JYnaey wrote:
suminha wrote:
I have trouble to understand the details in the passage.
The organization is quite simple, but I have problem to make the detail informations simple.
I usually paraphrase infos and make a chart in my brain, but this seems impossible in this passage.
Does anyone can explain the passage please?
Me too!
What does external fate (tragic condition) and internal condition (tragic process) mean in real life?
Can any one take some examples?
Let's say a hero died helping someone. Does it mean because the hero "helped"(internal) someone, he faced a situation(external) to die? Is the author saying that he died because he had good moral sense and it's not an external fate?
Also, is the author saying that irony is not tragedy and it should be distinguished from it?
Personally this is one undecipherable passage I've ever encountered ... maybe because I wouldn't care what the definitions of tragedy are, nor want to criticize one of those.
Sorry for the late reply!
This is a pretty tough passage. Rather than trying to understand all this junk in the context of the real world, just try your best to understand it in the context of the passage itself.
For starters, the author thinks that the first theory is flawed because it fails to distinguish between "tragic process" and "tragic condition. What exactly does that mean? Eh, maybe that's not crystal-clear, but at least we have a fuzzy picture of what the author is trying to say.
In line 14, we get what's supposed to be an explanation of that distinction (starting with "the theory does not acknowledge that..."), but unfortunately that explanation is pretty tough to follow. You should absolutely do your best to read that part carefully and understand it. BUT, if after reading it once or twice you're still confused, go with what you've got and move on.
For example, you might say to yourself, "alright, I know there are two theories, and according to the author each one is useful but imperfect. A flaw with the first theory is that it fails to distinguish between tragic process and tragic condition. The author talks about fate in explaining that distinction -- I don't really get it, but I know where to look if I get to a question about it..."
If you're lucky, they won't even ask about that part of the passage that you had trouble understanding! And if they do, maybe your limited understand will be enough to help you eliminate 2 or 3 choices using POE. Also, there might be something later in the passage that helps you better understand the part you struggled with.
In any case, it's NOT worth driving yourself nuts trying to understand every little detail of a passage. Instead, try your best to understand the purpose and structure, and then move on, regardless of how comfortable you feel. Remember, it's an adaptive test, and you're supposed to get questions wrong. So let go of the ones that stump you to make sure you have time for the more manageable ones.
For more on how to approach RC in general, check out
this article or
this RC video series (filmed LIVE!) or
this longer RC video series.
For more on letting go when you're stumped, check out
this video.
I hope that helps!