Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 26 Mar 2017, 10:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3152
Followers: 821

Kudos [?]: 6927 [4] , given: 1051

The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2012, 18:48
4
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

66% (02:27) correct 34% (01:31) wrong based on 379 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the country was a failure in 1987. If the program had been successful, the wholesale price of most illegal drugs would not have dropped substantially in 1987.

The argument in the passage depends on which of the following assumptions?

1) The supply of illegal drugs dropped substantially in 1987.

2)The price paid for most illegal drugs by the average consumer did not drop substantially in 1987.

3)Domestic production of illegal drugs increased at a higher rate than did the entry of such drugs into the country.

4)The wholesale price of a few illegal drugs increased substantially in 1987.

5)A drop in demand for most illegal drugs in 1987 was not the sole cause of the drop in their wholesale price.

Guys try this one. OA later . Thanks for discussion in advance
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Last edited by carcass on 15 Aug 2012, 23:54, edited 1 time in total.
If you have any questions
New!
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7248
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2205

Kudos [?]: 14342 [3] , given: 222

Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2012, 04:54
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
ankit0411 wrote:
carcass wrote:
The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the country was a failure in 1987. If the program had been successful, the wholesale price of most illegal drugs would not have dropped substantially in 1987.

The argument in the passage depends on which of the following assumptions?

1) The supply of illegal drugs dropped substantially in 1987.

2)The price paid for most illegal drugs by the average consumer did not drop substantially in 1987.

3)Domestic production of illegal drugs increased at a higher rate than did the entry of such drugs into the country.

4)The wholesale price of a few illegal drugs increased substantially in 1987.

5)A drop in demand for most illegal drugs in 1987 was not the sole cause of the drop in their wholesale price.

Guys try this one. OA later . Thanks for discussion in advance

Let me just try -

1) The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the country was a failure in 1987 - The program was a failure

2) If the program had been successful, the wholesale price of most illegal drugs would not have dropped substantially in 1987.

Thus, it means that the program was not successful ( there was illegal entry of drugs into the country) and hence, the prices dropped.

If I negate E - A drop in demand for most illegal drugs in 1987 was THE sole cause of the drop in their wholesale price.

okay - so if the price decrease was due to the drop in demand; the illegal entry of drugs was not the reason of their wholesale price decrease.

Am I right ?

Yes, you are right. If you use the assumption negation technique (ANT), you see that if the negative of option (E) is true, the conclusion cannot be true. Hence option (E) must be an assumption.
But let me add here that you should use ANT only when you get stuck or if you have doubts about the answer you have chosen. It is a little too complicated and time consuming to be used often.

The argument looks like this:
Premise: the wholesale price of most illegal drugs dropped substantially in 1987
Conclusion: the program was a failure i.e. the supply of illegal drugs did not drop.

Now, the argument looks shady, doesn't it? The price drop could happen because of increased supply or reduced demand. The author is concluding that the price drop is due to increase in supply (and says nothing about demand).

What is his assumption? His assumption is that the demand did not reduce or if it did, it did not reduce to the extent required to bring the price substantially down. So he is assuming that a reduction in demand was not the cause or at least was not the sole cause of reduction in the price.

_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 18 May 2012
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 2

Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2012, 21:11
It's (3). The Wholesale price of the illegal drugs have dropped sunstantially even without the entry of illegal drugs. So, there has to be some event which might have triggered the supply and an eventual drop in the price. This is clearly stated in (3) that it is due to domestic production of illegal drugs at a higher rate that the entry of such drugs. If the program had been successful, domestic production would not have happened and hence the price would not have dropped due to limited supply of illegal drugs.
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 81
Schools: IIM
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 11

Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2012, 22:54
I think the answer should be E. It is a strengthening assumption. We just eliminated another cause for the drop in prices.

If the demand had been dropped, the prices would also have been dropped but the premise says that the reason is illegal entry of the illegal drugs. So, we eliminated another cause.
Intern
Joined: 06 Jul 2012
Posts: 42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 36

Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2012, 22:56

If the drop in the demand is not the sole reason for drop in the prices, there must be some other reason for drop in the prices of the drugs.
_________________

If you think you are lost, you are.

Joined: 28 May 2012
Posts: 138
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.33
WE: Information Technology (Retail)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 11

Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2012, 04:26
carcass wrote:
The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the country was a failure in 1987. If the program had been successful, the wholesale price of most illegal drugs would not have dropped substantially in 1987.

The argument in the passage depends on which of the following assumptions?

1) The supply of illegal drugs dropped substantially in 1987.

2)The price paid for most illegal drugs by the average consumer did not drop substantially in 1987.

3)Domestic production of illegal drugs increased at a higher rate than did the entry of such drugs into the country.

4)The wholesale price of a few illegal drugs increased substantially in 1987.

5)A drop in demand for most illegal drugs in 1987 was not the sole cause of the drop in their wholesale price.

Guys try this one. OA later . Thanks for discussion in advance

Let me just try -

1) The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the country was a failure in 1987 - The program was a failure

2) If the program had been successful, the wholesale price of most illegal drugs would not have dropped substantially in 1987.

Thus, it means that the program was not successful ( there was illegal entry of drugs into the country) and hence, the prices dropped.

If I negate E - A drop in demand for most illegal drugs in 1987 was THE sole cause of the drop in their wholesale price.

okay - so if the price decrease was due to the drop in demand; the illegal entry of drugs was not the reason of their wholesale price decrease.

Am I right ?
_________________

You want something, go get it . Period !

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10675
Followers: 957

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 0

Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2014, 06:29
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 07 Sep 2013
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2014, 09:00
As per my learning, in assumption qq, we need to see a factor which can help us to conclude the same result concluded in passage. So, if passage says, price went down because of some 'X' reason, we need to choose an option which states that price could also have gone down because of some 'Y' reason.

1) The supply of illegal drugs dropped substantially in 1987.
-- No other reason mentioned.

2)The price paid for most illegal drugs by the average consumer did not drop substantially in 1987.
-- Again, no other reason of drop in price.

3)Domestic production of illegal drugs increased at a higher rate than did the entry of such drugs into the country.
-- It may sound tempting but even if it happens, it does not specify the rate of demand which may decrease/increase and consequently may decrease/increase the price respectively.

4)The wholesale price of a few illegal drugs increased substantially in 1987.
-- Again, out of scope.

5)A drop in demand for most illegal drugs in 1987 was not the sole cause of the drop in their wholesale price.
-- This I found reasonable to assume that price can also go down because of drop in demand.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10675
Followers: 957

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 0

Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2016, 21:46
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the   [#permalink] 28 Aug 2016, 21:46
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the 2 10 Jun 2013, 00:20
1 Dr. Nash: Drug addiction/ abuse control programs that 5 18 May 2013, 05:20
The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the 4 24 Aug 2012, 03:18
2 The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the 5 24 Aug 2012, 03:16
The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the 8 12 Apr 2007, 18:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by