Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 19 Jun 2018, 19:29
6
11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
35% (medium)
Question Stats:
68% (01:08) correct 32% (01:28) wrong based on 538 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects of proven authenticity. Doubts have been raised about the origins of a supposedly Mycenaean vase currently on display in the museum's antiquities wing. The only way to establish this vase's authenticity would be to pulverize it, then subject the dust to spectroscopic analysis.
The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Authentic Mycenaean vases are valuable and rare. (B) Museum A has been beset with questions about the provenance of many of the items in its antiquities wing. (C) The vase in question will no longer be displayed in Museum A. (D) Spectroscopic analysis has revolutionized the forensic investigation of art forgery. (E) Knowingly or not, many of the world's museums display some forgeries.
Status: On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 342
Re: Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Aug 2014, 02:45
1
1
Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects of proven authenticity. Doubts have been raised about the origins of a supposedly Mycenaean vase currently on display in the museum's antiquities wing. The only way to establish this vase's authenticity would be to pulverize it, then subject the dust to spectroscopic analysis.
The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Authentic Mycenaean vases are valuable and rare. We have nothing in the argument to support this. The M vases are just taken as an example to prove a point. There seems to be no particular reason to believe this option to be true. (B) Museum A has been beset with questions about the provenance of many of the items in its antiquities wing. We can't say this too. There is nothing in the argument to support this claim. Maybe the M vase case is the only case that Museum A has had to adopt the policy that it did. (C) The vase in question will no longer be displayed in Museum A. The policy elaborated in the 1st sentence talks about "proven authenticity". Since the authenticity of the vase is in question and the only way to prove the vase's authenticity is to damage it(reduce it to dust), one way or the other, the vase will be taken off display. (D) Spectroscopic analysis has revolutionized the forensic investigation of art forgery. Argument doesnt say anything to support this. (E) Knowingly or not, many of the world's museums display some forgeries.The argument never talks about other world museums. It only talks about Museum A. OFS
Re: Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Aug 2014, 08:39
Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects of proven authenticity. Doubts have been raised about the origins of a supposedly Mycenaean vase currently on display in the museum's antiquities wing. The only way to establish this vase's authenticity would be to pulverize it, then subject the dust to spectroscopic analysis. The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions? (A) Authentic Mycenaean vases are valuable and rare. (B) Museum A has been beset with questions about the provenance of many of the items in its antiquities wing. (C) The vase in question will no longer be displayed in Museum A. >> Correct. (D) Spectroscopic analysis has revolutionized the forensic investigation of art forgery. (E) Knowingly or not, many of the world's museums display some forgeries.
_________________
Re: Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Aug 2014, 17:33
AmoyV wrote:
Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects of proven authenticity. Doubts have been raised about the origins of a supposedly Mycenaean vase currently on display in the museum's antiquities wing. The only way to establish this vase's authenticity would be to pulverize it, then subject the dust to spectroscopic analysis.
The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Authentic Mycenaean vases are valuable and rare. We have nothing in the argument to support this. The M vases are just taken as an example to prove a point. There seems to be no particular reason to believe this option to be true. (B) Museum A has been beset with questions about the provenance of many of the items in its antiquities wing. We can't say this too. There is nothing in the argument to support this claim. Maybe the M vase case is the only case that Museum A has had to adopt the policy that it did. (C) The vase in question will no longer be displayed in Museum A. The policy elaborated in the 1st sentence talks about "proven authenticity". Since the authenticity of the vase is in question and the only way to prove the vase's authenticity is to damage it(reduce it to dust), one way or the other, the vase will be taken off display. (D) Spectroscopic analysis has revolutionized the forensic investigation of art forgery. Argument doesnt say anything to support this. (E) Knowingly or not, many of the world's museums display some forgeries.The argument never talks about other world museums. It only talks about Museum A. OFS
Re: Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Feb 2016, 16:20
vad3tha wrote:
Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects of proven authenticity. Doubts have been raised about the origins of a supposedly Mycenaean vase currently on display in the museum's antiquities wing. The only way to establish this vase's authenticity would be to pulverize it, then subject the dust to spectroscopic analysis. The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions? (A) Authentic Mycenaean vases are valuable and rare. (B) Museum A has been beset with questions about the provenance of many of the items in its antiquities wing. (C) The vase in question will no longer be displayed in Museum A. (D) Spectroscopic analysis has revolutionized the forensic investigation of art forgery. (E) Knowingly or not, many of the world's museums display some forgeries.
this is "draw a conclusion" type of question.
based on the info in the argument, we need to find an answer choice that would best be supported by the premises given.
P1 -> only undamaged objects are displayed P2 -> to prove it's authenticity, the vase needs to be "damaged". C - regardless of the results, the vase will be damaged and even if it's not a forgery, it will no longer be displayed in the museum.
A. irrelevant. B. so what? C. aha. if it's a forgery - will be removed from the exposition. if not, it will be damaged, and thus not be displayed. D. irrelevant. E. irrelevant.
Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2018, 19:32
Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects of proven authenticity. Doubts have been raised about the origins of a supposedly Mycenaean vase currently on display in the museum's antiquities wing. The only way to establish this vase's authenticity would be to pulverize it, then subject the dust to spectroscopic analysis.
Type- Inference
(A) Authentic Mycenaean vases are valuable and rare. -- Out of scope (B) Museum A has been beset with questions about the provenance of many of the items in its antiquities wing. -- Incorrect - we have just been provided one instance (C) The vase in question will no longer be displayed in Museum A. - Correct -- since Museum A will display only undamaged objects of proven authenticity. The ONLY way to establish this vase's authenticity would be to pulverize it, then subject the dust to spectroscopic analysis. (D) Spectroscopic analysis has revolutionized the forensic investigation of art forgery. -- Irrelevant (E) Knowingly or not, many of the world's museums display some forgeries. - Out of scope
Answer C
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long +1 Kudos if you find this post helpful
Re: Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Aug 2018, 15:24
This is a Must Be True or Inference CR question type. According to this questions, the best answer is the one that can be inferred from the stimulus (the set of facts) with 100% certainty. The best answer is C because once the object in question is damaged, the same object will not be displayed in Museum A.
gmatclubot
Re: Museum A will henceforth display only undamaged objects &nbs
[#permalink]
01 Aug 2018, 15:24
close
68% (01:08) correct 
