Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? e-GMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days. Sat., Oct 19th at 7 am PDT
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Apr 2011, 01:29
7
2
The template of the idiom is ‘prohibit x from doing y’; Choice c is correct- ‘prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings’ _________________
If you can't sync with the vibe of GMAT, you had better think!!!
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Dec 2011, 12:08
2
18
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings (B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings (C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings (D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills (E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Apr 2011, 06:28
1
ravi67741 wrote:
Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings. (A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings (B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings (C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings (D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills (E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
This is an example that tests correct idiomatic expressions.
Rule: RIGHT: PROHIBITS X FROM Y WRONG: PROHIBITS THAT WRONG: PROHIBITS X TO Y
Using this rule, we can quickly eliminate A, B. D & E can be eliminated because C is better and crisp. It has the correct idiomatic expression that the author is trying to use in his sentence structure.
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Apr 2011, 07:53
Easy one got it within 30 seconds..
The correct idiom is "prohibit x from Y" Only "C" uses the right idiom thus it is a correct choice...
ravi67741 wrote:
Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings. (A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings (B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings (C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings (D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills (E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
_________________
We are twice armed if we fight with faith.
He who knows when he can fight & when He can't will be victorious.
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Aug 2011, 23:16
MSDHONI wrote:
Easy one got it within 30 seconds..
The correct idiom is "prohibit x from Y" Only "C" uses the right idiom thus it is a correct choice...
ravi67741 wrote:
Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings. (A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings (B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings (C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings (D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills (E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
thanx dhoni....n hws ur prep goin on
_________________
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Dec 2011, 12:44
3
1
Here's the explanation:
ban and prohibit mean the same thing, but in this context, their usage is different and hence they complement each other. Here, the sentence is actually trying to say that Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida and Minnesota do not accept leaves, brush and grass clippings in their landfills.
Option A uses an incorrect idiom. The correct idiom is 'prohibit ... from' and not 'prohibit ... to'. Hence incorrect.
Option B suffers from a similar error. 'Prohibiting that' is incorrect usage.
Options C is the clearest answer choice here. It correctly uses the idiom 'prohibiting ... from'. Hence this is the correct answer.
Options D and E are both incorrect because they do not have a clear meaning due to the usage of 'bans that'.
Hope this helps!
_________________
MBA Candidate 2015 | Georgetown University McDonough School of Business
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Dec 2011, 14:33
sudish wrote:
Here's the explanation:
ban and prohibit mean the same thing, but in this context, their usage is different and hence they complement each other. Here, the sentence is actually trying to say that Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida and Minnesota do not accept leaves, brush and grass clippings in their landfills.
Option A uses an incorrect idiom. The correct idiom is 'prohibit ... from' and not 'prohibit ... to'. Hence incorrect.
Option B suffers from a similar error. 'Prohibiting that' is incorrect usage.
Options C is the clearest answer choice here. It correctly uses the idiom 'prohibiting ... from'. Hence this is the correct answer.
Options D and E are both incorrect because they do not have a clear meaning due to the usage of 'bans that'.
Hope this helps!
@sudish - why usage of 'bans that' is incorrect? Can you illustrate? Cheers!
_________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it! -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Dec 2011, 00:17
5
@Capricorn369:
Let's look at the first part of the sentence: 'Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans' This part can stand on its own and hence it's an independent clause.
The next part of the sentence in options D and E are: 'leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills' and 'landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings' Both these sentences are independent clauses as well and as such, can stand on their own. The first part of the sentence does not require the second part to complete its meaning. Hence, the second part is non-essential and is therefore a non-restrictive clause.
Now, we know that we use 'that' only when the clause is restrictive. If the clause is non-restrictive, we use 'which' so that the clause acts as subordinate to the main clause.
Had the options D and E been of the form: 'prohibit landfills from accepting leaves, brush and grass clippings.' they would have been correct because the latter part would have then acted as a restrictive clause required to complete the meaning of the main clause and could have been aptly joined to the main clause using 'that'.
Hope this is clear now!
_________________
MBA Candidate 2015 | Georgetown University McDonough School of Business
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Dec 2011, 05:45
2
1
shrive555 wrote:
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) Same (B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings (C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings (D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills (E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?
Nope, it is not redundant, " prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings" is the adjective phrase that help the meaning of "statewide bans" is clearer. The right idiom is "prohibit X from Y". Other choices seem awkward and wrong idiom. Choice D and E do not have clear meaning when use form "bans that"
_________________
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Oct 2013, 13:58
1
shrive555 wrote:
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) Same (B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings (C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings (D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills (E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?
Also, recall this example The law PROHIBITS any citizen FROM VOTING twice (The law PROHIBITS any citizen TO VOTE twice/PROHIBITS THAT any person VOTE twice are both wrong)
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 710
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Nov 2013, 08:30
Meaning wise is it right to say "prohibiting landfills to accept" how come landfills can accept anything landfill is not a person or organisation.. usually we prohibit someone who obeys ... landfills can not obey orders.
_________________
Piyush K ----------------------- Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison Don't forget to press--> Kudos My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use?| 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New) Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".
close
70% (00:59) correct 
