Nevernevergiveup wrote:
Children develop the ability to form the sounds necessary for speech between the ages of two and five. A team of linguists studied groups of children between two and five years of age in several regions of Australia and found that children pronounced certain phonemes differently in different regions. For example, children from a rural town in the South consistently pronounced the phonemes differently from their counterparts in Sydney. The linguists concluded that pronunciation of these phonemes is learned from contact with adults and other children and not inherited genetically.
Which of the following, if true, would lend the most support to the linguists' conclusion?
A. There are more similarities than differences found in the pronunciation patterns of any two groups of Australian children involved in the study.
B. Compared to the younger children in the study, the older children who had begun preschool were consistently better able to pronounce the phonemes.
C. Children from one of the regions studied had more difficulty pronouncing certain phonemes than did the children from every other region.
D. Australian children under the age of six have little contact with adults or children outside their region.
E. It has been proven that young children acquire social behavior patterns from contact with others and not through genetics.
OE
Only answer choice (B) gives us more reason to believe that pronunciation is learned rather than inherited. If older children who have had more contact with others in a school setting demonstrate better pronunciation, then we have more reason to believe that pronunciation is learned.
Answer choices (A) and (C) are irrelevant comparisons. Neither answer gives more credence to learning or genetics as an explanation of how pronunciation is acquired. Choice (D) is out of scope since without more information we don't know what effect contact with people outside the region might have on pronunciation. Answer choice (E) is also out of scope because it refers to social behavior, which has no clear link to pronunciation.
Not a great question. A bit misleading. The description of the study focuses on pronouncing certain phonemes differently but the conclusion says "pronunciation of these phonemes is learned from contact with adults and other children and not inherited". Nothing in the argument supports it.
But the question stem asks us to strengthen the conclusion so that is all we focus on.
Basically, think of it this way -
A study was conducted.
Conclusion of the study: pronunciation of certain phonemes is learned from contact with adults and other children and not inherited genetically.
Option (B) says that children were able to improve their pronunciation which means that it is learned skill (at least to an extent). So it does help our conclusion.
_________________
Karishma Bansal - ANA PREP
*SUPER SUNDAYS!* - FREE Access to ALL Resources EVERY Sunday
REGISTER at ANA PREP
(Includes access to Study Modules, Concept Videos, Practice Questions and LIVE Classes)
YouTube Channel
youtube.com/karishma.anaprep