Last visit was: 26 Jul 2024, 23:22 It is currently 26 Jul 2024, 23:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jan 2022
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [14]
Given Kudos: 110
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 26 Jan 2019
Posts: 508
Own Kudos [?]: 453 [1]
Given Kudos: 118
Location: India
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 May 2022
Status:Dreaming and Working
Affiliations: None
Posts: 437
Own Kudos [?]: 389 [1]
Given Kudos: 83
WE:Brand Management (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 May 2022
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 203
Send PM
Re: The number of arrangements that can be made out of the letters of the [#permalink]
Hi, in this case, why we have not taken 3! for three S' when these 3 S are together and why only 2! for C only?

Pls help.

Thanks :)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Aug 2022
Status:IELTS 8.5
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [1]
Given Kudos: 50
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V36
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V45
Send PM
Re: The number of arrangements that can be made out of the letters of the [#permalink]
1
Kudos
aj1410 wrote:
Hi, in this case, why we have not taken 3! for three S' when these 3 S are together and why only 2! for C only?

Pls help.

Thanks :)


The \(2!\) is to account for doublecounting of the two Cs in the letter pool. The three Ss are looked at as one unit or letter and are represented in the \(5!\) in the numerator.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Jun 2022
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 97
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Send PM
Re: The number of arrangements that can be made out of the letters of the [#permalink]
If we pull together all the S's for our null; i.e., SSS, why do we not "unlink" them at the end by multiplying the 60 by 3! ?.

total permutations = 420
permutations w/ S,S,S = 60 * 3! = 360. (??)
420-360 = 60.

Could someone explain? I thought when you linked together items in a permutation, you had to "unlink" them by multiplying by x! afterward - where (x) = the number of linked items.

Does this not apply here because the S's are indistinguishable items?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Nov 2021
Posts: 476
Own Kudos [?]: 242 [0]
Given Kudos: 381
Send PM
The number of arrangements that can be made out of the letters of the [#permalink]
griffith7 wrote:
If we pull together all the S's for our null; i.e., SSS, why do we not "unlink" them at the end by multiplying the 60 by 3! ?.

total permutations = 420
permutations w/ S,S,S = 60 * 3! = 360. (??)
420-360 = 60.

Could someone explain? I thought when you linked together items in a permutation, you had to "unlink" them by multiplying by x! afterward - where (x) = the number of linked items.

Does this not apply here because the S's are indistinguishable items?


The total possible permutations of the 7 letters is:

7!/3!2! = 420

The S's already have their 3! permutations embedded in the numerator factored out by the 3! in the denominator so it is unnecessary to gross up the 3 S's by 3!....they are already on the same footing.

In other words, the 3 S's in the 420 are not permuted among themselves so the number to be subtracted from 420 should not include a 3! permutation of 3 S's.

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Bot
The number of arrangements that can be made out of the letters of the [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
94619 posts