Last visit was: 27 Apr 2024, 13:13 It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 13:13

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Posts: 1734
Own Kudos [?]: 5744 [18]
Given Kudos: 3057
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Aug 2019
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [2]
Given Kudos: 400
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V33
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2020
Posts: 411
Own Kudos [?]: 477 [1]
Given Kudos: 219
Location: India
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 994
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [0]
Given Kudos: 309
Send PM
Re: The consensus among astronomers, based upon observations of the [#permalink]
A) It helps explain how pulsars could have neutrons on their surface even if they were not entirely made up of neutrons
[color=#ed1c24]This can be possible reason and stated in the passage let us hang onto it [/color]

(B) It forms part of a challenge to the claim that some pulsars may be made up of quarks
no there were no challenges assosciated with the pulsars as stated from the passage

(C) It helps explain why some pulsars would not be readily recognized as such by astronomers
Here too there were no hindrance in the researches not able to find out the cause of the properties of the pulsars

(D) It presents a new finding that challenges the consensus view of the structure of pulsars
These were in accordance with the properties pen down by the researchers

(E) It points out a problem with the view that pulsars have a mass roughly equal to that of our sun
This a out of context problem cited
Hence IMO A
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Mar 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Re: The consensus among astronomers, based upon observations of the [#permalink]
Hi, could somebody please explain why D is not the correct answer. As per my understanding, the astronomers agree upon the pulsars being spinning balls of neutrons compressed into a sphere.
Now the 'however' in the following statement as well as the bold-faced statement tries to bring forth the point that the pulsars may be filled with quarks .... and it would attract a layer of negatively charged particles that 'could' support a crust of neutrons.
Doesn't this challenge the consensus view of the structure of pulsars, more than explaining just the structure of neutrons on the surface.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2023
Posts: 103
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 132
Location: India
Send PM
The consensus among astronomers, based upon observations of the [#permalink]
GMATNinja
I have the same doubt as adi7 has. I think it is because the conclusion says that the 'surface' could support a crust of neutrons. It does not mean that its structure includes neutrons. But I feel I am not sure and just making it up.­
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2643
Own Kudos [?]: 7777 [2]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: The consensus among astronomers, based upon observations of the [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
D is wrong because the bolded portion does not describe a "new finding." It isn't even presenting a finding at all (as in the result of research or experiment). It's only describing what would happen, in theory, if a quark-filled pulsar existed. Also, note that even if the bolded portion did present a research finding, we'd have to be told that it was nice in order for D to be supported.

Meanwhile, A does describe something that challenges the consensus view. The preceding sentence has told us that the consensus view is wrong: quasars may be filled with quarks rather than neutrons. Then the sentence containing the bold part comes along to show us how it could be that quasars appear to be made of neutrons: the positively-charged filling could enable a negative outer shell that could then be covered in neutrons. In other words, the bold part is a premise describing the underlying science. That premise supports another premise (there could be a neutron layer on a quark-filled quasar), which in turn supports the conclusion (quasars could in theory be filled with quarks rather than neutrons).
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The consensus among astronomers, based upon observations of the [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne