I think you underestimate the importance of your work experience and of your essays. Usually undergrad academics are too far away from now to be a useful indicator. So, universities use the GMAT score. The GMAT also helps as a standardized international benchmark. However, LBS tends to not bother too much about the GMAT and maintains one of the lower GMAT averages among other top MBA programs (somewhere in the 690s). I personally know someone with a 640 who got in. I believe this is primarily to help retain the diversity in work experience and backgrounds in the student body that LBS tries to promote.
Also recommendations are actually considered somewhat lower in importance than other criteria, simply becuase everyone has good recommendations - also it is extremely difficult to standardize the recommendations. While alumni recommendations may help, most of the admitted students do NOT have recommendations from alums.
zuperman wrote:
Yup...that's the cunning plan right now
I have started getting a feel of things but one information that still eludes me is what kind of profile do these colleges want... I know that these colleges always look at the 'complete package' rather than just one aspect of it but somehow my gut feeling is that the decision criteria is generally based on your acads & recommendation....which is what discourages me from applying. Not that I have bad acads but was not a merit ranker or something nor I have a backing of some LBS or Harvard alumni. Do we have someone in this forum who's got an admit but doesn't agree to the same?