Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 08:13 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 08:13

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1115
Own Kudos [?]: 2164 [5]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63671 [6]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Aug 2018
Posts: 48
Own Kudos [?]: 60 [0]
Given Kudos: 111
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GMAT 2: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.36
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Send PM
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63671 [1]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
manass wrote:
can someone please explain q5

Quote:
5. According to the passage, comparable worth principles are different in which of the following ways from other mandates intended to reduce or eliminate pay inequities?

In the last paragraph of the passage, the author explains the differences between comparable worth and "other mandates" (i.e., the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964). He/she says that comparable worth:

  • is "more comprehensive" than the other mandates
  • "compares tasks in dissimilar jobs," which the other mandates do not
  • quantifies the "dollar value to the employer" of these dissimilar jobs.

Clearly, the main difference between comparable worth principles and other mandates is the treatment of dissimilar jobs -- the comparable worth principle compares these jobs to one another and quantifies their worth to the employer.

In looking through the answer choices, each one can be eliminated except for (E):
Quote:
E. Comparable worth principles can be used to quantify the value of elements of dissimilar jobs

(E) fits nicely into our analysis, and is the only answer choice supported by the passage. (E) is the correct answer to question #5.

I hope that helps!
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2018
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
5. It can be inferred from the passage that application of "other mandates" (see highlighted text) would be unlikely to result in an outcome satisfactory to the female employees in which of the following situations?

Why B? Aren't we suppose to consider different job roles basis other mandates?
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Posts: 790
Own Kudos [?]: 683 [0]
Given Kudos: 1316
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
Vigya wrote:
5. It can be inferred from the passage that application of "other mandates" (see highlighted text) would be unlikely to result in an outcome satisfactory to the female employees in which of the following situations?

Why B? Aren't we suppose to consider different job roles basis other mandates?



Hi Vigya,

Please refer this link for question 5:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/comparable-w ... l#p1833662


Let me know if you still have doubts.

Thanks.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
KyleWiddison wrote:
RC is a matter of process and practice. Your first read needs to be "complete". By complete I don't mean that you understand every bit of the passage and have all parts perfectly stored in your short term memory. You should have a really good sense of the main point of the passage and the sub-points as well. You should have a good feel of the location of key elements of the passage. In short, after your first read you should be able to answer general questions about the passage (main point, author would agree with, etc.) without having to look back at the passage and you should know where to go back to re-read (in more depth) the passage to answer specific detail and inference questions. This first read should be 3-5 minutes. You have to focus on structure, not details, to hit this time.

Practice RC passages consistently as you go through the other GMAT areas.

KW


what's the difficulty level of this passage? I got them all right within a decent time so just wondering where would this lie in the real GMAT test
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32941 [0]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
Expert Reply
abhishekkatochh7 wrote:

what's the difficulty level of this passage? I got them all right within a decent time so just wondering where would this lie in the real GMAT test


This is a medium level (600-650) passage.

Thank you
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Mar 2021
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 46
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
Hi, GMATNinja

In your explanation of this question,

Quote:
1. Which of the following most accurately states the central purpose of the passage?


I am still not convinced why B is correct. I understand how D (the option I chose) can be eliminated. I'd like you to take a look at my reasoning.

Quote:
B. To assess the significance of a change in policy


The policy refers to comparable worth. But where is "a change" in this policy mentioned?
Additionally, the second paragraph only describes a question: Are gains achieved through comparable worth long-lasting or temporary? Sure, this is a significance, but it is a significance of comparable worth itself, NOT of a change in comparable worth.

It would be helpful to get your response! Thanks in advance!
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63671 [1]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply

Question 1


dingodudesir wrote:
Hi, GMATNinja

In your explanation of this question,

Quote:
1. Which of the following most accurately states the central purpose of the passage?


I am still not convinced why B is correct. I understand how D (the option I chose) can be eliminated. I'd like you to take a look at my reasoning.

Quote:
B. To assess the significance of a change in policy


The policy refers to comparable worth. But where is "a change" in this policy mentioned?
Additionally, the second paragraph only describes a question: Are gains achieved through comparable worth long-lasting or temporary? Sure, this is a significance, but it is a significance of comparable worth itself, NOT of a change in comparable worth.

It would be helpful to get your response! Thanks in advance!

The "change in policy" is the shift to using comparable worth instead of some other policy. Take a look at this sentence from the first paragraph:

    "In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so."

The passage doesn't investigate at the significance of a change WITHIN the concept of comparable worth. Instead, it explores the significance of changing FROM some other policy TO comparable worth. The central question in the passage is whether the impact of implementing comparable worth policies is temporary or long-lasting. Thus, (B) captures the author's primary concern: "to assess the significance of a change in policy."

I hope that helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Jun 2021
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
Can anyone explain why in Q2 E. is the correct answer instead of B.?
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Posts: 790
Own Kudos [?]: 683 [0]
Given Kudos: 1316
Location: India
Send PM
Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
abhishektyga wrote:
Can anyone explain why in Q2 E. is the correct answer instead of B.?



Hi abhishektyga,

The answer to Question is option B and not option E. You can also refer to the expert reply here for option B:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/comparable-worth-as-a-standard-applied-to-eliminate-inequities-in-pay-132718.html#p1374654

Let us know if you have any other doubts.


Thanks.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 96
Own Kudos [?]: 83 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Send PM
Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1. According to the passage, which of the following is true of comparable worth as a policy?

(A) Comparable worth policy decisions in pay-inequity cases have often failed to satisfy the complaints. P3 other mandates that can be applied to reduce or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs.

(B) Comparable worth policies have been applied to both public-sector and private-sector employee pay schedules correct.

(C) Comparable worth as a policy has come to be widely criticized in the past decade. P1 states: this approach has become a critical social policy issue. Not critized.

(D) Many employers have considered comparable worth as a policy but very few have actually adopted is. P1 states: this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so

(E) Early implementations of comparable worth policies resulted in only transitory gains in pay equity. Nothing was stated in the passage about early implementation
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jul 2020
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 179 [0]
Given Kudos: 239
GMAT Focus 1:
615 Q79 V83 DI79
GMAT 1: 530 Q42 V20
GMAT 2: 640 Q48 V29
Send PM
Re: Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
Hi GMATNinja, KarishmaB

Could you please help here and explain 5th question (5. It can be inferred from the passage that application of "other mandates" (see highlighted text) would be unlikely to result in an outcome satisfactory to the female employees in which of the following situations?)

I always get stuck in all such questions, where they mention things like unlikely, could you please help me here? How I can tackle all such questions.

Thanks in Advance
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14830
Own Kudos [?]: 64934 [2]
Given Kudos: 427
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
AnkurGMAT20 wrote:
Hi GMATNinja, KarishmaB

Could you please help here and explain 5th question (5. It can be inferred from the passage that application of "other mandates" (see highlighted text) would be unlikely to result in an outcome satisfactory to the female employees in which of the following situations?)

I always get stuck in all such questions, where they mention things like unlikely, could you please help me here? How I can tackle all such questions.

Thanks in Advance



5. It can be inferred from the passage that application of "other mandates" (see highlighted text) would be unlikely to result in an outcome satisfactory to the female employees in which of the following situations?

I. Males employed as long-distance truck drivers for a furniture company make $3.50 more per hour than do females with comparable job experience employed in the same capacity.

II. Women working in the office of a cement company contend that their jobs are as demanding and valuable as those of the men working in the cement factory, but the women are paid much less per hour.

III. A law firm employs both male and female paralegals with the same educational and career backgrounds, but the starting salary for male paralegals is $5,000 more than for female paralegals.

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) I and II only
(E) I and III only

First let's understand what "other mandates" are.

Notice this:
Because of the principles driving them, other mandates that can be applied to reduce or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs. But whenever comparable worth principles are applied to pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences are eliminated.

Other mandates, because of their different principles (different from principle of comparable worth), have not remedied inequities when men and women hold different jobs.

So if "other mandates" are applied in situations where men and women hold different jobs, they will not lead to satisfactory result.

I. Males employed as long-distance truck drivers for a furniture company make $3.50 more per hour than do females with comparable job experience employed in the same capacity.

Both males & females have same jobs here. So other mandates should work.

II. Women working in the office of a cement company contend that their jobs are as demanding and valuable as those of the men working in the cement factory, but the women are paid much less per hour.

Here, they are both working in the same company but they may have different profiles. So other mandates may not work.

III. A law firm employs both male and female paralegals with the same educational and career backgrounds, but the starting salary for male paralegals is $5,000 more than for female paralegals.

Here, both are paralegals so other mandates will work.

Hence, only in (II), other mandates may not work.

Answer (B)
VP
VP
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 1374
Own Kudos [?]: 207 [0]
Given Kudos: 189
Send PM
Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
GMATNinja wrote:
The "change in policy" is the shift to using comparable worth instead of some other policy. Take a look at this sentence from the first paragraph:

    "In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so."


The passage doesn't investigate at the significance of a change WITHIN the concept of comparable worth....Instead, it explores the significance of changing FROM some other policy TO comparable worth. The central question in the passage is whether the impact of implementing comparable worth policies is temporary or long-lasting. Thus, (B) captures the author's primary concern: "to assess the significance of a change in policy."

I hope that helps!


Hi GMATNinja - per the yellow, you mention the yellow is the central message of the passage

I dont see how that in the yellow, is the central message AT ALL.

Instead i thought the central message was
-- "WHY" - I, the author, think comparable worth IS precedent-setting

The author is instead "justifying" his response to why he, the author, believes that Comparable worth is precedent-setting

Thus, the word 'asesssing' is wrong i thought

'Assessing' means - review / investigate / analyze -- 'assessing', does not mean - coming to any conclusion i thought

The author has gone beyond 'assessing' -- he has COME TO A CONCLUSION and is justifying his conclusion

Thus i eliminated B, because the author is not primarily 'assessing'

He is primarily giving us his conclusion and 'justifying' / 'defending' his conclusion

Thoughts ?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63671 [2]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply

Question 2


jabhatta2 wrote:
GMATNinja wrote:
The "change in policy" is the shift to using comparable worth instead of some other policy. Take a look at this sentence from the first paragraph:

    "In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so."


The passage doesn't investigate at the significance of a change WITHIN the concept of comparable worth....Instead, it explores the significance of changing FROM some other policy TO comparable worth. The central question in the passage is whether the impact of implementing comparable worth policies is temporary or long-lasting. Thus, (B) captures the author's primary concern: "to assess the significance of a change in policy."

I hope that helps!


Hi GMATNinja - per the yellow, you mention the yellow is the central message of the passage

I dont see how that in the yellow, is the central message AT ALL.

Instead i thought the central message was
-- "WHY" - I, the author, think comparable worth IS precedent-setting

The author is instead "justifying" his response to why he, the author, believes that Comparable worth is precedent-setting

Thus, the word 'asesssing' is wrong i thought

'Assessing' means - review / investigate / analyze -- 'assessing', does not mean - coming to any conclusion i thought

The author has gone beyond 'assessing' -- he has COME TO A CONCLUSION and is justifying his conclusion

Thus i eliminated B, because the author is not primarily 'assessing'

He is primarily giving us his conclusion and 'justifying' / 'defending' his conclusion

Thoughts ?

In paragraph 2, the author raises the central question in the passage: have comparable worth principles been precedent-setting?

In paragraph 3, the author then answers this question: yup, they have been precedent-setting.

There is nothing wrong with using the word "assessing" to talk about the author's purpose in this passage. The author has "assessed" comparable worth policies, and has found that they are pretty awesome.

Could you use another word, as you suggested? Sure! There's conceivably an answer choice out there that uses the word "justify" or "defend." However, because the author's main purpose is, indeed, to "assess the significance" of comparable worth principles, you can't eliminate (B). All of the other answer choices can be eliminated, so (B) is the correct answer choice for question 2.

I hope that helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 10
Send PM
Re: Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
Hey team,

Quick question here about Question 4. Why is option B "The training, skills, and job experience of computer programmers in one division of a corporation are compared to those of programmers making more money in another division." bad? How I understand the passage, CW should allow comparisons between different occupations. While I do agree that it would be good for comparisons between clerks and engineers, it should also be able to compare between programmers from different divisions. While programmers in different divisions may not be as dissimilar, they still could be. I know the Official answer is probably more direct than this option, I fail to understand why this is downright wrong and if I am missing anything in my understanding.

Thanks,
Rushil

solarzj wrote:
Source : GMATPrep Default Exam Pack

Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay, insists that the values of certain tasks performed in dissimilar jobs can be compared. In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so.

This widespread institutional awareness of comparable worth indicates increased public awareness that pay inequities—that is, situations in which pay is not "fair" because it does not reflect the true value of a job—exist in the labor market. However, the question still remains: have the gains already made in pay equity under comparable worth principles been of a precedent-setting nature or are they mostly transitory, a function of concessions made by employers to mislead female employees into believing that they have made long-term pay equity gains?

Comparable worth pay adjustments are indeed precedent-setting. Because of the principles driving them, other mandates that can be applied to reduce or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs. But whenever comparable worth principles are applied to pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences are eliminated. In this sense then, comparable worth is more comprehensive than other mandates, such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Neither compares tasks in dissimilar jobs (that is, jobs across occupational categories) in an effort to determine whether or not what is necessary to perform these tasks—know-how, problem-solving, and accountability—can be quantified in terms of its dollar value to the employer. Comparable worth, on the other hand, takes as its premise that certain tasks in dissimilar jobs may require a similar amount of training, effort, and skill; may carry similar responsibility; may be carried on in an environment having a similar impact upon the worker; and may have a similar dollar value to the employer.


1. According to the passage, which of the following is true of comparable worth as a policy?

(A) Comparable worth policy decisions in pay-inequity cases have often failed to satisfy the complaints

(B) Comparable worth policies have been applied to both public-sector and private-sector employee pay schedules

(C) Comparable worth as a policy has come to be widely criticized in the past decade

(D) Many employers have considered comparable worth as a policy but very few have actually adopted is.

(E) Early implementations of comparable worth policies resulted in only transitory gains in pay equity



2. Which of the following most accurately states the central purpose of the passage?

(A) To criticize the implementation of a new procedure

(B) To assess the significance of a change in policy

(C) To illustrate how a new standard alters procedures

(D) To explain how a new policy is applied in specific cases

(E) To summarize the changes made to date as a result of social policy



3. According to the passage, comparable worth principles are different in which of the following ways from other mandates intended to reduce or eliminate pay inequities:

(A) Comparable worth principles address changes in the pay schedules of male as well as female workers

(B) Comparable worth principles can be applied to employees in both the public and the private sector

(C) Comparable worth principles emphasize the training and skill of workers

(D) Comparable worth principles require changes in the employer's resource allocation

(E) Comparable worth principles can be used to quantify the value of elements of dissimilar jobs



4. Which of the following best describes an application of the principles of comparable worth as they are described in the passage?

(A) The current pay, rates of increase, and rates of promotion for female mechanics are compared with those of male mechanics.

(B) The training, skills, and job experience of computer programmers in one division of a corporation are compared to those of programmers making more money in another division.

(C) The number of women holding top executive positions in a corporation is compared to the number of women available for promotion to those positions, and both tallies are matched to the tallies for men in the same corporation.

(D) The skills, training, and job responsibilities of the clerks in the township tax assessor's office are compared to those of the much better-paid township engineers.

(E) The working conditions of female workers in a hazardous-materials environment are reviewed and their pay schedules compared to those of all workers in similar environments across the nation.



5. It can be inferred from the passage that application of "other mandates" (see highlighted text) would be unlikely to result in an outcome satisfactory to the female employees in which of the following situations?

I. Males employed as long-distance truck drivers for a furniture company make $3.50 more per hour than do females with comparable job experience employed in the same capacity.

II. Women working in the office of a cement company contend that their jobs are as demanding and valuable as those of the men working in the cement factory, but the women are paid much less per hour.

III. A law firm employs both male and female paralegals with the same educational and career backgrounds, but the starting salary for male paralegals is $5,000 more than for female paralegals.

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) I and II only
(E) I and III only

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63671 [0]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
Expert Reply

Question 4


Balbimoore wrote:
Hey team,

Quick question here about Question 4. Why is option B "The training, skills, and job experience of computer programmers in one division of a corporation are compared to those of programmers making more money in another division." bad? How I understand the passage, CW should allow comparisons between different occupations. While I do agree that it would be good for comparisons between clerks and engineers, it should also be able to compare between programmers from different divisions. While programmers in different divisions may not be as dissimilar, they still could be. I know the Official answer is probably more direct than this option, I fail to understand why this is downright wrong and if I am missing anything in my understanding.

Thanks,
Rushil

Have you seen this post?
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Status:Admitted to IIM Shillong (PGPEx 2023-24)
Affiliations: CFA Institute; ICAI; BCAS
Posts: 588
Own Kudos [?]: 554 [0]
Given Kudos: 694
Location: India
WE 2: EA to CFO (Consumer Products)
GPA: 3.78
WE:Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
TGC wrote:
KyleWiddison wrote:

You can also see in the first paragraph this section: "In the last decade, this approach has become a critical social policy issue, as large numbers of private-sector firms and industries as well as federal, state, and local governmental entities have adopted comparable worth policies or begun to consider doing so".

Comparable Worth is a new policy because it states that entities have adopted the comparable worth policies over the last decade. The adoption of these policies would represent a change in policy (from a different policy or no policy at all)...

KW


Then if you suggest that CW has been adopted as a new policy in the LAST DECADE, then how the below answer choice can be eliminated?

To explain how a new policy is applied in specific
cases


New policy=CW
Specific cases= Cases of comparing dissimilar jobs

Please advise !

GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo KarishmaB

I also have a similar doubt- why can't we consider "dissimilar jobs" as "specific cases" for this ques?
GMAT Club Bot
Comparable worth, as a standard applied to eliminate inequities in pay [#permalink]
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13961 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne