Last visit was: 23 May 2024, 07:37 It is currently 23 May 2024, 07:37
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93418
Own Kudos [?]: 626047 [305]
Given Kudos: 81940
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 18893
Own Kudos [?]: 22304 [124]
Given Kudos: 285
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 6817
Own Kudos [?]: 30306 [46]
Given Kudos: 799
Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2015
Posts: 87
Own Kudos [?]: 470 [32]
Given Kudos: 404
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V41
GMAT 3: 760 Q49 V46
Re: On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
18
Kudos
13
Bookmarks
On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t. Is t < 0?

(1) -1 < r < 0: Tells us r is a (negative) proper fraction
Does not tell us anything about the coordinates of t. Hence INSUFFICIENT

(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2:

If r is +ve and >1 t can be positive or negative
If r is +ve and <1 t will be positive since square of a proper fraction is less than the fraction itself
If r is -ve and <-1 t can be positive or negative
If r is -ve and >-1 t will be negative since square of a proper fraction is less than the fraction itself

Multiple cases hence INSUFFICIENT

Combining, it conforms to case 4.

Hence Ans = C

Originally posted by rishi02 on 16 Jun 2016, 06:09.
Last edited by rishi02 on 17 Jun 2016, 21:57, edited 2 times in total.
Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 198
Own Kudos [?]: 235 [20]
Given Kudos: 5
Re: On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
17
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t. Is t < 0?

(1) -1 < r < 0
(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2

r can take values from -0.99 to -.01 approx
if r = -0.99 then distance between r an t is r^2 = .98 the absolute value is the distance which can be both right side and left side. But in whichever case it will less than 0. Hence C is the answer.
General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2014
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 117 [13]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: United Arab Emirates
Re: On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
8
Kudos
5
Bookmarks
1) -1 < r < 0

This statement by itself is insufficient as it does not establish any relationship with t.

2) the distance between r and the t is = r^2

| t-r | = r^2

When t - r >=0 --> t >= r

t - r = r^
t = r^2 + r
t = r (r+1) ---------- eq 1

When t - r < 0 --> t < r

- t + r = r^2
t = r (1-r) ------------ eq 2

Insufficient

Taking 1 and 2 together

eq1 --> t = negative for the given value of r.

And as per the condition of the case t >= r

eq2 --> t = negative for the given value of r

And as per the condition of the case t < r

Either ways t < 0 in negative.
Sufficient

C is the correct answer

Sent from my SM-G935F using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1436
Own Kudos [?]: 4563 [16]
Given Kudos: 1228
Location: India
Re: On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
10
Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Question: Is t negative?

St1: -1 < r < 0 --> Clearly insufficient

St2: $$r - t \geq {0}$$
Possible solutions: 1) +ve - (+ve)
2) -ve - (-ve)
3) +ve - (-ve)
Not Sufficient

Combining St1 and St2: We know that r is negative --> Only possible solution is -ve - (-ve) --> t < 0.
Sufficient.

Intern
Joined: 30 Jun 2015
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 49 [0]
Given Kudos: 90
Location: Malaysia
Schools: Babson '20
GPA: 3.6
Re: On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
Thanks. can you please explain this in context of the problem?

ScottTargetTestPrep wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t. Is t < 0?

When a positive proper fraction with a smaller absolute value is added to (or subtracted from) a negative proper fraction with a larger absolute value, the sum (or difference) will always be less than zero.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93418
Own Kudos [?]: 626047 [4]
Given Kudos: 81940
Re: On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
4
Kudos
gzimmer wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t. Is t < 0?

Can someone help? I keep on seeing this explained in questions, but I am not getting it ("Point R has coordinate r"). Can someone give me a break down of what this is saying. EX: on an xy plane point Q could be at (1,0). It's x coordinate is 1, and it's Y coordinate is 0....

what is ("Point R has coordinate r") saying? can you give me an example if it were in number format?

It means that point R is at r on the number line. For example if r = -3, then we'd have the below case:
Attachments

MSP771229ab39762b67b1000004e1c46g1e825775i.gif [ 661 Bytes | Viewed 74533 times ]

Tutor
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Status:GMATH founder
Posts: 892
Own Kudos [?]: 1382 [4]
Given Kudos: 56
Re: On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bunuel wrote:
On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t. Is t < 0?

(1) -1 < r < 0
(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r²

$$t\,\,\mathop < \limits^? \,\,0$$

$$\left( 1 \right)\,\,\, - 1 < r < 0\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}\\ \,{\text{Take}}\,\,\left( {r,t} \right) = \left( { - 0.5,0} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{NO}}} \right\rangle \hfill \\\\ \,{\text{Take}}\,\,\left( {r,t} \right) = \left( { - 0.5, - 1} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \hfill \\ \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$

$$\left( 2 \right)\,\,\,\left| {r - t} \right| = {r^2}\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}\\ \,{\text{Take}}\,\,\left( {r,t} \right) = \left( {0,0} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{NO}}} \right\rangle \hfill \\\\ \,{\text{Take}}\,\,\left( {r,t} \right) = \left( { - 1, - 2} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \hfill \\ \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$

$$\left( {1 + 2} \right)\,\,\,\,\,\left| {r - t} \right| = {r^2}\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{{\text{squaring}}} \,\,\,\,\,{\left( {r - t} \right)^2} = {r^4}\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,{r^2} - 2rt + {t^2} = {r^4}\,\,\,\,\,\left( * \right)$$

$$- 1 < r < 0\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,{r^4} < {r^2}\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{\left( * \right)} \,\,\,\,\, - 2rt + {t^2} = {r^4} - {r^2} < 0$$

$$\left. \begin{gathered}\\ - 2rt + {t^2} < 0 \hfill \\\\ {t^2} \geqslant 0 \hfill \\ \\ \end{gathered} \right\}\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\, - 2rt < 0\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{r\, < \,\,0} \,\,\,t < 0\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,{\text{SUFF}}.\,$$

