NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 13:24 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 13:24
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
noboru
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 543
Own Kudos [?]: 8534 [28]
Given Kudos: 2
Schools:CBS
 Q50  V37
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Send PM
Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   19 Jul 2010, 15:34
1
Kudos
27
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

64% (02:06) correct 36% (02:19) wrong based on 1559 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of the size that the wild cheetah population must be in order for these animals to survive a natural disaster in the African grasslands region were too small, and the current population barely meets the previous estimates. At present, however, there is not enough African grassland to support a wild cheetah population larger than the current population.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following conclusions?


(A) Previous estimates of the size of the existing wild cheetah population were inaccurate.

(B) The cheetah’s natural habitat is decreasing in size at a faster rate than is the size of the wild cheetah population.

(C) The principal threat to the endangered wild cheetah population is neither pollution nor hunting, but a natural disaster.

(D) In the short term, the wild cheetah population will be incapable of surviving a natural disaster in the African grasslands.

(E) In regions where land is suitable for cheetah habitation, more natural disasters are expected to occur during the next decade than occurred during the past decade.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
D
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
pqhai
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 871
Own Kudos [?]: 8554 [12]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Send PM
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   22 Aug 2014, 14:41
12
Kudos
supergrad wrote:
if D is the answer can someone please explain how the passage supports the claim that the size of grassland and cheetah population is not increasing, the passage doesn't give any information on the trend


Hi supergrad.

I'm glad to help.

THEORIES:
Conclusion question.
Correct answer:
Must pass the “Fact test”. Do not infer too far, just stick to premises.
Must show the main point, not just repeat the premises.
Wrong answers:
Pass the fact test, but only rephrase the premises (repeat one, two premises or combination of premises)
Out of scope or infer too far (not pass the fact test).

STIMULUS:
Fact 1: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Necessary condition.
Fact 2: Previous estimates of the size that the wild cheetah population must be in order for these animals to survive a natural disaster in the African grasslands region were too small. FACT
Fact 3: The current population barely meets the previous estimates. FACT
Fact 4: At present there is not enough African grassland to support a wild cheetah population larger than the current population. --> Necessary condition is not met.

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:
Fact 2 means previous cheetah population needed to survive a natural disaster was too small.
Fact 3 means the current cheetah population is even smaller that that in the past. It means the current cheetah population is not enough to survive a natural disaster.
Fact 4 means the current cheetah population can’t become larger because there is not enough African grassland. Fact 4 clearly states that the cheetah population is not increasing, at least in the short term.

Combine fact 2, 3, 4 we can say that in the short term, the wild cheetah population will be incapable of surviving a natural disaster in the African grasslands.

Thus, D is correct.

Hope it’s clear.
User avatar
L
KarishmaB
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14831
Own Kudos [?]: 64940 [6]
Given Kudos: 427
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   26 Sep 2012, 20:03
6
Kudos
Expert Reply
joshnsit wrote:
Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of the size that the wild cheetah population must be in order for these animals to survive a natural disaster in the African grasslands region were too small, and the current population barely meets the previous estimates, At present, however, there is not enough African grassland to support a wild cheetah population larger than the current population.
The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following conclusions?
(A) Previous estimates of the size of the existing wild cheetah population were inaccurate.
(B) The cheetah's natural habitat is decreasing in size at a faster rate than is the size of the wild cheetah population.
(C) The principal threat to the endangered wild cheetah population is neither pollution nor hunting, but a natural disaster.
(D) In the short term, the wild cheetah population will be incapable of surviving a natural disaster in the African grasslands.
(E) In regions where land is suitable for cheetah habitation, more natural disasters are expected to occur during the next decade than occurred during the past decade.

Please comment your reasons while giving answer options. I will come back with OA once I get some correct reasoning flowing in.
Also, let me know which kind of question type this question is...


You should try to think ahead of what you are expecting from your answer option.

Look at the argument:
Previous estimates of 'cheetah population required to survive a natural disaster' were too small. (e.g. Previous estimate - if there are 100 cheetahs, they can survive a natural disaster. This estimate is too small. You perhaps need at least 200 to survive a natural disaster)
The current population barely meets the previous estimates. (The current pop is barely 100)
At present there is not enough African grassland to support a wild cheetah population larger than the current population. (So the population can't increase in the short term)

What can you say from this? What does this lead to?

That in the short term, if there is a natural disaster, the cheetahs probably will not survive it. (Option D)

(A) Previous estimates of the size of the existing wild cheetah population were inaccurate.
No. Previous estimates of 'cheetah population required to survive a natural disaster' were inaccurate. Not the estimates of current cheetah population.

(B) The cheetah's natural habitat is decreasing in size at a faster rate than is the size of the wild cheetah population.
The argument doesn't say that the natural habitat is decreasing. It only says that at present, it cannot increase. The rate of increase/decrease is anyway out of question.
General Discussion
User avatar
B
dentobizz
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 404
Own Kudos [?]: 1833 [1]
Given Kudos: 370
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Health Care)
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   08 Nov 2013, 05:43
1
Kudos
Bumping for Review and Discussion**
New Gmat club Project Click here

Theory on Must be true/Inference Questions

E-gmat
inference-vs-assumption-146758.html?hilit=MUST%20BE%20TRUE/%20INFERENCE

Kaplan
https://gmat.kaptest.com/2012/07/11/gmat ... niFDi.dpbs

Veritasprep
https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/veritas-prep-resource-links-no-longer-available-399979.html#/2012/12 ... questions/

Knewton
https://www.knewton.com/blog/inference-3/

Mangoosh Gmat
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-criti ... inference/

Manhattan Gmat
https://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... e-problem/

Vimeo videos




Thrusdays with Ron
avatar
supergrad
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Dec 2013
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   22 Aug 2014, 10:28
if D is the answer can someone please explain how the passage supports the claim that the size of grassland and cheetah population is not increasing, the passage doesn't give any information on the trend
avatar
AmithKumarSingh
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Aug 2014
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   22 Aug 2014, 23:19
1
Kudos
It not an easy task to get to the right conclusion here, thanks to the wordy premises ;)
Facts and premises are explained well in above post. I will go for an example case :)

from the 1st statement it is clear that though Cheetahs population was less, the grassland area was good enough,if not great.

Case1; in 10 sqkm area there are 20 cheetahs. Natural disaster-->very low chances that many cheetahs getting effected, but still the effect is huge as population is less.

Case2: Huge reduction in grassland area: 5 sqkm existing. Chettahs-16 (less than earlier 20)
But here if natural disaster occurs, more cheetahs will get affected as they are confined in less area to save their lives. and at the same time more cheetah's are influenced by the disaster coz of limitations.

So I went with D as it brings out this case :)

If it is not clear, plz let me know, i will try up presenting in a better way.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatAllenT
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 25 Jul 2014
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 140 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   24 Aug 2014, 11:04
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
mahendru1992 wrote:
Okay what I don't understand is the use of the words in the short term . Let me explain:-
We already know that the previous estimates were wrong and way too small to survive a natural disaster. We also know that the current population barely meets the previous estimates. Thus, we can infer that today, the current population is incapable of surviving a natural disaster. So why the use of in the short term. These words were the only I reason I discounted this statement


Hi mahendru1992,

Happy to help. What you're doing is saying that the information in the prompt supports the idea that the Wild Cheetah won't survive a natural disaster beyond just in the short-term. So how is it that we can only infer that its short-term?

The distinction comes down to knowing EXACTLY what this question is asking for. This is an inference question, which means we're asked to find an answer that HAS TO BE TRUE.

It comes down to this: just ask yourself, "do we know for sure that the Wild Cheetah population is incapable of surviving a natural disaster in the short-term?" If you're thinking the incapability is even further than short-term, than the answer to this question would HAVE TO BE: YES!

