Sep 2014
Posts: 88
Location: United States
GPA: 3.97

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 May 2015, 22:34
I did this slightly differently. We have 100 = 3C + 5W = 3 (C+W) + 2W = 9S + 2W. Now we know W>S. If S = 14, 17, W will be negative which is not possible. So D, E are eliminated. If S = 10, W=2 not possible since W>S. Not C. If S = 5, then W = 55/2 which is not integer. Not possible. So S has to be 8, which gives W = 14. Looks good. Answer = B.



Intern
Joined: 28 Mar 2014
Posts: 18

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Sep 2015, 20:27
There are three times the number of chickens and cows than sheep > 3*(w+c) = S why not this ? how comes this eqn s=(c+w)/3? kindly response pls



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 53831

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Sep 2015, 22:31
suyashtcs wrote: There are three times the number of chickens and cows than sheep > 3*(w+c) = S why not this ? how comes this eqn s=(c+w)/3? kindly response pls Edited to remove ambiguity. Hope it's better now.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 04 Mar 2015
Posts: 6

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Oct 2015, 08:24
I didn't understand this more details please Thanks in advance!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 53831

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Oct 2015, 11:43
MohammadManda7awi wrote: I didn't understand this more details please Thanks in advance! Please elaborate what didn't you understand? Thank you.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 04 Mar 2015
Posts: 6

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2015, 08:36
first of all, I would like to thank you for your help Actually, I didn't understand how 100 equal 1C+1W+4W+2C as well as why C should be a multiple of 5 for 3C+5W to add up to 100. and How we get these two pairs: (5, 17) and (10, 14).
Highly appreciate your help



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 53831

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2015, 03:56
MohammadManda7awi wrote: first of all, I would like to thank you for your help Actually, I didn't understand how 100 equal 1C+1W+4W+2C as well as why C should be a multiple of 5 for 3C+5W to add up to 100. and How we get these two pairs: (5, 17) and (10, 14).
Highly appreciate your help 1. We are given that together, cows and chickens have a total of 100 feet and heads. A cow has 1 head and 4 feet and a chicken has 1 head and 2 feet, so 100=1C+1W+4W+2C. This is also answered in the solution. Check highlighted parts below. Chickens and cows together have 100 feet and heads: \(100=1C+1W+4W+2C\), assuming that 1 is the number of heads per either unit and 4 and 2 are the number of legs per \(C\) and \(W\) accordingly. Therefore: \(100 = 3C + 5W\). 2. Your second question is answered here: m06183709.html#p14526163. This is also addressed in the solution  it's done by number picking.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 04 Mar 2015
Posts: 6

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Nov 2015, 08:53
Thank you very much,



Intern
Joined: 08 Dec 2015
Posts: 1

Re M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Dec 2015, 07:19
I think this is a highquality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. "4 and 2 are the number of legs per C and W accordingly"  wrong



Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2561
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Feb 2016, 14:17
a trully 700lvl question...I incorrectly answered, but now I see why I did the mistake.
cows have 4 legs chicks have 2 legs. cow and chicks have 1 head each :D suppose cows=K, chicks =C. we thus have: 4K+2C+K+C=100 5K+3C=100 We also know that K+C=3S. we then must find values for K and C so that K+C would be divisible by 3. C=1  won't work C=2 wont work C=3 wont work C=4  won't work C=5 > K=17. K+C=22  won't work. C=8  won't work C=9  won't work C=10 > K=14 > C+K=24  works. C=11 no C=12 no C=15 > K=11. won't work, since K must be > than C.
as we see, only K=14, and C=10 works. K+C=3S 24=3S S=8



Intern
Joined: 04 Jul 2015
Posts: 1

Re M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jul 2016, 20:31
I think this is a poorquality question and I agree with explanation.



Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2013
Posts: 3

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Jul 2016, 11:36
How do you know that you can use the same variable for feet and hands?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 53831

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jul 2016, 04:23
dkrunic wrote: How do you know that you can use the same variable for feet and hands? Please check here: m06183709.html#p1594846
_________________



Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2017
Posts: 19
Location: India
Concentration: Other, Other
WE: Medicine and Health (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)

A farm has chickens, cows and sheep. The number of chickens and cows combined is 3 times the number of sheep. If there are more cows than chickens or sheep, and together, cows and chickens have a total of 100 feet and heads, how many sheep live at the farm?
A. 5 B. 8 C. 10 D. 14 E. 17
Let \(C\) be a number of chickens, \(W\)  cows, and \(S\)  sheep. Chickens and cows together have 100 feet and heads: \(100=1C+1W+4W+2C\), assuming that 1 is the number of heads per either unit and 4 and 2 are the number of legs per \(C\) and \(W\) accordingly. Therefore: \(100 = 3C + 5W\). It is given that \(W \gt C\), and we also see that \(C\) should be a multiple of 5 for \(3C + 5W\) to add up to 100. Picking a few numbers, we get two pairs: (5, 17) and (10, 14). \(S = \frac{(C+W)}{3}\); \(5 + 17 = 22\) which is not divisible by 3, but \(10 + 14 = 24\) which is divisible by 3, therefore only the second pair will work. So, \(S = 8\).
Answer: B[/quote]
another pair of (5,25) is possible and as per this the answer can be C.10



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 53831

Re: M0612
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Feb 2017, 01:19
Sachin07 wrote: A farm has chickens, cows and sheep. The number of chickens and cows combined is 3 times the number of sheep. If there are more cows than chickens or sheep, and together, cows and chickens have a total of 100 feet and heads, how many sheep live at the farm?
A. 5 B. 8 C. 10 D. 14 E. 17
Let \(C\) be a number of chickens, \(W\)  cows, and \(S\)  sheep. Chickens and cows together have 100 feet and heads: \(100=1C+1W+4W+2C\), assuming that 1 is the number of heads per either unit and 4 and 2 are the number of legs per \(C\) and \(W\) accordingly. Therefore: \(100 = 3C + 5W\). It is given that \(W \gt C\), and we also see that \(C\) should be a multiple of 5 for \(3C + 5W\) to add up to 100. Picking a few numbers, we get two pairs: (5, 17) and (10, 14). \(S = \frac{(C+W)}{3}\); \(5 + 17 = 22\) which is not divisible by 3, but \(10 + 14 = 24\) which is divisible by 3, therefore only the second pair will work. So, \(S = 8\).
Answer: B
another pair of (5,25) is possible and as per this the answer can be C.10 Dear Sachin07, please note that all questions here are correct, so if you are getting answer which differs from the OA it means that you've done something wrong. For example, c = 5 and w = 25 doe not give a sum of 100 for 3c + 5w: 3*10 + 5*25 =155.
_________________



SVP
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 2102

Let \(K\) be a number of chickens, \(C\)  cows, and \(S\)  sheep.
Translation the word question into formulas:
chickens and cows combined is 3 times the number of sheep: \(K\) + \(C\) = 3\(S\).......1 Chickens and cows together have 100 feet and heads: \(3K + 5C=100\). It is known that chicken has 1 head and 2 feet and cow has 1 head and 4 feet...........2
cows than chickens or sheep: C> K & S............3 From 1: K=3S  C
Apply into 2 , we get: 9S+2C=100..... Here I want to make one equation in sheep and cow to make use of the info in (3).
Let's analyze the equation above, 100 is even & 2C is even so 9S MUST be even too. Hence S is even number...........Eliminate choices A & E
Rearrange 2: C= 50 (9S)/2
Plug in choice B, S=8 .......C=14 ......C>S........our target answer.
You may want to examine choice C, S=10..........C=5......C<S... incorrect
Answer: B







Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 25 posts ]



