shelrod007 wrote:
Hi Rajat ,
I am already a customer of Verbal Live prep , as per the student policy on the forums i am supposed to post my doubts on gmat club and paste the links on the forum .
As a beginer i have difficulty to split sentences so i posted the query here first .
Thanks for posting your query Shelrod.
I have reviewed your analysis and here is my assessment
You are right in your meaning analysis.
You are also right that “found” is not a verb and is a “verb-ed modifier”. (It gives information about the fossils. i.e. the fossils are found in Puerto Rico)
But you faltered when you could not recognize that “made” is a verb. Let's assume for a moment that “made” is a verb-ed modifier. Now ask yourself “How is it modifying fossils?” Can you say that "
fossils were made it the earliest known mammal"? No we cannot say that.
So as you can see it isn’t a verb-ed modifier. It is indeed a verb.
But the problem here in this sentence is that the Subject-Verb Pair do not make sense.
“Fossils made Sloth the earliest known mammal…” isn’t logical!
Fossils cannot make Sloth the earliest known mammal. (But something like “The discovery of fossils made the sloth the earliest known mammal…” will definitely make sense.)
Next we come to the pronoun -
Actually there isn’t any problem with “it”. “it” can logically refer to only one antecedent “sloth”. Nothing else.
When in doubt, always replace the pronoun with the possible nouns (one by one) and see which one makes sense.
Here only “… sloth the earliest known mammal…” makes sense. “… arm the earliest known mammal…” is illogical and so “it” cannot refer to “arm”.
Also “it” cannot refer to “fossils” for the reason mentioned by you. So “it” logically refers to only one noun (sloth) and so there isn’t any pronoun error.
(Always remember that the only rule governing the usage of pronouns is “There should be only one logical antecedent to a pronoun. The antecedent need not necessarily be near to the pronoun” If there is no logical antecedent or more than one logical antecedents, then the sentence has a pronoun error)
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Krishna.