Last visit was: 14 May 2024, 06:58 It is currently 14 May 2024, 06:58

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
CEO
CEO
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 2873
Own Kudos [?]: 5221 [16]
Given Kudos: 47
Location: India
GPA: 3.12
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Sep 2018
Posts: 191
Own Kudos [?]: 175 [0]
Given Kudos: 78
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Nov 2018
Posts: 78
Own Kudos [?]: 39 [1]
Given Kudos: 63
Send PM
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 14022
Own Kudos [?]: 33676 [1]
Given Kudos: 5787
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: In all battles two things are usually required of the Commander-in-Chi [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
goforgmat
puja priya
Adi93
tamal99
NinetyFour
prototypevenom

here it is.

Official Explanation


Topic and Scope

Parallels are drawn between the skills required to paint a picture and to conduct a battle.

Mapping the Passage

Para 1 compares painting a picture to fighting a battle, lists two similarities, planning and backup, and discusses planning.

Para 2 explains that practicing art is a great way to become a lover of art.

Para 3 and 4 draws in the analogy of the general and explain the need to study previous masters in war and art.

Para 5 and 6 explain the need to keep reserves in battle and painting.


1. As the author creates the analogy between war and painting in the passage, the Commander-in-Chief is to the battleground as the:

Difficulty Level: 750

Explanation

The Commander-in-Chief is mentioned in the first paragraph, so begin your search there. The author says that the battleground must be inspected and studied. What is the equivalent in painting? The subject being painted. (A) fits the bill.

(A): The correct answer

(B): Distortion. A tempting answer choice that might have required careful thought to eliminate if you hadn‘t chosen (A) outright. The general studies the battleground he fights the battle on, and likewise, the painter studies the subject he paints the picture of. Solid understanding of the metaphor is crucial. Hone this ability by paraphrasing at every opportunity.

(C): Out of Scope. Colours are mentioned in the last paragraphs when discussing reserves, a completely different part of the passage than the one in question.

(D): Out of Scope. While the author mentions art galleries in the context of planning, it has nothing to do with the metaphor of the battleground.

(E): Incorrect, as described above.

Strategy Point:

Pay attention to keywords mentioned in the question to get an idea of where to search in the passage.


2. Following the example of the master Manet, the young Matisse often inserted in his pictures areas of white such as tablecloths or crockery that allowed for striking contrasts with black objects such as a knife or a dark bottle. What is the relevance of this information to the passage?

Difficulty Level: 750

Explanation

A synthesis question testing your ability to evaluate the relevance of a new situation to the author‘s arguments. Zero in on elements of the new situation that sound relevant to the passage. Black and white are mentioned in the final paragraph. Recall that the author argues that black and white make weak impressions when contrasted. However, in the question stem situation, the impression is strong. We‘re looking for an answer that points this out, in other words, one that argues the new situation weakens the author‘s view. (C) fits exactly.

(A): Out of Scope. Not only does the situation not support the author‘s argument, but it has nothing to do with the paragraph on imitation. Don‘t get suckered by the false parallel between Matisse and the author‘s own discussion of great artists.

(B): Opposite. Right on topic, but the new situation does just the opposite to the author‘s claim.

(C): The correct answer

(D): Distortion. While the new situation does weaken the author‘s argument, the author never argues that all great painters take Nature as their subject, asthis answer choice suggests.

(E): Incorrect, as described above.


3. The author‘s statement - "But [the fighting troops], in the absence of high direction, are apt to get into sad confusion, all mixed together in a nasty mess, without order or plan—and consequently without effect" assumes that:

Difficulty Level: 750

Explanation

Yet another question testing your understanding of the author‘s extended metaphor. These will be very common in any passage where unusual parallels are drawn. The quoted statement comes from Para 5; since all of the answer choices mention painting, work through how this part of the metaphor corresponds. The author is arguing that without a reserve, colours, like troops, will be confused and without order and therefore useless. For this to be true, the author must also believe that a painting without order suffers artistically, choice (A). To test an assumption in your practice, use the denial test: If the author does in fact assume X, the argument should fall apart if X is false. In this case, if chaotic painting can have an artistic effect, then the author‘s point about confused troops becomes meaningless. The assumption as it is written is therefore valid.

(A): The correct answer

(B): Distortion. While the colours lack direction, there‘s nothing in the metaphor to indicate the artist resists direction.

(C): Out of Scope. Nothing in the statement is correlated to the author‘s general mental state.

(D): Out of Scope. This answer choice mentions confusion, which is also mentioned in the statement. The relevance stops there, though, as the rest of the answer choice is off-topic.

(E): Out of scope. This doesn‘t have to be assumed by the author.


Hope it helps
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Posts: 72
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [0]
Given Kudos: 121
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
WE:Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: In all battles two things are usually required of the Commander-in-Chi [#permalink]
SajjadAhmad wrote:
goforgmat
puja priya
Adi93
tamal99
NinetyFour
prototypevenom

here it is.

Official Explanation


Topic and Scope

Parallels are drawn between the skills required to paint a picture and to conduct a battle.

Mapping the Passage
Para 1 compares painting a picture to fighting a battle, lists two similarities, planning and backup, and discusses planning.

Para 2 explains that practicing art is a great way to become a lover of art.

Para 3 and 4 draws in the analogy of the general and explain the need to study previous masters in war and art.

Para 5 and 6 explain the need to keep reserves in battle and painting.


1. As the author creates the analogy between war and painting in the passage, the Commander-in-Chief is to the battleground as the:

Difficulty Level: 750

Explanation

The Commander-in-Chief is mentioned in the first paragraph, so begin your search there. The author says that the battleground must be inspected and studied. What is the equivalent in painting? The subject being painted. (A) fits the bill.

(A): The correct answer

(B): Distortion. A tempting answer choice that might have required careful thought to eliminate if you hadn‘t chosen (A) outright. The general studies the battleground he fights the battle on, and likewise, the painter studies the subject he paints the picture of. Solid understanding of the metaphor is crucial. Hone this ability by paraphrasing at every opportunity.

(C): Out of Scope. Colours are mentioned in the last paragraphs when discussing reserves, a completely different part of the passage than the one in question.

(D): Out of Scope. While the author mentions art galleries in the context of planning, it has nothing to do with the metaphor of the battleground.

(E): Incorrect, as described above.

Strategy Point:

Pay attention to keywords mentioned in the question to get an idea of where to search in the passage.


2. Following the example of the master Manet, the young Matisse often inserted in his pictures areas of white such as tablecloths or crockery that allowed for striking contrasts with black objects such as a knife or a dark bottle. What is the relevance of this information to the passage?

Difficulty Level: 750

Explanation

A synthesis question testing your ability to evaluate the relevance of a new situation to the author‘s arguments. Zero in on elements of the new situation that sound relevant to the passage. Black and white are mentioned in the final paragraph. Recall that the author argues that black and white make weak impressions when contrasted. However, in the question stem situation, the impression is strong. We‘re looking for an answer that points this out, in other words, one that argues the new situation weakens the author‘s view. (C) fits exactly.

(A): Out of Scope. Not only does the situation not support the author‘s argument, but it has nothing to do with the paragraph on imitation. Don‘t get suckered by the false parallel between Matisse and the author‘s own discussion of great artists.

(B): Opposite. Right on topic, but the new situation does just the opposite to the author‘s claim.

(C): The correct answer

(D): Distortion. While the new situation does weaken the author‘s argument, the author never argues that all great painters take Nature as their subject, asthis answer choice suggests.

(E): Incorrect, as described above.


3. The author‘s statement - "But [the fighting troops], in the absence of high direction, are apt to get into sad confusion, all mixed together in a nasty mess, without order or plan—and consequently without effect" assumes that:

Difficulty Level: 750

Explanation

Yet another question testing your understanding of the author‘s extended metaphor. These will be very common in any passage where unusual parallels are drawn. The quoted statement comes from Para 5; since all of the answer choices mention painting, work through how this part of the metaphor corresponds. The author is arguing that without a reserve, colours, like troops, will be confused and without order and therefore useless. For this to be true, the author must also believe that a painting without order suffers artistically, choice (A). To test an assumption in your practice, use the denial test: If the author does in fact assume X, the argument should fall apart if X is false. In this case, if chaotic painting can have an artistic effect, then the author‘s point about confused troops becomes meaningless. The assumption as it is written is therefore valid.

(A): The correct answer

(B): Distortion. While the colours lack direction, there‘s nothing in the metaphor to indicate the artist resists direction.

(C): Out of Scope. Nothing in the statement is correlated to the author‘s general mental state.

(D): Out of Scope. This answer choice mentions confusion, which is also mentioned in the statement. The relevance stops there, though, as the rest of the answer choice is off-topic.

(E): Out of scope. This doesn‘t have to be assumed by the author.


Hope it helps


Hi,
Regarding Q3, should I focus on the tone/approach of the passage over logic?
Option E is a direct assumption, if this were to be critically reasoned. I know this is not a CR question. And I agree E has an extreme language use. And I do understand that the author, in the passage is making parallel comparisons with every aspect of war with painting.
If the option E had something about painting, just as the other options, I would have went ahead with A. But given there was a direct assumption, and a metaphorical comparison, I chose E over A.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Mar 2020
Posts: 27
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 102
Send PM
Re: In all battles two things are usually required of the Commander-in-Chi [#permalink]
Sorry but in q3, when chaotic paintings cannot have an unintended effect they can have an intended effect and that would not support the authors line of argumentation

SajjadAhmad wrote:
goforgmat
puja priya
Adi93
tamal99
NinetyFour
prototypevenom

here it is.

Official Explanation


Topic and Scope

Parallels are drawn between the skills required to paint a picture and to conduct a battle.

Mapping the Passage

Para 1 compares painting a picture to fighting a battle, lists two similarities, planning and backup, and discusses planning.

Para 2 explains that practicing art is a great way to become a lover of art.

Para 3 and 4 draws in the analogy of the general and explain the need to study previous masters in war and art.

Para 5 and 6 explain the need to keep reserves in battle and painting.


1. As the author creates the analogy between war and painting in the passage, the Commander-in-Chief is to the battleground as the:

Difficulty Level: 750

Explanation

The Commander-in-Chief is mentioned in the first paragraph, so begin your search there. The author says that the battleground must be inspected and studied. What is the equivalent in painting? The subject being painted. (A) fits the bill.

(A): The correct answer

(B): Distortion. A tempting answer choice that might have required careful thought to eliminate if you hadn‘t chosen (A) outright. The general studies the battleground he fights the battle on, and likewise, the painter studies the subject he paints the picture of. Solid understanding of the metaphor is crucial. Hone this ability by paraphrasing at every opportunity.

(C): Out of Scope. Colours are mentioned in the last paragraphs when discussing reserves, a completely different part of the passage than the one in question.

(D): Out of Scope. While the author mentions art galleries in the context of planning, it has nothing to do with the metaphor of the battleground.

(E): Incorrect, as described above.

Strategy Point:

Pay attention to keywords mentioned in the question to get an idea of where to search in the passage.


2. Following the example of the master Manet, the young Matisse often inserted in his pictures areas of white such as tablecloths or crockery that allowed for striking contrasts with black objects such as a knife or a dark bottle. What is the relevance of this information to the passage?

Difficulty Level: 750

Explanation

A synthesis question testing your ability to evaluate the relevance of a new situation to the author‘s arguments. Zero in on elements of the new situation that sound relevant to the passage. Black and white are mentioned in the final paragraph. Recall that the author argues that black and white make weak impressions when contrasted. However, in the question stem situation, the impression is strong. We‘re looking for an answer that points this out, in other words, one that argues the new situation weakens the author‘s view. (C) fits exactly.

(A): Out of Scope. Not only does the situation not support the author‘s argument, but it has nothing to do with the paragraph on imitation. Don‘t get suckered by the false parallel between Matisse and the author‘s own discussion of great artists.

(B): Opposite. Right on topic, but the new situation does just the opposite to the author‘s claim.

(C): The correct answer

(D): Distortion. While the new situation does weaken the author‘s argument, the author never argues that all great painters take Nature as their subject, asthis answer choice suggests.

(E): Incorrect, as described above.


3. The author‘s statement - "But [the fighting troops], in the absence of high direction, are apt to get into sad confusion, all mixed together in a nasty mess, without order or plan—and consequently without effect" assumes that:

Difficulty Level: 750

Explanation

Yet another question testing your understanding of the author‘s extended metaphor. These will be very common in any passage where unusual parallels are drawn. The quoted statement comes from Para 5; since all of the answer choices mention painting, work through how this part of the metaphor corresponds. The author is arguing that without a reserve, colours, like troops, will be confused and without order and therefore useless. For this to be true, the author must also believe that a painting without order suffers artistically, choice (A). To test an assumption in your practice, use the denial test: If the author does in fact assume X, the argument should fall apart if X is false. In this case, if chaotic painting can have an artistic effect, then the author‘s point about confused troops becomes meaningless. The assumption as it is written is therefore valid.

(A): The correct answer

(B): Distortion. While the colours lack direction, there‘s nothing in the metaphor to indicate the artist resists direction.

(C): Out of Scope. Nothing in the statement is correlated to the author‘s general mental state.

(D): Out of Scope. This answer choice mentions confusion, which is also mentioned in the statement. The relevance stops there, though, as the rest of the answer choice is off-topic.

(E): Out of scope. This doesn‘t have to be assumed by the author.


Hope it helps


Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Jul 2021
Posts: 38
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: In all battles two things are usually required of the Commander-in-Chi [#permalink]
OhsostudiousMJ wrote:
SajjadAhmad wrote:
goforgmat
puja priya
Adi93
tamal99
NinetyFour
prototypevenom

here it is.

Official Explanation


Topic and Scope

Parallels are drawn between the skills required to paint a picture and to conduct a battle.

Mapping the Passage
Para 1 compares painting a picture to fighting a battle, lists two similarities, planning and backup, and discusses planning.

