Last visit was: 06 Nov 2024, 23:16 It is currently 06 Nov 2024, 23:16
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
805+ Level|   Tables|               
User avatar
Apt0810
Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2020
Posts: 347
Own Kudos:
502
 [2]
Given Kudos: 94
Posts: 347
Kudos: 502
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,322
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,322
Kudos: 874
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
mgpangwi
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jun 2020
Last visit: 13 Apr 2021
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Location: Philippines
Concentration: Strategy, Organizational Behavior
GMAT 1: 600 Q42 V31
GPA: 3.45
GMAT 1: 600 Q42 V31
Posts: 10
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 06 Nov 2024
Posts: 14,080
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5,872
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 14,080
Kudos: 40,564
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

1. For each of the following, select Yes if the statement is inferable from the given information. Otherwise select No.

In the table, the absolute values of the numbers in the "Seasonally adjusted changes from preceding month" columns represent the magnitudes of seasonally adjusted changes. In each of the seven columns representing the months from March 2010 through September 2010, the absolute value of the number in the "Used cars and trucks" row exceeds that of the number in the "New vehicles" row. Thus, in every month shown during this period, the magnitude of the change in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks is greater, not less, than that of the change in seasonally adjusted prices for new vehicles.

The correct answer is No.

The number at the intersection of the "Mar 2010" column and the "All items" row is 0.1. As the table title and the multicolumn header indicate, this means the seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items collectively was 0.1% higher in March 2010 than it was in the preceding month.

The correct answer is Yes.

The only seasonally unadjusted changes in prices shown in the table are those in the final column, which are for the whole 12-month period ending September 2010. The table contains no information about seasonally unadjusted changes in prices between any specific month and the preceding month.

The correct answer is No.
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,313
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,313
Kudos: 238
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma - focussing on the question stem specifically
Quote:
1. For each of the following, select Yes if the statement is inferable from the given information. Otherwise select No.

Yes.................No...................
The changes in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 and September 2010 were in most cases less in magnitude than the changes in seasonally adjusted prices of new vehicles for the same period.
The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.
The seasonally unadjusted change in the price of new vehicles in August 2010 over the previous month was about the same as the seasonally unadjusted change in the price of food away from home over the same period.

What is the accurate re-wording of the blue above in your view ? Is it

Rewording attempt I) "Is the statement true or false" ? Select "Yes" if true or select "No" if false.
OR
Rewording attempt II) "Is the information given in the table sufficient to answer the question" ?


If it is rewording attempt # 1 then the OA solution to the 3rd question doesnt make sense in my view.

The solution given to the 3rd question is "NO", not because statement 3 is "FALSE" but because data from the table is just not available to confirm if the 3rd statement is True OR false to begin with

What are your thoughts
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 06 Nov 2024
Posts: 15,441
Own Kudos:
69,320
 [1]
Given Kudos: 448
Location: Pune, India
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,441
Kudos: 69,320
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2
VeritasKarishma - focussing on the question stem specifically
Quote:
1. For each of the following, select Yes if the statement is inferable from the given information. Otherwise select No.

Yes.................No...................
The changes in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 and September 2010 were in most cases less in magnitude than the changes in seasonally adjusted prices of new vehicles for the same period.
The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.
The seasonally unadjusted change in the price of new vehicles in August 2010 over the previous month was about the same as the seasonally unadjusted change in the price of food away from home over the same period.

What is the accurate re-wording of the blue above in your view ? Is it

Rewording attempt I) "Is the statement true or false" ? Select "Yes" if true or select "No" if false.
OR
Rewording attempt II) "Is the information given in the table sufficient to answer the question" ?


If it is rewording attempt # 1 then the OA solution to the 3rd question doesnt make sense in my view.

The solution given to the 3rd question is "NO", not because statement 3 is "FALSE" but because data from the table is just not available to confirm if the 3rd statement is True OR false to begin with

What are your thoughts

"Inferable" means "Can I say that it is true?"

