Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 17:44 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 17:44

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Difficulty: Sub 505 Levelx   Short Passagex   Social Sciencex                     
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4384
Own Kudos [?]: 32878 [66]
Given Kudos: 4455
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Jan 2019
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 77 [22]
Given Kudos: 284
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GPA: 3.13
WE:Business Development (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 1691
Own Kudos [?]: 14673 [20]
Given Kudos: 766
Send PM
Tutor
Joined: 21 Apr 2014
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 743 [7]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
4
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Explanation for Question #1 (the Main Idea Q):

Tutor
Joined: 21 Apr 2014
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 743 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Explanation for Question #2 (Detail):
General Discussion
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63669 [10]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
9
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Quote:
35. According to the passage, scholars of women's history should refrain from doing which of the following?
(A) Relying on traditional historical sources when women's oral narratives are unavailable
(B) Focusing on the influence of political rhetoric on women's perceptions to the exclusion of other equally important factors
(C) Attempting to discover the cultural and historical factors that influence the stories women tell
(D) Assuming that the conventions of women's written autobiographies are similar to the conventions of women's oral narratives
(E) Accepting women's oral narratives less critically than they accept women's written histories

adkikani wrote:
Hi Experts,
My query is for Q#35, in which OA is E and I selected A.
Reason for choosing A:Since women's oral narratives are biased by traditional historic events, so scholars should refrain . . . . (as per Q stem)
Reason for eliminating E: In very first line, it follows that oral narratives follows next in line after use of written autobiographies. Then how is this option correct?

First, the passage does not state that women's oral narratives are always biased but rather that oral narratives (in general) are no more likely than are written narratives to provide a disinterested commentary on events or people. This implies that written narratives and oral narratives are equally likely to be biased.

Regardless, choice (A) does not state that scholars should refrain from using women's oral narratives; rather, it states that scholars should refrain from relying on traditional historical sources when women's oral narratives are unavailable. There is nothing in the passage implying what scholars should or should not do when women's oral narratives are unavailable, so choice (A) can be eliminated.

As for choice (E), the passage states that scholars of women’s history should use women’s oral narratives next to the use of women’s written autobiography. Regardless of which source is given a higher priority, the passage suggests that BOTH need to be examined critically because BOTH might be biased. According to the passage, scholars must "be as cautious about accepting oral narratives at face value as they already are about written memories" and thus should refrain from "accepting women's oral narratives less critically than they accept women's written histories." Choice (E) is correct.

I hope this helps!
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 216
Own Kudos [?]: 196 [5]
Given Kudos: 13
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
5
Kudos
Got the fifth question wrong.

According to the passage, scholars of women’s history should refrain from doing which of the following?


The answer to the fifth question lies in this part:
Scholars of women’s history should, however, be as cautious about accepting oral narratives at face value as they already are about written memories.

If they are supposed to be as cautious in interpreting written memories as the oral narratives, that means that they should not less critical towards either one of them.

(A) Relying on traditional historical sources when women’s oral narratives are unavailable NO mention of using either one.
(B) Focusing on the influence of political rhetoric on women’s perceptions to the exclusion of other equally important factors NO mention of using one factor over another when assesing perceptions.
(C) Attempting to discover the cultural and historical factors that influence the stories women tell The passage suggests that we SHOULD discover the underlying factors.This is a opposite answer.
(D) Assuming that the conventions of women’s written autobiographies are similar to the conventions of women’s oral narratives There is mention of convention in oral narratives but no mention of convention in writter autobiographies. This is a partially correct answer.
(E) Accepting women’s oral narratives less critically than they accept women’s written histories CORRECT
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 1691
Own Kudos [?]: 14673 [5]
Given Kudos: 766
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
5
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
abhinav008 wrote:
Hi Experts,

Please help me for Q 35

35. According to the passage, scholars of women's history should refrain from doing which of the following?
(A) Relying on traditional historical sources when women's oral narratives are unavailable
(B) Focusing on the influence of political rhetoric on women's perceptions to the exclusion of other equally important factors
(C) Attempting to discover the cultural and historical factors that influence the stories women tell
(D) Assuming that the conventions of women's written autobiographies are similar to the conventions of women's oral narratives
(E) Accepting women's oral narratives less critically than they accept women's written histories

As per passage :
Scholars of women’s history should, however, be as cautious about accepting oral narratives at face value as they already are about written memories. Oral narratives are no more likely than are written narratives to provide a disinterested commentary on events or people.

The author says that oral narratives are less likely than written narratives to provide balanced / Neutral commentary . So I marked option D thinking that Oral Narratives are not same as written narratives .

Please let me know where I am going wrong and how I can avoid doing such mistakes .

Many Thanks


Hi abhinav008,

I'd be happy to help. Here's the relevant slice from the passage:

Scholars of women’s history should, however, be as cautious about accepting oral narratives at face value as they already are about written memories. Oral narratives are no more likely than are written narratives to provide a disinterested commentary on events or people.[fraction][/fraction]

For one thing, I think your interpretation of "no more likely" led you astray: Is no more likely = less likely?

Those are two entirely different relationships. No more likely = up to or equal. Therefore, option D is patently false. In fact, allow me to share the full explanation of question 35:

35. According to the passage, scholars of women's history should refrain from doing which of the following?
(A) Relying on traditional historical sources when women's oral narratives are unavailable
(B) Focusing on the influence of political rhetoric on women's perceptions to the exclusion of other equally important factors
(C) Attempting to discover the cultural and historical factors that influence the stories women tell
(D) Assuming that the conventions of women's written autobiographies are similar to the conventions of women's oral narratives
(E) Accepting women's oral narratives less critically than they accept women's written histories

This is a detail question about what the author would suggest to scholars of women’s history. Well, we know that the author would suggest that those historians should be careful to factor in the context of oral narratives and to not take them at face value.
A) Would the author tell historians to refrain from the use of traditional historical sources? No way. This is an absurd option. When people select this option it’s because they lost context of the question itself.
B) A 180 option. This option says that the author would tell scholars of women’s history to REFRAIN FROM focusing on the influence of political rhetoric on women’s perceptions… Well we know that the author is specifically saying that scholars NEED to consider that influence.
C) Scholars should refrain from attempting to discover the cultural and historical factors that influence the stories women tell. Another 180 designed to punish those who lost sight of the question.
D) How can we say that the author would advise women’s historians to refrain from assuming the conventions of women’s written autobiographies are similar to that of oral narratives? The author never addressed the similarities or differences in the conventions between the two.
E) Yes, the author would tell scholars to refrain from accepting oral narratives less critically than they accept written histories. That’s perfect. The author issues caution about accepting oral narratives at face value, so this option is spot on.
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 1691
Own Kudos [?]: 14673 [3]
Given Kudos: 766
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Current feminist theory, in validating women’s own stories of their experience, has encouraged scholars of women’s history to view the use of women’s oral narratives as the methodology, next to the use of women’s written autobiography, that brings historians closest to the “reality” of women’s lives. Such narratives, unlike most standard histories, represent experience from the perspective of women, affirm the importance of women’s contributions, and furnish present-day women with historical continuity that is essential to their identity, individually and collectively.

Scholars of women’s history should, however, be as cautious about accepting oral narratives at face value as they already are about written memories. Oral narratives are no more likely than are written narratives to provide a disinterested commentary on events or people. Moreover, the stories people tell to explain themselves are shaped by narrative devices
and storytelling conventions, as well as by other cultural and historical factors, in ways that the storytellers may be unaware of. The political rhetoric of a particular era, for example, may influence women’s interpretations of the significance of their experience. Thus a woman who views the Second World War as pivotal in increasing the social acceptance of women’s paid work outside the home may reach that conclusion partly and unwittingly because of wartime rhetoric encouraging a positive view of women’s participation in such work.
3l. The passage is primarily concerned with
(A) contrasting the benefits of one methodology with the benefits of another
(B) describing the historical origins and inherent drawbacks of a particular methodology
(C) discussing the appeal of a particular methodology and some concerns about its use
(D) showing that some historians' adoption of a particular methodology has led to criticism of recent historical scholarship
(E) analyzing the influence of current feminist views on women's interpretations of their experience


32. According to the passage, which of the following shapes the oral narratives of women storytellers?
(A) The conventions for standard histories in the culture in which a woman storyteller lives
(B) The conventions of storytelling in the culture in which a woman storyteller lives
(C) A woman storyteller's experience with distinctive traditions of storytelling developed by the women in her family of origin
(D) The cultural expectations and experiences of those who listen to oral narratives
(E) A woman storyteller's familiarity with the stories that members of other groups in her culture tell to explain themselves


33. The author of the passage would be most likely to make which of the following recommendations to scholars of women's history?
(A) They should take into account their own life experiences when interpreting the oral accounts of women's historical experiences.
(B) They should assume that the observations made in women's oral narratives are believed by the intended audience of the story.
(C) They should treat skeptically observations reported in oral narratives unless the observations can be confirmed in standard histories.
(D) They should consider the cultural and historical context in which an oral narrative was created before arriving at an interpretation of such a narrative.
(E) They should rely on information gathered from oral narratives only when equivalent information is not available in standard histories.


34. Which of the following best describes the function of the last sentence of the passage?
(A) It describes an event that historians view as crucial in recent women's history.
(B) It provides an example of how political rhetoric may influence the interpretations of experience reported in women's oral narratives.
(C) It provides an example of an oral narrative that inaccurately describes women's experience during a particular historical period.
(D) It illustrates the point that some women are more aware than others of the social forces that shape their oral narratives.
(E) It identifies the historical conditions that led to the social acceptance of women's paid work outside the home.


35. According to the passage, scholars of women's history should refrain from doing which of the following?
(A) Relying on traditional historical sources when women's oral narratives are unavailable
(B) Focusing on the influence of political rhetoric on women's perceptions to the exclusion of other equally important factors
(C) Attempting to discover the cultural and historical factors that influence the stories women tell
(D) Assuming that the conventions of women's written autobiographies are similar to the conventions of women's oral narratives
(E) Accepting women's oral narratives less critically than they accept women's written histories


36. According to the passage, each of the following is a difference between women's oral narratives and most standard histories EXCEPT:
(A) Women's oral histories validate the significance of women's achievements.
(B) Women's oral histories depict experience from the point of view of women.
(C) Women's oral histories acknowledge the influence of well-known women.
(D) Women's oral histories present to day's women with a sense of their historical relationship to women of the past.
(E) Women's oral histories are crucial to the collective identity of today's women.



EMPOWERgmat Enhanced Explanation:

This passage was retained in the OG 2016.


Notes:
1 = Oral vs Written Narratives. Oral benefits
2 = Oral Narrative has risks. Be cautious

Analysis:
I love this passage because it’s a truth teller about how well one reads. There’s a distinction drawn in paragraph 1 that many people who read this passage miss: the distinction between oral narratives, and written autobiographies. “history to view the use of women’s oral narratives as the methodology, next to the use of women’s written autobiography, that brings historians closest to the “reality” of women’s lives”, so current theory values the use of the oral narrative. Those who catch that central distinction will find this passage and its questions remarkably easier to take down.

Paragraph 2 issues caution about oral narratives. These oral narratives can be shaped by factors such as storytelling conventions, and other cultural and historical factors. In other words, the author is saying that cultural and historical narratives can be of value, but issues caution about taking them at face value.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2017
Posts: 115
Own Kudos [?]: 85 [3]
Given Kudos: 109
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
3
Kudos
It took for me 20min to read and answer questions as I am used to writing notes small summaries without which I am unable to concentrate or involve. Any suggestions how to reduce my time on rc. Tia

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63669 [3]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
1
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply

Simplifying a gnarly sentence


tejyr wrote:
Scholars of women’s history should, however, be as cautious about accepting oral narratives at face value as they already are about written memories.

Can youu explain meaning of above sentence which is first line of 2nd para.

my understanding is:

1.scholars need to catious about accepting oral narratives as accepting written memories

2.scholars need to catious about accepting oral narratives as already written memories are accepted

This sentence says that:

  • Scholars of women's history are already cautious about accepting written narratives at face value
  • The author believes that these scholars should be similarly cautious about accepting oral narratives at face value.

In other words: Scholars of women's history should be equally careful about accepting both types of narratives at face value.

Clarifying question 3


Shivikaa wrote:
Please explain me the answer for Q33?
Thanks in Advance.

goofytiwari69 wrote:
3. The author of the passage would be most likely to make which of the following recommendations to scholars of women's history?

(A) They should take into account their own life experiences when interpreting the oral accounts of women's historical experiences.
(B) They should assume that the observations made in women's oral narratives are believed by the intended audience of the story.
(C) They should treat skeptically observations reported in oral narratives unless the observations can be confirmed in standard histories.
(D) They should consider the cultural and historical context in which an oral narrative was created before arriving at an interpretation of such a narrative.

(E) They should rely on information gathered from oral narratives only when equivalent information is not available in standard histories.

i am confused between c and d can anyone please help??

The author's purpose in writing this passage is to describe why a practice is encouraged by current feminist theory, then advise scholars to be cautious in adopting that practice. In the first paragraph, the author describes the practice (using women's oral narratives alongside their written narratives). In the second paragraph, the author explains why the practice should be adopted with caution (oral narratives are as likely as written narratives to be influenced by the context of their time).

Coming back to question 3:
Quote:
3. The author of the passage would be most likely to make which of the following recommendations to scholars of women's history?

This question cuts straight to the author's perspective. We know that the author wants scholars to be cautious with regards to using oral narratives, and we know why. So let's apply that knowledge to each answer choice:

Quote:
(A) They should take into account their own life experiences when interpreting the oral accounts of women's historical experiences.

The author never encourages scholars to incorporate their own experiences into their interpretations. The passage does discuss cultural and historical factors influencing the women who are providing these narratives, but doesn't address the life experience of the scholars interpreting them. Eliminate (A).

Quote:
(B) They should assume that the observations made in women's oral narratives are believed by the intended audience of the story.

The author never addresses the intended audience of these oral narratives. Instead, the author is most concerned with two types of people: scholars and the women telling these stories themselves. Eliminate (B).

Quote:
(C) They should treat skeptically observations reported in oral narratives unless the observations can be confirmed in standard histories.

The author does encourage scholars to be skeptical about oral narratives, but the second part of this answer choice isn't backed up by the passage.

In the first paragraph, the author makes clear that the use of oral narratives is "unlike standard histories." However, this isn't the reason why the author is skeptical of this practice. As we go on to read the second paragraph, we don't see the author telling scholars to confirm anything in standard histories. We don't see the author fault oral narratives for not lining up with standard histories.

Instead, the author encourages scholars to consider the storytelling conventions, historical factors, and cultural factors of the storyteller's time. Analyzing the context of a story is not the same as confirming whether it appears in a standard history. That's why we eliminate (C).

Quote:
(D) They should consider the cultural and historical context in which an oral narrative was created before arriving at an interpretation of such a narrative.

This choice matches, almost word for word, the author's explanation in paragraph 2:

    "the stories people tell to explain themselves are shaped by narrative devices and storytelling conventions, as well as by other cultural and historical factors, in ways that the storytellers may be unaware of."

More importantly, (D) lines up with the purpose and structure of the passage. The author uses paragraph 2 to tell scholars that they shouldn't use oral narratives without being mindful of their context. That's why we keep (D) around.

Quote:
(E) They should rely on information gathered from oral narratives only when equivalent information is not available in standard histories.

The author doesn't say anything remotely close to this in the passage. Eliminate (E).

I hope this clarifies why (D) is the best answer choice!
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14823
Own Kudos [?]: 64923 [3]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
PanpaliaAnshul wrote:
VeritasKarishma GMATNinja

Can you please help me by explaining the meaning of below sentence ?

Oral narratives are no more likely than are written narratives to provide a disinterested commentary on events or people.

Below is my understanding of this passage -

1. Para 1 : Author mentions about a oral narrative methodology and it's advantage compared to written autobiography methodology.
2. Para 2 : Author warns about the usage of oral narrative methodology and highlights various factors that need to be considered while using oral narrative methodology.

As below sentence is part of para 2, so it might be functioning as drawback of oral methodology. But, when i put dictionary meaning of disinterested i.e. which is not biased or partial, that's when i am not getting the context of the sentence.

Oral narratives are no more likely than are written narratives to provide a disinterested commentary on events or people.

Thanks,
Anshul



Narratives - written or oral - are not objective. They are not a disinterested commentary on events or people. So you cannot take them on face value. The person narrating has her feelings and opinions involved in the narration.
So say the war time rhetoric encouraging people to view women's work as a positive change could make women think that war time played a big part in increasing the social acceptance of women’s paid work outside the home. This does not mean that war time did actually play a big part.
So just like we are cautious with written narratives, we should be cautious with oral ones too.

"Oral narratives are no more likely than are written narratives to provide a disinterested commentary on events or people."
means that oral narratives are not more likely than written narratives to be objective. So don't accept them at face value just like you don't accept written memoirs at face value.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 31
Own Kudos [?]: 148 [2]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: United States
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
2
Kudos
My answers are CBDBEC. As everything else matches, let me try to explain why I answered D for 3

The author of the passage would be most likely to make which of the following recommendations to
scholars of women’s history?


(A) They should take into account their own life experiences when interpreting the oral accounts
of women’s historical experiences.
i dont think the author intended this, what he/she intended was to take it in perpective (historical and cultural)

(B) They should assume that the observations made in women’s oral narratives are believed by the
intended audience of the story.

(C) They should treat skeptically observations reported in oral narratives unless the
observations can be confi rmed in standard histories.
yes, we should treat skeptically, but did not mention that standard histories have to confirm this
(D) They should consider the cultural and historical context in which an oral narrative was created
before arriving at an interpretation of such a narrative.
yes, this is what the author says
Quote:
Moreover, the stories people tell to
explain themselves are shaped by narrative devices
and storytelling conventions, as well as by other
cultural and historical factors

(E) They should rely on information gathered from oral narratives only when equivalent information
is not available in standard histories.
it does not say that author feels the oral narratives are secondary
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2017
Posts: 115
Own Kudos [?]: 85 [2]
Given Kudos: 109
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Scholars of women’s history should, however, be
as cautious about accepting oral narratives at face
value as they already are about written memories.



Can youu explain meaning of above sentence which is first line of 2nd para.

my understanding is:

1.scholars need to catious about accepting oral narratives as accepting written memories

2.scholars need to catious about accepting oral narratives as already written memories are accepted
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14823
Own Kudos [?]: 64923 [2]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
SlowTortoise wrote:
Quote:
2. According to the passage, which of the following shapes the oral narratives of women storytellers?

(A) The conventions for standard histories in the culture in which a woman storyteller lives
(B) The conventions of storytelling in the culture in which a woman storyteller lives
(C) A woman storyteller's experience with distinctive traditions of storytelling developed by the women in her family of origin
(D) The cultural expectations and experiences of those who listen to oral narratives
(E) A woman storyteller's familiarity with the stories that members of other groups in her culture tell to explain themselves


KarishmaB GMATNinja

Could you explain why (B) is better than (D)?
I was stuck between these 2 options.

I eliminated (B) as I saw that no where in the passage had the author mentioned "the culture in which a woman storyteller lives".
Similarly, no where in the passage is it mentioned that "The cultural expectations and experiences of those who listen to oral narratives", but it was mentioned that the factors were cultural and historical (or historical experiences), and, hence, I selected (D)


Consider this from the passage:
Moreover, the stories people tell to explain themselves are shaped by narrative devices and storytelling conventions, as well as by other cultural and historical factors,..

They are shaped by narrative devices and storytelling conventions and other cultural and historical factors. For this the author gives the example of women living during Second World War (historical factor).

2. According to the passage, which of the following shapes the oral narratives of women storytellers?

(B) The conventions of storytelling in the culture in which a woman storyteller lives

We know that conventions do shape the narratives. Hence makes sense.

(D) The cultural expectations and experiences of those who listen to oral narratives

The cultural expectations of LISTENERS of the stories do not shape the narratives. The passage talks about cultural and historical factors related to the narrator of the story.

Answer (B)
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Posts: 2101
Own Kudos [?]: 8810 [1]
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Took 8 mins and 40 seconds , including 2 mins to read .

-The author talks about how historians should adopt a particular research methodology
-He then shares some concerns about methodology and warns historians against making some mistakes while implementing the methodology
- He also points out certain differences between one methodology and the another

1. (C) discussing the appeal of a particular methodology and some concerns about its use

2.
(B) The conventions of storytelling in the culture in which a woman storyteller lives

3.
"Moreover, the stories people tell to explain themselves are shaped by narrative devices and storytelling conventions, as well as by other cultural and historical factors, in ways that the storytellers may be unaware of."
(D) They should consider the cultural and historical context in which an oral narrative was created before arriving at an interpretation of such a narrative.

4.
"The political rhetoric of a particular era, for example, may influence women's interpretations of the significance of their experience. Thus a woman who views the Second World War as pivotal in increasing the social acceptance of women's paid work outside the home may reach that conclusion partly and unwittingly because of wartime rhetoric encouraging a positive view of women's participation in such work."
Answer B

5.
“Scholars of women's history should, however, be as cautious about accepting oral narratives at face value as they already are about written memories"
Option (E) is clearly what the scholars should refrain from

6.
"Such narratives, unlike most standard histories, represent experience from the perspective of women, affirm the importance of women's contributions"
Since there is no mention of the contribution by important women particularly, option (C) is the correct answer.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2020
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 12
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Please help me with Q. No. 5.

I am stuck with options b.

5. According to the passage, scholars of women's history should refrain from doing which of the following?

(A) Relying on traditional historical sources when women's oral narratives are unavailable

(B) Focusing on the influence of political rhetoric on women's perceptions to the exclusion of other equally important factors

As per the passage oral narrative is influenced by 1. story telling conventions/ 2. historical and cultural factors/ 3. and also political rhetoric. As such historians should refrain from just focusing on the political rhetoric part while completely barring the other two. Thus this seems like a suitable answer choice.

(C) Attempting to discover the cultural and historical factors that influence the stories women tell

(D) Assuming that the conventions of women's written autobiographies are similar to the conventions of women's oral narratives

(E) Accepting women's oral narratives less critically than they accept women's written histories
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 May 2019
Posts: 322
Own Kudos [?]: 243 [1]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE:Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
1
Kudos
CaptainX wrote:
Please help me with Q. No. 5.

I am stuck with options b.

5. According to the passage, scholars of women's history should refrain from doing which of the following?

(A) Relying on traditional historical sources when women's oral narratives are unavailable

(B) Focusing on the influence of political rhetoric on women's perceptions to the exclusion of other equally important factors

As per the passage oral narrative is influenced by 1. story telling conventions/ 2. historical and cultural factors/ 3. and also political rhetoric. As such historians should refrain from just focusing on the political rhetoric part while completely barring the other two. Thus this seems like a suitable answer choice.

(C) Attempting to discover the cultural and historical factors that influence the stories women tell

(D) Assuming that the conventions of women's written autobiographies are similar to the conventions of women's oral narratives

(E) Accepting women's oral narratives less critically than they accept women's written histories


Hi CaptainX

Consider below line from passage:
"The political rhetoric of a particular era, for example, may influence women’s interpretations of the significance of their experience."

In this passage author is giving an example of political rhetoric of a certain time, nowhere it is mentioned oral narrative is influenced by political rhetoric in general.

However author clearly mentions-"the stories people tell to explain themselves are shaped by narrative devices and storytelling conventions, as well as by other cultural and historical factors, in ways that the storytellers may be unaware of."

If you look at option E, , author should refrain from Accepting women's oral narratives less critically than they accept women's written histories.

This option looks much more reasonable than option B.

Remember we should not try to find the right answer rather eliminating 4 wrong answer will help you in long run.

I hope it helps :)
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 May 2011
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 58 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
akrish1982 wrote:
My answers are CBDBEC. As everything else matches, let me try to explain why I answered D for 3

The author of the passage would be most likely to make which of the following recommendations to
scholars of women’s history?


(A) They should take into account their own life experiences when interpreting the oral accounts
of women’s historical experiences.
i dont think the author intended this, what he/she intended was to take it in perpective (historical and cultural)

(B) They should assume that the observations made in women’s oral narratives are believed by the
intended audience of the story.

(C) They should treat skeptically observations reported in oral narratives unless the
observations can be confi rmed in standard histories.
yes, we should treat skeptically, but did not mention that standard histories have to confirm this
(D) They should consider the cultural and historical context in which an oral narrative was created
before arriving at an interpretation of such a narrative.
yes, this is what the author says
Quote:
Moreover, the stories people tell to
explain themselves are shaped by narrative devices
and storytelling conventions, as well as by other
cultural and historical factors

(E) They should rely on information gathered from oral narratives only when equivalent information
is not available in standard histories.
it does not say that author feels the oral narratives are secondary


The passage does use the word Cautious in the sentence "Scholars of women’s history should, however, be as cautious about accepting oral narratives at face value as they already are about written memories." So I picked C
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 123 [0]
Given Kudos: 373
GMAT 1: 630 Q48 V29
Send PM
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
EMPOWERgmatMax wrote:
Current feminist theory, in validating women’s own stories of their experience, has encouraged scholars of women’s history to view the use of women’s oral narratives as the methodology, next to the use of women’s written autobiography, that brings historians closest to the “reality” of women’s lives. Such narratives, unlike most standard histories, represent experience from the perspective of women, affirm the importance of women’s contributions, and furnish present-day women with historical continuity that is essential to their identity, individually and collectively.

Scholars of women’s history should, however, be as cautious about accepting oral narratives at face value as they already are about written memories. Oral narratives are no more likely than are written narratives to provide a disinterested commentary on events or people. Moreover, the stories people tell to explain themselves are shaped by narrative devices
and storytelling conventions, as well as by other cultural and historical factors, in ways that the storytellers may be unaware of. The political rhetoric of a particular era, for example, may influence women’s interpretations of the significance of their experience. Thus a woman who views the Second World War as pivotal in increasing the social acceptance of women’s paid work outside the home may reach that conclusion partly and unwittingly because of wartime rhetoric encouraging a positive view of women’s participation in such work.
3l. The passage is primarily concerned with
(A) contrasting the benefits of one methodology with the benefits of another
(B) describing the historical origins and inherent drawbacks of a particular methodology
(C) discussing the appeal of a particular methodology and some concerns about its use
(D) showing that some historians' adoption of a particular methodology has led to criticism of recent historical scholarship
(E) analyzing the influence of current feminist views on women's interpretations of their experience


32. According to the passage, which of the following shapes the oral narratives of women storytellers?
(A) The conventions for standard histories in the culture in which a woman storyteller lives
(B) The conventions of storytelling in the culture in which a woman storyteller lives
(C) A woman storyteller's experience with distinctive traditions of storytelling developed by the women in her family of origin
(D) The cultural expectations and experiences of those who listen to oral narratives
(E) A woman storyteller's familiarity with the stories that members of other groups in her culture tell to explain themselves


33. The author of the passage would be most likely to make which of the following recommendations to scholars of women's history?
(A) They should take into account their own life experiences when interpreting the oral accounts of women's historical experiences.
(B) They should assume that the observations made in women's oral narratives are believed by the intended audience of the story.
(C) They should treat skeptically observations reported in oral narratives unless the observations can be confirmed in standard histories.
(D) They should consider the cultural and historical context in which an oral narrative was created before arriving at an interpretation of such a narrative.
(E) They should rely on information gathered from oral narratives only when equivalent information is not available in standard histories.


34. Which of the following best describes the function of the last sentence of the passage?
(A) It describes an event that historians view as crucial in recent women's history.
(B) It provides an example of how political rhetoric may influence the interpretations of experience reported in women's oral narratives.
(C) It provides an example of an oral narrative that inaccurately describes women's experience during a particular historical period.
(D) It illustrates the point that some women are more aware than others of the social forces that shape their oral narratives.
(E) It identifies the historical conditions that led to the social acceptance of women's paid work outside the home.


35. According to the passage, scholars of women's history should refrain from doing which of the following?
(A) Relying on traditional historical sources when women's oral narratives are unavailable
(B) Focusing on the influence of political rhetoric on women's perceptions to the exclusion of other equally important factors
(C) Attempting to discover the cultural and historical factors that influence the stories women tell
(D) Assuming that the conventions of women's written autobiographies are similar to the conventions of women's oral narratives
(E) Accepting women's oral narratives less critically than they accept women's written histories


36. According to the passage, each of the following is a difference between women's oral narratives and most standard histories EXCEPT:
(A) Women's oral histories validate the significance of women's achievements.
(B) Women's oral histories depict experience from the point of view of women.
(C) Women's oral histories acknowledge the influence of well-known women.
(D) Women's oral histories present to day's women with a sense of their historical relationship to women of the past.
(E) Women's oral histories are crucial to the collective identity of today's women.



For question 36 - I was confused between C and D, could you explain?
EMPOWERgmat Enhanced Explanation:

This passage was retained in the OG 2016.


Notes:
1 = Oral vs Written Narratives. Oral benefits
2 = Oral Narrative has risks. Be cautious

Analysis:
I love this passage because it’s a truth teller about how well one reads. There’s a distinction drawn in paragraph 1 that many people who read this passage miss: the distinction between oral narratives, and written autobiographies. “history to view the use of women’s oral narratives as the methodology, next to the use of women’s written autobiography, that brings historians closest to the “reality” of women’s lives”, so current theory values the use of the oral narrative. Those who catch that central distinction will find this passage and its questions remarkably easier to take down.

Paragraph 2 issues caution about oral narratives. These oral narratives can be shaped by factors such as storytelling conventions, and other cultural and historical factors. In other words, the author is saying that cultural and historical narratives can be of value, but issues caution about taking them at face value.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Current feminist theory, in validating womens own stories of their [#permalink]
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13961 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne