rotorman wrote:
I think we can't include anything new in this essay.
remember we have to see from the perspective of Kellogg student.
It should be like a conclusion of what one has presented in rest of the application, directing his/her strengths for the benefit of Kellogg community.
I disagree. You have four essays to explain yourself and I do not think that one of those four essays should simply summarize the other three.
I
kind of agree with the quote your posted: "The key is to use this response to draw the inferences that you would hope the reader to make based on your application, perhaps explicitly commenting on themes that run through your experience or drawing connections between your goals and some aspect of your background."
Remember, the question is fairly vague. It asks asks "Assume you are evaluating your application from the perspective of a student member of the Kellogg Admissions Committee. Why would you and your peers select you for admission, and what impact would you make as a member of the Kellogg community?"
In essays #1, #2, #4 I did not explicitly say how I was going to impact the Kellogg community. This is something new that I'll bring up in essay #3.
And more importantly, if you look at the other 3 essays:
Essay 1 asks about your goals and your career progression
Essay 2 asks about leadership
Essay 4 (I chose b) asks about something surprising in my life
What's missing here? You have to think about essay #3 in the big picture.
Teamwork, background, and values are missing. I also focused on writing about what Jerz mentioned earlier:
"this essay is a chance to show why you're an interesting person who I'd want to spend 2 years of my life with"I fused those things together to come up with my essay #3. Very little, if any, of my essay reflects to information I touched on within my other 3 essays.