Last visit was: 04 May 2024, 07:55 It is currently 04 May 2024, 07:55

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93027
Own Kudos [?]: 621136 [3]
Given Kudos: 81744
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93027
Own Kudos [?]: 621136 [2]
Given Kudos: 81744
Send PM
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Sep 2021
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 45
Location: Spain
Concentration: Finance, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V35
GPA: 3.7
Send PM
VP
VP
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Posts: 1487
Own Kudos [?]: 2301 [1]
Given Kudos: 114
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q169 V168

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist" is both a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
My answer is (E). It took me 58 seconds.

(A) "Both" should be paired with "And“, not "As well as".
(B) The sentence's subject (Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist") is singular.
(C) See above.

(DE) do not contain evident issues. The only difference between (D) and (E) are the "very" in "D". I have to say that an actual GMAT question would not present such a split. But we can come up with several reasons against the use of "very".
<1> "very" is a hugely overused word. To the untrained ears, "very provocative" and "provocative" invoke similar emotional response. In that case, "very" is redundant.
<2> To be parallel with “a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past“, in which no adverb is used to emphasize intensity of the speedy crash course or the tumultuous past, we may get the hint and be reluctant to throw in ”very“.

Ultimately, the sentence writer may claim that (D) can be easily eliminated because (A) does not use "very". Such argument should be rejected though because each version should be evaluated independently. (A) does not necessarily present a view that matches the so-called intended meaning.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Posts: 321
Own Kudos [?]: 270 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: United States (NH)
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
Schools: Wharton '25
WE:Information Technology (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Re: Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist" is both a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
A. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative
both X and Y is the correct idiom. Eliminate

B. documentary "The Agronomist" are both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative
both X and Y is the correct idiom. Eliminate

C. documentary "The Agronomist" are both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a provocative
documentary is singular and don't agree with linking verb 'are'. Eliminate

D. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a very provocative
'a crash course' is not parallel with 'a very provocative'. Eliminate

E. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a provocative
Fixes all the issues in the earlier options and grammatically correct.

So E is the best answer choice.
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Apr 2019
Status:Learning
Posts: 748
Own Kudos [?]: 583 [1]
Given Kudos: 49
Send PM
Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist" is both a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Correct Option E

Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative visit with one of its most colorful citizens

Sentence Exam on:
- SV Agreement
- Idiom Both X and Y

both X and Y is parallel structure, and both elements are regarded equally.
X as well as Y X is the main focus and Y is an afterthought, of secondary importance
they are definitely not presented rhetorically as equals.
This second structure is NOT parallelism.

Both X and Y - has to be parallel and equally important
X = a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past
Y = a provocative visit with one of its most colorful citizens

Eliminate A, and B, based on above knowledge.

A. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative - Wrong
B. documentary "The Agronomist" are both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative - Wrong

Eliminate C - SV Agreement flaw
"The Agronomist" - Singular and verb used "are"
C. documentary "The Agronomist" are both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a provocative - Wrong

Eliminate D - Parallelism flaw and use of very adjective before provocative
D. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a very provocative - Wrong

Correct Answer E
E. documentary "The Agronomist" is both
- a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and
- a provocative
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2020
Posts: 73
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 43
Send PM
Re: Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist" is both a [#permalink]
Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative visit with one of its most colorful citizens


A. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative - the structure of the 'idiom' (not sure if its an idiom lol) - both x... And Y, here its both... as well as.. - hence eliminated.
B. documentary "The Agronomist" are both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative - the subject is singular and hence 'is' is the appropriate verb and not 'are', - hence eliminated.
C. documentary "The Agronomist" are both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a provocative- the subject is singular and hence 'is' is the appropriate verb and not 'are', - hence eliminated.
D. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a very provocative - Perfect but the word 'Very' changes the meaning of the sentence. - hence eliminated.
E. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a provocative - Looks perfect!
ISB & IIM Moderator
Joined: 17 Mar 2021
Posts: 288
Own Kudos [?]: 121 [0]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
GPA: 3.5
Send PM
Re: Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist" is both a [#permalink]
It took me 44secs to solve

Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative visit with one of its most colorful citizens


A. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative - Idiom is Both X and Y
B. documentary "The Agronomist" are both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative - SV ERROR
C. documentary "The Agronomist" are both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a provocative - SV ERROR
D. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a very provocative - Use of word "very" is redundant
E. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a provocative - Correct

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2020
Posts: 125
Own Kudos [?]: 128 [0]
Given Kudos: 77
Send PM
Re: Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist" is both a [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative visit with one of its most colorful citizens


A. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative

This answer choice is grammatically incorrect. The correct idiom is both A and B.


B. documentary "The Agronomist" are both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative

This answer choice repeats the original mistake. The correct idiom is both A and B.

In addition, this answer choice creates a Subject Verb Agreement mistake by replacing the singular verb is with the plural form are.



C. documentary "The Agronomist" are both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a provocative

While this answer choice corrects the original mistake, it creates a Subject Verb Agreement mistake by replacing the singular verb is with the plural form are.


D. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a very provocative

While this answer choice corrects the original mistake, it changes the meaning of the original sentence by adding the word very.


E. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a provocative

CORRECT


Not clear as to why "is" is correct here? shouldn't "BOTH" be preceded by "are" since "both" is plural?
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5124
Own Kudos [?]: 4684 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist" is both a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
VelvetThunder wrote:
Bunuel wrote:

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative visit with one of its most colorful citizens


A. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative

This answer choice is grammatically incorrect. The correct idiom is both A and B.


B. documentary "The Agronomist" are both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past as well as a provocative

This answer choice repeats the original mistake. The correct idiom is both A and B.

In addition, this answer choice creates a Subject Verb Agreement mistake by replacing the singular verb is with the plural form are.



C. documentary "The Agronomist" are both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a provocative

While this answer choice corrects the original mistake, it creates a Subject Verb Agreement mistake by replacing the singular verb is with the plural form are.


D. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a very provocative

While this answer choice corrects the original mistake, it changes the meaning of the original sentence by adding the word very.


E. documentary "The Agronomist" is both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a provocative

CORRECT


Not clear as to why "is" is correct here? shouldn't "BOTH" be preceded by "are" since "both" is plural?


Hello VelvetThunder,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe we can resolve your doubt.

You are correct that "both a crash course in the nation's tumultuous past and a provocative visit" is a plural noun phrase, however, this phrase is the object of the sentence, not the subject. The subject of the sentence - the "doer" of the action "is" - is the action of "Watching", which is singular.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Watching Jonathan Demme's 2004 documentary "The Agronomist" is both a [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6925 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne