GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 25 Apr 2019, 19:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Columnist: "The mayor's opponents claim that the questions surrounding

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 231
Location: India
GMAT Date: 04-30-2015
Reviews Badge
Columnist: "The mayor's opponents claim that the questions surrounding  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2014, 05:36
1
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (01:49) correct 35% (01:56) wrong based on 291 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Columnist: "The mayor's opponents claim that the questions surrounding the vice-mayor's tax return make the mayor unfit to be re-elected. The vice-mayor, however, was directly elected by the public in an election prior to the election that put the mayor into office. Furthermore, the vice-mayor's faulty tax return can be clearly traced to an innocent error made by an accountant and it sheds no light on the ability of the vice­ mayor to perform his duties. "

Which of the following best describes the main point of the argument above?


A. The mayor is fit to be re-elected.

B. The vice-mayor is able to perform his duties.

C. Critics should not confuse the mayor's fitness for office with the vice-mayor's fitness for office.

D. The mayor's opponents argument about the vice-mayor's tax issues as they relate to the mayor's re-election Is seriously flawed.

E. The Vice Mayor is not at fault for the mistake on his tax return.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 330
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Columnist: "The mayor's opponents claim that the questions surrounding  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2014, 10:20
D for me..can be concluded from the info and is the gist of the argument..not just any portion of the argument..as in case of other options
_________________
Appreciate the efforts...KUDOS for all
Don't let an extra chromosome get you down..:P
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2015
Posts: 21
Re: Columnist: "The mayor's opponents claim that the questions surrounding  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Sep 2016, 02:41
2
A is close but D surely is the answer. Option D is the logical deduction of the argument. By introducing "however", columnist brings the source of information that not only defends vice-mayor but also states a fact the vice-mayor's election was purely an independent event. Hence, he wants to convey that it will be illogical to link Mayor's candidature with vice-mayor's deeds.

A is really a strong statement to be considered main point of the argument. D is more discussed and is the logical interpretation of the columnist's argument.

"Give Kudos Take Kudos- isn't it simple?"
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Apr 2018
Posts: 12
Columnist: "The mayor's opponents claim that the questions surrounding  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2019, 08:56
earnit wrote:
Columnist: "The mayor's opponents claim that the questions surrounding the vice-mayor's tax return make the mayor unfit to be re-elected. The vice-mayor, however, was directly elected by the public in an election prior to the election that put the mayor into office. Furthermore, the vice-mayor's faulty tax return can be clearly traced to an innocent error made by an accountant and it sheds no light on the ability of the vice­ mayor to perform his duties. "

Which of the following best describes the main point of the argument above?


A. The mayor is fit to be re-elected-Statement is too strong to be taken as conclusion

B. The vice-mayor is able to perform his duties-It is an inference;Therefore, It cannot be the conclusion.

C. Critics should not confuse the mayor's fitness for office with the vice-mayor's fitness for office-Irrelevant, as there is nowhere mentioned about critics;Therefore, It cannot be the conclusion.

D. The mayor's opponents argument about the vice-mayor's tax issues as they relate to the mayor's re-election Is seriously flawed.-This statement is perfect candidate for conclusion as it covers the whole jest of the argument

E. The Vice Mayor is not at fault for the mistake on his tax return.-Direct statement from the argument;Therefore, It cannot be the conclusion.
GMAT Club Bot
Columnist: "The mayor's opponents claim that the questions surrounding   [#permalink] 19 Apr 2019, 08:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Columnist: "The mayor's opponents claim that the questions surrounding

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.