Chitra657
RaviChandra
State officials report that soaring
rates of liability insurance have risen to force cutbacks in the operations of everything from local governments and school districts to day-care centers and recreational facilities.
(A) rates of liability insurance have risen to force
(B) rates of liability insurance are a force for
(C) rates for liability insurance are forcing
(D) rises in liability insurance rates are forcing
(E) liability insurance rates have risen to force
https://www.nytimes.com/1986/02/20/nyregion/liability-insurance-a-growing-crisis.htmlSoaring
increases in liability-insurance rates are affecting thousands of residents of New York and other states,
forcing cutbacks in the operations of everything from school districts and local governments to bowling alleys and day-care centers.
The
RATES FOR bus tickets are good for commuters. (= prices)
The
RATE OF theft has fallen. (= frequency or speed)
OA is C. because Rates for is the idiomatic usage.
Are Options A&B wrong only for the reason they are using "r
ates of"
is there any other flaw in these options plz explain y other options are wrong.
In C) "rates....are forcing"
Isnt this structure a bit weird? Rates are not living things, they cant force someone or something. That's the only reason I eliminated C, because that felt a shady
AndrewN VeritasKarishma GMATNinja pls help
Hello,
Chitra657. First off, you should probably learn to relax your stance on anthropomorphizing a bit. Many non-physical entities—prices, costs, and yes, rates, to name just a few—can be said to
influence decisions in one way or another. (There is even
this classic question that has landfills accepting yard debris... or not.) If you were unsure, though, you could still arrive at the correct answer in other ways. Consider the following:
- Choices (A), (D), and (E) all incorporate redundancy: soaring and have risen or rises share the same semantic space, so there is no need to add anything to the adjective just prior to the underlined portion.
- Choice (B) refers to rates as a force, and that is little better than saying that rates force something, not to mention that both prepositions are questionable—rates of liability insurance and a force for cutbacks. Is (B) really the best way to express the vital meaning of the sentence?
If you look at a barebones version of (C), you are left with a streamlined,
soaring rates for insurance are forcing cutbacks. If you have one doubt with (C) and a few with (B), you should probably go with the safer bet and take a shot on the unknown. I have learned the hard way that it is better to go with something uncomfortable than to get behind an option you know is wrong, deep down.
Anyway, I hope my response proves useful to you. Thank you for thinking to ask, and good luck with your studies.
- Andrew