Last visit was: 20 May 2025, 03:22 It is currently 20 May 2025, 03:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 Level|   Bold Face CR|               
User avatar
aurobindo
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Last visit: 16 Apr 2012
Posts: 562
Own Kudos:
478
 [283]
Given Kudos: 4
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools:Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
 Q48  V34 GMAT 2: 740  Q49  V42
GPA: 3.53
Posts: 562
Kudos: 478
 [283]
38
Kudos
Add Kudos
244
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 16 May 2025
Posts: 7,305
Own Kudos:
67,947
 [61]
Given Kudos: 1,932
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,305
Kudos: 67,947
 [61]
40
Kudos
Add Kudos
21
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GK_Gmat
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Last visit: 28 Feb 2009
Posts: 349
Own Kudos:
1,033
 [7]
Posts: 349
Kudos: 1,033
 [7]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
vsaxenaGMAT
Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Last visit: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
21
 [5]
Posts: 38
Kudos: 21
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
:oops: Hi All,
lets discuss what GMAC means by "Claim", "position", "judgement". Such terms may reappear and then discuss this question again.

I think:
Claim: each side of argument
Position: just a stand point or a view on which a claim is made.
judgement: When supported by aurgument, a Position should be concidered as judgement.
User avatar
goalsnr
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Last visit: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 630
Own Kudos:
4,989
 [5]
Given Kudos: 10
Products:
Posts: 630
Kudos: 4,989
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here is my attempt to explain :

0.Issue - topic of argument
Museums that house Renaissance oil paintings typically store them in envbironments
that are carefully kept within narrow margins of temperature and humidity to inhibit any
deterioration.Laboratory tests have shown that the kind of oil paint used in these paintings
actually adjusts to climatic changes quite well.Can the museum rleax standards based on the tests?

1.Conclusion -What does the author think?
Museums would be rash to relax those standards

2.Position - point of view or attitude about an issue or question
museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings.

3. Judgement -an opinion formed from a consideration of the facts.
as some museum directors believe,paint is the most sensitive substance in these works


Please correct me if Iam wrong.
User avatar
bsv180985
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Last visit: 21 Nov 2011
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
985
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
 Q50  V36
Posts: 44
Kudos: 985
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I choose D here.
Read carefully and try to paraphrase what you read.

Let's take a look at first bold.
If, as some museum directors believe, paint is
the most sensitive substance in these works
,
Notice, that it directors believe. It's not a position, nor an evidence, nor a claim, nor an objection. It looks like judgement.

First bold lead to second bold directly. First supports second clearly. The second looks like position.

museums can reduce energy
costs without risking damage to these paintings


However, further this position is called into question. (possible risk to painting occurs)

D captures all mentioned above

aurobindo
Museums that house Renaissance oil paintings typically store them in environments that are carefully kept within narrow margins of temperature and humidity to inhibit any deterioration. Laboratory tests have shown that the kind of oil paint used in these paintings actually adjusts to climatic changes quite well. If, as some museum directors believe, paint is the most sensitive substance in these works, then by relaxing the standards for temperature and humidity control, museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings. Museums would be rash to relax those standards, however, since results of preliminary tests indicate that gesso, a compound routinely used by Renaissance artists to help paint adhere to the canvas, is unable to withstand significant variations in humidity.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


(A) The first is an objection that has been raised against the position taken by the argument; the second is the position taken by the argument.

(B) The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is the position that the argument calls into question.

(C) The first is a judgment that has been offered in support of the position that the argument calls into question; the second is a circumstance on which that judgment is, in part, based.

(D) The first is a judgment that has been offered in support of the position that the argument calls into question; the second is that position.

(E) The first is a claim that the argument calls into question; the second is the position taken by the argument.
User avatar
gunjan1208
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Last visit: 05 Dec 2011
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 4
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I think this is the question adopted from OG. Though I have seen you post late (I started my preparation 2 months ago and now am intrested to work actively in this forum), I have some suggestions to offer in line with the question asked by you.

Facts: i have completed my OG verbal reasoning and I found that "minor type questions" which have "bold faced questions" as subtopic are also my weakness. But at the same time, I am practicing to improve on it. That made me see your post.

Opinion: I have started to love these questions since they challenge me every time but I have not mastered them. Also, these questions are time taking and you might not encounter more than one question on the real GMAT, do not focus much on these. However, you must not entirely forget them.

Conclusion: You must try to get the maximum information about these questions in less time.

My suggestion would be to go through the manhattan CR stretegy guide and then there is a trick given to plumb these questions. Initially by learning that, you wont be able to solve all the questions (my own assumption, may not be so) but then practice few more questions on GMAT forums and then I think you would start getting them.

By the way, I have been practicing these questions since last two days and I could not get this correct again after OG since I have not mastered.

But I wanted to offer the solution which I feel is right since I am facing the same problem and that's how I plan to uproot it.
(If you dont have manhattan, let me know. I can explain it to you)
Kudos for me if you like my suggestion.

Thanks,
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 4,579
Own Kudos:
32,190
 [3]
Given Kudos: 679
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,579
Kudos: 32,190
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, I got a PM to respond to this one. I created a non polished video.. let me know if this helps...

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHpFsCapBW0[/youtube]
avatar
monsoon1
Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Last visit: 05 Jun 2015
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
163
 [1]
Given Kudos: 137
Posts: 22
Kudos: 163
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nicely explained ! Thanks!

Just wanted to make sure that "Position" and "Judgement" have the same meaning and that choice B is incorrect because it states that "Position taken by the argument" and not "Position taken by the directors of museum"
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 4,579
Own Kudos:
32,190
 [1]
Given Kudos: 679
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,579
Kudos: 32,190
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great question monsoon1. Position and Judgement can be interchanged in certain scenarios because they are quite inter-related. You take a position on something based on your judgement. for example: I support Obama (my position) because in my opinion (judgement) he is better suited to take the country out of recession. Now, can I say that my position is that Obama is better suited to take the country out of recession - yes I can say that.

Let me know if this helps.
avatar
animesh_an
Joined: 07 Jun 2013
Last visit: 13 Apr 2017
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
11
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 8
Kudos: 11
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vsaxenaGMAT
:oops: Hi All,
lets discuss what GMAC means by "Claim", "position", "judgement". Such terms may reappear and then discuss this question again.

I think:
Claim: each side of argument
Position: just a stand point or a view on which a claim is made.
judgement: When supported by aurgument, a Position should be concidered as judgement.
Can someone elaborate the above three definition.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 4,579
Own Kudos:
32,190
 [2]
Given Kudos: 679
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,579
Kudos: 32,190
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
animesh_an
vsaxenaGMAT
:oops: Hi All,
lets discuss what GMAC means by "Claim", "position", "judgement". Such terms may reappear and then discuss this question again.

I think:
Claim: each side of argument
Position: just a stand point or a view on which a claim is made.
judgement: When supported by aurgument, a Position should be concidered as judgement.
Can someone elaborate the above three definition.

Hi Animesh,

I don't agree with the above definitions. All of these three words could be used to refer to the same statement. For example: If I say:

Joe is an idiot since he does not care about studies.

Here, the underlined part "Joe is an idiot" is my judgment about Joe. Right? You know about judgments that people make about others. So, I can call this statement a "judgment".
I can also call it my claim since I am claiming something i.e. "Joe is an idiot". I can also claim " I am super human". In a similar way, "Joe is an idiot" can also be called a claim.
Lastly, "Joe is an idiot" is also my position or the position of the argument since the argument as a whole seeks to establish that "Joe is an idiot" by providing a reason that "he does not care about the studies".

The same statement "Joe is an idiot" in the above context can also be called "the main conclusion of the argument", or "opinion", or "belief".

There are no specific definition for these words in the context of GMAT; what these words mean in our everyday life is what they mean in GMAT. So, if you know the meaning of these terms from your everyday usage, you need not cram any definitions.

I think you should solve some official CR questions. You'll then better appreciate what I have said here.

Also, e-GMAT offers "Bold Face" concept files as part of the free trial. You may want to try it out. It' completely. Click on the below image.


Thanks,
Chiranjeev
User avatar
gmat6nplus1
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Last visit: 09 Jan 2019
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GMAT 1: 590 Q40 V30
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
WE:Project Management (Media/Entertainment)
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
Posts: 141
Kudos: 654
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Museums that house Renaissance oil paintings typically store them in envbironments that are carefully kept within narrow margins of temperature and humidity to inhibit any deterioration. Laboratory tests have shown that the kind of oil paint used in these paintings actually adjusts to climatic changes quite well. If, as some museum directors believe, paint is the most sensitive substance in these works, then by relaxing the standards for temperature and humidity control, museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings. Museums would be rash to relax those standards, however, since results of preliminary tests indicate that gesso, a compound routinely used by Renaissance artists to help paint adhere to the canvas, is unable to withstand significant variations in humidity.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


- Background
- Evidence
B - hypothetical situation
B - hypothetical outcome
- Evidence against the adoption of the hypothetical situation.

Moreover: Boldface statements agree to each other. The main conclusion doesn't agree with the boldface statements


A. The first is an objection that has been raised against the position taken by the argument; the second is the position taken by the argument.
The second is not the position taken by the argument. Out
B. The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is the position that the argument calls into question.
The first is not the position taken by the argument. Out
C. The first is a judgment that has been offered in support of the position that the argument calls into question; the second is a circumstance on which that judgment is, in part based.
The second is not a circumstance, it is the hypothetical outcome. Out
D. The first is a judgment that has been offered in support of the position that the argument calls into question; the second is that position.
Fits perfectly
E. The first is a claim that the argument calls into question; the second is the position taken by the argument.
The second is not the position taken by the argument. Out
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,238
Kudos: 1,312
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts,

Can you suggest my flaw while dissecting below argument:
Museums that house Renaissance oil paintings typically store them in environments that are carefully kept within narrow margins of temperature and humidity to inhibit any deterioration.

This is a fact

Laboratory tests have shown that the kind of oil paint used in these paintings actually adjusts to climatic changes quite well.

This is a fact because of - lab tests have ....

If, as some museum directors believe, paint is the most sensitive substance in these works, then by relaxing the standards for temperature and humidity control, museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings.

This whole statement is a belief of M directors and this is where I faltered.According to me M directors make a conditional statement that by relaxing the standards for temperature and humidity control, they can achieve goal of - museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings. This is aptly supported by fact that - paint is the most sensitive substance in these works

So, tell here,according to me - BF1 is a fact and BF2 is opinion of people.

When I read the solution, I could not make out that - museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings - is the author's main opinion.

Further reading:
Museums would be rash to relax those standards, however, since results of preliminary tests indicate that gesso, a compound routinely used by Renaissance artists to help paint adhere to the canvas, is unable to withstand significant variations in humidity.

All this is a fact. However, once I have established the BF part earlier is it important to read rest of argument? How to co-relate the same with two BF.
WR,
Arpit
User avatar
GMATNinjaTwo
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Last visit: 07 May 2025
Posts: 233
Own Kudos:
1,065
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,070
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V47
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V48
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V47
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q168 V167
GRE 2: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q168 V167
GRE 2: Q170 V169
Posts: 233
Kudos: 1,065
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Hi Experts,

Can you suggest my flaw while dissecting below argument:
Museums that house Renaissance oil paintings typically store them in environments that are carefully kept within narrow margins of temperature and humidity to inhibit any deterioration.

This is a fact

Laboratory tests have shown that the kind of oil paint used in these paintings actually adjusts to climatic changes quite well.

This is a fact because of - lab tests have ....

If, as some museum directors believe, paint is the most sensitive substance in these works, then by relaxing the standards for temperature and humidity control, museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings.

This whole statement is a belief of M directors and this is where I faltered.According to me M directors make a conditional statement that by relaxing the standards for temperature and humidity control, they can achieve goal of - museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings. This is aptly supported by fact that - paint is the most sensitive substance in these works

So, tell here,according to me - BF1 is a fact and BF2 is opinion of people.

When I read the solution, I could not make out that - museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings - is the author's main opinion.

Further reading:
Museums would be rash to relax those standards, however, since results of preliminary tests indicate that gesso, a compound routinely used by Renaissance artists to help paint adhere to the canvas, is unable to withstand significant variations in humidity.

All this is a fact. However, once I have established the BF part earlier is it important to read rest of argument? How to co-relate the same with two BF.
WR,
Arpit
First problem: "This is aptly supported by fact that - paint is the most sensitive substance in these works". Notice that the first boldfaced portion is preceded by "IF"... this is a conditional statement relying on something that has NOT been proven as fact. "If it rains today, I will get wet." - I don't know for a fact that it will rain.

Second problem: "museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings - is the author's main opinion." This is not in fact the author's main opinion; rather, this is the main opinion of the directors who WRONGLY believe that "paint is the most sensitive substance in these works". The author of the passage is saying that IF you believe that paint is the most sensitive substance in these works (judgement), THEN you will take the position that museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to the paintings. This fits with choice D. The author of the passage then presents evidence that this judgement is FALSE: "results of preliminary tests indicate that gesso, a compound routinely used by Renaissance artists to help paint adhere to the canvas, is unable to withstand significant variations in humidity." This evidence suggests that gesso, not paint, is the most sensitive substance in those works. If the temperature and humidity standards are relaxed, the paint will be fine, but the gesso will probably fail, risking damage to the paintings.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
er.arun88
Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Last visit: 30 Jul 2018
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
63
 [2]
Given Kudos: 92
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Marketing
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Posts: 28
Kudos: 63
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Found Best solution for this problem.


https://e-gmat.com/blogs/og13-123-renai ... paintings/

Kudos if you like the information :)
User avatar
DAVEexamPAL
User avatar
examPAL Representative
Joined: 01 Mar 2017
Last visit: 15 Oct 2020
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 106
Kudos: 119
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer is (D).

Solution:
The passage outlines a position taken by some museum directors - according to which, since paint is the least sensitive and can withstand changes, changes in temperature can be made, and then calls that position into question - since Gesso may actually be more sensitive. Thus, the first BF (paint is the most sensitive) is a judgement that has been offered in support of the position that the argument calls into question, and the second (changes in humidity can be made is that position.

Another way to solve - using the process of elimination:

(A) The first is an objection that has been raised against the position taken by the argument; the second is the position taken by the argument.
No, the second is not the position taken by the argument, but rather the opposite - a position the argument questions

(B) The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is the position that the argument calls into question.
No, the first is not a position at all, it is a judgement which supports the position that the argument questions

(C) The first is a judgment that has been offered in support of the position that the argument calls into question; the second is a circumstance on which that judgment is, in part, based.
The first part is true, but the second is not a circumstance, it is the position which is being called into question itself

(D) The first is a judgment that has been offered in support of the position that the argument calls into question; the second is that position.
Yes!

(E) The first is a claim that the argument calls into question; the second is the position taken by the argument.
No, the second is not the position taken by the argument, but the reverse
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,238
Kudos: 1,312
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Museums that house Renaissance oil paintings typically store them in environments that are carefully kept within narrow margins of temperature and humidity to inhibit any deterioration. Laboratory tests have shown that the kind of oil paint used in these paintings actually adjusts to climatic changes quite well. If, as some museum directors believe, paint is the most sensitive substance in these works, then by relaxing the standards for temperature and humidity control, museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings. Museums would be rash to relax those standards, however, since results of preliminary tests indicate that gesso, a compound routinely used by Renaissance artists to help paint adhere to the canvas, is unable to withstand significant variations in humidity.


GMATNinja


Quote:
]Some museum directors believe that "paint is the most sensitive substance in these works." If that is indeed the case, then think about how those directors would respond to the lab tests. They would say, "Well, the paint is not sensitive to temp and humidity. Since the paint is the most sensitive substance, then NO substance in the paintings should be sensitive to temp and humidity. In that case, why waste money (energy costs) regulating the temp and humidity?

Is there a typo error in above and correct version should be:
They (museum directors) would say, "Well, the paint is sensitive to temp and humidity.

My reasoning: the inherent property of oil paint makes
my deterioration of paints less susceptible to weather changes and hence no energy costs are needed to regulate external temp and humidity.

Usually in bold face we link opinions of different characters in argument to author's opinion.
Here I am unable to link lab test results to music directors's judgement.

DAVEexamPAL
Quote:
The passage outlines a position taken by some museum directors (MD)- according to which, since paint is the leastsensitive and can withstand changes, changes in temperature can be made, and then calls that position into question - since Gesso may actually be more sensitive. Thus, the first BF (paint is the most sensitive) is a judgement that has been offered in support of the position that the argument calls into question, and the second (changes in humidity can be made is that position.

Do not MD take the position that paint is most sensitive?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 16 May 2025
Posts: 7,305
Own Kudos:
67,947
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,932
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,305
Kudos: 67,947
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
adkikani
Quote:
Museums that house Renaissance oil paintings typically store them in environments that are carefully kept within narrow margins of temperature and humidity to inhibit any deterioration. Laboratory tests have shown that the kind of oil paint used in these paintings actually adjusts to climatic changes quite well. If, as some museum directors believe, paint is the most sensitive substance in these works, then by relaxing the standards for temperature and humidity control, museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings. Museums would be rash to relax those standards, however, since results of preliminary tests indicate that gesso, a compound routinely used by Renaissance artists to help paint adhere to the canvas, is unable to withstand significant variations in humidity.


GMATNinja


Quote:
]Some museum directors believe that "paint is the most sensitive substance in these works." If that is indeed the case, then think about how those directors would respond to the lab tests. They would say, "Well, the paint is not sensitive to temp and humidity. Since the paint is the most sensitive substance, then NO substance in the paintings should be sensitive to temp and humidity. In that case, why waste money (energy costs) regulating the temp and humidity?

Is there a typo error in above and correct version should be:
They (museum directors) would say, "Well, the paint is sensitive to temp and humidity.

My reasoning: the inherent property of oil paint makes
my deterioration of paints less susceptible to weather changes and hence no energy costs are needed to regulate external temp and humidity.

Usually in bold face we link opinions of different characters in argument to author's opinion.
Here I am unable to link lab test results to music directors's judgement.

DAVEexamPAL
Quote:
The passage outlines a position taken by some museum directors (MD)- according to which, since paint is the leastsensitive and can withstand changes, changes in temperature can be made, and then calls that position into question - since Gesso may actually be more sensitive. Thus, the first BF (paint is the most sensitive) is a judgement that has been offered in support of the position that the argument calls into question, and the second (changes in humidity can be made is that position.

Do not MD take the position that paint is most sensitive?
Nope, not a typo! "Laboratory tests have shown that the kind of oil paint used in these paintings actually adjusts to climatic changes quite well." If the paint adjusts to climatic changes quite well, then we can say that it is NOT sensitive to climatic changes (i.e. temperature and humidity). So if paint is THE MOST SENSITIVE substance and yet it is NOT sensitive to climatic changes, then surely no other substance will be sensitive to climatic changes.

Yes, the MD's believe paint is the most sensitive, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it is sensitive to climatic changes.

For example, you could own several plants and say that one is the most sensitive plant that you own. Yet, that plant is able to withstand large fluctuates in temperature and humidity. So even though it is the MOST sensitive plant that you own, it is NOT sensitive to those changes. This implies that none of your plants would be sensitive to those changes.

In other words, being the most sensitive doesn't necessarily mean that it is sensitive to everything.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Nightmare007
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Last visit: 05 Aug 2020
Posts: 438
Own Kudos:
424
 [2]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
Posts: 438
Kudos: 424
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C is wrong because
Judgement : Paint is the most sensitive substance in these paints is NOT BASED on museums can reduce energy costs without risking damage to these paintings. BUT the statement: museums can reduce.... these paintings is BASED on paint is the most sensitive substance.

D is right. 1st is the judgement or belief provided offering support to a position. 2nd is THAT position, which the author objects.
:)

sky is the limit, 800 is the limit.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7305 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts