Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the

Question

Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder.

I would like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. I would propose that scientific archeological expeditions and governmental authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal excavator’s grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities.

You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. I agree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong.

I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of one another. In one small  excavation in Cyprus , archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as  l’melekh  handles have been found in abundance—more than 4,000 examples so far.

The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalogue the finds; as a result, they cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes.

It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it?   1 
 1. The primary purpose of the passage is to propose

(A) an alternative to museum display of artifacts
(B) a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession
(C) a way to distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value
(D) the governmental regulation of archaeological sites
(E) a new system for cataloguing duplicate artifacts

2 
 2. The author implies that all of the following statements about duplicate artifacts are true EXCEPT:

(A) A market for such artifacts already exists.
(B) Such artifacts seldom have scientific value.
(C) There is likely to be a continuing supply of such artifacts.
(D) Museums are well supplied with examples of such artifacts.
(E) Such artifacts frequently exceed in quality those already catalogued in museum collections.

3 
 3. Which of the following is mentioned in the passage as a disadvantage of storing artifacts in museum basements?

(A) Museum officials rarely allow scholars access to such artifacts.
(B) Space that could be better used for display is taken up for storage.
(C) Artifacts discovered in one excavation often become separated from each other.
(D) Such artifacts are often damaged by variations in temperature and humidity.
(E) Such artifacts’ often remain uncatalogued and thus cannot be located once they are put in storage.

4 
 4. The author mentions the  excavation in Cyprus  (lines 31-34) to emphasize which of the following points?

(A) Ancient lamps and pottery vessels are less valuable, although more rare, than royal seal impressions.
(B) Artifacts that are very similar to each other present cataloguing difficulties to archaeologists.
(C) Artifacts that are not uniquely valuable, and therefore could be sold, are available in large quantities.
(D) Cyprus is the most important location for unearthing large quantities of salable artifacts.
(E) Illegal sales of duplicate artifacts are wide-spread, particularly on the island of Cyprus.

5 
 5. The author’s argument concerning the effect of the official sale of duplicate artifacts on illegal excavation is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Prospective purchasers would prefer to buy authenticated artifacts.
(B) The price of illegally excavated artifacts would rise.
(C) Computers could be used to trace sold artifacts.
(D) Illegal excavators would be forced to sell only duplicate artifacts.
(E) Money gained from selling authenticated artifacts could be used to investigate and prosecute illegal excavators.

6 
 6. The author anticipates which of the following initial objections to the adoption of his proposal?

(A) Museum officials will become unwilling to store artifacts.
(B) An oversupply of salable artifacts will result and the demand for them will fall.
(C) Artifacts that would have been displayed in public places will be sold to private collectors.
(D) Illegal excavators will have an even larger supply of artifacts for resale.
(E) Counterfeiting of artifacts will become more commonplace.

7 
 7. The author implies that which of the following would occur if duplicate artifacts were sold on the open market?

I. Illegal excavation would eventually cease completely.
II. Cyprus would become the primary source of marketable duplicate artifacts.
III. Archaeologists would be able to publish the results of their excavations more frequently than they currently do.

(A) I only
(B) III only
(C) I and II only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III

Question 5 - Official Explanation

The best answer is A.

The author's argument concerning the effect of the official sale of duplicate artifacts on illegal excavation appears in lines 51-52, in which the author predicts that such official sale  would reduce demand  for " the clandestine product ."

The rhetorical question that follows (lines 52-55) indicates that the author finds it unlikely that any purchaser would prefer objects of unknown provenance to objects of known origin, or, to rephrase, the author assumes that most people would prefer to purchase objects of authenticated provenance, as choice A states.

The author's argument concerning the effect of such sales on illegal excavation does not assume any of the other answer choices.

Question 6 - Official Explanation

The best answer is C. The author begins the third paragraph by saying "You might object..." in order to anticipate possible objections to the adoption of his proposal. In the next sentence the author asserts that "ancient artifacts...should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder" (lines 21-24), acknowledging an opponent's fear that individuals might be allowed to purchase objects that ought to be displayed in public institutions. This objection is paraphrased in choice C. Choice A alludes to a situation that shows the benefits, not the drawbacks, of the author's proposal; B, D, and E describe situations that are not discussed in the passage.

dgr8sandeep · Accepted Answer

Explanation for Q6.

As stated in the passage "You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder."

Option C says 'Artifacts that would have been displayed in public places will be sold to private collectors' . This option says that there could be an objection that artifacts would be would now not be displayed but sold. That's the initial objection that one can have for the author's suggestion.

mbaiseasy · Answer

P1: 2 Major Problems (1) lack of funds and (2) illegal excavation

P2: Outrageous suggestion on how to solve both problems in P1

P3: Possible objection that archaelogical excavation is to acquire knowledge, not money; The author qualified the artifacts for open market as those with no unique artistic merit or scientific value; not all artifacts have scientific value

P4: Example of duplicate artifacts in large number

P5: storage problem in museum; difficult to catalogue; so sell those in duplicates; marked artifacts are preferred over illegally excavated artifacts

*********************

The author implies that all of the following statements about duplicate artifacts are true EXCEPT:
 
A) A market for such artifacts already exists.
 there are bidders in the illegal market - Yes! 
 
B) Such artifacts seldom have scientific value.
 duplicate and not rare items come in super large quantities... Go to Paragraph 3 and then followed by examples in Paragraph 4 -Yes!

C) There is likely to be a continuing supply of such artifacts.
 The author mentioned: "The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered
in the future." - Yes!  
 
D) Museums are well supplied with examples of such artifacts.
 This one is a bit tricky. They mentioned an excavation in Cyprus with large supplies of duplicate artifacts. It wasn't mentioned that they were placed in Museum.. So I keep this - Yet I had doubt that this could be correct... 
 
E) Such artifacts frequently exceed in quality those already catalogued in museum collections.
 Now, quality.. this waasn't mentioned anywhere in the museum... The issue with catalogue was the difficulty of doing so..

Answer: E

The author's argument concerning the effect of the official sale of duplicate artifacts on illegal excavation is based on which of the following assumptions?
 
A) Prospective purchasers would prefer to buy authenticated artifacts.
 This is in the last paragraph. "Who would want an unmarked
pot when another was available whose provenance was
known, and that was dated stratigraphically by the
professional archaeologist who excavated it? 
" 
 
B) The price of illegally excavated artifacts would rise.
 Pricing was not mentioned anywhere... There was a mention of so called to the highest bidder but no such prediction of rising in price 
 
C) Computers could be used to trace sold artifacts.
 This is not one of the effects.... This was just mentioned to rest assure that sold artifacts are retrievable... This is something already occuring even before the proposal... 
 
D) Illegal excavators would be forced to sell only duplicate artifacts.
 The goal is to make illegal excavators decrease and not to sway them to sell a type of artifacts... 
 
E) Money gained from selling authenticated artifacts could be used to investigate and prosecute illegal excavators.
 Wow! This is nice but not mentioned.

Answer: A

The author mentions the excavation in Cyprus (lines 31-34) to emphasize which of the following points?
 
A) Ancient lamps and pottery vessels are less valuable, although more rare, than royal seal impressions.
 These were mentioned to show the large supply of these artifacts.... Not to compare their value... 
 
B) Artifacts that are very similar to each other present cataloguing difficulties to archaeologists.
 Catalogue difficulty is because of lack of money 
 
C) Artifacts that are not uniquely valuable, and therefore could be sold, are available in large quantities.
 Bingo! 
 
D) Cyprus is the most important location for unearthing large quantities of salable artifacts.
 Wow! Not mentioned! 
 
E) Illegal sales of duplicate artifacts are wide-spread, particularly on the island of Cyprus. 
 Wow! No such association was made!

Answer: C

jabhatta2 · Answer

GMATNinja Question 1 -- how to differentiate between A and B ... I selected A

but the OA is B .. OA says A is wrong because "While explaining in paragraph 5 that museums often store countless artifacts unseen in their basement , the author proposes no alternative for museum display of these artifacts" But isn't the author proposing -- that a) excavators sell privately b) (implying : less artifacts will be available for the museum to display once this practice is underway) c) (implying: this activity will be in a way an alternative to museum display as there will be less artifacts to display for the museum) ___________________ 5. The author’s argument concerning the effect of the official sale of duplicate artifacts on illegal excavation is based on which of the following assumptions? (A) Prospective purchasers would prefer to buy authenticated artifacts. (B) The price of illegally excavated artifacts would rise. (C) Computers could be used to trace sold artifacts. (D) Illegal excavators would be forced to sell only duplicate artifacts. (E) Money gained from selling authenticated artifacts could be used to investigate and prosecute illegal excavators. I also have a question regarding Q5. It asks the assumption but option (A) is clearly mentioned in the last paragraph of the passage , how can it be assumption. Assumption is something that is unstated. because of this reason I did not mark this option. Yes I agree that other options are cannot be correct but option A has confused me a bit. Can someone explain where am I going wrong . Or am I just over-analyzing

GMATNinja · Answer

The question asks what the  primary purpose  of the passage is, so the correct answer must tell us  the overall purpose  of  the entire passage , not the purpose of a single paragraph.

Sure, we could say that (A) is wrong because it focuses on an alternative to the museum  display  of artifacts, while paragraph 5 focuses on an alternative to  storing artifacts in museum basements  (which is quite different from putting artifacts on display). But a much simpler reason to eliminate (A) is that it's too narrow to represent the primary purpose of the passage.

The question asks us why the author wrote this passage. Choice (A) tells us why the author wrote paragraph 5, and gets a key detail wrong as well. That's why we eliminate it.

Choice (B), on the other hand, is a succinct expression of the passage's purpose. The author is verbose, but ultimately wrote this whole thing to offer a way to fund archaeologists' work while reducing the negative effects of illegal excavation. The author identifies these two problems right up front, then spends the rest of the passage explaining how the act of selling excavated artifacts can solve both.

I hope this helps!

GMATNinja · Answer

Question 7

Let's take these three statements one at a time:

The author admits, "It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market." This suggests that illegal excavation would NOT cease  completely , so we can eliminate the first statement.

One SMALL excavation in Cyprus is mentioned as an example, but the author's idea (to sell excavated artifacts on the open market) would apply to excavations all over the world, not just in Cyprus. We have no reason to believe that Cyprus, and not some other country, would become the primary source of marketable duplicate artifacts. Eliminate II.

We are told that, "Only paltry sums are available for excavating and  even less is available for publishing the results  and preserving the sites once excavated." But if artifacts were sold on the open market, "such sales would provide  substantial funds  for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the  publication of results ."

Archaeologists currently do not have a lot of money to spend on publishing results. But if they sell duplicate artifacts on the open market, those sales will provide funding to publish results. This  suggests  that archaeologists would be able to publish the results of their excavations more frequently than they currently do. Keep III.

Only III works, so (B) is the answer!

Question 5 
 
The author basically says, in the form of a question, that if buyers have a choice between an unmarked pot and another whose provenance (place of origin) was known and that was dated by a professional archaeologist, they will choose the latter. The author talks about what buyers would  choose , not what buyers would  prefer .

If the author had said, "Based on extensive survey data, we know that buyers prefer artifacts whose provenance is known and that are dated by professional archaelogists.", then, yes, (A) would be a repeat of information in the passage. The author's statement (err, question) is basically a  hypothesis  -- one that is based on the ASSUMPTION that buyers would prefer to buy authenticated artifacts.

The author's question is similar to something like this: "If we offer pizza and spam, who wouldn't want the pizza??" Behind that rhetorical question is the assumption that people prefer pizza over spam. If that assumption is incorrect, then the implied argument -- that most or all people would choose pizza -- would be weakened.

I hope that helps!

GMATNinja · Answer

Question 4 
 
We are told that, "in one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard." This example reinforces the point made in the preceding sentence: that there are "thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of one another."

The author is trying to counter the objection that "everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value." If we have 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs, does each one have scientific value? According to the author, no. Sure, we might want to study a few of those jugs and put a few on display at museums. But most of those duplicates will just wind up lost in a museum basement, "as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered" (because they have not been properly cataloged).

The Cyprus excavation is just one example of a large quantity of artifacts that, because they are not uniquely valuable, could be sold (to provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging).

This fits with choice (C): The author mentions the excavation in Cyprus (lines 31-34) to emphasize the point that (C) artifacts that are not uniquely valuable, and therefore could be sold, are available in large quantities.

GMATNinja · Answer

Question 6

In the second paragraph, the author makes the "outrageous" proposal that "scientific archeological expeditions and governmental authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market."

In the third paragraph, he lists some potential objections to that proposal:
 
 "Professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money," AND  
 "Ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder."

Our task in answering question 6 is to choose the answer choice that best reflects one of the two objections listed above.

Nope, not a good match. The author does mention that "basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future," but that doesn't mean that museum officials will become  unwilling  to store artifacts. Eliminate (A).

This doesn't line up with the objections listed. In addition, the author states that "the demand for the  clandestine  product would be substantially reduced" if his proposal were adopted. But that's because he believes that the demand will shift from illegally excavated artifacts to legally excavated artifacts -- he doesn't think that  overall  demand for artifacts will fall. (B) is out.

This aligns with the second objection anticipated by the author: that "ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder."

An item displayed in a public place would be "available for all to appreciate." The hypothetical objection here is that these objects would have been available to the public, but are instead scooped up by private collectors. (C) is looking good.

The author never lists this as a potential objection to his proposal. In fact, he says that his proposal will "break the illegal excavator’s grip on the market." Get rid of (D).

The author never mentions counterfeiting of artifacts, so this is definitely not an objection that he anticipated.

(E) is out, and (C) is the answer to question 6.

I hope that helps!

bmvs · Answer

Hi  GMATNinja ,

My question is not about the passage, but about grammar used in one of the sentences of the paragraph. The sentence reads as below:
There is not enough money even to catalog the finds; as a result, they cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. 
Why are we using Past Perfect Progressive? Why can't we just use "as if they were never discovered" ?

Many thanks!

Hovkial · Answer

OFFICIAL GMAT EXPLANATION TO QUESTION (4)

The best answer is C. In lines 27-29, the author refutes the assertion that every object excavated has potential scientific value and therefore should not be sold. In lines 30-31, the author defines those objects that do not have scientific value: "the thousands of pottery vessels... that are essentially duplicates of one another." The Cyprus excavation appears in the next sentence as an example of one location in which such duplicate artifacts have been found in large quantities. The reference to "2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs" highlights the profusion and uniformity of the Cyprus finds. Thus, the excavation is mentioned in order to emphasize the ready availability of objects that lack unique value and therefore could be sold.

GMATNinja · Answer

First, a disclaimer: this is not an SC question so there is pretty much no point worrying about grammar nuances -- especially things like "past perfect progressive" that rarely come up in GMAT SC questions! (If you're interested in some thoughts on how the GMAT tests verb tenses, check out this video .) Also, remember that the GMAT will NEVER ask you to look at a sentence in a bubble and determine whether it's right or wrong -- your job is always to pick the BEST answer choice out of the five available, so analyzing this one particular sentence on its own, while perhaps interesting, isn't a good use of your study time. All that said, I think it's quite common to use the past perfect after "as if" or "as though" when the action is something that didn't really happen. For example: "Tim is skipping around as if he had won the lottery." - Tim didn't actually win the lottery. Similarly, in the passage, the artifacts actually HAVE been discovered, so "never been discovered" represents something that didn't actually happen. In this case, the past perfect is used. In the unlikely event that this comes up as a decision point on a GMAT SC question, please let us know! Until then, there are much more important things to worry about

.

Sneha2021 · Answer

KarishmaB   GMATNinja

In q2, why A & D are incorrect?

2. The author implies that all of the following statements about duplicate artifacts are true EXCEPT:
(A) A market for such artifacts already exists.
The author suggested to sell duplicate artifacts but there is no info to support that market or demand for duplicate already exist. We know from the passage that "thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps" exist or could be found but demand exists is not mentioned anywhere.

(D) Museums are well supplied with examples of such artifacts.
There are not enough space in basement for artifacts likely to be discovered in future but current supply of duplicate artifacts wasn't mentioned.

The author has discussed about a "possible solution" by selling duplicate artifacts but both A & D focus on market already exist for duplicate artifacts.

Thanks for your time!

Sneha2021 · Answer

KarishmaB   GMATNinja

For q5, I agree that A is correct but why C is incorrect?

5. The author’s argument concerning the effect of the official sale of duplicate artifacts on illegal excavation is based on which of the following assumptions?
(C) Computers could be used to trace sold artifacts.
- Author is not saying that bcz we can trace artifacts, illegal excavation would stop. He is saying that demand for unmarked pot would not be there. So tracing the artifacts does not affect illegal excavation.

KarishmaB · Answer

You are looking for what is implied. You have to "figure it out."

Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal excavator’s grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities.

Looks like there is a market for such objects. The author expects the sale to raise a lot of money. Also, it seems the illegal excavator has a grip on the market. Then the market must be there.

Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements.

The museum basements are bulging so it means they have enough of such artefacts.

KarishmaB · Answer

5. The author’s argument concerning the effect of the official sale of duplicate artifacts on illegal excavation is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Prospective purchasers would prefer to buy authenticated artifacts.
(B) The price of illegally excavated artifacts would rise.
(C) Computers could be used to trace sold artifacts.
(D) Illegal excavators would be forced to sell only duplicate artifacts.
(E) Money gained from selling authenticated artifacts could be used to investigate and prosecute illegal excavators.

The author says this about the effect of official sale on illegal excavation:
 I would like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology  and reduce the amount of illegal digging . I would propose that scientific archeological expeditions and governmental authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results.  At the same time, they would break the illegal excavator’s grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities.

The assumption is that people will buy officially sold artefacts. 
The effect on illegal sale doesn't assume that computers could be used to trace sold artefacts. In fact, it is given as an advantage of officially selling artefacts. It has no connection with the impact on illegal trade.

ArnauG · Answer

1.  The primary purpose of the passage is to propose  (B)  a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession.
The author suggests selling excavated artifacts on the open market as a means to provide funds for archaeology and reduce illegal excavation. The proposal aims to address the financial constraints faced by archaeologists and the problem of illegal digging.

2.  The author implies that all of the following statements about duplicate artifacts are true EXCEPT:  (E)  Such artifacts frequently exceed in quality those already catalogued in museum collections.
In the passage, the author discusses the abundance of duplicate artifacts, such as pottery vessels and ancient lamps. The author acknowledges their lack of unique artistic merit or scientific value. However, there is no mention of these duplicate artifacts frequently exceeding the quality of those already catalogued in museum collections. Therefore, option (E) is the correct answer.

3.  Which of the following is mentioned in the passage as a disadvantage of storing artifacts in museum basements?  (E)  Such artifacts often remain uncatalogued and thus cannot be located once they are put in storage.
The passage states that there is not enough money to catalogue the finds, resulting in artifacts being stored in museum basements without proper documentation. As a result, these artifacts become inaccessible and cannot be located again. This supports option (E) as the correct answer.

4.  The author mentions the excavation in Cyprus (lines 31-34) to emphasize which of the following points?  (C)  Artifacts that are not uniquely valuable, and therefore could be sold, are available in large quantities.
The excavation in Cyprus is mentioned to highlight the discovery of thousands of virtually indistinguishable small jugs and a large number of royal seal impressions. This serves to emphasize that artifacts which are not uniquely valuable but could be sold are available in large quantities. This aligns with option (C) as the correct answer.

5.  The author’s argument concerning the effect of the official sale of duplicate artifacts on illegal excavation is based on which of the following assumptions?  (A)  Prospective purchasers would prefer to buy authenticated artifacts.
The author suggests that by selling excavated duplicate artifacts on the open market with proper documentation and authentication, prospective purchasers would prefer these authenticated artifacts over unmarked, illegally obtained ones. This assumption is central to the author's argument, making option (A) the correct answer.

6.  The author anticipates which of the following initial objections to the adoption of his proposal?  (C)  Artifacts that would have been displayed in public places will be sold to private collectors.
The passage mentions that artifacts with unique artistic merit or scientific value should not be sold. The author anticipates objections that artifacts that would have been displayed in public places, such as museums, may be sold to private collectors instead. This aligns with option (C) as the correct answer.

7.  The author implies that which of the following would occur if duplicate artifacts were sold on the open market?  (B)  III only. (III. Archaeologists would be able to publish the results of their excavations more frequently than they currently do.)
The passage suggests that by selling duplicate artifacts on the open market, substantial funds could be generated for the excavation, preservation, and publication of archaeological findings. This implies that archaeologists would be able to publish the results of their excavations more frequently than they currently do, supporting option (B) as the correct answer. The passage does not imply that illegal excavation would completely cease or that Cyprus would become the primary source of marketable duplicate artifacts.

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards