Last visit was: 15 May 2024, 18:35 It is currently 15 May 2024, 18:35

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1015
Own Kudos [?]: 2765 [23]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Send PM
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 506
Own Kudos [?]: 640 [1]
Given Kudos: 61
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2015
Posts: 154
Own Kudos [?]: 616 [0]
Given Kudos: 79
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 May 2010
Posts: 101
Own Kudos [?]: 63 [0]
Given Kudos: 65
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Children develop the ability to form the sounds necessary for speech [#permalink]
Though i initially selected C, but later realized that B is only answer.

The option B states that "Compared to the younger children in the study, the older children who had begun preschool were consistently better able to pronounce the phonemes."

It compares two groups of children and implies that preschool contributed to pronouncing the phonemes clearly. Now look at the last part of the argument, which says that "The linguists concluded that pronunciation of these phonemes is learned from contact with adults and other children and not inherited genetically".Attending the preschool means interaction with the other children.

So option B is right answer.
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11254
Own Kudos [?]: 32533 [1]
Given Kudos: 306
Send PM
Re: Children develop the ability to form the sounds necessary for speech [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
aditya8062 wrote:
B has a fault : The ARGUMENT is about "DIFFERENTLY" pronouncing phonemes and NOT ABOUT "BEING better able to pronounce the phonemes"

to prove that this PROCESS IS not GENETIC but is learned the AUTHOR should have studied THOSE AUSTRALIAN babies who have settled in some other region .

B DOES not prove that THIS PROCESS is NOT GENETIC . B just claims that older kids are BETTER ABLE to PRONOUNCE the phonemes ---->
...

Hi Aditya,

The argument is not about pronouncing 'phonemes' differently or same way, but that "pronunciation of these phonemes is learned from contact with adults and other children and not inherited genetically."
"DIFFERENTLY" pronouncing phonemes or [i]"BEING better able to pronounce the phonemes" .. are just the premise or observations..

Quote:
the AUTHOR should have studied THOSE AUSTRALIAN babies who have settled in some other region .
..
Ofcourse when the author says Compared to the younger children in the study, the older children who had begun preschool were consistently better able to pronounce the phonemes., he is comparing the australian younger kids and those into preschool of the same area and there is an improvement in pronounciation when a kid goes to preschool.
this clearly shows the same child when entering the pre school learns the correct/better way of pronouncing the phonemes; It proves that pronounciation of phonemes has changed in the school and is learnt and not inherited..
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11254
Own Kudos [?]: 32533 [1]
Given Kudos: 306
Send PM
Re: Children develop the ability to form the sounds necessary for speech [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
RAHKARP27071989 wrote:
aditya8062 wrote:
B has a fault : The ARGUMENT is about "DIFFERENTLY" pronouncing phonemes and NOT ABOUT "BEING better able to pronounce the phonemes"

to prove that this PROCESS IS not GENETIC but is learned the AUTHOR should have studied THOSE AUSTRALIAN babies who have settled in some other region .

B DOES not prove that THIS PROCESS is NOT GENETIC . B just claims that older kids are BETTER ABLE to PRONOUNCE the phonemes ---->this could very well be a genetic development, a tendency that develops with age . case in point : diabetes is GENETIC disorder but it is MORE PRONOUNCED with AGED people or in there words it gets MORE DEVELOPED in OLDER PEOPLE than in TEENAGE PEOPLE ---->by this we cannot conclude that OLDER PEOPLE GETS this DISEASE from OTHER PEOPLE around them !!



Hi aditya8062,

Few more points to add.
Option B talks about older people (We don't care about them)
The argument is concerned with younger children and that too between 2 to 6.

I don't see any valid answer in this.

I really wish that gmatclub should also have some prerequisites before posting any question.

Because of limited resources, its very difficult to practice within scope of GMAT standard questions :cry:


Hi,
The argument is not about any age or about different pronounciation, it is about the pronounciation of phonemes being genetic or learned ..
the usage of kids going to preschool and learning the better way tells us that it can be taught in school..
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jul 2017
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Send PM
Children develop the ability to form the sounds necessary for speech [#permalink]
Hi VeritasKarishma . Need your help here.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14893
Own Kudos [?]: 65301 [2]
Given Kudos: 431
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Children develop the ability to form the sounds necessary for speech [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Nevernevergiveup wrote:
Children develop the ability to form the sounds necessary for speech between the ages of two and five. A team of linguists studied groups of children between two and five years of age in several regions of Australia and found that children pronounced certain phonemes differently in different regions. For example, children from a rural town in the South consistently pronounced the phonemes differently from their counterparts in Sydney. The linguists concluded that pronunciation of these phonemes is learned from contact with adults and other children and not inherited genetically.

Which of the following, if true, would lend the most support to the linguists' conclusion?

A. There are more similarities than differences found in the pronunciation patterns of any two groups of Australian children involved in the study.
B. Compared to the younger children in the study, the older children who had begun preschool were consistently better able to pronounce the phonemes.
C. Children from one of the regions studied had more difficulty pronouncing certain phonemes than did the children from every other region.
D. Australian children under the age of six have little contact with adults or children outside their region.
E. It has been proven that young children acquire social behavior patterns from contact with others and not through genetics.

OE
Only answer choice (B) gives us more reason to believe that pronunciation is learned rather than inherited. If older children who have had more contact with others in a school setting demonstrate better pronunciation, then we have more reason to believe that pronunciation is learned.

Answer choices (A) and (C) are irrelevant comparisons. Neither answer gives more credence to learning or genetics as an explanation of how pronunciation is acquired. Choice (D) is out of scope since without more information we don't know what effect contact with people outside the region might have on pronunciation. Answer choice (E) is also out of scope because it refers to social behavior, which has no clear link to pronunciation.


Not a great question. A bit misleading. The description of the study focuses on pronouncing certain phonemes differently but the conclusion says "pronunciation of these phonemes is learned from contact with adults and other children and not inherited". Nothing in the argument supports it.
But the question stem asks us to strengthen the conclusion so that is all we focus on.

Basically, think of it this way -
A study was conducted.
Conclusion of the study: pronunciation of certain phonemes is learned from contact with adults and other children and not inherited genetically.

Option (B) says that children were able to improve their pronunciation which means that it is learned skill (at least to an extent). So it does help our conclusion.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 May 2019
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 88
Send PM
Re: Children develop the ability to form the sounds necessary for speech [#permalink]
chetan2u wrote:
RAHKARP27071989 wrote:
aditya8062 wrote:
B has a fault : The ARGUMENT is about "DIFFERENTLY" pronouncing phonemes and NOT ABOUT "BEING better able to pronounce the phonemes"

to prove that this PROCESS IS not GENETIC but is learned the AUTHOR should have studied THOSE AUSTRALIAN babies who have settled in some other region .

B DOES not prove that THIS PROCESS is NOT GENETIC . B just claims that older kids are BETTER ABLE to PRONOUNCE the phonemes ---->this could very well be a genetic development, a tendency that develops with age . case in point : diabetes is GENETIC disorder but it is MORE PRONOUNCED with AGED people or in there words it gets MORE DEVELOPED in OLDER PEOPLE than in TEENAGE PEOPLE ---->by this we cannot conclude that OLDER PEOPLE GETS this DISEASE from OTHER PEOPLE around them !!



Hi aditya8062,

Few more points to add.
Option B talks about older people (We don't care about them)
The argument is concerned with younger children and that too between 2 to 6.

I don't see any valid answer in this.

I really wish that gmatclub should also have some prerequisites before posting any question.

Because of limited resources, its very difficult to practice within scope of GMAT standard questions :cry:


Hi,
The argument is not about any age or about different pronounciation, it is about the pronounciation of phonemes being genetic or learned ..
the usage of kids going to preschool and learning the better way tells us that it can be taught in school..


Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17289
Own Kudos [?]: 850 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Children develop the ability to form the sounds necessary for speech [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Children develop the ability to form the sounds necessary for speech [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6929 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne