Last visit was: 21 Jul 2024, 19:40 It is currently 21 Jul 2024, 19:40
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 May 2010
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 196 [29]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94441
Own Kudos [?]: 642828 [10]
Given Kudos: 86716
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 122
Own Kudos [?]: 3614 [1]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Posts: 469
Own Kudos [?]: 904 [2]
Given Kudos: 123
Send PM
Re: Example #2 of SD from gmat math book [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Pardon me. Let me try. The sd is a measure of the compactness. The consecutive integers are packed the same way ( equidistant ) from each other no matter where you start counting from. To get the distances from the mean of a data sample you just need the number of elements. Let's say it is 5 and data set is {1 2 3 4 5} the mean is middle number 3. Because of symmetry and knowing data is equidistant from each other, we can calculate the square of individual distances from the mean. Hence we can know the variance. Hence we can get the sd. So here A is sufficient to answer the question. because of symmetry the sd of {1 2 3 4 5} is same as the sd of {96 97 98 99 100} or {11 12 13 14 15} ie any consecutive 5 integers

Posted from my mobile device
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 903
Own Kudos [?]: 1194 [0]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Send PM
Re: Example #2 of SD from gmat math book [#permalink]
To add on top of what gmat1220 has mentioned, assume that you have a set of 39 consecutive even numbers, then the median = mean and thus two numbers on either side of mean will be 2 away, the next two will be 4 away, and so forth. So this gives the number of distances from mean, and the number of terms is already there, so you can substitute and find the SD.( Of course this is a SD question, so no need to calculate any further).


For option 2, there is nothing that gives how the other members of set are placed with respect to mean, or how many numbers are there in the set, and hence there is no definitive answer.

e.g. there could be three members (whereby the SD will be very low), or 100 members, in which case the SD will vary widely as many elements away from the mean will cause the SD to increase.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 122
Own Kudos [?]: 3614 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: Example #2 of SD from gmat math book [#permalink]
thanks a ton guys...ok so statement makes sense, i got that right but my confusion was over statement 2

stmt 2 : it gives us the mean. We already know the that set is set of consecutive even numbers so we know it is evenly distributed so why cant we calculate the SD.

Can someone clarify this.
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1108
Own Kudos [?]: 4754 [3]
Given Kudos: 376
Send PM
Re: Example #2 of SD from gmat math book [#permalink]
3
Kudos
ajit257 wrote:
thanks a ton guys...ok so statement makes sense, i got that right but my confusion was over statement 2

stmt 2 : it gives us the mean. We already know the that set is set of consecutive even numbers so we know it is evenly distributed so why cant we calculate the SD.

Can someone clarify this.


380,382,384. Mean=382. Standard deviation: 2
378,380,382,384,386. Mean=382: Standard deviation: Somewhere between 2 and 4
376,378,380,382,384,386,388; Mean=382: Standard deviation: Somewhere between 4 and 6

Even though the even numbers are symmetrically distributed about the mean, with every inclusion of a pair of numbers, the standard deviation will gradually increase.

380,382,384:
Here there are just two numbers on both sides of 382. The deviation of 380 from the mean 382 is 2; the deviation of 384 from the mean 382 is also 2, thus the standard deviation is 2.

378,380,382,384,386
Here there are 5 numbers.
382 is the mean.
The deviation of 380 from the mean 382 is 2; the deviation of 384 from the mean 382 is also 2;
But,
The deviation of 378 from the mean 382 is 4; the deviation of 384 from the mean 386 is also 4;
Thus the standard deviation will be somewhere between 2 and 4.

Also, as per the rule, the standard deviation increases with increase in the Range of the set.
380,382,384. Range=4
378,380,382,384,386. Range=8
376,378,380,382,384,386,388. Range=12
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 122
Own Kudos [?]: 3614 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: Example #2 of SD from gmat math book [#permalink]
so stmt 2 is based on the concept of the more numbers you add closer to the mean ....sd changes.

thanks fluke.
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 4128
Own Kudos [?]: 9459 [1]
Given Kudos: 91
 Q51  V47
Send PM
Re: Example #2 of SD from gmat math book [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
fluke wrote:
380,382,384. Mean=382. Standard deviation: 2


Just to clarify, the standard deviation of that set is not equal to 2. If everything in a set is 2 away from the mean, the standard deviation will indeed be 2, but in your example, 382 is not 2 away from the mean; it is equal to the mean. Because of that, the standard deviation will certainly be less than 2.

If you care to complete the calculation, the distances of the elements in the set {380, 382, 384} to the mean are 2, 0 and 2. Squaring these and averaging, we get 8/3, so the standard deviation is sqrt(8/3).
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1108
Own Kudos [?]: 4754 [0]
Given Kudos: 376
Send PM
Re: Example #2 of SD from gmat math book [#permalink]
IanStewart wrote:
fluke wrote:
380,382,384. Mean=382. Standard deviation: 2


Just to clarify, the standard deviation of that set is not equal to 2. If everything in a set is 2 away from the mean, the standard deviation will indeed be 2, but in your example, 382 is not 2 away from the mean; it is equal to the mean. Because of that, the standard deviation will certainly be less than 2.

If you care to complete the calculation, the distances of the elements in the set {380, 382, 384} to the mean are 2, 0 and 2. Squaring these and averaging, we get 8/3, so the standard deviation is sqrt(8/3).


True. My mistake. Thanks.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 34040
Own Kudos [?]: 853 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: There is a set of consecutive even integers. What is the [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: There is a set of consecutive even integers. What is the [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
94441 posts