Last visit was: 10 Jul 2025, 20:48 It is currently 10 Jul 2025, 20:48
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
705-805 Level|   Inequalities|                                 
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,631
Own Kudos:
740,223
 [1]
Given Kudos: 98,170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,631
Kudos: 740,223
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Maxximus
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 261
Own Kudos:
235
 [4]
Given Kudos: 90
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 261
Kudos: 235
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Ross7it
Joined: 18 Jun 2017
Last visit: 24 Apr 2019
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 80
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,788
Own Kudos:
12,488
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,788
Kudos: 12,488
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Ross7it,

With certain questions, you have to be careful about confusing the information that you've been given with the question that you are asked to answer. Your solution is correct - but I think you lost track of the question that you attempting to answer.

Your work shows that there are 4 VALUES FOR X that fit the given inequality. When you plug in each of those values for X, the resulting calculation IS greater than 0. The question is NOT asking for the end calculation though; it's asking about the possible values of X. Each of those 4 values for X ARE less than 5, so the answer to the question is 4 values.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
avatar
Ross7it
Joined: 18 Jun 2017
Last visit: 24 Apr 2019
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 80
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi Ross7it,

With certain questions, you have to be careful about confusing the information that you've been given with the question that you are asked to answer. Your solution is correct - but I think you lost track of the question that you attempting to answer.

Your work shows that there are 4 VALUES FOR X that fit the given inequality. When you plug in each of those values for X, the resulting calculation IS greater than 0. The question is NOT asking for the end calculation though; it's asking about the possible values of X. Each of those 4 values for X ARE less than 5, so the answer to the question is 4 values.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich


Dear Rich,
Thanks for answering, but it still not clear.

So, how the testing method works here? Could explain me better, please? Some guys on the first page of the topic tested numbers from -4 to 4, but it was not the same to substitute those numbers for X. Am I correct?

Many thanks
Ross

P.S. I am refering to this one:

"Just start testing numbers:
4,3,2,1,0,-1,-2,-3,-4 etc

4 - yep
3 - yep
2 - no
1 - no
0 - no
-1 - no
-2 - yes
-3 - yes
-4 and below - no

4,3,-2,-3, so D."
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,788
Own Kudos:
12,488
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,788
Kudos: 12,488
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Ross7it,

The inequality (x+2)(x+3)/(x-2) >= 0 actually has an unlimited number of integer solutions for X.

The question is NOT asking us for ALL of the solutions though; it's only asking for the ones that are LESS than 5. Based on the five answer choices, there will be at least 1 value, but no more than 5 values, that fit what we're looking for. Thus, it should not be too difficult to find those 1-5 values; we can just 'plug in' until we find them all.

When you TEST X=4, you will end up with (6)(7)/(2). This equals 42/2 = 21, which is >= 0. Thus, X=4 IS one of the examples of what we are looking for (an integer value of X that 'fits' the given inequality AND is LESS than 5). That math is relatively easy to do, so you should be able to find the other values without too much trouble (by 'plugging in' 3, 2, 1, 0, -1, etc.) and paying attention to the results.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 21,070
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 296
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 21,070
Kudos: 26,130
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
macjas
How many of the integers that satisfy the inequality \(\frac{(x+2)(x+3)}{(x-2)} \geq 0\) are less than 5?

A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4
E. 5


OG 2019 PS14203

Solution:

We see that if x = -3 or -2, then the value of the expression (on the left hand side of the inequality) will be 0, which is greater than or EQUAL to 0.

If x is -4 or less, then the numerator of the expression is positive (because the two factors are negative) and the denominator is negative. However, the value of the entire expression will be negative, which does not satisfy the inequality.

If x = -1, 0, or 1, then the numerator of the expression is positive (because the two factors are positive) and the denominator is negative. However, the value of the expression will be negative, which does not satisfy the inequality.

We see that x can’t be 2 since the denominator will then be 0 and we can’t divide by 0.

If x is 3 or greater, then the numerator of the expression is positive (because the two factors are negative) and the denominator is also positive. Therefore, the value of the expression will be positive, which does satisfy the inequality.

However, since we are looking for the values of x that are less than 5, so there are only 4 such values (namely, -3, -2, 3, and 4).

Answer: D
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 13 May 2024
Posts: 6,755
Own Kudos:
34,051
 [1]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,755
Kudos: 34,051
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
macjas
How many of the integers that satisfy the inequality \(\frac{(x+2)(x+3)}{(x-2)} \geq 0\) are less than 5?

A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4
E. 5
OG 2019 PS14203

We can see that, when x = -2 and x = -3, the fraction evaluates to be ZERO.
So, we already have two values that satisfy the given inequality: x = -2 and x = -3
Also, when x = 2, the fraction is UNDEFINED

So, we have three critical points: x = -2, x = -3 and x = 2
These 3 points divide the number line into 4 regions:
Region i: x < -3
Region ii: -3 < x < -2
Region iii: -2 < x < 2
Region iv: x > 2

Let's see what happens with the values of x in each region...
Region i: x < -3
If x < -3, then (x+2), (x+3), and (x-2) are all NEGATIVE, which means the fraction evaluates to be a NEGATIVE value
Since we want the fraction to be greater than or equal to 0, none of the values in this region satisfy the inequality.

Region ii: -3 < x < -2
If -3 < x < -2, then (x+2) is NEGATIVE, (x+3) is POSITIVE, and (x-2) is NEGATIVE, which means the fraction evaluates to be a POSITIVE value
However, since there are no integers within this range, there's nothing to count here.

Region iii: -2 < x < 2
If -2 < x < 2, then (x+2) is POSITIVE, (x+3) is POSITIVE, and (x-2) is NEGATIVE, which means the fraction evaluates to be a NEGATIVE value
Since we want the fraction to be greater than or equal to 0, none of the values in this region satisfy the inequality.

Region iv: x > 2
If x > 2, then (x+2) is POSITIVE, (x+3) is POSITIVE, and (x-2) is POSITIVE, which means the fraction evaluates to be a POSITIVE value
In other words, ALL x-values greater than 2 satisfy the given inequality.
However, since we're looking for integer values less than 5, the only x values that satisfy the given inequality are x = 3 and x = 4

In total, there are FOUR solutions

Answer: D

Cheers,
Brent
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 21,070
Own Kudos:
26,130
 [1]
Given Kudos: 296
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 21,070
Kudos: 26,130
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How many of the integers that satisfy the inequality \(\frac{(x+2)(x+3)}{(x-2)} \geq 0\) are less than 5?

A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4
E. 5

Solution:

First, let's find the values of x which make the given expression 0. Setting the numerator equal to 0, we see that if x = -2 or x = -3, then the expression becomes 0 and thus, the inequality is satisfied.

If x is less than -3, then all of x + 3, x + 2, and x - 2 are negative; thus, [(x + 2)(x + 3)]/(x - 2) is also negative. There are no values of x less than -3 that satisfy the given inequality.

If x = -1, 0, or 1, then the numerator is positive while the denominator is negative; hence, these values will not satisfy the inequality.

Notice that the expression is undefined for x = 2.

Finally, if x = 3 or x = 4, then all of x + 3, x + 2, and x - 2 are positive; thus, the expression itself is positive as well.

We see that the inequality holds for -3, -2, 3, and 4. Thus, four integers that satisfy the inequality are less than 5.

Answer: D­
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 1,888
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Video solution from Quant Reasoning:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 4,847
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,847
Kudos: 8,628
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Solution:

The question stem can be rephrased as

Is (x+2)(x+3)(x-2)>=0 ? (Multiply (x-2)^2 on both sides)

The roots of the quadratic are -3,-2 and 2

Using the wavy line concept, with a greater than sign the range would be

-3<=x<=-2

=>Integral solutions would be x = -3, -2, 3, 4 (option d)

Devmitra Sen
GMAT SME
User avatar
TooLong150
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Last visit: 07 Feb 2022
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,412
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 4: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 5: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 6: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3
Products:
GMAT 6: 730 Q50 V39
Posts: 135
Kudos: 524
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi All,

While this question looks a bit complex, it's not as difficult as it might appear. This question emphasizes a particular part of the process that is so important for GMAT questions of all types: you have to take notes and do work in an organized way.

In this prompt, we're asked to focus on integer solutions that are LESS than 5. From the answers, we know that there is at least one solution, but no more than five solutions. This means that there aren't that many options and they shouldn't be too hard to find.

If you were "stuck" on this question, then here's how you can go about solving it quickly - Just start plugging in integers until you've "found" all of the ones that "fit." Start with the number 4, then 3, then 2, etc. You'd be amazed how often you can use what's called "brute force" against a Quant question; plug in numbers and pound on the question until you've found the solution.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

Yes, just test numbers

x < 5
x=4 Yes
x=3 Yes
x=2 (no)(Undefined)
x= 1 (no)
x = 0 (no)
x = -1 (No)
x = -2 (Yes)
x= -3 (Yes)
x = -4 (No)
x = -5 (No)
x = -6 (No)
Pattern shows us that we're done.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,788
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,788
Kudos: 12,488
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TooLong150
EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi All,

While this question looks a bit complex, it's not as difficult as it might appear. This question emphasizes a particular part of the process that is so important for GMAT questions of all types: you have to take notes and do work in an organized way.

In this prompt, we're asked to focus on integer solutions that are LESS than 5. From the answers, we know that there is at least one solution, but no more than five solutions. This means that there aren't that many options and they shouldn't be too hard to find.

If you were "stuck" on this question, then here's how you can go about solving it quickly - Just start plugging in integers until you've "found" all of the ones that "fit." Start with the number 4, then 3, then 2, etc. You'd be amazed how often you can use what's called "brute force" against a Quant question; plug in numbers and pound on the question until you've found the solution.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

Yes, just test numbers

x < 5
x=4 Yes
x=3 Yes
x=2 (no)(Undefined)
x= 1 (no)
x = 0 (no)
x = -1 (No)
x = -2 (Yes)
x= -3 (Yes)
x = -4 (No)
x = -5 (No)
x = -6 (No)
Pattern shows us that we're done.

