GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Oct 2019, 16:08

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 492
The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 10 Oct 2018, 21:35
1
8
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

77% (01:30) correct 23% (01:50) wrong based on 944 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Editorial: The mayor plans to deactivate the city’s fire alarm boxes, because most calls received from them are false alarms. The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since most people now have access to either public or private telephone. But the city’s commercial district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial’s argument?

(A) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs the city more than five million dollars annually.
(B) Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department.
(C) The fire department gets less information from an alarm box than it does from a telephone call.
(D) The city’s fire department is located much closer to the residential areas than to the commercial district.
(E) On average, almost 25 percent of the public telephones in the city are out of order.

Verbal Review 2015, CR26, P125

Originally posted by saurya_s on 01 Sep 2004, 12:34.
Last edited by bb on 10 Oct 2018, 21:35, edited 3 times in total.
Necessary Corrections for Official Guide Verbal Review 2nd Edition Project
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 484
Location: San Jose, CA
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2004, 12:45
3
Will go with B
If there are auto fire alarms then there is no need for manual fire alram boxes used to call the fire dept. Hence even though there are no pub phones in comm district, the comm district is still safe without the manual fire alarm boxes
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 110
Location: US
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2004, 12:59
B.

But, I was getting confused between B & E.
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 484
Location: San Jose, CA
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2004, 13:03
crackgmat3 wrote:
B.

But, I was getting confused between B & E.

I think E is incomplete
The arg says "since most people now have access to either public or private telephone" whereas E talks about only public telephones
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 492
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2004, 14:50
Can somebody tell me what is the conclusion which we are trying to weaken?
S
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 110
Location: US
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2004, 17:44
saurya_s wrote:
Can somebody tell me what is the conclusion which we are trying to weaken?
S

so some alarm boxes are still necessary - is the conclusion.
CEO
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 3763
Location: Singapore
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2004, 17:49
B for sure ! We want to find something that weakens this particular stance "City commercial buildings need alarm boxes because they have no phopnes"

(B) does just that. If the building all have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly (note the key words here) to the fire department, then fire boxes are completely redundant because no one is going it, ever.

In (E), tellign us 25% of the public telephones in the city are out of order does not dispute the argument that alarm boxes are not required.
Manager
Status: Bouncing back from failure
Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 64
Schools: Wharton,MIT, Tepper, Kelly,
WE 1: 7 years- Service Managament, poject Management, Business Consultant- Retail
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2014, 02:42
I have been fallen into trap answer B.

I chose B because B support the fact that why alarm box is not required. By now I have realized that argument is about why alarm box is required in commercial building.
Manager
Joined: 28 May 2014
Posts: 51
Schools: NTU '16
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V27
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jul 2014, 22:45
Wilfred,

What has to be weakened here? Mayor plans to deactivate the city’s fire alarm boxes or the commercial or necessity of alarm boxes in city’s commercial district? I am confused. Opted answer E assuming that since public telephones are not necessary, alarm boxes should be present.
Intern
Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Posts: 29
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2015, 20:28
Editorial: The mayor plans to deactivate the city’s fire alarm boxes, because most calls received from them are false alarms. The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since most people now have access to either public or private telephone. But the city’s commercial district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial’s argument?

(A) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs the city more than five million dollars annually.
(B) Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department.
(C) The fire department gets less information from an alarm box than it does from a telephone call.
(D) The city’s fire department is located much closer to the residential areas than to the commercial district.
(E) On average, almost 25 percent of the public telephones in the city are out of order.
Intern
Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Posts: 29
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2015, 20:31
prep wrote:
Editorial: The mayor plans to deactivate the city’s fire alarm boxes, because most calls received from them are false alarms. The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since most people now have access to either public or private telephone. But the city’s commercial district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial’s argument?

(A) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs the city more than five million dollars annually.
(B) Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department.
(C) The fire department gets less information from an alarm box than it does from a telephone call.
(D) The city’s fire department is located much closer to the residential areas than to the commercial district.
(E) On average, almost 25 percent of the public telephones in the city are out of order.

Doubt regarding this question:

The conclusion of the argument is: Alarm boxes are necessary. So we have to prove that Alarm boxes aren't necessary.

Option C -> proves telephone calls are more important than alarm boxes thus making alarm boxes not necessary. Can someone explain me why is C wrong?

Can someone also explain a step by step approach to solve this question please?
Intern
Joined: 16 Apr 2015
Posts: 37
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: UFlorida '18, UFL '17
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2015, 22:09
prep

Hi ,

Basically the mayor claims that the alarm boxes are not necessary but the author of the editorial adds on that the alarm boxes are necessary in commercial spaces.Thus to undermine the author's argument we have to understate that the commercial spaces also do not need any alarm boxes.

Lets look at the options below:

(A) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs the city more than five million dollars annually.Out of scope.We do not know how the city's expenses are related to the alarm boxes.
(B) Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department.CORRECT as this provides a reason as to why the commercial buildings dont need an alarm box.
(C) The fire department gets less information from an alarm box than it does from a telephone call.
The fire department is still alerted either from an alarm box or through the telephone call.The information is passed on to the fire department.Moreover it does not differentiate between normal spaces and commercial spaces.
(D) The city’s fire department is located much closer to the residential areas than to the commercial district. : Out of the arguments scope.
(E) On average, almost 25 percent of the public telephones in the city are out of order.: out of scope of the argument

Manager
Joined: 03 Aug 2015
Posts: 51
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Schools: ISB '18, SPJ GMBA '17
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2016, 06:35
prep wrote:
Editorial: The mayor plans to deactivate the city’s fire alarm boxes, because most calls received from them are false alarms. The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since most people now have access to either public or private telephone. But the city’s commercial district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial’s argument?

(A) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs the city more than five million dollars annually.
(B) Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department.
(C) The fire department gets less information from an alarm box than it does from a telephone call.
(D) The city’s fire department is located much closer to the residential areas than to the commercial district.
(E) On average, almost 25 percent of the public telephones in the city are out of order.

Good Q...But certainly not 600-700 level...IMO 500 Level...
Manager
Status: Final Call! Will Achieve Target ANyHow This Tym! :)
Joined: 05 Jan 2016
Posts: 81
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.8
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 16 Aug 2017, 02:24
4
prep wrote:
prep wrote:
Editorial: The mayor plans to deactivate the city’s fire alarm boxes, because most calls received from them are false alarms. The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since most people now have access to either public or private telephone. But the city’s commercial district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial’s argument?

(A) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs the city more than five million dollars annually.
(B) Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department.
(C) The fire department gets less information from an alarm box than it does from a telephone call.
(D) The city’s fire department is located much closer to the residential areas than to the commercial district.
(E) On average, almost 25 percent of the public telephones in the city are out of order.

Doubt regarding this question:

The conclusion of the argument is: Alarm boxes are necessary. So we have to prove that Alarm boxes aren't necessary.

Option C -> proves telephone calls are more important than alarm boxes thus making alarm boxes not necessary. Can someone explain me why is C wrong?

Can someone also explain a step by step approach to solve this question please?

Hi prep,

I am happy to respond.

Conclusion of the above argument - some alarm boxes are still necessary.
Reason as suggested from the argument - the city’s commercial district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones. SO, this goes against the mayor's plan/claim. So, the alarm boxes will still be necessary for the city's commercial district.

Option C - The fire department gets less information from an alarm box than it does from a telephone call.
This option is stating the advantage of the telephone calls over alarm boxes. That's good. But as we already know from the argument that the city’s commercial district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few public telephones, so instead of the advantages of the telephone calls, we still need the alarm boxes. So, this option makes the argument stand as it is. Therefore, incorrect.

Step by Step approach -
Its a weaken question, so,

1. Firstly, look for the conclusion.
2. Look for the premises which makes that conclusion hold. (Then, try to predict an answer. That will solidify your reasoning for the argument.)
3. Look for an alternate cause or something that weakens the conclusion along with the reasoning that is leading that conclusion to hold.

If we look at the correct option for this question,

Option B - Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department.
This provides an alternate reason which weakens our conclusion of requiring the alram boxes still. So, correct.

Hope you got the soultion for your question.
_________________
Regards,
Varun

Trying my best..... will succeed definitely! :)

The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long.
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful. :)

Do Check OG 2017 SC Solutions - http://gmatwithcj.com/solutions-gmat-official-guide-2017-sentence-correction-questions/

Originally posted by vnigam21 on 15 Aug 2017, 03:10.
Last edited by vnigam21 on 16 Aug 2017, 02:24, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Status: Final Call! Will Achieve Target ANyHow This Tym! :)
Joined: 05 Jan 2016
Posts: 81
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.8
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2017, 03:18
Detailed solution for this question :

The editorial argues that fire alarm boxes remain necessary in the commercial district, because the specific alternatives to the alarm boxes to which the mayor refers-public and private phones-are not common there. The question asks you to identify a weakness in the editorial’s argument in favor of keeping alarm boxes in the commercial district.

Choice B is the best answer. If commercial businesses use a different alternative-alarm systems connected to the fire department-then the editorial’s conclusion is not well supported.

Neither choice A nor choice C gives any reason to think that the alarm boxes are not necessary, although both choices prove grounds for deactivating the boxes if they are no longer necessary.

Choice D emphasizes the need to make sure that fires in the commercial district are reported quickly and does not weaken the editorial’s argument.

If public telephones are often out of order (choice E), there is more, rather than less, reason to think that the alarm boxes are necessary.
_________________
Regards,
Varun

Trying my best..... will succeed definitely! :)

The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long.
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful. :)

Do Check OG 2017 SC Solutions - http://gmatwithcj.com/solutions-gmat-official-guide-2017-sentence-correction-questions/
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2016
Posts: 123
Schools: ISB '18
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2017, 03:27
saurya_s wrote:
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 26
Page: 125
Difficulty:

Editorial: The mayor plans to deactivate the city’s fire alarm boxes, because most calls received from them are false alarms. The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since most people now have access to either public or private telephone. But the city’s commercial district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial’s argument?

(A) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs the city more than five million dollars annually.
(B) Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department.
(C) The fire department gets less information from an alarm box than it does from a telephone call.
(D) The city’s fire department is located much closer to the residential areas than to the commercial district.
(E) On average, almost 25 percent of the public telephones in the city are out of order.

Verbal Review 2015, CR26, P125

B indicates that there is exists an alternate mechanism, which alerts the fire department even without the presence of fire alarm boxes. Hence the Mayor's conclusion is strengthened and the editorial's conclusion is weakened.
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5939
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2018, 10:40
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes   [#permalink] 20 Oct 2018, 10:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by