Last visit was: 28 May 2024, 11:39 It is currently 28 May 2024, 11:39
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 14031
Own Kudos [?]: 34315 [16]
Given Kudos: 5807
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2020
Posts: 344
Own Kudos [?]: 432 [3]
Given Kudos: 72
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Apr 2019
Status:Learning
Posts: 748
Own Kudos [?]: 584 [2]
Given Kudos: 49
Send PM
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6906 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: Scholars generally agree that the Maesta, the high altarpiece painted [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Namangupta1997 wrote:
Hi AndrewN

If we think question 6 as a CR question, which it actually is, the completion of year of the painting is one of the premise of the argument. I didn't choose option E as it seems to be questioning the validity of the premise. Isn't that wrong on assumption based questions? Maybe I confused it with weakening questions in which any option that weakens the premise is not really a weakening option?

As much as possible, Namangupta1997, aim not to tell a question what it is or needs to be. Just approach the task of answering it objectively. Notice that the completion date of 1311 is not a stated fact, but a claim. The first paragraph of the passage tells us that {s}ome scholars have argued that the painting was commissioned in 1308 and completed by the summer of 1311, but the former date seems improbable for two reasons. The author of the passage does not question the completion date, but keep in mind, that date has only been proposed by some scholars. That is different from a consensus or an established fact, what we might think of as a premise.

The author asserts in the topic sentence of the second paragraph that scholars who argue that the 1308 agreement was the commission for the entire Maesta must explain how Duccio managed to complete the altarpiece in less than three years, and goes on to critique the views of White and Stubblevine. But notice that it is the author who is placing these time constraints—this three-year window—and this absolute condition—must explain—on the execution of the Maesta, so it should be clear from both paragraphs that the author believes that the work was completed by the summer of 1311. Only answer choice (E) is reasonable.

Thank you for thinking to ask. (I enjoyed this passage when I came across it on 7 May.)

Show SpoilerMy timer result
Attachment:
Screen Shot 2022-07-24 at 07.09.19.png
Screen Shot 2022-07-24 at 07.09.19.png [ 65.75 KiB | Viewed 7587 times ]


- Andrew
VP
VP
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Posts: 1482
Own Kudos [?]: 2314 [1]
Given Kudos: 114
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q169 V168

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Scholars generally agree that the Maesta, the high altarpiece painted [#permalink]
1
Kudos
In question 6: (C) The narrative consistency of the Maesta ‘can be explained by the short time it took Duccio to complete it.

Is it "can be explained" or "can't be explained"?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Nov 2019
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [1]
Given Kudos: 46
Location: India
GMAT 1: 550 Q45 V21
WE:Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Scholars generally agree that the Maesta, the high altarpiece painted [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1. Which of the following titles best summarizes the content of the passage?

(A) Competing Views of Duccio’s Influence on Fourteenth-Century Italian Painting - Incorrect. Duccio's influence on 14th century Italian painting is never discussed.
(B) New Theories on How the Maesta Came into Being - Incorrect. No such theories are discussed about how Maesta came in existence.
(C) Duccio’s Techniques in Painting the Maesta: A Scholarly Dispute. - Incorrect. Although it is suggested that Duccio might have painted the Maesta as a fresco is, this is not the overall summary of the passage.
(D) When Work on the Maesta Was Begun? : An Unresolved Question - Correct. The passage discusses in the first para on when the work would have been commissioned and second para further elaborates that if work was commissioned in 1308, by when would it have been completed.
(E) The Maesta: Duccio’s Masterpiece? - Incorrect. There is no question on whether The Maesta was Duccio's masterpiece. It was painted by him.

2. According to the passage, the author’s response to White’s explanation of how the Maesta was painted is most directly influenced by which of the following?

(A) The complexity of the painting on the main panel - Correct. Answer is in this part of the para - White suggests that “the actual work of painting a large panel was much more like frescoing a wall than might at first thought,” thus implying that the panel was painted by Duccio as quickly as a fresco would be painted. But this appears a wildly improbable thesis, given the intricate design and complexity of the painting on the main panel.
(B) The evidence of studio intervention on the back panels
(C) The terms of the commission for the Rucellai Madonna
(D) The work of Simone Martini and the Lorenzetti brothers
(E) The comparison of Duccio’s work with that of other artists

3. The passage implies which of the following about frescoes?

I. They are generally more intricate in design than panel paintings. - Incorrect. The quickness with which they were painted does not suggest that they were more intricate.
II. Wall frescoes were generally painted more quickly than panels of comparable size. - This is implied in passage.
III. Artists in fourteenth-century Italy preferred them to panel paintings. - We can't imply preference compared to panel paintings.

(A) I only
(B) II only - Correct
(C) I and II only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III

4. According to the passage, the commission for the Rucelfai Madonna differs from the document highlighted in line (8) in that the former

(A) specified the date by which the painting was to be completed - Does not differ on this aspect.
(B) specified what the painting was to represent - Correct. This is what the form and subject of the painting means.
(C) indicated how much Duccio was to be paid when the painting was completed - Does not differ on this aspect.
(D) indicated which artists would assist Duccio in completing the painting - Does not differ on this aspect.
(E) specified Duccio’s role in the execution of the painting - Incorrect. the former, Rucellai Madonna, does not specify Duccio's role in the execution of the painting. It is the Siena document that does specify his role.

The answer is in the lines "The one bona fide Duccio commission in existence, for the Rucellai Madonna in the Uffizi Gallery, stipulates the form and subject of the painting. That part of the Siena document that concerns the Maesta itself mentions only Duccio’s role in its execution."
VP
VP
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Posts: 1482
Own Kudos [?]: 2314 [1]
Given Kudos: 114
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q169 V168

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Scholars generally agree that the Maesta, the high altarpiece painted [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Here are my answers:

Question 1: My answer is (D).
(A) Not discussed
(B) Not discussed, especially the new part.
(C) The only thing in dispute in this article is the start year of the Maesta.
(D) Exactly the topic of the passage.
(E) No question mark. Scholars generally agree that the Maesta is one of the greatest panel paintings ever produced.

Question 2: My answer is (A).
The answer is given in this sentence: But this appears a wildly improbable thesis, given the intricate design and complexity of the painting on the main panel.
(BD) are mentioned in the author's response to Stubblebine's explanation.
(E) is never discussed.
As for (C), it is mentioned in the first paragraph with no relevance here.

Question 3: My answer is (B)
White suggests that “the actual work of painting a large panel was much more like frescoing a wall than might at first thought,” thus implying that the panel was painted by Duccio as quickly as a fresco would be painted. But this appears a wildly improbable thesis, given the intricate design and complexity of the painting on the main panel.
From the above two sentences, we know (I) is false and (II) is true.
(III) is never discussed in the article.

Question 4: My answer is B.
"The one bona fide Duccio commission in existence, for the Rucellai Madonna in the Uffizi Gallery, stipulates the form and subject of the painting. " This sentence directly supports (B)

In this question, "the former" refers to the commission, not the highlighted "document", which actually appears in the article before the commission. If we are not careful, we may misunderstand this question.

Question 5: My answer is (D).
"Although the painting of large altarpieces was often carried out by the designing master with the help of members of his shop,..." This sentence directly supports (D).

Question 6: My answer is (E).
The author just could not believe that the painting could be completed with such rapidity. "scholars who argue that the 1308 agreement was the commission for the entire Maesta must explain how Duccio managed to complete the altarpiece in less than three years." The author is doubtful about the start date of 1308, but never questions the completion date of 1311. Certainly the completion date must be well established. So (E) is the assumption of the author.
(A) The author agree that, if his assistants were indeed playing a role, Duccio must carefully supervise them. But the author have no problem to believe that Duccio decided to undertake this important project all by himself.
(B) This would give Duccio plenty of time to finish the project. It could explain how Duccio managed to complete the altarpiece. If author assumed this, the author would put forward this explanation rather than question the others.
(C) The author do not think so.
(D) The author believes that even with full devotion by Duccio, he was still unable to finish the project in less than three years. Also, did Duccio work on both Rucellai Madonna and Maesta simultaneously? It was never discussed, and test takers should not be expected to know the outside knowledge.
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 14031
Own Kudos [?]: 34315 [0]
Given Kudos: 5807
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Scholars generally agree that the Maesta, the high altarpiece painted [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Competition mode is off now

OAs are:

DABBDE

zhanbo excellent 9/10

ElninoEffect 7/10

waseem31 5.5/10
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2021
Posts: 148
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 22
Location: Canada
Send PM
Re: Scholars generally agree that the Maesta, the high altarpiece painted [#permalink]
GMATNinja, could you please clarify whether Q5 is asking about the intention of the author?
I did not select (D) for Q5 since Stubblebine has the view about relying on the work of others, and not author.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2016
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Send PM
Re: Scholars generally agree that the Maesta, the high altarpiece painted [#permalink]
tkorzhan1995 wrote:
GMATNinja, could you please clarify whether Q5 is asking about the intention of the author?
I did not select (D) for Q5 since Stubblebine has the view about relying on the work of others, and not author.



tkorzhan1995
I share my thought on about this question-
The question is about practice of assigning work to members of shop by master painter and something about that practice.

Author mentioned in passage that such practice was often followed for large paintings, but in case of Maesta painting author's view was atleast Duccio designed and supervised ( means not relying on members of work) while making Maesta.
Thus eliminated B and correct answer D.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2020
Posts: 148
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 63
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Send PM
Re: Scholars generally agree that the Maesta, the high altarpiece painted [#permalink]
Hi AndrewN

If we think question 6 as a CR question, which it actually is, the completion of year of the painting is one of the premise of the argument. I didn't choose option E as it seems to be questioning the validity of the premise. Isn't that wrong on assumption based questions? Maybe I confused it with weakening questions in which any option that weakens the premise is not really a weakening option?
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 14031
Own Kudos [?]: 34315 [0]
Given Kudos: 5807
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Scholars generally agree that the Maesta, the high altarpiece painted [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Added two more questions (7 and 8).
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2022
Posts: 250
Own Kudos [?]: 444 [0]
Given Kudos: 1015
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Scholars generally agree that the Maesta, the high altarpiece painted [#permalink]
Hi KarishmaB,

6. The author assumes which of the following in analyzing White’s and Stubblebine’s arguments?

(E) The Maesta must have been completed by the summer of 1311.

Can you please share your reasoning for option E?

Reference -"Second, scholars who argue that the 1308 agreement was the commission for the entire Maesta must explain how Duccio managed to complete the altarpiece in less than three years...."

Thanks in advance. :)
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Scholars generally agree that the Maesta, the high altarpiece painted [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6950 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14031 posts