This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Posts: 1905
Own Kudos [?]: 5667 [3]
Given Kudos: 237
WE:General Management (Education)
Re: On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
(1) -1 < r < 0
no info about t.
NOT SUFFICIENT

(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2
No info about the r .
NOT SUFFICIENT

Combining Statement 1 & 2
the coordinate of T : t
is either $$r+r^2$$ or $$r-r^2$$

Now, when -1 < r < 0, both $$r+r^2$$ or $$r-r^2$$ will be <0
Hence t <0
SUFFICIENT

Bunuel wrote:
On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t. Is t < 0?

(1) -1 < r < 0
(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2
Tutor
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Posts: 1301
Own Kudos [?]: 2227 [6]
Given Kudos: 66
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Re: On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
5
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Video solution from Quant Reasoning:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Posts: 5986
Own Kudos [?]: 13504 [1]
Given Kudos: 124
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Re: On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Bunuel wrote:
On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t. Is t < 0?

(1) -1 < r < 0
(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2

Solve the Official Questions more productively

Click here and solve 1000+ Official Questions with Video solutions as Timed Sectional Tests
and Dedicated Data Sufficiency (DS) Course

Video solution by GMATinsight

Get TOPICWISE: Concept Videos | Practice Qns 100+ | Official Qns 50+ | 100% Video solution CLICK.
Two MUST join YouTube channels : GMATinsight (1000+ FREE Videos) and GMATclub
Intern
Joined: 15 May 2019
Status:Engineering Manager
Posts: 49
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Schools: IIMA PGPX"20
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Re: On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
Let's assume r and t on below line,
------t---r---t------
is t<0?

1. -1<r<0, no info on t. (Insufficient)
2. distant b/w R and T is $$r^2$$. This doesn't tell where t is. it could +ve or -ve. (Insufficient)

Combining 1 & 2, Since r ranges b/w -1 and 0, not inclusive, making square of any values b/w it would less than the original value. TF t can never be >0. (Sufficient)
Ans C.
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2022
Posts: 250
Own Kudos [?]: 437 [0]
Given Kudos: 1015
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
Hi KarishmaB,

Can you please share your approach to this question? I figured that both statements are individually insufficient, but want to be clear on how we are getting sufficient using both statements.

Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14891
Own Kudos [?]: 65440 [2]
Given Kudos: 431
Location: Pune, India
On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Bunuel wrote:
On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t. Is t < 0?

(1) -1 < r < 0
(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2

This is what I am thinking: "Is t < 0?" means we want to find out whether point T is to the left of 0

(1) -1 < r < 0
No clue where T is located. Could be to the left or to the right of 0. Insufficient.

(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2
Don't know where R is and where T is. Both could be to the left of 0 or both could be to the right of 0 and hence insufficient.

Both together, I imagine a number line. r lies between 0 and -1, say r = -1/2. Then r^2 = 1/4

______________ -1 ______________ -1/2______________ 0 _____________________________

Point T is at a distance 1/4 away from -1/2. Whether it is to the left or to the right of -1/2, it will be to the left of 0 only because magnitude of 1/4 is less than magnitude of -1/2. Then the number property comes to mind -
For all numbers between 0 and -1, the magnitude of the square obtained is smaller. So -1/3's square will be 1/9 which has magnitude less than 1/3 and so on. Then the placement of R and T will look something like this:

______________ -1 _______(T)_______ R_______(T)_______ 0 ______________________________
or
______________ -1 ___________________(T)___ R___(T)___ 0 ______________________________
or
_______(T)____ -1 ____ R_____________(T)______________ 0 ______________________________

Hope you see that in every case, T will be to the left of 0. Sufficient.

Check this video on using Number Line to solve questions: https://youtu.be/3gxVx3Y9xJA
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2022
Posts: 250
Own Kudos [?]: 437 [0]
Given Kudos: 1015
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
Re: On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinat [#permalink]
KarishmaB wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t. Is t < 0?

(1) -1 < r < 0
(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2

This is what I am thinking: "Is t < 0?" means we want to find out whether point T is to the left of 0

(1) -1 < r < 0
No clue where T is located. Could be to the left or to the right of 0. Insufficient.

(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2
Don't know where R is and where T is. Both could be to the left of 0 or both could be to the right of 0 and hence insufficient.

Both together, I imagine a number line. r lies between 0 and -1, say r = -1/2. Then r^2 = 1/4

______________ -1 ______________ -1/2______________ 0 _____________________________

Point T is at a distance 1/4 away from -1/2. Whether it is to the left or to the right of -1/2, it will be to the left of 0 only because magnitude of 1/4 is less than magnitude of -1/2. Then the number property comes to mind -
For all numbers between 0 and -1, the magnitude of the square obtained is smaller. So -1/3's square will be 1/9 which has magnitude less than 1/3 and so on. Then the placement of R and T will look something like this:

______________ -1 _______(T)_______ R_______(T)_______ 0 ______________________________
or
______________ -1 ___________________(T)___ R___(T)___ 0 ______________________________
or
_______(T)____ -1 ____ R_____________(T)______________ 0 ______________________________

Hope you see that in every case, T will be to the left of 0. Sufficient.