Para 2 explains that practicing art is a great way to become a lover of art.

Para 3 and 4 draws in the analogy of the general and explain the need to study previous masters in war and art.

Para 5 and 6 explain the need to keep reserves in battle and painting.


1. As the author creates the analogy between war and painting in the passage, the Commander-in-Chief is to the battleground as the:

Difficulty Level: 750

Explanation

The Commander-in-Chief is mentioned in the first paragraph, so begin your search there. The author says that the battleground must be inspected and studied. What is the equivalent in painting? The subject being painted. (A) fits the bill.

(A): The correct answer

(B): Distortion. A tempting answer choice that might have required careful thought to eliminate if you hadn‘t chosen (A) outright. The general studies the battleground he fights the battle on, and likewise, the painter studies the subject he paints the picture of. Solid understanding of the metaphor is crucial. Hone this ability by paraphrasing at every opportunity.

(C): Out of Scope. Colours are mentioned in the last paragraphs when discussing reserves, a completely different part of the passage than the one in question.

(D): Out of Scope. While the author mentions art galleries in the context of planning, it has nothing to do with the metaphor of the battleground.

(E): Incorrect, as described above.

Strategy Point:

Pay attention to keywords mentioned in the question to get an idea of where to search in the passage.


2. Following the example of the master Manet, the young Matisse often inserted in his pictures areas of white such as tablecloths or crockery that allowed for striking contrasts with black objects such as a knife or a dark bottle. What is the relevance of this information to the passage?

Difficulty Level: 750

Explanation

A synthesis question testing your ability to evaluate the relevance of a new situation to the author‘s arguments. Zero in on elements of the new situation that sound relevant to the passage. Black and white are mentioned in the final paragraph. Recall that the author argues that black and white make weak impressions when contrasted. However, in the question stem situation, the impression is strong. We‘re looking for an answer that points this out, in other words, one that argues the new situation weakens the author‘s view. (C) fits exactly.

(A): Out of Scope. Not only does the situation not support the author‘s argument, but it has nothing to do with the paragraph on imitation. Don‘t get suckered by the false parallel between Matisse and the author‘s own discussion of great artists.

(B): Opposite. Right on topic, but the new situation does just the opposite to the author‘s claim.

(C): The correct answer

(D): Distortion. While the new situation does weaken the author‘s argument, the author never argues that all great painters take Nature as their subject, asthis answer choice suggests.

(E): Incorrect, as described above.


3. The author‘s statement - "But [the fighting troops], in the absence of high direction, are apt to get into sad confusion, all mixed together in a nasty mess, without order or plan—and consequently without effect" assumes that:

Difficulty Level: 750

Explanation

Yet another question testing your understanding of the author‘s extended metaphor. These will be very common in any passage where unusual parallels are drawn. The quoted statement comes from Para 5; since all of the answer choices mention painting, work through how this part of the metaphor corresponds. The author is arguing that without a reserve, colours, like troops, will be confused and without order and therefore useless. For this to be true, the author must also believe that a painting without order suffers artistically, choice (A). To test an assumption in your practice, use the denial test: If the author does in fact assume X, the argument should fall apart if X is false. In this case, if chaotic painting can have an artistic effect, then the author‘s point about confused troops becomes meaningless. The assumption as it is written is therefore valid.

(A): The correct answer

(B): Distortion. While the colours lack direction, there‘s nothing in the metaphor to indicate the artist resists direction.

(C): Out of Scope. Nothing in the statement is correlated to the author‘s general mental state.

(D): Out of Scope. This answer choice mentions confusion, which is also mentioned in the statement. The relevance stops there, though, as the rest of the answer choice is off-topic.

(E): Out of scope. This doesn‘t have to be assumed by the author.


Hope it helps


Hi,
Regarding Q3, should I focus on the tone/approach of the passage over logic?
Option E is a direct assumption, if this were to be critically reasoned. I know this is not a CR question. And I agree E has an extreme language use. And I do understand that the author, in the passage is making parallel comparisons with every aspect of war with painting.
If the option E had something about painting, just as the other options, I would have went ahead with A. But given there was a direct assumption, and a metaphorical comparison, I chose E over A.


Hi there,

I'm still unsure why you went with E over A. A is the perfect answer choice imo, while E is simply not a required assumption A maintains the metaphor, while strengthening the metaphor's application to painting. Perhaps an artist can paint chaotically and still create an effective painting. A plugs the gap in the analogy.

E is not an required assumption, as the wording is far too general. We are only concerned about the need for guidance "last reserves" of troops in a battle. We don't care about the need for guidance of troops generally.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17276
Own Kudos [?]: 850 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In all battles two things are usually required of the Commander-in-Chi [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In all battles two things are usually required of the Commander-in-Chi [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6927 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14022 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne