GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Jul 2018, 18:48

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# State officials report that soaring rates of liability

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 544
GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
WE: Business Development (Consulting)
State officials report that soaring rates of liability  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 25 Feb 2014, 17:23
11
41
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

64% (00:56) correct 36% (01:05) wrong based on 2466 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

State officials report that soaring rates of liability insurance have risen to force cutbacks in the operations of everything from local governments and school districts to day-care centers and recreational facilities.

(A) rates of liability insurance have risen to force
(B) rates of liability insurance are a force for
(C) rates for liability insurance are forcing
(D) rises in liability insurance rates are forcing
(E) liability insurance rates have risen to force

OA is C. because Rates for is the idiomatic usage.

Are Options A&B wrong only for the reason they are using "rates of"
is there any other flaw in these options plz explain y other options are wrong.

Originally posted by RaviChandra on 29 Oct 2009, 22:50.
Last edited by mikemcgarry on 25 Feb 2014, 17:23, edited 2 times in total.
OA not Provided
VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1098
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Re: State officials report that soaring rates of liability  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2013, 23:39
5
7
nikhil.jones.s wrote:
I understand the fact that in B) 'are a force' is unidiomatic but what about 'rates for liability insurance' in C). Isn't that unidiomatic as well? As in, 'the rate of attrition' is right and not 'the rate for attrition'. Kindly help me through this.

"rates for" and "rates of" are both idiomatic: it depends on the subject. If the subject is a price "rates for" is correct, is the subject is a measure/rate "rates of" is correct ('the rate of attrition')

However this idioms are not tested with high frequency, so you can arrive at the correct answer without knowing the difference; just keep in mind that just because you know that "the rate of" is idiomatic, it does not mean that a change in the words makes the construct unidiomatic: there can be multiple correct versions of the thing (as here "rates of/for").
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

##### General Discussion
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 293
Re: Idiomatic Usage rates for  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Oct 2009, 00:56
in addition to the idiomatic usage...

A. It already states "soaring rates". So mentioned "risen" again is not needed.
for B "are a force for" when compared to C "are forcing" makes C look proper to me.
Intern
Joined: 07 Dec 2009
Posts: 14
Re: Idiomatic Usage rates for  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2010, 10:44
1
2
There is also a verb issue here. On my first try of this question, I thought it should be "have risen" because the rates are rising and continue to rise. But, this one is tricky, because they put the word soaring in the sentence. This meaning already indicates the action is happening and continuing to happen, so the present perfect is not needed! Present tense works!
Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 837
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Re: Idiomatic Usage rates for  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2010, 11:05
IMO C.

Clues:
report
soaring rates - no need of rise/risen
"forcing cutbacks" is better than "to force cutbacks"
_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1275
Re: Idiomatic Usage rates for  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2010, 07:42
C is best.

In A, D and E --> 'soaring' and 'risen' redundant

Between B and C --> C it is.
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 311
Re: Idiomatic Usage rates for  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2010, 10:28
agre with Seekmba ...yes C it is
Manager
Joined: 19 Dec 2010
Posts: 113
Re: Idiomatic Usage rates for  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2011, 15:50
C
everything else is redundant when you say soaring...risen
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 79
Re: Idiomatic Usage rates for  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2011, 18:22
1
[quote="RaviChandra"]State officials report that soaring rates of liability insurance have risen to force cutbacks in the operations of everything from local governments and school districts to day-care centers and recreational facilities.

(A) rates of liability insurance have risen to force
(B) rates of liability insurance are a force for
(C) rates for liability insurance are forcing
(D) rises in liability insurance rates are forcing
(E) liability insurance rates have risen to force

souring and rises are redundant as they try to convey the same meaning. Between B and C "rates for" is the correct idiom.
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 166
Re: State officials report that soaring rates of liability  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2012, 20:30
I have chosen C for this question:

A. "Have risen" is redundant because "soaring" already describes the rates. Also, "to force" should be changed to "are forcing" to describe what the rates are doing.

B. "Are a force for" is wordy and is not the correct answer.

C. This answer choice is correct. The words "have risen" are no longer in the sentence and do not cause redundancy. Also, "are forcing" is correctly used here.

D. "Soaring rises" is redundant.

E. Again, "have risen" is redundant. Also, "to force" should be "are forcing."
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 208
Re: State officials report that soaring rates of liability  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2012, 09:46
Vote for C :

Original sentence: have risen - Perfect-future tense
Joined: 06 May 2013
Posts: 92
Location: Malawi
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Schools: Tuck '20 (S)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: State officials report that soaring rates of liability  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2013, 23:16
I understand the fact that in B) 'are a force' is unidiomatic but what about 'rates for liability insurance' in C). Isn't that unidiomatic as well? As in, 'the rate of attrition' is right and not 'the rate for attrition'. Kindly help me through this.
Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 187
Re: State officials report that soaring rates of liability  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2014, 05:57
RaviChandra wrote:
State officials report that soaring rates of liability insurance have risen to force cutbacks in the operations of everything from local governments and school districts to day-care centers and recreational facilities.

(A) rates of liability insurance have risen to force
(B) rates of liability insurance are a force for
(C) rates for liability insurance are forcing
(D) rises in liability insurance rates are forcing
(E) liability insurance rates have risen to force

OA is C. because Rates for is the idiomatic usage.

Are Options A&B wrong only for the reason they are using "rates of"
is there any other flaw in these options plz explain y other options are wrong.

This problem is one of few that really demands understanding of specific words on the SC.

First of all, "soaring" already implies a rise. Thus, any options that use "rise" are redundant. A, D and E gone. Second, the rates are not a force. They are not this spec ops unit that's going to infiltrate something and neither are they some divine entity that will cast its might upon us. So "rates... are a force" is wrong. B gone.

Even if we do not omit certain options because of "rise":

A) implies that the intent behind the rising rates is to force cutbacks, as if rates are a living, thinking enitity that can make such decisions. That's not the intended meaning of the author, so A distorts the meaning. GONE

D) implies that the actual rises are forcing cutbacks.. They're not forcing anything. Rises is (in a reduntant manner) trying to modify insurances but fails to do so since the option says "rises in". This messes up the intended meaning. GONE

E) This implies that the actual rates have come out of their dwelling with the intent of forcing cutbacks.. This also completely messes up the intended meaning.

So, even if we ignore the grammatical errors, we still have consistent errors of meaning in all of the wrong options. Thus, C is the only adequate answer choice.
Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Posts: 7
Re: State officials report that soaring rates of liability  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Feb 2014, 04:14
RaviChandra wrote:
State officials report that soaring rates of liability insurance have risen to force cutbacks in the operations of everything from local governments and school districts to day-care centers and recreational facilities.

(A) rates of liability insurance have risen to force
(B) rates of liability insurance are a force for
(C) rates for liability insurance are forcing
(D) rises in liability insurance rates are forcing
(E) liability insurance rates have risen to force

OA is C. because Rates for is the idiomatic usage.

Are Options A&B wrong only for the reason they are using "rates of"
is there any other flaw in these options plz explain y other options are wrong.

The underlined portion " State officials report that soaring rates of liability insurance have risen to force cutbacks in the operations of everything from local governments and school districts to day-care centers and recreational facilities.
Director
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 540
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
Re: State officials report that soaring rates of liability  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Feb 2014, 07:06
2
1
Rates of = Measure
Rates for = Price Charged

_________________

Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner.
My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-score-750-and-750-i-moved-from-710-to-189016.html

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Oct 2013
Posts: 434
State officials report that soaring rates of liability  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2014, 15:43
State officials report that soaring rates of liability insurance have risen to force cutbacks in the operations of everything from local governments and school districts to day-care centers and recreational facilities.

(A) rates of liability insurance have risen to force
(B) rates of liability insurance are a force for
(C) rates for liability insurance are forcing
(D) rises in liability insurance rates are forcing
(E) liability insurance rates have risen to force
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3443
Re: State officials report that soaring rates of liability  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2014, 16:33
1
Merged similar topics. See the above explanations
_________________
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 214
Re: State officials report that soaring rates of liability  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 May 2014, 01:25
"rate of" and "rate for " is not explained in the dictionary though the two meanings are explained in dictionaries.

how do we know that "rate for" refer to price/amount of money. we can only learn from this sc question.

moreover, gmat now tests idioms less than meaning. this is a good news for non native.
_________________

If anyone in this gmat forum is in England,Britain, pls, email to me, (thanghnvn@gmail.com) . I have some questions and need your advise. Thank a lot.

Intern
Joined: 20 Dec 2014
Posts: 15
Re: State officials report that soaring rates of liability  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2014, 15:17
C.

soaring ___ eliminate all options which has raises, its redundant, A, D and E. B, are a force incorrect.

RaviChandra wrote:
State officials report that soaring rates of liability insurance have risen to force cutbacks in the operations of everything from local governments and school districts to day-care centers and recreational facilities.

(A) rates of liability insurance have risen to force
(B) rates of liability insurance are a force for
(C) rates for liability insurance are forcing
(D) rises in liability insurance rates are forcing
(E) liability insurance rates have risen to force

OA is C. because Rates for is the idiomatic usage.

Are Options A&B wrong only for the reason they are using "rates of"
is there any other flaw in these options plz explain y other options are wrong.
Intern
Joined: 23 Dec 2011
Posts: 31
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.83
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
State officials report that soaring rates of liability  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2015, 08:55
RaviChandra wrote:
State officials report that soaring rates of liability insurance have risen to force cutbacks in the operations of everything from local governments and school districts to day-care centers and recreational facilities.

(A) rates of liability insurance have risen to force
(B) rates of liability insurance are a force for
(C) rates for liability insurance are forcing
(D) rises in liability insurance rates are forcing
(E) liability insurance rates have risen to force

OA is C. because Rates for is the idiomatic usage.

Are Options A&B wrong only for the reason they are using "rates of"
is there any other flaw in these options plz explain y other options are wrong.

IMO - C
(A) rates of liability insurance have risen to force >> correct idiom is - rates for. to force - this wrongly implying that rates have rises just to force...where as intended meaning should be rates rises are forcing....Also, soaring & rises are redundant
(B) rates of liability insurance are a force for >> correct idiom is - rates for. Correct usage can be are a force for cutting back (for...V-ing)
(C) rates for liability insurance are forcing >> CORRECT
(D) rises in liability insurance rates are forcing >> soaring & rises are redundant
(E) liability insurance rates have risen to force >> to force - this wrongly implying that rates have rises just to force...where as intended meaning should be rates rises are forcing....Also, soaring & risen are redundant
State officials report that soaring rates of liability &nbs [#permalink] 04 Jan 2015, 08:55

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 26 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# State officials report that soaring rates of liability

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.