Newspaper editors should not allow reporters to write the headlines for their own stories. The reason for this is that, while the headlines that reporters themselves write are often clever, what typically makes them clever is that they allude to little-known information that is familiar to the reporter but that never appears explicitly in the story itself. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? (A) The reporter who writes a story is usually better placed than the reporters' editor is to judge what the story's most newsworthy features are. (B) To write a headline that is clever, a person must have sufficient understanding of the story that the headline accompanies. (C) Most reporters rarely bother to find out how other reporters have written stories and headlines about the same events that they themselves have covered. (D) For virtually any story that a reporter writes, there are at least a few people who know more about the story's subject matter than does the reporter. (E) The kind of headlines that newspaper editors want are those that anyone who has read a reporter's story in its entirety will recognize as clever. Newspaper Headlines Step 1: Identify the Question The words most strengthens in the question indicate that this is a Strengthen the Argument question. Step 2: Deconstruct the Argument © Ed shouldn’t let reporters write own HL Clever HL have info not in story Step 3: Pause and State the Goal On Strengthen questions, the goal is to find an answer that will make the conclusion more likely. In this case, you are looking to support the idea that reporters should not write headlines for their own stories . Step 4: Work from Wrong to Right (A) This answer weakens the argument, suggesting that the reporter who wrote the story would be in a better position to write the headline because he knows what is newsworthy in the story. (B) This information weakens the conclusion. A reporter is very likely to have sufficient understanding of the story, so he would be able to write the headline. (C) It is unclear if this information relates to whether reporters should write their own headlines. Research about other reporters’ methods might help a reporter if those methods were better, but could also hurt story and headline quality if the other reporters also made errors, such as writing headlines that were too clever. (D) In the context of this argument, knowledge about the story is actually bad because it results in writing headlines that include information not in the story. This answer suggests that people beyond the reporter may actually have this problem as well. If anything, this answer slightly weakens the argument because it suggests that even if a reporter does not write his own headline, the headline could still suffer the same problems if the person chosen to write it knows too much. (E) CORRECT . The argument states that reporters write headlines with information not in the story. Although you might have recognized the problem with this type of headline (how would the average reader see it was clever or understand?), it is not clearly stated that this type of a headline is a problem. Maybe newspapers like having such headlines to attract clever readers or encourage readers to think more deeply about the subject. This answer establishes that the kind of headlines reporters were writing are, in fact, not desired, at least from the perspective of the editor, supporting the idea that the reporters should not write their own headlines. Argument Evaluation Situation The headlines newspaper reporters write for their own stories are often clever only because they allude to little-known information that never appears explicitly in the stories themselves. Reasoning What would most help the argument support the conclusion that newspaper editors should not allow reporters to write headlines for their own stories? The argument's only explicit premise is that the headlines newspaper reporters write for their own stories are often clever only because they allude to little-known information that never appears explicitly in the stories themselves. In order for this premise to support the conclusion that newspaper editors should not allow reporters to write their own headlines, it would be helpful to be given a reason why editors should avoid headlines alluding to such little-known information. (A) This suggests that reporters are likely to write better headlines for their stories than editors are, so it weakens the argument that editors should not allow reporters to write their own headlines. (B) Since a reporter who wrote a story is likely to understand that story well, this does not provide a reason why editors should not allow reporters to write their own headlines. (C) If most reporters did what is suggested, they could perhaps hone their headline-writing skills—unless almost all reporters are weak in such skills, as suggested in the given information. The fact that they do not bother to do so may help explain why reporters' headline-writing skills are weak. An explanation of why this is so does not provide additional support for the argument's conclusion. (D) The people who know more about a story's subject matter than the reporter writing the story might be just as likely to see the cleverness of allusions to little-known information as the reporters are. So, to the extent that this is relevant at all, it slightly weakens the argument by suggesting that obscurely clever headlines sometimes function as intended. (E) Correct . The argument's explicit premise suggests that typically a reporter's headline for his or her own story cannot be recognized as clever by a reader who has read the whole story. So, if editors want headlines that anyone who has read the accompanying stories would recognize as clever, they have a reason not to let reporters write the headlines.

Last visit was: 07 Sep 2026, 21:20

It is currently 07 Sep 2026, 21:20

Toolkit

Critical Reasoning (CR)

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Sep 02
Save on All Magoosh Study Plans
01:00 PM EDT
-
11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 04
BIG NEWS! We’ve been nominated, and we’d love your vote!
10:00 AM EDT
-
11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 07
All GMAT Club Tests are free and open for Labor Day on Monday, September 7th!
12:01 AM PDT
-
11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT
Sep 07
The Free 12-Week GMAT Study Plan (Full Walkthrough)
10:00 AM PDT
-
11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost.
Sep 09
Masters' Spotlight Fair
07:00 AM PDT
-
10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Sep 09
How Aman Bounced Back from 3 MBA Rejections to Get Into Cambridge
10:00 AM PDT
-
11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application...
Sep 15
Live Online Class with Top GMAT Expert Rich Zwelling
07:00 PM EDT
-
09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 21
Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover
08:00 PM EDT
-
10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST

Back to Forum

Create Topic

Newspaper editors should not allow reporters to write the headlines

1 2 3

agrasan

Joined: 18 Jan 2024

Last visit: 17 Aug 2026

Posts: 689

Own Kudos:

193

Given Kudos: 6,706

Location: India

Posts: 689

Kudos: 193

13 Jan 2026, 22:27

Kudos

Bookmarks

Thanks KarishmaB.
I don't understand how do we know that the reporter has a good understanding of the story? I might be missing minor details in the argument to infer this but can you please let me know which line in the argument says this?

KarishmaB

Strengthen the argument means strengthen the conclusion. What is the conclusion here?

Conclusion: Newspaper editors should not allow reporters to write the headlines for their own stories.
The argument supports it by saying that it should be so because readers of the story don't understand the reporters' headlines.

We need to support that the reporters should not write their own headline.
Option (E) supports it by saying that editors want headlines that anyone reading the story should understand. Hence, it supports that reporters should not be allowed to write their own headlines. Makes sense.

Option (B) says that to write a clever headline, the person should have a good understanding of the story.
Ok, we know that the reporter has a good understanding of the story. So how does it indicate that the reporter should not be allowed to write his own headline? It doesn't. Hence it doesn't support the conclusion.

Answer (E)

KarishmaB

Tutor

Joined: 16 Oct 2010

Last visit: 06 Sep 2026

Posts: 16,646

Own Kudos:

81,219

[2]

Given Kudos: 491

Location: Pune, India

Expert

Expert reply

Posts: 16,646

Kudos: 81,219

[2]

13 Jan 2026, 22:37

Kudos

Bookmarks

agrasan

Given: ...while the headlines that reporters themselves write are often clever, what typically makes them clever is that they allude to little-known information that is familiar to the reporter but

The reporter researches the story and writes it. He knows it well and is familiar with little known info too. That is why he is the authority to write the story on the topic.

MartyMurray

Tutor

Joined: 11 Aug 2023

Last visit: 07 Sep 2026

Posts: 2,159

Own Kudos:

8,188

[2]

Given Kudos: 244

GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

Posts: 2,159

Kudos: 8,188

[2]

14 Jan 2026, 07:41

Kudos

Bookmarks

agrasan

I understand why (E) is correct but unable to eliminate (B) properly. My reasoning is we are given that reporters have "little known information" (according to the line "....they allude to little-known information that is familiar to the reporter...").

(B) says that person writing a headline must have sufficient understanding where as it is not the case with reporters mentioned in the argument so clearly (B) strengthens the argument.

Please let me know where I am going wrong.

The meaning of "little-known information that is familiar to the reporter" is not that reporters have "little information." Rather, it's that reporters have information that is little known, meaning that it is not commonly known.

So, the passage indicates that reporters have information that most other people do not have, meaning that reporters DO have understanding of a story that a headline accompanies.

Thus, what (B) does is explains WHY reporters can write clever headlines, and, if anything, (B) indicates why reporters should be allowed to write headlines, in a way going against the conclusion.

Pikachuu

Joined: 28 Mar 2024

Last visit: 07 Sep 2026

Posts: 105

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 99

Status:Question is not CAN YOU? Its WILL YOU?

Concentration: Technology, General Management

Schools: Booth (Chicago) CBS

GPA: 9.6

Products:

Schools: Booth (Chicago) CBS

Posts: 105

Kudos: 12

08 May 2026, 07:56

Kudos

Bookmarks

We need something that most strengthens the argument:-

(A) The reporter who writes a story is usually better placed than the reporters' editor is to judge what the story's most newsworthy features are. - Irrelevant
(B) To write a headline that is clever, a person must have sufficient understanding of the story that the headline accompanies - Irrelevant
(C) Most reporters rarely bother to find out how other reporters have written stories and headlines about the same events that they themselves have covered. - Irrelevant
(D) For virtually any story that a reporter writes, there are at least a few people who know more about the story's subject matter than does the reporter - Irrelevant – Classic statistical real life data trap
(E) The kind of headlines that newspaper editors want are those that anyone who has read a reporter's story in its entirety will recognize as clever – Good – explains the mechanism how the solution helps to reduce problem.

Boil it down:
There is a problem.
Conclusion: A proposed solution will tackle the problem

Gap : Is the problem actually a problem?
· Can the solution help in reducing the problem?