So to know whether you can infer a statement, select "Yes" if you can say that it is true and select "No" if it is not true or you don't know enough.
avatar
NikLexx
Joined: 18 May 2021
Last visit: 18 May 2021
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abhimahna
tanubarsainyan
Can some one please explin part 1

If you see the seasonal adjusted changes for All items from March to Sept, you will find sometimes it is +ve (implies it is increasing ) and sometimes it is -ve(implies it is decreasing. While if you see the same for All Items less food and Energy, you will find out of 7 months given , 4 have value 0 and the other three have very small change in the value, thus, it is true that there is greater Month to Month variability in the former than the latter. Hence, TRUE.


Very concise and clear explanation. Thank you :please:
User avatar
kienbn932
Joined: 11 Nov 2021
Last visit: 28 Dec 2022
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 13
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
stormbind
I find this question to be especially annoying because of part 2:

2. The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items is higher in March 2010 than it is in the preceding month.

In the question, all items means "average", rather than "each of the items". This is clarified only by the existence of a separate table row with the name "All Items".

You need to stop and check every detail of the table to infer the meaning of all items, and I feel there is not enough time in the exam to do that.

Yes this is so pathetic of them to make us feel bad about ourselves
User avatar
gmattakeer749404
Joined: 17 May 2021
Last visit: 08 Aug 2023
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Posts: 11
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
So confused about Statement 1 of Part 1. If something is inferable, it should mean whether or not the information is sufficient (like the DS questions). We know statement 1 is false, therefore it is inferable, so the answer should be yes. I'm so confused by this wording, can someone explain the definition?
User avatar
Ahanasarkar99
Joined: 09 Apr 2022
Last visit: 03 Jul 2023
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Location: India
GPA: 3.9
WE:Design (Computer Software)
Posts: 7
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chris93
Project IR Butler 2019-20 - Get one IR Question Everyday
Question # 176, Date : 26-Mar-2020
This post is a part of Project IR Butler 2019-20. Click here for Details

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures the average prices of goods and services purchased by consumers. In the United States, the CPI-U calculates the CPI for all urban consumers.

The CPI-U Is calculated based on prices of food, clothing, shelter, fuels, transportation fares, charges for doctors' and dentists' services, drugs, and other goods and services that people buy for day-to-day living. All taxes directly associated with the purchase and use of items (such as, In the United States, sales taxes) are included in the index. An increase In CPI-U by a certain fractional amount means an increase by that fractional amount in overall prices within the relevant category.

For analyzing general price trends in the economy, seasonally adjusted prices are usually preferred over unadjusted prices because adjusting eliminates the effect of changes that normally occur at the same time and in about the same magnitude every year—such as price movements resulting from climatic conditions, production cycles, model changeovers, and holidays.

Attachment:
55.jpg

1. For each of the following, select Yes if the statement is inferable from the given information. Otherwise select No.

Yes.................No...................
The changes in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 and September 2010 were in most cases less in magnitude than the changes in seasonally adjusted prices of new vehicles for the same period.
The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.
The seasonally unadjusted change in the price of new vehicles in August 2010 over the previous month was about the same as the seasonally unadjusted change in the price of food away from home over the same period.

No, Yes and No

2. For each of the following, select Yes if the statement is inferable from the given information. Otherwise select No.

Yes.................No.................
From March 2010 to September 2010, there was greater month-to-month variability in the All items category than in the All items less food and energy category.
The CPI-U for electricity increased 0.5% from July to August 2010.
There was no change in the CPI-U for all items less food and energy from May 2010 to September 2010.

Yes, No and No

Doesn't "The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month." mean, previous month = Feb 2010 for All items which is not mentioned in the table and hence the answer should be No. Please explain me.
User avatar
Nikkz99
Joined: 23 Jun 2021
Last visit: 28 Oct 2024
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 319
Location: India
GPA: 3.54
Posts: 57
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The data is given in the table format (Only the last column is Unadjusted), This is basically a yes or no question. Select YES only if data can be inferable from the given information else select NO. Also to note is that, The table actually reflecting the data in terms of percentage (As far as I know) and adjusted CPI-U (Except the last column).

Q1 in brief:
-> It says that the Used cars and trucks between March 2010 & September 2010 (So we need to traverse from March to Septemeber's data) has less magnitude in most of the cases compared to new vehicles.

Well the table consists of data in terms of percentage, We can't literally able to deduce the magnitude with it. We cannot infer the information with the given data.

So, Answer for Q1 is NO

Q2 in brief:
-> Was All Items unadjusted CPI-U higher in March 2010 than February 2010 ?

Although we don't have February's CPI-U, but the value "0.1" indicates that there's increase in the prices compared to the previous month. So, we can infer information. "YES"


Q3 actually deals with Seasonally Unadjusted changes during the period of August 2010. We aren't provided data for that month's seasonally unadjusted CPI-U. So, We cannot infer the information. The answer is NO.


It is okay to take smaller steps rather than not making any progress towards the goal.
User avatar
nazii
Joined: 29 Oct 2021
Last visit: 12 Jan 2024
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 279
Posts: 59
Kudos: 37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear friend thanks for your explanation
However, there is a big issue with question 1.
The big question is that which sentence is inferable from table
Of course, the first statement is not True ,I agree, BUT IT IS INFEREBALE FROM TABLE, so why we should not mark it as Yes??
I think it's similar to YES/ NO data sufficiency question , The answer can be a valid and strong no, but we chose that answer as sufficient.
PLS help me understand this
NL15
Solution provided by Manhattan:

This table is ridiculous, isn’t it? And three paragraphs to start, before I even get to the question? There’s no way I’m possibly going to look through all of this data in 2.5 minutes. (Hint: that’s one clue to solving these kinds of questions!)

In general, on Integrated Reasoning tables, read the information that tells you what the table is about and look at all of the big labels (such as the column headers), but do NOT try to read / remember / understand all of the actual data points. You’ll use whatever data you need when you get a specific question about that data—but not before!

In this case, the first paragraph tells us that this CPI-U thing calculates average prices on a bunch of things for a certain population (urban consumers in the US). The second paragraph starts off by listing a bunch of categories—ignore them. If you need to know the specific categories, you can come back here later. In fact, ignore most of the details here until we figure out what the questions are about.

The third paragraph explains that we generally prefer to use seasonally adjusted prices. A quick glance at the table shows us that it includes both adjusted and unadjusted numbers. It also explains why—ignore this. Many, if not most, people will have used a minute or more at this point, so don’t spend that time now. If you need to know why, you can come back here later to understand.

Finally, glance at the table labels. The columns list a bunch of individual months from 2010 and those are labeled seasonally adjusted changes from preceding month. Notice two important things here: these numbers are seasonally adjusted, not unadjusted, and each monthly figure is based on the change from the preceding month. The final column is for a whole 12-month period and these numbers are unadjusted. Finally, there are a million individual categories listed in the rows. ?

I’m not 100% sure that I understand the difference between adjusted and unadjusted—but I don’t care about that right now. I’ll figure that out if I need to based on a specific question. Just keep going!

Now it’s time to examine the statements; here’s the first one:

The changes in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 and September 2010 were in most cases less in magnitude than the changes in seasonally adjusted prices of new vehicles for the same period.

Let’s see. They mention two categories: used cars and trucks and new vehicles. Great, I only need to look at those two rows. They also specifically mention adjusted for these, so I only care about the monthly columns. Scan until you find the right rows; luckily, they’re already right next to each other in the table.

The question asks about the magnitude of the changes in the two categories, so we need to compare them, month by month, to see which changed more and which changed less. For March 2010, the magnitude of change for used cars and trucks was 0.5, but only 0.1 for new vehicles. For that month, then, the magnitude of change was larger for the used cars and trucks. Compare the other months. In each case, the magnitude of change (the distance from zero) is larger for used cars and trucks. (This was true even in September 2010—the change was negative, but it was -0.7, which is 0.7 units away from 0. The magnitude of change for new cars was only 0.1.)

The statement says that the change for used cars and trucks was in most cases less in magnitude, but that’s not true. During all of the months in question, however, the change in magnitude (from zero) for used cars and trucks was greater.

Select No for statement 1.

Here’s the second statement:

The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.

This time, the statement is directing me to the all items category in the month-by-month (adjusted) timeframe. That’s right at the top of the table. We’re specifically asked about March 2010 compared to the previous month, but the table doesn’t include the previous month, so how can it tell us anything at all about February?

Read the labels! Right above the months, the table says Seasonally adjusted changes from preceding month. (Emphasis added.) In other words, the figure for March 2010 is based upon the change from February 2010. That change is positive, so it is true that the number for March is higher than the number for February.

Select Yes for statement 2.

And finally, our third statement:

The seasonally unadjusted change in the price of new vehicles in August 2010 over the previous month was about the same as the seasonally unadjusted change in the price of food away from home over the same period.

Read carefully! What data do they want now? Seasonally UNadjusted this time, not adjusted! The only data we have for the unadjusted category is based on the 12 months ended Sep 2010—we don’t have month-by-month data! Therefore, I can’t tell anything at all about what happened in August 2010 vs. July 2010—not for the UNadjusted data.

Note something very tricky. If you gloss over the Un in the word unadjusted, you might just go check the Aug and Jul columns for new vehicles and food away from home. For new vehicles, the change was 0.3. For food away from home, the change was 0.3. Those two numbers are the same—and so you would pick Yes, and you would fall into the trap. We don’t have any unadjusted data for the month of August alone.

Select No for statement 3.

The answers to the three statements are No, Yes, No.

Finally, notice something. How many rows and cells did you need in order to answer all three statements here? The first statement required us to use most of the cells in two adjacent rows. The second statement required us to use one cell in one row. The third statement required us to use nothing—but, even if we fell into the trap, we’d still only have used two cells in two different rows (one of which was a row we’d already used previously).

In other words, we never have to look at the vast majority of the data in this table. They could have cut out 3/4 of the rows without changing the question at all—except, perhaps, reducing the anxiety of a lot of test-takers when they saw a table with nearly 20 rows.

Key Takeaways for Integrated Reasoning Table Analysis Questions
(1) You will NOT need to use all of the data, so when you see a crazy number of rows or columns, don’t let yourself get anxious; instead, remind yourself that you won’t need to look at most of this. Ditto for those three paragraphs of text at the top. Don’t bother to read the table thoroughly or take in all of the data—just know what kind of information is available, then return to whatever you need based on the question statements.

(2) For many table questions, the ability to re-sort the data is critically important to our ability to answer these questions efficiently. Sometimes, though, we don’t need to sort the data at all—as in this case. Learn how to decide when and how to re-sort the data.

(3) Read carefully. When you have a table, by definition, the questions are going to hinge around whether you’re examining the right cell or cells from the table. Make sure you read the statements carefully with this question in mind: What group/category are they asking me about now?

URL: https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/blog ... -analysis/
User avatar
gowthamkanirajan
Joined: 25 Mar 2023
Last visit: 09 Sep 2024
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 18
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kris01
The changes in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 and September 2010 were in most cases less in magnitude than the changes in seasonally adjusted prices of new vehicles for the same period.

Lets check the first question.
It talks about the seasonally adjusted values for used cars and trucks and those for new vehicles. So, we need to only look at 2 rows(new vehicles and used cars and trucks)and all columns between March 2010 and September 2010(7 months). We are asked whether the for the majority of months, seasonally adjusted values for old cars and trucks is lesser than those for new vehicles. Since it talks about majority, we need to tabulate or compare values till we get upto 4 yeses or nos. Let's quickly tabulate that

New Vehicles Used cars and trucks
March 2010 0.1 < 0.5 No
April 2010 0.0 < 0.2 No
May 2010 0.1 < 0.6 No
June 2010 0.1 < 0.9 No

Since, we have got four nos, we know that for the majority of months the answer is no. Since, we cannot infer the statement in question, the answer is no for this question.

2. The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.

This one asks us whether the seasonally adjusted values for all items in March 2010 was higher than Feb 2010. Now, we are not given the values for feb 2010. However, we know that at the top of the table it is mentioned that the Seasonally adjusted values given change from preceding month. Hence, the seasonally adjusted value for March 2010 is calculated from Feb 2010 and hence we just need to note whether the change for all items (the topmost row in the table) is positive for March 2010. It turns out it is(value=0.1). Since we can infer the statement in question, the answer is Yes.

3. The seasonally unadjusted change in the price of new vehicles in August 2010 over the previous month was about the same as the seasonally unadjusted change in the price of food away from home over the same period.

This one is tricky. It needs us to look for the seasonally unadjusted value which is the last column here. However, it wants us to compare the last column price change for new vehicles in august over preceding month with the last column price change of food away from home in the same period. We are not given this data and thus we cannot test the validity of this statement from the given data. Note here, we are not asked to confirm whether the data is right or not. We are asked to confirm whether the data can be inferred from the given data or not. Since, we cannot infer the data from the given information, the answer is no.

Let me know if this is clear or if you have any further doubts.

chris93
https://www.kaogmat.com/ir/4340.html


The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures the average prices of goods and services purchased by consumers. In the United States, the CPI-U calculates the CPI for all urban consumers.

  The CPI-U is calculated based on prices of food, clothing, shelter, fuels, transportation fares, charges for doctors and dentists' services, drugs, and other goods and services that people buy for day-to-day living. All taxes directly associated with the purchase and use of items (such as, in the United States, sales taxes) are included in the index. An increase in CPI-U by a certain fractional amount means an increase by that fractional amount in overall prices within the relevant category.

  For analyzing general price trends in the economy, seasonally adjusted prices are usually preferred over unadjusted prices because adjusting eliminates the effect of changes that normally occur at the same time and in about the same magnitude every year—such as price movements resulting from climatic conditions, production cycles, model changeovers, and holidays.



  For each of the following, select Yes if the statement is inferable from the given information. Otherwise select No.

  Percent Changes in CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), US City Average
Yes No
The changes in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 and September 2010 were in most cases less in magnitude than the changes in seasonally adjusted prices of new vehicles for the same period.
The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.
The seasonally unadjusted change in the price of new vehicles in August 2010 over the previous month was about the same as the seasonally unadjusted change in the price of food away from home over the same period.
hi,
Can you please explain 2nd question once more.because i dont get how you interpret that the Seasonally adjusted values given change from preceding month.i don't see that above the table.please clarify

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
sectan
Joined: 31 Mar 2023
Last visit: 22 May 2024
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 77
Posts: 18
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kris01
The changes in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 and September 2010 were in most cases less in magnitude than the changes in seasonally adjusted prices of new vehicles for the same period.

Lets check the first question.
It talks about the seasonally adjusted values for used cars and trucks and those for new vehicles. So, we need to only look at 2 rows(new vehicles and used cars and trucks)and all columns between March 2010 and September 2010(7 months). We are asked whether the for the majority of months, seasonally adjusted values for old cars and trucks is lesser than those for new vehicles. Since it talks about majority, we need to tabulate or compare values till we get upto 4 yeses or nos. Let's quickly tabulate that

New Vehicles Used cars and trucks
March 2010 0.1 < 0.5 No
April 2010 0.0 < 0.2 No
May 2010 0.1 < 0.6 No
June 2010 0.1 < 0.9 No

Since, we have got four nos, we know that for the majority of months the answer is no. Since, we cannot infer the statement in question, the answer is no for this question.