To use a different example to demonstrate the exact same logic why D has to be right: let's say we know that somebody ran at least 10 miles. Do we know that the person ran at least 1 mile? Yes. Same exact logic. If the data supports a greater range, you can infer a smaller part of that range.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatAllenT
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 25 Jul 2014
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 140 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   24 Aug 2014, 11:20
Expert Reply
mahendru1992 wrote:
AllenEMPOWERgmat wrote:
mahendru1992 wrote:
Okay what I don't understand is the use of the words in the short term . Let me explain:-
We already know that the previous estimates were wrong and way too small to survive a natural disaster. We also know that the current population barely meets the previous estimates. Thus, we can infer that today, the current population is incapable of surviving a natural disaster. So why the use of in the short term. These words were the only I reason I discounted this statement


Hi mahendru1992,

Happy to help. What you're doing is saying that the information in the prompt supports the idea that the Wild Cheetah won't survive a natural disaster beyond just in the short-term. So how is it that we can only infer that its short-term?

The distinction comes down to knowing EXACTLY what this question is asking for. This is an inference question, which means we're asked to find an answer that HAS TO BE TRUE.

It comes down to this: just ask yourself, "do we know for sure that the Wild Cheetah population is incapable of surviving a natural disaster in the short-term?" If you're thinking the incapability is even further than short-term, than the answer to this question would HAVE TO BE: YES!

To use a different example to demonstrate the exact same logic why D has to be right: let's say we know that somebody ran at least 10 miles. Do we know that the person ran at least 1 mile? Yes. Same exact logic. If the data supports a greater range, you can infer a smaller part of that range.

Thanks for answering allenempowergmat
But if we do take a parallel example, shouldn't the analogy be if the person ran atleast 1 mile, could he have ran 10 miles? And the answer is of course he couldn't or maybe he did, but we don't know for sure.


Hi mahendru1992,

I think you may have mis-read. The fact was that he ran AT LEAST 10 miles. If he ran at least 10 miles, do we know that he ran at least 1? Of course. See the distinction?
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatAllenT
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 25 Jul 2014
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 140 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   25 Aug 2014, 10:43
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
mahendru1992 wrote:
AllenEMPOWERgmat wrote:

Hi mahendru1992,

I think you may have mis-read. The fact was that he ran AT LEAST 10 miles. If he ran at least 10 miles, do we know that he ran at least 1? Of course. See the distinction?

Hi, sorry for troubling you, but I don't get it.
Okay, so what you mean is that if in the short term we know that the cheetah population wouldn't survive, then it's obvious that we know that the population wouldn't survive today per se. Am I right?
But what I'm trying to say is that the argument says that today we know that the population wouldn't survive a natural disaster but we don't know anything about the future, even if it's a short one. I mean what if some restoration process occurs which helps in increasing the population or what if they bring other cheetahs from other countries or reserves. This doesn't make sense for a short term, but i'm sure there are other 'what ifs' that do qualify. Don't you think we're assuming too much?
Thanks for bearing with me


Hi mahendru1992,

No trouble at all. Let's lay out all of the facts once more, and you'll see how this goes beyond JUST the present moment:

Previous estimates of the cheetah to survive a natural disaster in the African grasslands region were too small. That means we know the number needs to be bigger.
The current population barely meets the previous estimates. That means that the current population is WAY below what it needs to survive if it doesn't meet the previous estimates which were already too low.
At present, there is not enough African grassland to support a wild cheetah population larger than the current population. This tells us that there is not even enough grassland to support a population any bigger than it is today.

Given those facts, is there any way the wild cheetah could survive a natural disaster of the short-term (say the next few months, maybe even a year?). No way. That's why D has to be right.

I think that the source of your doubt has to do with your definition of short-term. If you were thinking of it as something on the order of say 2-5 years, then, you're right, we can't infer that.
avatar
pate13
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2014
Posts: 62
Own Kudos [?]: 243 [0]
Given Kudos: 86
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
Schools: CBS '20 Tuck '20 Booth '20 Sloan '20
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V41
GMAT 2: 700 Q47 V40
GPA: 3.26
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   29 Oct 2014, 21:08
tuanquang269 wrote:
This is my new project: Renew Old Thread => Back to basic => Just try It and give your reasoning
The topic will be sticky for 2 days from starting


Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of the size that the wild cheetah population must be in order for these animals to survive a natural disaster in the African grasslands region were too small, and the current population barely meets the previous estimates, At present, however, there is not enough African grassland to support a wild cheetah population larger than the current population.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following conclusions?

(A) Previous estimates of the size of the existing wild cheetah population were inaccurate.
(B) The cheetah's natural habitat is decreasing in size at a faster rate than is the size of the wild cheetah population.
(C) The principal threat to the endangered wild cheetah population is neither pollution nor hunting, but a natural disaster.
(D) In the short term, the wild cheetah population will be incapable of surviving a natural disaster in the African grasslands.
(E) In regions where land is suitable for cheetah habitation, more natural disasters are expected to occur during the next decade than occurred during the past decade.



While I understand what this question is trying to say, and I answered it correctly, I think this is a poor question. Is it really true that the population would be INCAPABLE of surviving a natural disaster? Even if there is a .000001% chance of the population surviving, it still isn't incapable of surviving. Absolute language on CR questions is usually a major indicator that an answer choice is wrong. I think D would be a lot better stated, and more accurate, if it said "In the short term, the wild cheetah population would probably not survive a natural disaster in the African grasslands."
User avatar
KyleWiddison
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 782
Own Kudos [?]: 2583 [2]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   30 Oct 2014, 10:13
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
pate13 wrote:
tuanquang269 wrote:
This is my new project: Renew Old Thread => Back to basic => Just try It and give your reasoning
The topic will be sticky for 2 days from starting


Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of the size that the wild cheetah population must be in order for these animals to survive a natural disaster in the African grasslands region were too small, and the current population barely meets the previous estimates, At present, however, there is not enough African grassland to support a wild cheetah population larger than the current population.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following conclusions?

(A) Previous estimates of the size of the existing wild cheetah population were inaccurate.
(B) The cheetah's natural habitat is decreasing in size at a faster rate than is the size of the wild cheetah population.
(C) The principal threat to the endangered wild cheetah population is neither pollution nor hunting, but a natural disaster.
(D) In the short term, the wild cheetah population will be incapable of surviving a natural disaster in the African grasslands.
(E) In regions where land is suitable for cheetah habitation, more natural disasters are expected to occur during the next decade than occurred during the past decade.



While I understand what this question is trying to say, and I answered it correctly, I think this is a poor question. Is it really true that the population would be INCAPABLE of surviving a natural disaster? Even if there is a .000001% chance of the population surviving, it still isn't incapable of surviving. Absolute language on CR questions is usually a major indicator that an answer choice is wrong. I think D would be a lot better stated, and more accurate, if it said "In the short term, the wild cheetah population would probably not survive a natural disaster in the African grasslands."


You are correct that the answer for these "draw a conclusion" questions will often be weak or trivial, but that is not a requirement. The real standard is to stay close to the precise wording of the argument and avoid answer choices that are STRONGER than the premises of the argument.

If you look at the premises here, you will find very strong language throughout: "size...must be...to survive", "too small", "not enough". These are very definitive statements and the answer choice isn't stronger than those premises.

That said, I agree that on the GMAT you would probably see a bit softer language, similar to what you have suggested. A good example of this is #103 - the Patria trade embargo question. The correct answer states: "Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time." Instead of absolute language like "will fail" the GMAT used "would be likely to fail".

KW
User avatar
S
talismaaniac
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 72
Own Kudos [?]: 337 [0]
Given Kudos: 95
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT Date: 09-28-2012
WE:Accounting (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   17 Aug 2017, 04:52
Is my reasoning faulty? The estimated population size for wild cheetah to survive natural disaster was small. And current population is below the estimate, and African grassland cannot sustain even that.
First. Congrats all the existing wild cheetahs. This is great news for you. Earlier you had your competition. Now you are few and free. Whoa!
However, what is the African Grassland has to do with that? May be to accommodate the Cheetahs. Wait! So do you mean that earlier the African Grassland was able to accommodate the estimated population, and now the current population is even low, and the Grassland is not even able to support that.
Therefore, the grassland must be shrinking, that too at a faster rate.

D says natural disaster in the short term. However, what has the natural disaster to do with the size of grassland? Why was natural disaster mentioned in the first place?
User avatar
L
KarishmaB
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14831
Own Kudos [?]: 64940 [1]
Given Kudos: 427
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   18 Aug 2017, 03:20
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
talismaaniac wrote:
Is my reasoning faulty? The estimated population size for wild cheetah to survive natural disaster was small. And current population is below the estimate, and African grassland cannot sustain even that.
First. Congrats all the existing wild cheetahs. This is great news for you. Earlier you had your competition. Now you are few and free. Whoa!
However, what is the African Grassland has to do with that? May be to accommodate the Cheetahs. Wait! So do you mean that earlier the African Grassland was able to accommodate the estimated population, and now the current population is even low, and the Grassland is not even able to support that.
Therefore, the grassland must be shrinking, that too at a faster rate.

D says natural disaster in the short term. However, what has the natural disaster to do with the size of grassland? Why was natural disaster mentioned in the first place?


I think you haven't understood the argument properly.

Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of the size that the wild cheetah population must be in order for these animals to survive a natural disaster in the African grasslands region were too small,

The previous estimates were too small. That means they were not accurate. The actual value of "the actual size that the wild cheetah population must be in order for these animals to survive a natural disaster in the African grasslands region" should be greater.

and the current population barely meets the previous estimates,

The current population is less than the pervious estimates.

At present, however, there is not enough African grassland to support a wild cheetah population larger than the current population.
But the grassland can support only current population, not larger.

So what will happen if there is a natural disaster in the near future?

The cheetah population is much less than that required to survive a natural disaster. So it will probably not survive.
Hence answer is (D)

What is the relevance of "short term"? We can't say the same thing about long term (because the cheetah population might grow).
User avatar
G
GDT
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2020
Posts: 250
Own Kudos [?]: 102 [0]
Given Kudos: 477
Send PM
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   18 Mar 2020, 03:42
(A) Previous estimates of the size of the existing wild cheetah population were inaccurate.estimates were of wild cheetah popn. required to survive a natural disaster not of the actual existing popn.

(B) The cheetah’s natural habitat is decreasing in size at a faster rate than is the size of the wild cheetah population.We don't know of the comparative rates but only that both these rates are falling

(C) The principal threat to the endangered wild cheetah population is neither pollution nor hunting, but a natural disaster.Whether natural disaster is a principal threat or not is not mentioned or pointed out in the stimulus

(D) In the short term, the wild cheetah population will be incapable of surviving a natural disaster in the African grasslands.Since we know that at present wild cheetah popn. barely meets our estimate of min. popn. required to survive the natural disaster, so in case of such a happening now as per stimulus we can conclude that they won't be able to survive

(E) In regions where land is suitable for cheetah habitation, more natural disasters are expected to occur during the next decade than occurred during the past decade.Nothing is mentioned in the stimulus in this regard
User avatar
P
bidskamikaze
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2018
Posts: 268
Own Kudos [?]: 265 [0]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
Schools: ESMT NUS '22 IIMA PGPX'23 NTU
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   18 Mar 2021, 08:48
noboru wrote:
Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of the size that the wild cheetah population must be in order for these animals to survive a natural disaster in the African grasslands region were too small, and the current population barely meets the previous estimates. At present, however, there is not enough African grassland to support a wild cheetah population larger than the current population.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following conclusions?


(A) Previous estimates of the size of the existing wild cheetah population were inaccurate.

(B) The cheetah’s natural habitat is decreasing in size at a faster rate than is the size of the wild cheetah population.

(C) The principal threat to the endangered wild cheetah population is neither pollution nor hunting, but a natural disaster.

(D) In the short term, the wild cheetah population will be incapable of surviving a natural disaster in the African grasslands.

(E) In regions where land is suitable for cheetah habitation, more natural disasters are expected to occur during the next decade than occurred during the past decade.


- Previous estimates of the size that the wild cheetah population were too small
- Current population barely meets the previous estimates.
- At present, there is not enough African grassland to support a wild cheetah population larger than the current population.

CONCLUSION: (D) In the short term, the wild cheetah population will be incapable of surviving a natural disaster in the African grasslands.

Answer D.
User avatar
VerbalBot
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17226
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink] New post   03 Sep 2023, 12:26
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Wild cheetahs live in the African grasslands. Previous estimates of th [#permalink]
03 Sep 2023, 12:26
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
mysterymanrog
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions