GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 23 Sep 2018, 23:12

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 999
Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2008, 13:58
3
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

64% (01:38) correct 36% (01:13) wrong based on 88 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it cannot compete economically with other means of accomplishing the objectives of spaceflight.
Edward: No mode of human transportation has a better record of reliability: two accidents in twenty-five years. Thus manned spaceflight definitely has a positive future.

Which of the following is the best logical evaluation of Edward's argument as a response to Teresa's argument?

(A) It cites evidence that, if true, tends to disprove the evidence cited by Teresa in drawing her conclusion.
(B) It indicates a logical gap in the support that Teresa offers for her conclusion.
(C) It raises a consideration that outweighs the argument Teresa makes.
(D) It does not meet Teresa's point because it assumes that there is no serious impediment to transporting people into space, but this was the issue raised by Teresa.
(E) It fails to respond to Teresa's argument because it does not address the fundamental issue of whether space activities should have priority over other claims on the national budget.
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 268
Re: CR : SPACE FLIGHT  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 04 Oct 2008, 22:33
4
1
The problem with two statements is that one disaprove the spacefligh for one reason and other approve the same for a different reason.
According to Teresa, there is a serious economical consideration in getting manned space flight into space
While Edward, sites a totally different reason in favour of manned spacefligh. now lets see.

A.It cites evidence that, if true, tends to disprove the evidence cited by Teresa in drawing her conclusion.... ofcourse, Edward sites an evidence but this evidence disprove the conclusion not the evidence sited by Teresa.----->out

B. It indicates a logical gap in the support that Teresa offers for her conclusion.
It doesn't relates to the support given by Teresa to the conclusion. In other words, it doesn't indicate any gap in Teresa's reasoning.-------> out
C. It raises a consideration that outweighs the argument Teresa makes.
No comparison can me drawn between two statments since these two dont relate with eachother........out

D. It does not meet Teresa's point because it assumes that there is no serious impediment to transporting people into space, but this was the issue raised by Teresa.
yup. Teresa stated a serious impediment (economical) for transporting ppl into space but Edward said that there is no serious issue in transporting ppl . Edwards just compare there safty record of manned space flight with other means of transportation.......Correct IMO

E. It fails to respond to Teresa's argument because it does not address the fundamental issue of whether space activities should have priority over other claims on the national budget.
activities should have priority over other claims on the national budget.

Priorities in national budget? ...Hmm! this is as close to the question as Mr.Bush to the humanity----out

Originally posted by rishi2377 on 04 Oct 2008, 18:47.
Last edited by rishi2377 on 04 Oct 2008, 22:33, edited 1 time in total.
##### General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 5
Re: CR : SPACE FLIGHT  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2008, 14:29
1
IMO (B).

A. Out of Scope.
B. Correct
C. Nothing like that. Edward had responded in illogical manner.
D. Teresa didn't raise any such issue.
E. National Budget: Out of Scope.

Regards,
Code Snooker
Intern
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 8
Re: CR : SPACE FLIGHT  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2008, 19:07
As per me answer should be D.

Edward doesn't address the original issue raised by Teresa

What's OA?
Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 999
Re: CR : SPACE FLIGHT  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2008, 21:00
OA is D. Thanks rishi2377 for your nice explanation
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg

VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1265
Re: CR : SPACE FLIGHT  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2008, 00:37
amitdgr wrote:
Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it cannot compete economically with other means of accomplishing the objectives of spaceflight.
Edward: No mode of human transportation has a better record of reliability: two accidents in twenty-five years. Thus manned spaceflight definitely has a positive future.

Which of the following is the best logical evaluation of Edward's argument as a response to Teresa's argument?

(A) It cites evidence that, if true, tends to disprove the evidence cited by Teresa in drawing her conclusion. -> no it does not disprove the evi by teresa!!
(B) It indicates a logical gap in the support that Teresa offers for her conclusion. -> there is no such evi
(C) It raises a consideration that outweighs the argument Teresa makes. -> nopes
(D) It does not meet Teresa's point because it assumes that there is no serious impediment to transporting people into space, but this was the issue raised by Teresa.
(E) It fails to respond to Teresa's argument because it does not address the fundamental issue of whether space activities should have priority over other claims on the national budget.

I was confused between D and E

national budget appears out of scope hence reject E
D is answer!!! in D too i have a doubt as transporting people into space is not the point of discuission here !!
whats the source of this question?????
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1265
Re: CR : SPACE FLIGHT  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2008, 00:42
rishi2377 wrote:
The problem with two statements is that one disaprove the spacefligh for one reason and other approve the same for a different reason.
According to Teresa, there is a serious economical consideration in getting manned space flight into space
While Edward, sites a totally different reason in favour of manned spacefligh. now lets see.

A.It cites evidence that, if true, tends to disprove the evidence cited by Teresa in drawing her conclusion.... ofcourse, Edward sites an evidence but this evidence disprove the conclusion not the evidence sited by Teresa.----->out

B. It indicates a logical gap in the support that Teresa offers for her conclusion.
It doesn't relates to the support given by Teresa to the conclusion. In other words, it doesn't indicate any gap in Teresa's reasoning.-------> out
C. It raises a consideration that outweighs the argument Teresa makes.
No comparison can me drawn between two statments since these two dont relate with eachother........out

D. It does not meet Teresa's point because it assumes that there is no serious impediment to transporting people into space, but this was the issue raised by Teresa.
yup. Teresa stated a serious impediment (economical) for transporting ppl into space but Edward said that there is no serious issue in transporting ppl . Edwards just compare there safty record of manned space flight with other means of transportation.......Correct IMO

E. It fails to respond to Teresa's argument because it does not address the fundamental issue of whether space activities should have priority over other claims on the national budget.
activities should have priority over other claims on the national budget.

Priorities in national budget? ...Hmm! this is as close to the question as Mr.Bush to the humanity----out

Teresa talks about accomplishment of objectives of spaceflights !!!!no where transportation of humans is in question!!

can u explain this a bit?I agree E is out hence D is the only one left
I marked D cos of POE rules
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 999
Re: CR : SPACE FLIGHT  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2008, 01:01
amitdgr wrote:
Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it cannot compete economically with other means of accomplishing the objectives of spaceflight.
Edward: No mode of human transportation has a better record of reliability: two accidents in twenty-five years. Thus manned spaceflight definitely has a positive future.

Which of the following is the best logical evaluation of Edward's argument as a response to Teresa's argument?

(A) It cites evidence that, if true, tends to disprove the evidence cited by Teresa in drawing her conclusion.
(B) It indicates a logical gap in the support that Teresa offers for her conclusion.
(C) It raises a consideration that outweighs the argument Teresa makes.
(D) It does not meet Teresa's point because it assumes that there is no serious impediment to transporting people into space, but this was the issue raised by Teresa.
(E) It fails to respond to Teresa's argument because it does not address the fundamental issue of whether space activities should have priority over other claims on the national budget.

OK... Here is what I think.....

Teresa -> Manned space flight costs so much and it is not important for man to actually go there cos, there are other more economical ways of doing the same work that a man would do there ...... So there is No future in manned space flights.

Ed -> Know what ? Manned space flights have had fewer number of accidents than any other mode of transport, so manned space flight has a future.

Teresa talks about high costs being an impediment for future of manned space flights and Ed talks about accidents.

Ed's point does not respond to Teresa's argument properly. In fact he assumes that there is NO cost impediment to transport people and talks about its safety.
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg

SVP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1803
Concentration: Finance
Re: Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Dec 2013, 11:59
amitdgr wrote:
Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it cannot compete economically with other means of accomplishing the objectives of spaceflight.
Edward: No mode of human transportation has a better record of reliability: two accidents in twenty-five years. Thus manned spaceflight definitely has a positive future.

Which of the following is the best logical evaluation of Edward's argument as a response to Teresa's argument?

(A) It cites evidence that, if true, tends to disprove the evidence cited by Teresa in drawing her conclusion.
(B) It indicates a logical gap in the support that Teresa offers for her conclusion.
(C) It raises a consideration that outweighs the argument Teresa makes.
(D) It does not meet Teresa's point because it assumes that there is no serious impediment to transporting people into space, but this was the issue raised by Teresa.
(E) It fails to respond to Teresa's argument because it does not address the fundamental issue of whether space activities should have priority over other claims on the national budget.

Whoaaaa, slow down buddy that first line you mentioned--> Economically means efficiently (in a more productive way if you will), while economic means monetary, those cousin words are often confused but keep that in mind. Other than that, I totally agree with your response. I'll just touch on a few points really quickly

OK let’s go through the answer choices . ‘A’ says that it cites evidence that if true disproves the evidence cited by Teresa. This is not accurate in any way so I’ll cross this one out. ‘B’ says that it indicated a logical gap in the support the Teresa offers. Well Teresa is claiming that it can’t compete economically while Edward is saying that it is the most reliable among viable options. I don’t see any logical gap in Teresa’s argument. So this one isn’t true at all. ‘C’ says that it raises a consideration that outweighs the argument Teresa makes. Well it doesn’t really outweigh her argument, to me it seems that they are talking about two different things: productivity and reliability, respetively. ‘E’ says it fails to respond to Teresa’s argument because it does not address the fundamental issue of whether space activities should have priority over other claims on the national budget. Sorry on what? National Budget? Where did that come from. Clearly out.

Cheers!
J
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2962
Re: Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Oct 2017, 14:43
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it &nbs [#permalink] 24 Oct 2017, 14:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it

## Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.