Mission2012 wrote:
IndianExpress wrote:
I eliminated A,B and C based on the absence of "that while D on the presence of "there" (at the end). Can anybody tell me if my approach was correct or not?
Are A, B and C incorrect only because of missing "that".
Can some expert help me to understand the structure of A, B and C
A, B and C are wrong. As far as I know, you want to know what's wrong with them, correct?
Although unhappy with the high rent her company was paying for its suburban office building, the chief executive recognized rental rates for buildings in the suburbs as far lower than it typically is for property that is located within the city limits.
(A) rental rates for buildings in the suburbs
as far
lower than it typically is for property that is located within the city limits
>>> Wrong. comparison "as...as", not "as .... than". "it" is incorrect, should be "rates" (plural) or "those for"(B) rental rates for buildings in the suburbs
as being far
lower than what the rates typically charged within the city limits had been for property located
there
>>> Wrong. comparison "as...as", not "as .... than". Also "there" changes the meaning of the sentence. The use of "what" is redundant.(C) rental rates typically
being charged for property located within the city limits to be far
lower as they typically were within the city limits for the property
there.
>>> Wrong. "being charged" is wrong grammar. Wrong comparison "to be far lower as", doesn't make any sense. The structure should be "as...as" or "lower.... than", not "lower as"Hope it helps a little bit.