2MuchFun wrote:
I wasn't actually concerned about you revealing my identity my man, I just found it a bit (very) odd that you went to all the trouble of figuring out who people were. I was even more surprised you admitted it. It's kind of like looking in someone else's medicine cabinet. People do it I guess, but do they ever actually admit it? And how do you possibly have the time for all this working at that firm? I have a few buddies over there, and I never see em ...
I'm also a bit confused, so are you actually posting as multiple people? If so, see above re: " (very) odd " ...
Ps - I'm just busting your nuts dude ...
Busting my nuts or no, I have to respond to that character assassination seriously. I spent 15 minutes figuring out who a few people were only to take a quick look at when they got in versus when they were put in the database. It was really easy and I figured out what I wanted to know. The database is on a one day lag at the very least. But how are they entering the data? I suggested a few ways on a previous post but still didn’t know. Looking at the most recent admits took about 3 minutes to paste in 11 names and that was also driven by the goal of trying to pin down how they’re putting in the data. Why else would I call out your name and then ask you when you submitted your forms? As a result of your answer, I’ve now come to the conclusion that you are entered once you submit that form. I think the database is on more than a one day lag now. Also, the database doesn't give you both first and last names so unless your e-mail address is your name, I don't *really* know who people are nor do I care. I can, however, do the analysis I wanted with the e-mail address. Unexpectedly, I saw Whylangone and felt compelled to post about the hypocrisy of that revelation.
Also, you said “that firm” in your post. I have never once said which hedge fund I work for. Did you just admit to spending some time figuring out who I am? I don’t imagine it would be that hard to do but doing that goes directly against the nature of your post.
Additionally, the bulk of the work I’ve done on this stuff I do before work starts, during lunch or after work ends. But why would I do any of this and why do I care? I was admitted very very quickly but the three weeks I spent between submission and admission, I was checking my status all the time. I also felt a sense of community here and I saw a way I could help out others who were not admitted yet. It began as a simple database update but then I got curious. So I did a little work here, an analysis there and eventually it became a hobby. I enjoy analyzing things and taking things apart to see how they work. So everything I’ve done satisfies two things I enjoy which are helping others and taking apart a process. The end goal is two break the admissions process down completely so that others in the gmatclub can see the analysis in future years. This way, people in future years will know what they can expect. As far as I can tell, no one has ever done this and I view it as a service to our little community. It is not driven by a single thing you insinuated in your post.