2. The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.

This one asks us whether the seasonally adjusted values for all items in March 2010 was higher than Feb 2010. Now, we are not given the values for feb 2010. However, we know that at the top of the table it is mentioned that the Seasonally adjusted values given change from preceding month. Hence, the seasonally adjusted value for March 2010 is calculated from Feb 2010 and hence we just need to note whether the change for all items (the topmost row in the table) is positive for March 2010. It turns out it is(value=0.1). Since we can infer the statement in question, the answer is Yes.

3. The seasonally unadjusted change in the price of new vehicles in August 2010 over the previous month was about the same as the seasonally unadjusted change in the price of food away from home over the same period.

This one is tricky. It needs us to look for the seasonally unadjusted value which is the last column here. However, it wants us to compare the last column price change for new vehicles in august over preceding month with the last column price change of food away from home in the same period. We are not given this data and thus we cannot test the validity of this statement from the given data. Note here, we are not asked to confirm whether the data is right or not. We are asked to confirm whether the data can be inferred from the given data or not. Since, we cannot infer the data from the given information, the answer is no.

Let me know if this is clear or if you have any further doubts.

chris93
https://www.kaogmat.com/ir/4340.html


The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures the average prices of goods and services purchased by consumers. In the United States, the CPI-U calculates the CPI for all urban consumers.

  The CPI-U is calculated based on prices of food, clothing, shelter, fuels, transportation fares, charges for doctors and dentists' services, drugs, and other goods and services that people buy for day-to-day living. All taxes directly associated with the purchase and use of items (such as, in the United States, sales taxes) are included in the index. An increase in CPI-U by a certain fractional amount means an increase by that fractional amount in overall prices within the relevant category.

  For analyzing general price trends in the economy, seasonally adjusted prices are usually preferred over unadjusted prices because adjusting eliminates the effect of changes that normally occur at the same time and in about the same magnitude every year—such as price movements resulting from climatic conditions, production cycles, model changeovers, and holidays.



  For each of the following, select Yes if the statement is inferable from the given information. Otherwise select No.

  Percent Changes in CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), US City Average
Yes No
The changes in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 and September 2010 were in most cases less in magnitude than the changes in seasonally adjusted prices of new vehicles for the same period.
The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.
The seasonally unadjusted change in the price of new vehicles in August 2010 over the previous month was about the same as the seasonally unadjusted change in the price of food away from home over the same period.
­Hi, I have question around the wording "all items" here. Does all items here mean the sum of all items (as indicated by the top row) or each as in each item individually? As the answer would differ in that case
User avatar
Slim533k
Joined: 29 Oct 2021
Last visit: 06 Nov 2024
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 135
Location: India
Schools: IIM-A '24
Schools: IIM-A '24
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Mods, Sajjad1994 The table feels incomplete. The heading of the table "Percentage changes in cpi for all urban consumers (CPI-U), US City Average" cannot be seen. Resulting in forced errors. Kindly update the image.
User avatar
TemmyRoosh
Joined: 02 Nov 2023
Last visit: 19 Oct 2024
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 74
Location: India
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­I believe this question is incorrect. The title of the table is also missing
 
User avatar
surajexp
Joined: 13 Dec 2022
Last visit: 06 Nov 2024
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 6
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
laveen
Kris01
The changes in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 and September 2010 were in most cases less in magnitude than the changes in seasonally adjusted prices of new vehicles for the same period.

Lets check the first question.
It talks about the seasonally adjusted values for used cars and trucks and those for new vehicles. So, we need to only look at 2 rows(new vehicles and used cars and trucks)and all columns between March 2010 and September 2010(7 months). We are asked whether the for the majority of months, seasonally adjusted values for old cars and trucks is lesser than those for new vehicles. Since it talks about majority, we need to tabulate or compare values till we get upto 4 yeses or nos. Let's quickly tabulate that

New Vehicles Used cars and trucks
March 2010 0.1 < 0.5 No
April 2010 0.0 < 0.2 No
May 2010 0.1 < 0.6 No
June 2010 0.1 < 0.9 No

Since, we have got four nos, we know that for the majority of months the answer is no. Since, we cannot infer the statement in question, the answer is no for this question.

2. The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.

This one asks us whether the seasonally adjusted values for all items in March 2010 was higher than Feb 2010. Now, we are not given the values for feb 2010. However, we know that at the top of the table it is mentioned that the Seasonally adjusted values given change from preceding month. Hence, the seasonally adjusted value for March 2010 is calculated from Feb 2010 and hence we just need to note whether the change for all items (the topmost row in the table) is positive for March 2010. It turns out it is(value=0.1). Since we can infer the statement in question, the answer is Yes.

3. The seasonally unadjusted change in the price of new vehicles in August 2010 over the previous month was about the same as the seasonally unadjusted change in the price of food away from home over the same period.

This one is tricky. It needs us to look for the seasonally unadjusted value which is the last column here. However, it wants us to compare the last column price change for new vehicles in august over preceding month with the last column price change of food away from home in the same period. We are not given this data and thus we cannot test the validity of this statement from the given data. Note here, we are not asked to confirm whether the data is right or not. We are asked to confirm whether the data can be inferred from the given data or not. Since, we cannot infer the data from the given information, the answer is no.

Let me know if this is clear or if you have any further doubts.




The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures the average prices of goods and services purchased by consumers. In the United States, the CPI-U calculates the CPI for all urban consumers.

The CPI-U is calculated based on prices of food, clothing, shelter, fuels, transportation fares, charges for doctors and dentists' services, drugs, and other goods and services that people buy for day-to-day living. All taxes directly associated with the purchase and use of items (such as, in the United States, sales taxes) are included in the index. An increase in CPI-U by a certain fractional amount means an increase by that fractional amount in overall prices within the relevant category.

For analyzing general price trends in the economy, seasonally adjusted prices are usually preferred over unadjusted prices because adjusting eliminates the effect of changes that normally occur at the same time and in about the same magnitude every year—such as price movements resulting from climatic conditions, production cycles, model changeovers, and holidays.



For each of the following, select Yes if the statement is inferable from the given information. Otherwise select No.

Percent Changes in CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), US City Average
Yes No
The changes in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 and September 2010 were in most cases less in magnitude than the changes in seasonally adjusted prices of new vehicles for the same period.
The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.
The seasonally unadjusted change in the price of new vehicles in August 2010 over the previous month was about the same as the seasonally unadjusted change in the price of food away from home over the same period.
Hi Kris...i have a doubt.
For the question 1 ......you say that the answer should be NO because the Answer of Inference in False...so you stated that Answer should be NO
BUT IN CONTRAST.....for marking the Answer of question 2......you only saw whether the statement can be Inferred or Not......since the statement could be inferred ...you marked YES. (but then the answer of Inference was NO.....because seasonally adjusted CPI-U for ALL items was NOT higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.)

...so i believe this is the wrong approach.


Now what i understood after studying the question thoroughly is -

Firstly, the question is asking whether the statement can be INFERRED or NOT......i don't think so the question is asking whether the statement is True or Not.
Now you would ask.....if the question is only asking, whether the statement can be inferred or not......then HOW would the Answer for question 1 would be NO..

now see....the Table clearly states that the Changes mentioned are only PERCENTAGE changes.......whereas the question 1 is asking "THE CHANGES in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 & Sept 2010 WERE in most cases LESS IN MAGNITUDE..."

so the question is asking regarding the CHANGES IN MAGNITUDE.....i.e. Absolute Value.....& since we cannot Infer whether the changes in Absolute values are less or more (since the table is only showing Percentage change).....so the answer is NO

Hope I made some sense.

Please clarify whether my thinking is correct or not.......i have my GMAT in 2 days :)
­



Hi Laveen,

In all the three statements we have to identify whether those are correctly inferable from the table given.

Statement 1 - "The changes in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 and September 2010 were in most cases less in magnitude than the changes in seasonally adjusted prices of new vehicles for the same period."

As we can see in the table that the magnitude of the changes in adj. prices (in most of the months) for "Used cars and trucks" is higher than that of the "New Vehicles", which is exactly opposite to the stem of the statement1. Therefore the statement 1 can't be inferred. Hence he answer will be No.

Also as per your explaination "now see....the Table clearly states that the Changes mentioned are only PERCENTAGE changes.......whereas the question 1 is asking "THE CHANGES in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 & Sept 2010 WERE in most cases LESS IN MAGNITUDE..."
so the question is asking regarding the CHANGES IN MAGNITUDE.....i.e. Absolute Value.....& since we cannot Infer whether the changes in Absolute values are less or more (since the table is only showing Percentage change).....so the answer is NO"

We can't infer whether the magnitude of the Used cards and trucks is lesser than the New vehicles just by analysing the changes in the CPI. Therefore again the answer will be "No".

Statement 2 - The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.
Here in the statement, CPI-U for "all items" indicates the data given in row 1 only & not the data given in all rows separately (as you thought, I guess). For this statement, we have the data only for the month of March-10 but we don't have the data about Feb-10. But as we can see clearly that the change in the march month over the previous month is in +ve number (its increasing) which indicates that the CPI-U for all items in the March will be higher than the Feb. Therefore the answer will be "Yes" for the statement.

Hope my explanation would help you. ­
User avatar
surajexp
Joined: 13 Dec 2022
Last visit: 06 Nov 2024
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 6
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi laveen,

In all the three statements we have to identify whether those are correctly inferable from the table given.

Statement 1 - "The changes in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 and September 2010 were in most cases less in magnitude than the changes in seasonally adjusted prices of new vehicles for the same period."

As we can see in the table that the magnitude of the changes in adj. prices (in most of the months) for "Used cars and trucks" is higher than that of the "New Vehicles", which is exactly opposite to the stem of the statement1. Therefore the statement 1 can't be inferred. Hence he answer will be No.

Also as per your explaination "now see....the Table clearly states that the Changes mentioned are only PERCENTAGE changes.......whereas the question 1 is asking "THE CHANGES in seasonally adjusted prices for used cars and trucks between March 2010 & Sept 2010 WERE in most cases LESS IN MAGNITUDE..."
so the question is asking regarding the CHANGES IN MAGNITUDE.....i.e. Absolute Value.....& since we cannot Infer whether the changes in Absolute values are less or more (since the table is only showing Percentage change).....so the answer is NO"

We can't infer whether the magnitude of the Used cards and trucks is lesser than the New vehicles just by analysing the changes in the CPI. Therefore again the answer will be "No".

Statement 2 - The seasonally adjusted CPI-U for all items was higher in March 2010 than in the previous month.
Here in the statement, CPI-U for "all items" indicates the data given in row 1 only & not the data given in all rows separately (as you thought, I guess). For this statement, we have the data only for the month of March-10 but we don't have the data about Feb-10. But as we can see clearly that the change in the march month over the previous month is in +ve number (its increasing) which indicates that the CPI-U for all items in the March will be higher than the Feb. Therefore the answer will be "Yes" for the statement.

Hope my explanation would help you.
User avatar
Riri15
Joined: 07 Feb 2021
Last visit: 06 Nov 2024
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 9
Products:
Posts: 23
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Isn't the first statement false because you cannot infer magnitude from the given data, data is about percentage and not magnitude
User avatar
Aragorn_
Joined: 22 Apr 2023
Last visit: 06 Nov 2024
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Experts,

Please provide solution to this problem. Different people have used different approaches for the same question. Need to clarify which ones are correct and to be followed in exam.
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
Math Expert
96609 posts
RC & DI Moderator
11490 posts
DI Forum Moderator
171 posts