Hi TooLong150,

Yes - that's perfect! Once you get down to X = -4, you might recognize that a Number Property pattern emerges: the numerator will be the product of two negative numbers, so that product will STAY POSITIVE as X gets smaller AND the denominator will STAY NEGATIVE as X gets smaller. Dividing a positive number by a negative number ALWAYS yields a negative result, meaning that there's no reason to keep looking at integer values for X that are smaller than -4 (because they will ALL lead to total numbers that are negative numbers - which is NOT what the question is asking us for).

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
avatar
MBAHOUSE
avatar
MBA House Admissions Consultant
Joined: 26 May 2022
Last visit: 23 Apr 2024
Posts: 338
Own Kudos:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 338
Kudos: 86
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Inequality with a very different technique used by mbahouse
Attachments

F5545F19-4055-478E-9B6D-14D80C9FE15B.jpeg
F5545F19-4055-478E-9B6D-14D80C9FE15B.jpeg [ 229.8 KiB | Viewed 4777 times ]

User avatar
TheGMATStrategy
Joined: 14 Jan 2020
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Affiliations: TGS
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
Posts: 15
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post


Want more help? Here you go: http://linktr.ee/thegmatstrategy
User avatar
RenB
Joined: 13 Jul 2022
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 394
Own Kudos:
1,153
 [2]
Given Kudos: 300
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V84 DI82
GPA: 3.74
WE:Corporate Finance (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V84 DI82
Posts: 394
Kudos: 1,153
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ross7it
EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi Ross7it,

With certain questions, you have to be careful about confusing the information that you've been given with the question that you are asked to answer. Your solution is correct - but I think you lost track of the question that you attempting to answer.

Your work shows that there are 4 VALUES FOR X that fit the given inequality. When you plug in each of those values for X, the resulting calculation IS greater than 0. The question is NOT asking for the end calculation though; it's asking about the possible values of X. Each of those 4 values for X ARE less than 5, so the answer to the question is 4 values.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich


Dear Rich,
Thanks for answering, but it still not clear.

So, how the testing method works here? Could explain me better, please? Some guys on the first page of the topic tested numbers from -4 to 4, but it was not the same to substitute those numbers for X. Am I correct?

Many thanks
Ross

P.S. I am refering to this one:

"Just start testing numbers:
4,3,2,1,0,-1,-2,-3,-4 etc

4 - yep
3 - yep
2 - no
1 - no
0 - no
-1 - no
-2 - yes
-3 - yes
-4 and below - no

4,3,-2,-3, so D."

Hi,
Solved using the shortcut method-
link- https://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities ... 91482.html
1. Identify the number of roots- 3 roots in this qs: 2,-2,-3. Arrange in ascending order: -3,-2,2
2. Plot the roots in the diagram at the points the curve cuts the line
The rightmost will be positive infinity, then plot the roots in a descending way.
(See image)
Take any value>2 to test the sign for the rightmost area(over the line). Check what will be the test value. Here it is positive, thus the region will be positive. The points in this region will be positive. At the roots it will be 0. The signs in the regions to the left will be alternate.
(the logic is explained in the link above)
Alternatively negative values will be observed in the regions marked '-'
3. Suitable values under 5: 3,4,-2,-3
Since at x=2, denominator will become 0 and thus not possible

Voila!
Attachments

WhatsApp Image 2023-05-14 at 4.31.14 PM.jpeg
WhatsApp Image 2023-05-14 at 4.31.14 PM.jpeg [ 48.81 KiB | Viewed 4326 times ]

User avatar
RenB
Joined: 13 Jul 2022
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 394
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 300
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V84 DI82
GPA: 3.74
WE:Corporate Finance (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V84 DI82
Posts: 394
Kudos: 1,153
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi
chetan2u can you please share similar questions like these to practice?
I tried filtering the OG material. The non-OG ones are often too complicated than these :/
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,631
Own Kudos:
740,223
 [2]
Given Kudos: 98,170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,631
Kudos: 740,223
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RenB
Hi
chetan2u can you please share similar questions like these to practice?
I tried filtering the OG material. The non-OG ones are often too complicated than these :/
­Here are some official questions resmebling this one I was able to find:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/which-of-the ... 14715.html (GMAT Prep Focus)
https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-solution ... 20191.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/which-of-the ... 44461.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/if-x-is-a-re ... 21693.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/if-6-x-x-1-1 ... 90494.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/which-of-the ... 26628.html
Hope this helps.
User avatar
wwcd
Joined: 21 Apr 2024
Last visit: 12 May 2025
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 83
Posts: 48
Kudos: 52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 10 July 2025
Posts: 5,688
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,688
Kudos: 5,200
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How many of the integers that satisfy the inequality \(\frac{(x+2)(x+3)}{(x-2)} \geq 0\) are less than 5?

Using wavy line method, Solutions: -
x > 2
-3 <= x <= -2

Integer values of x satisfying the inequality = {-3,-2,3,4}

IMO D
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
Math Expert
102631 posts
PS Forum Moderator
686 posts