Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 00:09 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 00:09

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92916
Own Kudos [?]: 619079 [54]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2016
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 286 [23]
Given Kudos: 124
Schools: ISB '18
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Send PM
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Posts: 2101
Own Kudos [?]: 8810 [7]
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Posts: 97
Own Kudos [?]: 296 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole [#permalink]
The question is asking what the chance is that BOTH events occur (Tigers win AND Federer plays). To find this we need the respective probabilities of each event.
Chance that the Tigers do not win = 10%. This means that the chance that the Tigers win at least once is 1-10% = 90%
Chance that Federer doesn't play = 20%. This means that the chance that Federer does play is 1-20% = 80%

So the probability of BOTH events occurring is 90% * 80% = 72%

Answer D

Unless I'm misinterpreting the question, since I find the wording a little strange. It is redundant and ambiguous to say the "maximum possible probability" in a situation where the probability is not a dependent variable. Here we are told exactly what the probabilities are, so in my interpretation of the question, it should have simply asked "What is the probability that the Tigers will win and Federer will play during the season?"
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Mar 2014
Posts: 97
Own Kudos [?]: 32 [1]
Given Kudos: 616
Schools: Tepper '18
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Skywalker18 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole season. There is a 20% chance that Federer will not play at all in the whole season. What is the greatest possible probability that the Tigers will win and Federer will play during the season?

(A) 55%
(B) 60%
(C) 70%
(D) 72%
(E) 80%

Kudos for a correct solution.


There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole season
We can infer that there is 90% chance Tigers will win .
Similarly There is a 20% chance that Federer will not play at all in the whole season
We can also infer that there is 80% chance that Federer will play.

Answer E



I do not understand this completely,i'm afraid.!!
I attempted this problem in the following way

Tigers will not win = 10%, which means Tigers will win =90% = 9/10
Federer will not play = 20% which means Federer will play = 80% = 80/100 = 4/5

Probability of both occurring is 9/10*4/5 =18*25 = 72%

But this is the wrong answer. Are we assuming that the GREATEST probability of both occurring is Federer wins all the games that he plays (80%)? Please suggest.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2015
Posts: 38
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 25
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole [#permalink]
I was about to go with simple .9 * .8 approach but then the keyword not at all and the question will comes into picture.
So IMO, it should be 1-((prob of not playing)*(prob of not wining)),
which is 1-((.2)*(.1)) = 80%
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11178
Own Kudos [?]: 31935 [1]
Given Kudos: 290
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
MeghaP wrote:
Skywalker18 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole season. There is a 20% chance that Federer will not play at all in the whole season. What is the greatest possible probability that the Tigers will win and Federer will play during the season?

(A) 55%
(B) 60%
(C) 70%
(D) 72%
(E) 80%

Kudos for a correct solution.


There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole season
We can infer that there is 90% chance Tigers will win .
Similarly There is a 20% chance that Federer will not play at all in the whole season
We can also infer that there is 80% chance that Federer will play.

Answer E



I do not understand this completely,i'm afraid.!!
I attempted this problem in the following way

Tigers will not win = 10%, which means Tigers will win =90% = 9/10
Federer will not play = 20% which means Federer will play = 80% = 80/100 = 4/5

Probability of both occurring is 9/10*4/5 =18*25 = 72%

But this is the wrong answer. Are we assuming that the GREATEST probability of both occurring is Federer wins all the games that he plays (80%)? Please suggest.


Hi,
you are correct that the probability for two INDEPENDENT events are P(A)*P(B)
and here it should be 72%..

May be the Q means that the greatest possiblity where you have control over happening of events..

So here, the entire playing by Federer happens when Tigers wins..
In other terms Federer playing is a subset of Tigers wins..
so greatest possiblity will be equal to the lesser of two, which is 80%
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2015
Status:Profile 1
Posts: 50
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [0]
Given Kudos: 41
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole season. There is a 20% chance that Federer will not play at all in the whole season. What is the greatest possible probability that the Tigers will win and Federer will play during the season?

(A) 55%
(B) 60%
(C) 70%
(D) 72%
(E) 80%

Kudos for a correct solution.


Bunuel,

can you please tell exact logic behind this question and how we detect this type of question to apply correct logic.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2017
Posts: 50
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 165
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole [#permalink]
Got it wrong on the first go. Had considered each event to be independent and left out the greatest possibility aside and came up with
(prob of roger playing)*(prob of tiger wining)
.9*.8=.72*100=72%

However below is correct
1-((prob of federer not playing)*(prob of tiger not wining)),
which is 1-((.2)*(.1)) = .8*100=80%
Bunuel can you please confirm if "greatest possibility" in Problem statement is the keyword to identify the right solution here.
Please advise.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2017
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole [#permalink]
I would really hope that the GMAT would include more information on how/whether the two events are related if they put this on an actual exam. We don't even know if the Tigers and Federer play the same sport (and note how the question uses a well-known baseball team name with a well-known tennis player's name to further lead one to believe they are playing in different leagues). I get that it says "greatest probability," but I think at least mentioning that Federer plays for the Tigers is a basic piece of information that would make the question a fair one to ask.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 312
Own Kudos [?]: 798 [0]
Given Kudos: 76
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole [#permalink]
FB2017 wrote:
Got it wrong on the first go. Had considered each event to be independent and left out the greatest possibility aside and came up with
(prob of roger playing)*(prob of tiger wining)
.9*.8=.72*100=72%

However below is correct
1-((prob of federer not playing)*(prob of tiger not wining)),
which is 1-((.2)*(.1)) = .8*100=80%
Bunuel can you please confirm if "greatest possibility" in Problem statement is the keyword to identify the right solution here.
Please advise.




Hi FB2017

i can see a mistake in your calculation ... which is 1-0.2 = 0.8 , whereas 1-(0.2x0.1) is 1-0.02 = 0.98 ?????

----------------------------------------------
Hello Bunuel

what is wrong in the concept which i applied
P(win) =0.9
P(play) = 0.8
2 independent events , P ( win and play) = 0.9x0.8 = 0.72
is this probability of both events ( independent) occuring is wrong??? kindly advise. or the OA is wrong?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92916
Own Kudos [?]: 619079 [2]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole season. There is a 20% chance that Federer will not play at all in the whole season. What is the greatest possible probability that the Tigers will win and Federer will play during the season?

(A) 55%
(B) 60%
(C) 70%
(D) 72%
(E) 80%

Kudos for a correct solution.


Veritas Prep Official Solution:



Let’s review what we are given.

P(Tigers will not win at all) = 0.1

P(Tigers will win) = 1 – 0.1 = 0.9

P(Federer will not play at all) = 0.2

P(Federer will play) = 1 – 0.2 = 0.8

Do we know the relation between the two events “Tigers will win” (A) and “Federer will play” (B)? No. They are not mutually exclusive and we do not know whether they are independent.

If they are independent, then the P(A and B) = 0.9 * 0.8 = 0.72

If the relation between the two events is unknown, then the maximum value of P(A and B) will be 0.8 because P(B), the lesser of the two given probabilities, is 0.8.

Since 0.8, or 80%, is the greater value, the greatest possibility that the Tigers will win and Federer will play during the season is 80%. Therefore, our answer is E.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32680
Own Kudos [?]: 822 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: There is a 10% chance that Tigers will not win at all during the whole [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92915 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne