MacFauz wrote:
ashgoel wrote:
kingfalcon wrote:
I'd say your sweet spot is the 10-15 range (e.g., Darden, Duke, Ross) and it probably makes sense to apply to 1 or 2 schools in the 1-9 range (e.g., Kellogg) and potentially 1 or 2 schools in the 16-25 range (e.g., KF). In other words, based on how you've presented yourself, I think you've done a great job selecting schools.
Now, if you get that GMAT above 730 or so and present that work experience in the right way, I'd say you'd be much more competitive at the top 10 and more of a "lock" (if there were such a thing) among the 10-15 schools.
Hope that helps!
~~~
Thanks for your reply. I had question related to school rankings. Which source according to you does the best job in ranking the schools. I used FT and Businessweek. However, there is a wide difference in the rankings provided by the two sources. While, I average the ranks to arrive at a final figure, which source according to you would be more authentic?
Thanks
I like USnews and poets and quants... You'd find that their rankings would be more similar to businessweek's than ft's To be honest, I don't think it is possible to rank 2 year and 1 year programs in the same list and do justice to them both......... FT's rankings always seemed a bit odd to me...
I second the Poets and Quants composite ranking. For what it's worth, here are the schools I was thinking of in the different tiers:
1-9: HBS, GSB, Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Kellogg, Columbia, Tuck, Haas
10-15*: Duke, Darden, Ross, Stern, UCLA, Yale SOM, Johnson
16-25: KF, McCombs, Vandy, etc.
*Yes I know there are too many schools in this tier, but they all can reasonably be called top schools and all jockey for position in the 10-15 bracket.