Last visit was: 25 Jul 2024, 08:11 It is currently 25 Jul 2024, 08:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Posts: 1060
Own Kudos [?]: 2169 [16]
Given Kudos: 77
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Posts: 241
Own Kudos [?]: 123 [0]
Given Kudos: 50
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 103 [0]
Given Kudos: 84
Location: United States
Send PM
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Posts: 1060
Own Kudos [?]: 2169 [1]
Given Kudos: 77
Send PM
Re: A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids... [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
sonusaini1 wrote:
A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids damages if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify about proper medical procedures.

A) if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify( correct)
B) unless there will be another doctor to testify( if then construction conveys the intended meaning better)
C) without another doctor's testimony( doesn't convey the meaning)
D) should there be no testimony from some other doctor( awkward construction)¹1
E) lacking another doctor to testify( present participle incorrectly modifies the damages)

Both options A and B seems ok but I will go with A.

Please correct me if I am wrong

Thanks


Try one more time. Your answer is not correct!!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2018
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 32 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.88
Send PM
Re: A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids... [#permalink]
Choice D. Properly conveys the meaning. Kinda hard to explain why it's the right answer but here goes!

A: Don't think the conditional If is appropriate here
B: Structure seems off
C: Meaning distorted I think
D: Awkward but I couldn't find any faults with it
E: should be lacking another doctor's testimony..

Please let me know if I'm right!
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Posts: 1060
Own Kudos [?]: 2169 [0]
Given Kudos: 77
Send PM
Re: A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids... [#permalink]
gmatconqueror2018 wrote:
Choice D. Properly conveys the meaning. Kinda hard to explain why it's the right answer but here goes!

A: Don't think the conditional If is appropriate here
B: Structure seems off
C: Meaning distorted I think
D: Awkward but I couldn't find any faults with it
E: should be lacking another doctor's testimony..

Please let me know if I'm right!


Your answer is not correct!! Try one more time!!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Posts: 161
Own Kudos [?]: 165 [0]
Given Kudos: 22
Send PM
Re: A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids... [#permalink]
Imo E

A) if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify---incorrect, some other redundant in this sentence
B) unless there will be another doctor to testify---incorrect, there is no condition in sentence
C) without another doctor's testimony---jncorrect meaning issues
D) should there be no testimony from some other doctor---incorrect, no moral obligation s mentioned
E) lacking another doctor to testify ---correct, lacking modifies previous noun

Posted from my mobile device
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Posts: 1060
Own Kudos [?]: 2169 [1]
Given Kudos: 77
Send PM
Re: A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids... [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Yash312 wrote:
Imo E

A) if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify---incorrect, some other redundant in this sentence
B) unless there will be another doctor to testify---incorrect, there is no condition in sentence
C) without another doctor's testimony---jncorrect meaning issues
D) should there be no testimony from some other doctor---incorrect, no moral obligation s mentioned
E) lacking another doctor to testify ---correct, lacking modifies previous noun

Posted from my mobile device


Your answer is not correct!! Try one more time!!
Director
Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Posts: 663
Own Kudos [?]: 736 [3]
Given Kudos: 362
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q47 V44
GPA: 3.4
Send PM
A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids... [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
It seems like this Kaplan question is pretty much just a rewording of the following OG question:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-patient-ac ... 79284.html

The most popular answer on the other thread sheds some light on why "B" is not the correct answer:

@RisingForceX :
"In my view, (B) is wrong.

After searching the usage of "unless" on the internet, then I found this example:

"Unless she hurries up, we won't arrive in time."

You'll see that it uses present simple tense in the unless clause, and uses future tense (will not) in the Then clause.

Then look at this problem, you'll see that it already uses "will" in the Then Clause. Therefore, it is not able to use future tense again in the Unless clause.
"

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Chris
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Posts: 1060
Own Kudos [?]: 2169 [1]
Given Kudos: 77
Send PM
A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids... [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Arro44 wrote:
It seems like this Kaplan question is pretty much just a rewording of the following OG question:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-patient-ac ... 79284.html


Hi! You have a very nice eye for details and memory :)

I got this question in a Kaplan Practice test!!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Dec 2020
Posts: 123
Own Kudos [?]: 47 [0]
Given Kudos: 56
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Operations, Economics
Schools: Booth '26
GPA: 3.7
Send PM
Re: A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids... [#permalink]
CAMANISHPARMAR wrote:
A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids damages if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify about proper medical procedures.

A) if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify
B) unless there will be another doctor to testify
C) without another doctor's testimony
D) should there be no testimony from some other doctor
E) lacking another doctor to testify



Requesting experts to please tell why D is wrong? I have read such sentences in articles.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Feb 2023
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V36
Send PM
Re: A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids... [#permalink]
Can you tell me if my reasoning is correct?

A) if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify // Testify about is wrong idiom
B) unless there will be another doctor to testify // Testify about is wrong idiom
C) without another doctor's testimony // Testimony about is correct
D) should there be no testimony from some other doctor // about is quite far from testimony, might have dual meanings
E) lacking another doctor to testify // Testify about is wrong idiom
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Apr 2023
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 12
Send PM
Re: A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids... [#permalink]
AndrewN, KarishmaB, GMATNinja, MartyTargetTestPrep

Can someone please help explain the correct answer (C) & why isn't (D) correct? TIA!!
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 15153
Own Kudos [?]: 66872 [1]
Given Kudos: 436
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids... [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
CattoSiddy wrote:
AndrewN, KarishmaB, GMATNinja, MartyTargetTestPrep

Can someone please help explain the correct answer (C) & why isn't (D) correct? TIA!!


If the answer is (C), I don't even understand what the sentence is trying to convey. I would just ignore the question since it isn't an official question.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Jul 2017
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Location: India
Send PM
Re: A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids... [#permalink]
Can anyone clear why D is incorrect and reason for the correct answer?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A lawyer defending a doctor from malpractice charges easily avoids... [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6985 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts