Last visit was: 27 Apr 2024, 11:10 It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 11:10

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2013
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 167 [39]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GMAT 1: 590 Q41 V29
GMAT 2: 540 Q44 V20
GPA: 3.5
WE:Programming (Computer Software)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Sep 2013
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [7]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
General Discussion
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92955
Own Kudos [?]: 619448 [3]
Given Kudos: 81611
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92955
Own Kudos [?]: 619448 [2]
Given Kudos: 81611
Send PM
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
shameekv wrote:
Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a napkin, but the last three numbers got smudged. Thurston remembers only that the last three digits contained at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer. If Thurston dials 10 phone numbers by using the readable digits followed by 10 different random combinations of three digits, each with at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer, what is the probability that he will dial the original number correctly?

A. 1/9
B. 10/243
C. 1/27
D. 10/271
E. 1/1000000


If the last three digits have 1 zero (XX0), the total # of numerous possible is 9*9*3 (multiply by 3 since XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways: XX0, X0X, or 0XX).
If the last three digits have 2 zeros (X00), the total # of numerous possible is 9*3 (multiply by 3 since X00 can be arranged in 3 ways: X00, 00X, or X0X).

P=10/(9*9*3+9*3)=1/27.

Answer: C.

P.S. Please read carefully and follow: rules-for-posting-please-read-this-before-posting-133935.html Pay attention to the rule #3. Thank you.


Similar question to practice: john-wrote-a-phone-number-on-a-note-that-was-later-lost-94787.html
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Mar 2013
Posts: 31
Own Kudos [?]: 550 [1]
Given Kudos: 56
GMAT Date: 03-20-2014
Send PM
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
1
Kudos
We know that atleast one digit is Zero and atleast one digit is non-zero. The third digit can be any single digit integer (zero or non-zero).

Total # of combinations should be [One zero] * [One Non-zero] * [Any single digit integer] * \(\frac{3!}{2!}\)

= 1*9*10*3 = 270

P=10/270 = 1/27

Hence C
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 587
Own Kudos [?]: 3157 [1]
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
1
Kudos
If the last three digits have 1 zero (XX0), the total # of numbers possible is 9*9*3 (multiply by 3 since XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways: XX0, X0X, or 0XX).

If the last three digits have 2 zeros (X00), the total # of numbers possible is 9*3 (multiply by 3 since X00 can be arranged in 3 ways: X00, 00X, or X0X).

P = 10/(9*9*3+9*3) = 1/27.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel,

Since I got this question wrong, I need insights on this.

We have two options of using either
(1).two zeros and a non-zero
or
(2). two non-zero and a zero.

In the above solution when you say XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways, since the problem is that you are considering XX as a unique single digit non-zero. However, there can be a case where 450 and 540 can be the numbers in which case the permutation will come out different.

We can consider permutations in

N00 as 3 since 0 is a unique number and we have 9 possibilities for 'N'.So, we have

9 possibilities for N and arrangement of NOO which would be !3/!2 (Divide by !2 since 0 are unique)
=27

NN0

9 possibilities for each N and arrangement of NNO which would be !3 (Not divide by !2 since N is not unique)
=9*9*6

Please suggest where I am going wrong in this one

Rgds,
TGC!
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 477
Own Kudos [?]: 275 [0]
Given Kudos: 537
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Sloan '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
Can someone please explain why we divide 10 to 270. I know that the probability means dividing desired outcome to possible outcomes. Here desired outcome is just one number not ten.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92955
Own Kudos [?]: 619448 [0]
Given Kudos: 81611
Send PM
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Ergenekon wrote:
Can someone please explain why we divide 10 to 270. I know that the probability means dividing desired outcome to possible outcomes. Here desired outcome is just one number not ten.


But Thurston tries 10 times not just 1:

"If Thurston dials 10 phone numbers by using the readable digits followed by 10 different random combinations of three digits, each with at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer, what is the probability that he will dial the original number correctly?"
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 May 2013
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 33 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Send PM
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
Hi.

Please explain why after find the total possible number of the telephone numbers, we have 10 divided by 270?
I have thought that the chance that there is one correct phone numbers and 9 incorrect phone numbers is:

(1/270)*[(269/270)^9]*10!

The correct answer choice seems to indicate that each pick does not relate to the later picks, but the chance to pick the correct phone numbers increases after each pick, it isn't? That is why I multiply the chance to get correct phone numbers and the chance to get incorrect phone numbers.

What is wrong with my answer?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Jun 2013
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 57 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
GRE 1: Q170 V159
Send PM
Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
If the last three digits have 1 zero (XX0), the total # of numbers possible is 9*9*3 (multiply by 3 since XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways: XX0, X0X, or 0XX).

If the last three digits have 2 zeros (X00), the total # of numbers possible is 9*3 (multiply by 3 since X00 can be arranged in 3 ways: X00, 00X, or X0X).

P = 10/(9*9*3+9*3) = 1/27.

Answer: C.



Hi Bunuel,

I have a Query. In case 1 where there is only one zero, XX0 can also be XY0, in that case should it not be multiplied by 3! (i.e. 6)? For. example 3,2,0 can be written in 6 ways.

Thanks in advance for your clarification.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92955
Own Kudos [?]: 619448 [2]
Given Kudos: 81611
Send PM
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
arichinna wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
If the last three digits have 1 zero (XX0), the total # of numbers possible is 9*9*3 (multiply by 3 since XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways: XX0, X0X, or 0XX).

If the last three digits have 2 zeros (X00), the total # of numbers possible is 9*3 (multiply by 3 since X00 can be arranged in 3 ways: X00, 00X, or X0X).

P = 10/(9*9*3+9*3) = 1/27.

Answer: C.



Hi Bunuel,

I have a Query. In case 1 where there is only one zero, XX0 can also be XY0, in that case should it not be multiplied by 3! (i.e. 6)? For. example 3,2,0 can be written in 6 ways.

Thanks in advance for your clarification.


The point is that 9*9 gives all possible ordered pairs of the remaining two digits:

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
...
99

Now, 0, in three digits can take either first, second or third place, hence multiplying by 3: XX0, X0X, 0XX.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 151
Own Kudos [?]: 711 [0]
Given Kudos: 84
Location: India
Schools: IIMC (A)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 2.6
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
arichinna wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
If the last three digits have 1 zero (XX0), the total # of numbers possible is 9*9*3 (multiply by 3 since XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways: XX0, X0X, or 0XX).

If the last three digits have 2 zeros (X00), the total # of numbers possible is 9*3 (multiply by 3 since X00 can be arranged in 3 ways: X00, 00X, or X0X).

P = 10/(9*9*3+9*3) = 1/27.

Answer: C.



Hi Bunuel,

I have a Query. In case 1 where there is only one zero, XX0 can also be XY0, in that case should it not be multiplied by 3! (i.e. 6)? For. example 3,2,0 can be written in 6 ways.

Thanks in advance for your clarification.


The point is that 9*9 gives all possible ordered pairs of the remaining two digits:

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
...
99

Now, 0, in three digits can take either first, second or third place, hence multiplying by 3: XX0, X0X, 0XX.

Hope it's clear.


Dear Bunuel,

I didn't get this explanation. Why are we taking XX0 and not XY0, because the non-zero numbers can also be different.
Such as

120
102
210
201
012
021

Which should lead to 6 combinations - \(3*2*1 = 6\)

Thanks
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92955
Own Kudos [?]: 619448 [0]
Given Kudos: 81611
Send PM
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Thoughtosphere wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
arichinna wrote:
[

Hi Bunuel,

I have a Query. In case 1 where there is only one zero, XX0 can also be XY0, in that case should it not be multiplied by 3! (i.e. 6)? For. example 3,2,0 can be written in 6 ways.

Thanks in advance for your clarification.


The point is that 9*9 gives all possible ordered pairs of the remaining two digits:

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
...
99

Now, 0, in three digits can take either first, second or third place, hence multiplying by 3: XX0, X0X, 0XX.

Hope it's clear.


Dear Bunuel,

I didn't get this explanation. Why are we taking XX0 and not XY0, because the non-zero numbers can also be different.
Such as

120
102
210
201
012
021

Which should lead to 6 combinations - \(3*2*1 = 6\)

Thanks


12 and 21 in your example are treated as two different numbers in my explanation. So, when I multiply by 3 I get the same result as you when you multiply by 6.

Sorry, cannot explain any better than this:
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
...
99

Total of 81 numbers. 0 in three digits can take either first, second or third place, hence multiplying by 3: XX0, X0X, 0XX.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Sep 2015
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
Please help me understand this -

We need to find - If Thurston dials 10 phone numbers by using the readable digits followed by 10 different random combinations of three digits, each with at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer, what is the probability that he will dial the original number correctly?.

Please consider this while counting possible outcomes. Remember, logically he will stop trying once he gets the original number. When Thurston starts dialing 10 numbers, he -
->gets the original number in 1st attempt. So he tries just 1 out of 10 number.
->gets the original number in 2nd attempt. So he tries just 2 out of 10 number.
....
...
..
gets the original number in 10th attempt. So he tries just 10 out of 10 number.


But all the explanation seems to focus on finding numbers that fit in criteria - at least one 0 and at least one non-zero for counting favorable outcomes, and not on the number that is original and ONLY ONE.

I think probability has to be calculated at two levels -

Choosing 10 numbers from all favorable outcome i.e. from 270 X (original number found at 1st attempt + original number found at 2nd attempt +......+original number found at 10th attempt).

Can somebody help where I am going wrong.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Apr 2013
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 239 [1]
Given Kudos: 872
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Bunuel wrote:
shameekv wrote:
Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a napkin, but the last three numbers got smudged. Thurston remembers only that the last three digits contained at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer. If Thurston dials 10 phone numbers by using the readable digits followed by 10 different random combinations of three digits, each with at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer, what is the probability that he will dial the original number correctly?

A. 1/9
B. 10/243
C. 1/27
D. 10/271
E. 1/1000000


If the last three digits have 1 zero (XX0), the total # of numbers possible is 9*9*3 (multiply by 3 since XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways: XX0, X0X, or 0XX).

If the last three digits have 2 zeros (X00), the total # of numbers possible is 9*3 (multiply by 3 since X00 can be arranged in 3 ways: X00, 00X, or X0X).

P = 10/(9*9*3+9*3) = 1/27.

Answer: C.

P.S. Please read carefully and follow: https://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-pos ... 33935.html Pay attention to the rule #3. Thank you.



How did you simply write 10/270?

This is how I did it.

Total possibilities for the numbers = 270 (found this one exactly how you did)

Of these only 1 is correct and the other 269 are incorrect.

Final probability = Probability of selecting 1 correct and 9 incorrect / probability of selecting any 10 out of 270

This will also give the same answer.

I just want to know your "exact mathematical logic" why you wrote 10/270.

Thank you for your help :)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Apr 2020
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
The combination of the last 3 numbers could be 0ZZ (where I assume Z is the non-zero integer), which will be 3C1 x 81, or 00Z, which will be 3x9. In total we will have 270 combinations. It is indeed that out of that 270 combinations available there is only 1 correct combination, in which the probability is 1/270. However, given that he attempted 10 phone calls, it is possible that he will get the correct combination either in the 1st attempt, 2nd attempt.... or even in the 10th attempt. Each attempt has a probability of 1/270. So the total probability of him getting the right combination in 10 tries is 10x1/270 = 1/27.
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 18768
Own Kudos [?]: 22071 [0]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: United States (CA)
Send PM
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
Expert Reply
shameekv wrote:
Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a napkin, but the last three numbers got smudged. Thurston remembers only that the last three digits contained at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer. If Thurston dials 10 phone numbers by using the readable digits followed by 10 different random combinations of three digits, each with at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer, what is the probability that he will dial the original number correctly?

A. 1/9
B. 10/243
C. 1/27
D. 10/271
E. 1/1000000


We can divide the last 3 digits of the phone number into 2 cases:

1) exactly 1 zero and 2 non-zero digits.

2) exactly 2 zeros and 1 non-zero digit.

Case 1: ZNN, NZN, NNZ (where Z is the 0 digit and N is a nonzero digit)

(1 x 9 x 9) x 3 = 243

Case 2: ZZN, ZNZ, NZZ

(1 x 1 x 9) x 3 = 27

Therefore, the total number of ways the last 3 digits of the phone number can be formed given that there is at least one zero and at least one non-zero digit is 243 + 27 = 270. Since Thurston tries 10 of them, the probability he dials the correct phone number is 10/27 = 1/27.

Answer: C
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32716
Own Kudos [?]: 822 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92955 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne