Hi
Souvik101990,
Did you ever get the results? If so, then were you provided with a percentile or (even better) a percentile scale? There is not any official information out there about the scoring for the EA (Executive Assessment), so I'm curious to hear what a 99% GMAT scorer like yourself would score on the EA.
Below are my best guesses, if we map EA percentiles directly to GMAT Percentiles and assume the same scoring curve.
Until EA official score percentile information is provided by GMAC, we are left to postulate. Until then, however, I will be using a makeshift formula that I've derived [(EA score -100) x 6] + 200 to map EA scores to GMAT scores.
200 = 99% (800 equivalent)
195 = 99% (770 equivalent)
190 = 97% (740 equivalent)
185 = 90% (710 equivalent)
180 = 82% (680 equivalent)
175 = 73% (650 equivalent)
170 = 62% (620 equivalent)
165 = 51% (590 equivalent)
160 = 41% (560 equivalent)
155 = 32% (530 equivalent)
150 = 26% (500 equivalent)etc. (all the way down to 100)
However, the truth is that I have no idea because I have also heard that 150 is a good score, for example, and it's entirely possible that the percentiles for the EA are completely different.
Thanks for your continued contributions--you're a scientist!
-Brian