Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 11:00 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 11:00

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Difficulty: 505-555 Levelx   Long Passagex   Social Sciencex                     
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 102
Own Kudos [?]: 249 [94]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 343
Own Kudos [?]: 4586 [24]
Given Kudos: 606
Concentration: Technology, Other
Send PM
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63672 [11]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
General Discussion
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63672 [4]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
adkikani wrote:
Query for Gmatninja, Gmatninja2:

I have a couple of Qs for which I could get get correct OA.

Q6, Main purpose of passage : I selected B instead of D
Reasoning: Author does cites evidences in para 2 and 3 for weakening assumption / explanation by general people made in para 1

Q7, selected option A in place of OA C

Q8, confused between options C and A

Choice (B) in Q6 is tempting because it contains the word "contradiction". It is true that the author's view contradicts (or challenges) the widely accepted explanation for "the migrants' subsequent lack of economic mobility in the north". However, the purpose of the passage is not to resolve an existing contradiction.

Q7 and Q8 do not appear to be official questions. As shown in the original post (and in OG 2015 itself), this passage should have six questions (Question No.: 134 - 139). I'm not sure where those last two came from, but I wouldn't worry about them, unless they came from another edition that I didn't check?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63672 [4]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
2
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Quote:
5. It can be inferred from the passage that the "easy conclusion" mentioned in line 53 is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People who migrate from rural areas to large cities usually do so for economic reasons.
(B) Most people who leave rural areas to take jobs in cities return to rural areas as soon as it is financially possible for them to do so.
(C) People with rural backgrounds are less likely to succeed economically in cities than are those with urban backgrounds.
(D) Most people who were once skilled workers are not willing to work as unskilled workers.
(E) People who migrate from their birthplaces to other regions of country seldom undertake a second migration.

ShashankDave wrote:
Hi GMATNinja,
I got the 5th question wrong, the others are not so difficult. Please provide a strategy for attempting this question, as in where to look for answers in the passage and where to not look, and how to see hints in the passage pointing to the answer. Also please comment on why (E) is wrong and why C is correct?

The "easy conclusion" ties the economic problems faced by the black population after their migration to the North to their rural background. The key to this question lies in the following portion:

    It has been frequently assumed, but not proved, that the majority of the migrants in what has come to be called the Great Migration came from rural areas and were motivated by two concurrent factors: the collapse of the cotton industry following the boll weevil infestation, which began in 1898, and increased demand in the north for labor following the cessation of European immigration caused by the outbreak of the first world war in 1914. This assumption has led to the conclusion that the migrants' subsequent lack of economic mobility in the north is tied to rural background, a background that implies unfamiliarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills.

In other words, the migrants came from rural areas. Thus, the migrants were unfamiliar with urban living and lacked industrial skills. As a result, the migrants faced economic challenges. In order for this reasoning to hold, we have to assume that being unfamiliar with urban living and lacking industrial skills would give the migrants an economic disadvantage. Imagine if we could prove that economic success in the North had nothing to do with familiarity with urban living or with having industrial skills. In that case, the "easy conclusion" could not be properly drawn.

Thus, choice (C) is necessary in order to draw the "easy conclusion." Whether such migrants undertake a second migration does not impact the "easy conclusion", so choice (E) can be eliminated.

For more advice on tackling RC passages, check out the Ultimate RC Guide for Beginners.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Jun 2013
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 200 [3]
Given Kudos: 3
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.86
WE:Analyst (Advertising and PR)
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
3
Kudos
For question 2, we want the answer choice that weaken the author's argument that black immigrants who moved from the South to the North were not mostly from rural background.

2. in the passage, the author anticipates which of the following as a possible objection to her argument?
(a) it is uncertain how many people actually migrated during the great migration. This is irrelevant; it does not weaken the argument.
(b) the eventual economic status of the great migration migrants has not been adequately traced. This actually strengthens the author's argument by calling the widely accepted assumption into question.
(c) it is not likely that people with steady jobs would have reason to move to another area of the country. This weakens the argument. In the passage, it states that 35% of urban black population in the South was engaged in skilled trades (Line 35). And the remaining 65% of this population worked in newly developed industries (Line 40). Hence, this can imply that urban black population in the South had jobs. As a result, if choice (C) is true, the great migration must come from rural areas (This contradicts the author's argument and supported the accepted assumption).
(d) it is not true that the term "manufacturing and mechanical pursuits" actually encompasses the entire industrial sector. This is basically irrelevant.
(e) of the black workers living in southern cities, only those in a small number of trades were threatened by obsolescence. This actually strengthened the accepted assumption by showing that only a few urban black population's jobs were threatened.

For question 5, the information we needed to answer this question is from line 51 to 55. "Thus, a move north would be seen as advantageous to a group that was already urbanized and steadily employed, and the easy conclusion tying their -subsequent economic problems in the north to their rural background comes into question"
This matches Choice (C).

For question 8, we need to know that the passage is discussing the reasons why black people from the South moved to the North and challenging the accepted assumption that most black population who migrated from the South to the North were from rural background. With this in mind, we can easily answer choice (A).
(b) the effect of migration on the regional economies of the united states following the first world war. The author discuss little about this.
(c) the transition from a rural to an urban existence for those who migrated in the great migration. The author perhaps never discuss about this at all.
(d) the transformation of the agricultural south following the boll weevil infestation. The author discuss little about this.
(e) the disappearance of the artisan class in the united states as a consequence of mechanization in the early twentieth century. Nothing is mentioned about the decline in the artisan class.
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6860 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
imSKR wrote:
GMATNinja:

Quote:
6. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) Support an alternative to an accepted methodology
(B) Present evidence that resolves a contradiction
(C) Introduce a recently discovered source of information
(D) Challenge a widely accepted explanation
(E) Argue that a discarded theory deserves new attention


The whole passage seems to be in favour that author is in favour of the explanation. And Just at the end, he mentioned that this conclusion is questionable.
I did wrong this question because i missed question while reading in the end as i had understood the gist of passage by then.
Lesson learnt: read till the end.

My Question:
Do you think reading only last line to determine the primary passage can work? ( can included reading first line of each passage and last line of passage at most)

Please share your comments when and when not such strategy to be applied?
GMATNinja AndrewN

Hello, imSKR. There is a big difference between can and should in your question. I would recommend reading the passage in its entirety if you have time to do so. That is, there are big-picture sentences that can be dropped just about anywhere in the passage. Sometimes the first line of the passage presents that main idea. Sometimes the first line of a subsequent paragraph marks a shift that ends up being reflected in the correct answer. And sometimes, as was the case here, the last line proves crucial. But the only way I would look to take a shortcut is if I had maybe a minute left to both read the passage and answer the questions attached to it. Contrary to what you might think, reading the passage often allows you to work through the questions more efficiently, rather than hunting down answers and hoping for the best.

- Andrew
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 343
Own Kudos [?]: 4586 [1]
Given Kudos: 606
Concentration: Technology, Other
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Hey Radhika,
Sorry for the delay in response.

Quote:
Hi

Can you please clear me on my understanding on the passage and Question 2. What i understood from the last line of the passages "and the easy conclusion tying their subsequent economic problems in the North to their rural background came into question" that author is considering the two things contradictory: 1) line 55-57 : that those who were urbanized in south will have better position in north 2) line 16-20: that migrants in north were not economically sound as they were not aware about the urban industrialized skills.

Do i get it right ?
According to this understanding only I was diverted to chose option B as answer for Q2.

Please let me know where am I going wrong.

Thanks in advance


First a default/prevalent explanation is presented and then author comes up with another explanation . Finally author concludes that previous conclusion is not adequate.

Look at the following lines from Para:
it is perhaps surprising
to argue that an employed population could be enticed
to move, but an explanation lies in the labor conditions
then prevalent in the south.
about thirty-five percent of the urban black popu-
(35) lation in the south was engaged in skilled trades

blah blah

thus, a move north would be seen as advantageous to a group that was already urbanized and steadily employed,

2. in the passage, the author anticipates which of the following as a possible objection to her argument?
(b) the eventual economic status of the great migration migrants has not been adequately traced.
I would say this is irrelevant. Author has used the skills and status of BW before the great migration to counter the previously presented argument. Look the bold marked author conclusion.
(c) it is not likely that people with steady jobs would have reason to move to another area of the country.

Hope this answered ur query.
Please drop me PM if u need further clarification on this.
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1261
Own Kudos [?]: 1240 [1]
Given Kudos: 1207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Query for Gmatninja, Gmatninja2:

I have a couple of Qs for which I could get get correct OA.

Q6, Main purpose of passage : I selected B instead of D
Reasoning: Author does cites evidences in para 2 and 3 for weakening assumption / explanation by general people made in para 1

Q7, selected option A in place of OA C

Q8, confused between options C and A
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Apr 2013
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 239 [1]
Given Kudos: 872
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
karun_aggarwal wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 10th Edition, 2003

Practice Question
Question No.: RC 31 ~ 36
Page: 330

The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2015

Practice Question
Question No.: 134 - 139
Page: 416 - 417

In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the black population of the United States left the South, where the preponderance of the black population had been located, and migrated to northern states, with the largest number moving, it is claimed, between 1916 and 1918. It has been frequently assumed, but not proved, that the majority of the migrants in what has come to be called the Great Migration came from rural areas and were motivated by two concurrent factors: the collapse of the cotton industry following the boll weevil infestation, which began in 1898, and increased demand in the north for labor following the cessation of European immigration caused by the outbreak of the first world war in 1914. This assumption has led to the conclusion that the migrants' subsequent lack of economic mobility in the north is tied to rural background, a background that implies unfamiliarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills.

But the question of who actually left the south has never been rigorously investigated. Although numerous investigations document an exodus from rural southern areas to southern cities prior to the Great Migration. No one has considered whether the same migrants then moved on to northern cities. In 1910 over 600,000 black workers, or ten percent of the black work force, reported themselves to be engaged in "manufacturing and mechanical pursuits," the federal census category roughly encompassing the entire industrial sector. The Great Migration could easily have been made up entirely of this group and their families. It is perhaps surprising to argue that an employed population could be enticed to move, but an explanation lies in the labor conditions then prevalent in the South.

About thirty-five percent of the urban black population in the South was engaged in skilled trades. Some were from the old artisan class of slavery—blacksmiths, masons, carpenters—which had had a monopoly of certain trades, but they were gradually being pushed out by competition, mechanization, and obsolescence, the remaining sixty-five percent, more recently urbanized, worked in newly developed industries—tobacco, lumber, coal and iron manufacture, and railroads. Wages in the South, however, were low, and black workers were aware, through labor recruiters and the black press, that they could earn more even as unskilled workers in the North than they could as artisans in the South. After the boll weevil infestation, urban black workers faced competition from the continuing influx of both black and white rural workers, who were driven to undercut the wages formerly paid for industrial jobs. Thus, a move north would be seen as advantageous to a group that was already urbanized and steadily employed, and the easy conclusion tying their subsequent economic problems in the North to their rural background comes into question.
1. The author indicates explicitly that which of the following records has been a source of information in her investigation?

(A) United States immigration service reports from 1914 to 1930
(B) Payrolls of southern manufacturing firms between 1910 and 1930
(C) The volume of cotton exports between 1898 and 1910
(D) The federal census of 1910
(E) Advertisements of labor recruiters appearing in southern newspapers after 1910



2. In the passage, the author anticipates which of the following as a possible objection to her argument?

(A) It is uncertain how many people actually migrated during the great migration.
(B) The eventual economic status of the great migration migrants has not been adequately traced.
(C) It is not likely that people with steady jobs would have reason to move to another area of the country.
(D) It is not true that the term "manufacturing and mechanical pursuits" actually encompasses the entire industrial sector.
(E) Of the black workers living in southern cities, only those in a small number of trades were threatened by obsolescence.



3. According to the passage, which of the following is true of wages in southern cities in 1910?

(A) They were being pushed lower as a result of increased competition.
(B) They had begun t to rise so that southern industry could attract rural workers.
(C) They had increased for skilled workers but decreased for unskilled workers.
(D) They had increased in large southern cities but decreased in small southern cities.
(E) They had increased in newly developed industries but decreased in the older trades.



4. The author cites each of the following as possible influences in a black worker's decision to migrate north in the great migration except

(A) Wage levels in northern cities
(B) Labor recruiters
(C) Competition from rural workers
(D) Voting rights in northern states
(E) The black press



5. It can be inferred from the passage that the "easy conclusion" mentioned in line 53 is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People who migrate from rural areas to large cities usually do so for economic reasons.
(B) Most people who leave rural areas to take jobs in cities return to rural areas as soon as it is financially possible for them to do so.
(C) People with rural backgrounds are less likely to succeed economically in cities than are those with urban backgrounds.
(D) Most people who were once skilled workers are not willing to work as unskilled workers.
(E) People who migrate from their birthplaces to other regions of country seldom undertake a second migration.



6. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) Support an alternative to an accepted methodology
(B) Present evidence that resolves a contradiction
(C) Introduce a recently discovered source of information
(D) Challenge a widely accepted explanation
(E) Argue that a discarded theory deserves new attention



7. according to information in the passage, which of the following is a correct sequence of groups of workers, from highest paid to lowest paid, in the period between 1910 and 1930?
(a) artisans in the north; artisans in the south; unskilled workers in the north; unskilled workers in the south
(b) artisans in the north and south; unskilled workers in the north; unskilled workers in the south
(c) artisans in the north; unskilled workers in the north; artisans in the south
(d) artisans in the north and south; unskilled urban workers in the north; unskilled rural workers in the south
(e) artisans in the north and south, unskilled rural workers in the north and south; unskilled urban workers in the north and south

OA=C

8. the material in the passage would be most relevant to a long discussion of which of the following topics?
(a) the reasons for the subsequent economic difficulties of those who participated in the great migration
(b) the effect of migration on the regional economies of the united states following the first world war
(c) the transition from a rural to an urban existence for those who migrated in the great migration
(d) the transformation of the agricultural south following the boll weevil infestation
(e) the disappearance of the artisan class in the united states as a consequence of mechanization in the early twentieth century

OA=A



Hi GMATNinja,
I got the 5th question wrong, the others are not so difficult. Please provide a strategy for attempting this question, as in where to look for answers in the passage and where to not look, and how to see hints in the passage pointing to the answer. Also please comment on why (E) is wrong and why C is correct?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [1]
Given Kudos: 172
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
karun_aggarwal wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 10th Edition, 2003

Practice Question
Question No.: RC 31 ~ 36
Page: 330

The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2015

Practice Question
Question No.: 134 - 139
Page: 416 - 417

In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the black population of the United States left the South, where the preponderance of the black population had been located, and migrated to northern states, with the largest number moving, it is claimed, between 1916 and 1918. It has been frequently assumed, but not proved, that the majority of the migrants in what has come to be called the Great Migration came from rural areas and were motivated by two concurrent factors: the collapse of the cotton industry following the boll weevil infestation, which began in 1898, and increased demand in the north for labor following the cessation of European immigration caused by the outbreak of the first world war in 1914. This assumption has led to the conclusion that the migrants' subsequent lack of economic mobility in the north is tied to rural background, a background that implies unfamiliarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills.

But the question of who actually left the south has never been rigorously investigated. Although numerous investigations document an exodus from rural southern areas to southern cities prior to the Great Migration. No one has considered whether the same migrants then moved on to northern cities. In 1910 over 600,000 black workers, or ten percent of the black work force, reported themselves to be engaged in "manufacturing and mechanical pursuits," the federal census category roughly encompassing the entire industrial sector. The Great Migration could easily have been made up entirely of this group and their families. It is perhaps surprising to argue that an employed population could be enticed to move, but an explanation lies in the labor conditions then prevalent in the South.

About thirty-five percent of the urban black population in the South was engaged in skilled trades. Some were from the old artisan class of slavery—blacksmiths, masons, carpenters—which had had a monopoly of certain trades, but they were gradually being pushed out by competition, mechanization, and obsolescence, the remaining sixty-five percent, more recently urbanized, worked in newly developed industries—tobacco, lumber, coal and iron manufacture, and railroads. Wages in the South, however, were low, and black workers were aware, through labor recruiters and the black press, that they could earn more even as unskilled workers in the North than they could as artisans in the South. After the boll weevil infestation, urban black workers faced competition from the continuing influx of both black and white rural workers, who were driven to undercut the wages formerly paid for industrial jobs. Thus, a move north would be seen as advantageous to a group that was already urbanized and steadily employed, and the easy conclusion tying their subsequent economic problems in the North to their rural background comes into question.
1. The author indicates explicitly that which of the following records has been a source of information in her investigation?

(A) United States immigration service reports from 1914 to 1930
(B) Payrolls of southern manufacturing firms between 1910 and 1930
(C) The volume of cotton exports between 1898 and 1910
(D) The federal census of 1910 (in2nd para 4th line In 1910 over 600,000 black workers, or ten percent of the black workforce, reported themselves to be engaged in "manufacturing and mechanical pursuits," the federal census category roughly encompassing the entire industrial sector.
(E) Advertisements of labor recruiters appearing in southern newspapers after 1910



2. In the passage, the author anticipates which of the following as a possible objection to her argument?

(A) It is uncertain how many people actually migrated during the great migration.
(B) The eventual economic status of the great migration migrants has not been adequately traced.
(C) It is not likely that people with steady jobs would have reason to move to another area of the country. (line 33-36 clearly states that The Great Migration could easily have been made up entirely of this group and their families. It is perhaps surprising to argue that an employed population could be enticed to move, but an explanation lies in the labor conditions then prevalent in the South
(D) It is not true that the term "manufacturing and mechanical pursuits" actually encompasses the entire industrial sector.
(E) Of the black workers living in southern cities, only those in a small number of trades were threatened by obsolescence.



3. According to the passage, which of the following is true of wages in southern cities in 1910?

(A) They were being pushed lower as a result of increased competition. line 38> Wages in the South, however, were low, and black workers were aware, through labor recruiters and the black press
(B) They had begun to rise so that southern industry could attract rural workers.
(C) They had increased for skilled workers but decreased for unskilled workers.
(D) They had increased in large southern cities but decreased in small southern cities.
(E) They had increased in newly developed industries but decreased in the older trades.



4. The author cites each of the following as possible influences in a black worker's decision to migrate north in the great migration except

(A) Wage levels in northern cities
(B) Labor recruiters
(C) Competition from rural workers
(D) Voting rights in northern states (this not talked about anywhere in the passage)
(E) The black press



5. It can be inferred from the passage that the "easy conclusion" mentioned in line 53 is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People who migrate from rural areas to large cities usually do so for economic reasons.
(B) Most people who leave rural areas to take jobs in cities return to rural areas as soon as it is financially possible for them to do so.
(C) People with rural backgrounds are less likely to succeed economically in cities than are those with urban backgrounds.
(D) Most people who were once skilled workers are not willing to work as unskilled workers.
(E) People who migrate from their birthplaces to other regions of country seldom undertake a second migration.



6. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) Support an alternative to an accepted methodology
(B) Present evidence that resolves a contradiction
(C) Introduce a recently discovered source of information
(D) Challenge a widely accepted explanation
(E) Argue that a discarded theory deserves new attention



7. According to information in the passage, which of the following is a correct sequence of groups of workers, from highest paid to lowest paid, in the period between 1910 and 1930?

(a) artisans in the north; artisans in the south; unskilled workers in the north; unskilled workers in the south
(b) artisans in the north and south; unskilled workers in the north; unskilled workers in the south
(c) artisans in the north; unskilled workers in the north; artisans in the south clearly C coz South, however, were low, and black workers were aware, through labor recruiters and the black press, that they could earn more even as unskilled workers in the North than they could as artisans in the South
(d) artisans in the north and south; unskilled urban workers in the north; unskilled rural workers in the south
(e) artisans in the north and south, unskilled rural workers in the north and south; unskilled urban workers in the north and south



8. the material in the passage would be most relevant to a long discussion of which of the following topics?

(a) the reasons for the subsequent economic difficulties of those who participated in the great migration
(b) the effect of migration on the regional economies of the united states following the first world war
(c) the transition from a rural to an urban existence for those who migrated in the great migration
(d) the transformation of the agricultural south following the boll weevil infestation
(e) the disappearance of the artisan class in the united states as a consequence of mechanization in the early twentieth century

[spoiler]A[/spoiler]



Source : JOURNAL ARTICLE
Black Workers and the Great Migration North
Carole Marks
Phylon (1960-)
Vol. 46, No. 2 (2nd Qtr., 1985), pp. 148-161
Published by: Clark Atlanta University
DOI: 10.2307/274413
https://www.jstor.org/stable/274413
Page Count: 14

Attachment:
Black Workers and the Great Migration North.pdf
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Nov 2019
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
1
Kudos
What should be a good time limit for solving this RC?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [2]
Given Kudos: 172
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
1
Kudos
karun_aggarwal wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 10th Edition, 2003

Practice Question
Question No.: RC 31 ~ 36
Page: 330

The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2015

Practice Question
Question No.: 134 - 139
Page: 416 - 417

In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the black population of the United States left the South, where the preponderance of the black population had been located, and migrated to northern states, with the largest number moving, it is claimed, between 1916 and 1918. It has been frequently assumed, but not proved, that the majority of the migrants in what has come to be called the Great Migration came from rural areas and were motivated by two concurrent factors: the collapse of the cotton industry following the boll weevil infestation, which began in 1898, and increased demand in the north for labor following the cessation of European immigration caused by the outbreak of the first world war in 1914. This assumption has led to the conclusion that the migrants' subsequent lack of economic mobility in the north is tied to rural background, a background that implies unfamiliarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills.

But the question of who actually left the south has never been rigorously investigated. Although numerous investigations document an exodus from rural southern areas to southern cities prior to the Great Migration. No one has considered whether the same migrants then moved on to northern cities. In 1910 over 600,000 black workers, or ten percent of the black work force, reported themselves to be engaged in "manufacturing and mechanical pursuits," the federal census category roughly encompassing the entire industrial sector. The Great Migration could easily have been made up entirely of this group and their families. It is perhaps surprising to argue that an employed population could be enticed to move, but an explanation lies in the labor conditions then prevalent in the South.

About thirty-five percent of the urban black population in the South was engaged in skilled trades. Some were from the old artisan class of slavery—blacksmiths, masons, carpenters—which had had a monopoly of certain trades, but they were gradually being pushed out by competition, mechanization, and obsolescence, the remaining sixty-five percent, more recently urbanized, worked in newly developed industries—tobacco, lumber, coal and iron manufacture, and railroads. Wages in the South, however, were low, and black workers were aware, through labor recruiters and the black press, that they could earn more even as unskilled workers in the North than they could as artisans in the South. After the boll weevil infestation, urban black workers faced competition from the continuing influx of both black and white rural workers, who were driven to undercut the wages formerly paid for industrial jobs. Thus, a move north would be seen as advantageous to a group that was already urbanized and steadily employed, and the easy conclusion tying their subsequent economic problems in the North to their rural background comes into question.
1. The author indicates explicitly that which of the following records has been a source of information in her investigation?

(A) United States immigration service reports from 1914 to 1930
(B) Payrolls of southern manufacturing firms between 1910 and 1930
(C) The volume of cotton exports between 1898 and 1910
(D) The federal census of 1910
(E) Advertisements of labor recruiters appearing in southern newspapers after 1910



2. In the passage, the author anticipates which of the following as a possible objection to her argument?

(A) It is uncertain how many people actually migrated during the great migration. > this was clearly stated in the passage with facts "No one has considered whether the same migrants then moved on to northern cities. In 1910 over 600,000 black workers, or ten percent of the black work force."

(B) The eventual economic status of the great migration migrants has not been adequately traced. (this is clearly mentioned)
(C) It is not likely that people with steady jobs would have reason to move to another area of the country. (in these line the author clearly states
(D) It is not true that the term "manufacturing and mechanical pursuits" actually encompasses the entire industrial sector. (clearly out of scope)
(E) Of the black workers living in southern cities, only those in a small number of trades were threatened by obsolescence. (clearly out of scope)



3. According to the passage, which of the following is true of wages in southern cities in 1910?

(A) They were being pushed lower as a result of increased competition.
(B) They had begun to rise so that southern industry could attract rural workers.
(C) They had increased for skilled workers but decreased for unskilled workers.
(D) They had increased in large southern cities but decreased in small southern cities.
(E) They had increased in newly developed industries but decreased in the older trades.



4. The author cites each of the following as possible influences in a black worker's decision to migrate north in the great migration except

(A) Wage levels in northern cities
(B) Labor recruiters
(C) Competition from rural workers
(D) Voting rights in northern states
(E) The black press



5. It can be inferred from the passage that the "easy conclusion" mentioned in line 53 is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People who migrate from rural areas to large cities usually do so for economic reasons.
(B) Most people who leave rural areas to take jobs in cities return to rural areas as soon as it is financially possible for them to do so.
(C) People with rural backgrounds are less likely to succeed economically in cities than are those with urban backgrounds.
(D) Most people who were once skilled workers are not willing to work as unskilled workers.
(E) People who migrate from their birthplaces to other regions of country seldom undertake a second migration.



6. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) Support an alternative to an accepted methodology
(B) Present evidence that resolves a contradiction
(C) Introduce a recently discovered source of information
(D) Challenge a widely accepted explanation
(E) Argue that a discarded theory deserves new attention



7. According to information in the passage, which of the following is a correct sequence of groups of workers, from highest paid to lowest paid, in the period between 1910 and 1930?

(a) artisans in the north; artisans in the south; unskilled workers in the north; unskilled workers in the south
(b) artisans in the north and south; unskilled workers in the north; unskilled workers in the south
(c) artisans in the north; unskilled workers in the north; artisans in the south
(d) artisans in the north and south; unskilled urban workers in the north; unskilled rural workers in the south
(e) artisans in the north and south, unskilled rural workers in the north and south; unskilled urban workers in the north and south



8. the material in the passage would be most relevant to a long discussion of which of the following topics?

(a) the reasons for the subsequent economic difficulties of those who participated in the great migration
(b) the effect of migration on the regional economies of the united states following the first world war
(c) the transition from a rural to an urban existence for those who migrated in the great migration
(d) the transformation of the agricultural south following the boll weevil infestation
(e) the disappearance of the artisan class in the united states as a consequence of mechanization in the early twentieth century

[spoiler]A[/spoiler]



Source : JOURNAL ARTICLE
Black Workers and the Great Migration North
Carole Marks
Phylon (1960-)
Vol. 46, No. 2 (2nd Qtr., 1985), pp. 148-161
Published by: Clark Atlanta University
DOI: 10.2307/274413
https://www.jstor.org/stable/274413
Page Count: 14

Attachment:
Black Workers and the Great Migration North.pdf


2. In the passage, the author anticipates which of the following as a possible objection to her argument?

(A) It is uncertain how many people actually migrated during the great migration. > this was clearly stated in the passage with facts "No one has considered whether the same migrants then moved on to northern cities. In 1910 over 600,000 black workers, or ten percent of the black work force."

(B) The eventual economic status of the great migration migrants has not been adequately traced. (this is clearly mentioned)
(C) It is not likely that people with steady jobs would have reason to move to another area of the country. (in these line the author clearly states The Great Migration could easily have been made up entirely of this group and their families. It is perhaps surprising to argue that an employed population could be enticed to move, but an explanation lies in the labor conditions then prevalent in the South.

(D) It is not true that the term "manufacturing and mechanical pursuits" actually encompasses the entire industrial sector. (clearly out of scope)
(E) Of the black workers living in southern cities, only those in a small number of trades were threatened by obsolescence. (clearly out of scope)


6)The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) Support an alternative to an accepted methodology >we are not supporting anything in this passage
(B) Present evidence that resolves a contradiction > the whole passage was even contradicting at the end as well no contradiction resolved
(C) Introduce a recently discovered source of information >nothing is introduced that can solely be its primary purpose

(D) Challenge a widely accepted explanation > This assumption has led to the conclusion that the migrants' subsequent lack of economic mobility in the north is tied to rural background, a background that implies unfamiliarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills. (over here it talks about the rural background in the north, and rural people are migrated up north
Thus, a move north would be seen as advantageous to a group that was already urbanized and steadily employed, and the easy conclusion tying their subsequent economic problems in the North to their rural background comes into question. (this, however, says that the migration makes sense for the urban population and those who are urbanized)
hence, here is the primary purpose the widely accepted explanation was rural people migrated but at the end it say makes sense for urban people to migrate


(E) Argue that a discarded theory deserves new attention > no discarded theory as such is given in the passage
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2020
Posts: 590
Own Kudos [?]: 301 [1]
Given Kudos: 154
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Foi2Evei2 wrote:
Hi GMATNinja , egmat and other experts

I have question about #2
Quote:
2. In the passage, the author anticipates which of the following as a possible objection to her argument?


I think option (C) still have some questionable gap

the author's argument; The easy conclusion is wrong (the migrants' subsequent lack of economic mobility in the north is tied to rural background, a background that implies unfamiliarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills.

So that the author provide the evidence that the migrants did not lack the skill and might not be unfamiliar with urban.

This question is to let us find the option that weaken the author's conclusion.
Quote:
(C) It is not likely that people with steady jobs would have reason to move to another area of the country.

This option can weaken the author evidence and that's why this option is correct. BUT the author has the evidence to say why the migrants want to move to the North e.g. have higher wages. so that I am not sure this is the best option we have or not?



Foi2Evei2, I'm no expert but see if this helps you. I have a couple of points -

1. We are not asked to weaken the author's conclusion, we're asked about the objection that the author anticipates to her argument. It's not the same as weakening the author's conclusion.
2. The author says that the it is possible that the entire migrated population had a steady source of employment and then goes on to mention a possible objection in the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph. Quoting it here for you -
"It is perhaps surprising to argue that an employed population could be enticed to move, but an explanation lies in the labor conditions then prevalent in the South."
3. You have correctly inferred that the author indeed does counter this objection, but stating the reasons for the migration.
VP
VP
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Posts: 1392
Own Kudos [?]: 542 [1]
Given Kudos: 1656
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I’m not an expert, but maybe I can help point a few things out that may add to the discussion:

It’s a little tricky to see exactly what the author is focused on, but if you look to the last sentence of the first paragraph, you can get a clearer picture.

The author is writing with the knowledge that these workers DID have economic difficulties when they migrated to the North.

The prior assumption, which the author questions, is that most of these workers came from rural backgrounds in the South and migrated because of the 2 reasons given in the first paragraph (lack of Euro immigrants due to WW1 and the Bovine Issue) and this fact was the reason for the difficulties the migrating workers suffered in the North. The author disputes this and offers further evidence in the second paragraph to back up his reasoning.

In the 2nd paragraph, the author attempts to show that many southern workers had already migrated to SOUTHERN CITIES before the period of The Great Migration to the North. Because of this fact, the author argues that the prior assumption (that these southern workers’ struggles in the North stemmed from coming directly from a rural background in the South) is invalid.

The author ends the passage, in the last sentence, by pointing out that the assumption regarding why these workers had difficulty in the North does not seem valid. The prior assumption was that these workers came from rural backgrounds directly and migrated from these rural backgrounds directly to work in the North.

Because of this discussion, A would be a more fitting title than C. C discusses the transition from a rural to an urban setting, when the author shows that these southern workers most likely first had migrated to southern cities and THEN migrated to the North during the Great Migration.

Because of this disparity in the answers, A would be more fitting.


CEdward wrote:
I am actually quite vehement about saying that the answer to 8 should not be A. GMATNinja not surprised that these aren't official questions.

The entire passage seeks to disprove ...as evidenced by the last line of the final paragraph that the seemingly 'easy conclusion' noted at the end of the first paragraph that the blacks would struggle in the North is unwarranted. Why would we go about having a long discussion of their subsequent economic difficulties? The passage lays the groundwork for thinking that a move north would be justifiable on the grounds that it would be more economically beneficial despite their lack of skill. In other words, they WOULD not have economic difficulties.

I could play devil's advocate and suggest that perhaps they actually did struggle because of their lack of skill...but now we are starting to spin stories to create an argument. Are we warranted in thinking they struggled in the north? The tone of the passage and the direction the author is moving in certainly don't suggest that.

C on the other hand seems a safer bet. This was after all called "The Great Migration" so we would be interested in knowing how these individuals coped with the transition...this is less provocative then saying that they struggled as in choice A.

8. the material in the passage would be most relevant to a long discussion of which of the following topics?

(a) the reasons for the subsequent economic difficulties of those who participated in the great migration
(b) the effect of migration on the regional economies of the united states following the first world war
(c) the transition from a rural to an urban existence for those who migrated in the great migration
(d) the transformation of the agricultural south following the boll weevil infestation
(e) the disappearance of the artisan class in the united states as a consequence of mechanization in the early twentieth century

Please give me a thumbs up if you agree.


Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2020
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Sajjad1994

question no 5 line 53 is not highlighted
question no 8 is showing spoiler

_/\_ _/\_
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32945 [1]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Alka10 wrote:
Hi Folks,

What could have been the ideal time to solve this passage?

I took nearly 9 mins 18 sec (reading + answering)

Thanks


Hello Alka10

Welcome to GMAT Club!

A medium-level passage with 8 questions and you have done it in 9 minutes and 18 secs. You are already in optimum time but the real question is your accuracy that is how many questions you got correct in 9 minutes and 18 sec.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63672 [1]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
sharmashagun770 wrote:
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
5. It can be inferred from the passage that the "easy conclusion" mentioned in line 53 is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People who migrate from rural areas to large cities usually do so for economic reasons.

(B) Most people who leave rural areas to take jobs in cities return to rural areas as soon as it is financially possible for them to do so.

(C) People with rural backgrounds are less likely to succeed economically in cities than are those with urban backgrounds.

(D) Most people who were once skilled workers are not willing to work as unskilled workers.

(E) People who migrate from their birthplaces to other regions of country seldom undertake a second migration.


ShashankDave wrote:
Hi GMATNinja,

I got the 5th question wrong, the others are not so difficult. Please provide a strategy for attempting this question, as in where to look for answers in the passage and where to not look, and how to see hints in the passage pointing to the answer. Also please comment on why (E) is wrong and why C is correct?


The "easy conclusion" ties the economic problems faced by the black population after their migration to the North to their rural background. The key to this question lies in the following portion:

    It has been frequently assumed, but not proved, that the majority of the migrants in what has come to be called the Great Migration came from rural areas and were motivated by two concurrent factors: the collapse of the cotton industry following the boll weevil infestation, which began in 1898, and increased demand in the north for labor following the cessation of European immigration caused by the outbreak of the first world war in 1914. This assumption has led to the conclusion that the migrants' subsequent lack of economic mobility in the north is tied to rural background, a background that implies unfamiliarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills.

In other words, the migrants came from rural areas. Thus, the migrants were unfamiliar with urban living and lacked industrial skills. As a result, the migrants faced economic challenges. In order for this reasoning to hold, we have to assume that being unfamiliar with urban living and lacking industrial skills would give the migrants an economic disadvantage. Imagine if we could prove that economic success in the North had nothing to do with familiarity with urban living or with having industrial skills. In that case, the "easy conclusion" could not be properly drawn.

Thus, choice (C) is necessary in order to draw the "easy conclusion." Whether such migrants undertake a second migration does not impact the "easy conclusion", so choice (E) can be eliminated.

For more advice on tackling RC passages, check out the Ultimate RC Guide for Beginners.

I hope that helps!


Hi GMATNinja,

Thank you for this explanation; it is helpful. However, I have a question regarding the stated assumption. Now, the first passage explicitly states the assumption for the conclusion which does indicate financial reasons for the relocation. Then, why would we eliminate A?

Great question. As you say, the passage explicitly states an assumption that led to the "easy conclusion" mentioned in question 5.

Quote:
It has been frequently assumed, but not proved, that the majority of the migrants in what has come to be called the Great Migration came from rural areas and were motivated by two concurrent factors: the collapse of the cotton industry following the boll weevil infestation, which began in 1898, and increased demand in the north for labor following the cessation of European immigration caused by the outbreak of the first world war in 1914.

Given that, it's probably fair to say that one of the assumptions that the "easy conclusion" is based is that the migrants referred to in the passage were motivated by economic factors (such as the collapse of the cotton industry). So what's wrong with (A)?

Well, notice that (A) is making a really general statement: that ANY time people migrate from rural areas to large cities, they're usually doing it for economic reasons. The argument doesn't make that broad of an assumption. It does assume that the specific migrants mentioned in the passage had economic motivations, but it doesn't assume that this is usually the case.

So since (A) is too general of a statement, we can't say it's an assumption that the "easy conclusion" is based on, and we can eliminate it.

I hope that helps!
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2014
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 146 [0]
Given Kudos: 59
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
JarvisR wrote:
1. the author indicates explicitly that which of the following records has been a source of information in her investigation?
(a) united states immigration service reports from 1914 to 1930
(b) payrolls of southern manufacturing firms between 1910 and 1930
(c) the volume of cotton exports between 1898 and 1910
(d) the federal census of 1910
>>in 1910 over 600,000 black workers, or ten percent of the black work force, reported themselves to be engaged in "manufacturing and mechanical pursuits," the federal census category roughly encompassing the entire industrial sector.
(e) advertisements of labor recruiters appearing in southern newspapers after 1910

2. in the passage, the author anticipates which of the following as a possible objection to her argument?
(a) it is uncertain how many people actually migrated during the great migration.
(b) the eventual economic status of the great migration migrants has not been adequately traced.
(c) it is not likely that people with steady jobs would have reason to move to another area of the country.
>> it is perhaps surprising to argue that an employed population could be enticed to move, but an explanation lies in the labor conditions then prevalent in the south.

(d) it is not true that the term "manufacturing and mechanical pursuits" actually encompasses the entire industrial sector.
(e) of the black workers living in southern cities, only those in a small number of trades were threatened by obsolescence.

3. according to the passage, which of the following is true of wages in southern cities in 1910?
(a) they were being pushed lower as a result of increased competition.
>> Line 40 - 50

(b) they had begun to rise so that southern industry could attract rural workers.
(c) they had increased for skilled workers but decreased for unskilled workers.
(d) they had increased in large southern cities but decreased in small southern cities.
(e) they had increased in newly developed industries but decreased in the older trades.

4. the author cites each of the following as possible influences in a black worker's decision to migrate north in the great migration except
(a) wage levels in northern cities
(b) labor recruiters
(c) competition from rural workers
(d) voting rights in northern states
>>No mention regarding voting in arg

(e) the black press

5. it can be inferred from the passage that the "easy conclusion" mentioned in line 53 is based on which of the following assumptions?
(a) people who migrate from rural areas to large cities usually do so for economic reasons.
(b) most people who leave rural areas to take jobs in cities return to rural areas as soon as it is financially possible for them to do so.
(c) people with rural backgrounds are less likely to succeed economically in cities than are those with urban backgrounds.
>>it has been frequently assumed, but not proved, that the majority of the migrants in what has come to be called the great migration came from rural areas...
this assumption has led to the conclusion that the migrants' subsequent lack of economic mobility in the north is tied to rural background, a background that implies unfamiliarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills.

(d) most people who were once skilled workers are not willing to work as unskilled workers.
(e) people who migrate from their birthplaces to other regions of country seldom undertake a second migration.

6. the primary purpose of the passage is to
(a) support an alternative to an accepted methodology
(b) present evidence that resolves a contradiction
(c) introduce a recently discovered source of information
(d) challenge a widely accepted explanation
>> thus, a move north would be seen as advantageous to a group that was already urbanized and steadily employed, and the easy conclusion tying their subsequent economic problems in the north to their rural background comes into question.

(e) argue that a discarded theory deserves new attention

7. according to information in the passage, which of the following is a correct sequence of groups of workers, from highest paid to lowest paid, in the period between 1910 and 1930?
(a) artisans in the north; artisans in the south; unskilled workers in the north; unskilled workers in the south
(b) artisans in the north and south; unskilled workers in the north; unskilled workers in the south
(c) artisans in the north; unskilled workers in the north; artisans in the south
>>wages in the south, however, were low, and black workers were aware, through labor recruiters and the black press, that they could earn more even as unskilled
workers in the north than they could as artisans in the south.

(d) artisans in the north and south; unskilled urban workers in the north; unskilled rural workers in the south
(e) artisans in the north and south, unskilled rural workers in the north and south; unskilled urban workers in the north and south

8. the material in the passage would be most relevant to a long discussion of which of the following topics?
(a) the reasons for the subsequent economic difficulties of those who participated in the great migration
>>Line 10-20 and ending lines of para.

(b) the effect of migration on the regional economies of the united states following the first world war
(c) the transition from a rural to an urban existence for those who migrated in the great migration
(d) the transformation of the agricultural south following the boll weevil infestation
(e) the disappearance of the artisan class in the united states as a consequence of mechanization in the early twentieth century





Hi

Can you please clear me on my understanding on the passage and Question 2. What i understood from the last line of the passages "and the easy conclusion tying their subsequent economic problems in the North to their rural background came into question" that author is considering the two things contradictory: 1) line 55-57 : that those who were urbanized in south will have better position in north 2) line 16-20: that migrants in north were not economically sound as they were not aware about the urban industrialized skills.

Do i get it right ?
According to this understanding only I was diverted to chose option B as answer for Q2.

Please let me know where am I going wrong.

Thanks in advance
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2014
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 146 [0]
Given Kudos: 59
Send PM
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
Juz2play wrote:
For question 2, we want the answer choice that weaken the author's argument that black immigrants who moved from the South to the North were not mostly from rural background.

2. in the passage, the author anticipates which of the following as a possible objection to her argument?
(a) it is uncertain how many people actually migrated during the great migration. This is irrelevant; it does not weaken the argument.
(b) the eventual economic status of the great migration migrants has not been adequately traced. This actually strengthens the author's argument by calling the widely accepted assumption into question.
(c) it is not likely that people with steady jobs would have reason to move to another area of the country. This weakens the argument. In the passage, it states that 35% of urban black population in the South was engaged in skilled trades (Line 35). And the remaining 65% of this population worked in newly developed industries (Line 40). Hence, this can imply that urban black population in the South had jobs. As a result, if choice (C) is true, the great migration must come from rural areas (This contradicts the author's argument and supported the accepted assumption).
(d) it is not true that the term "manufacturing and mechanical pursuits" actually encompasses the entire industrial sector. This is basically irrelevant.
(e) of the black workers living in southern cities, only those in a small number of trades were threatened by obsolescence. This actually strengthened the accepted assumption by showing that only a few urban black population's jobs were threatened.

For question 5, the information we needed to answer this question is from line 51 to 55. "Thus, a move north would be seen as advantageous to a group that was already urbanized and steadily employed, and the easy conclusion tying their -subsequent economic problems in the north to their rural background comes into question"
This matches Choice (C).

For question 8, we need to know that the passage is discussing the reasons why black people from the South moved to the North and challenging the accepted assumption that most black population who migrated from the South to the North were from rural background. With this in mind, we can easily answer choice (A).
(b) the effect of migration on the regional economies of the united states following the first world war. The author discuss little about this.
(c) the transition from a rural to an urban existence for those who migrated in the great migration. The author perhaps never discuss about this at all.
(d) the transformation of the agricultural south following the boll weevil infestation. The author discuss little about this.
(e) the disappearance of the artisan class in the united states as a consequence of mechanization in the early twentieth century. Nothing is mentioned about the decline in the artisan class.



Hi

Can you please clear me on my understanding on the passage and Question 2. What i understood from the last line of the passages "and the easy conclusion tying their subsequent economic problems in the North to their rural background came into question" that author is considering the two things contradictory: 1) line 55-57 : that those who were urbanized in south will have better position in north 2) line 16-20: that migrants in north were not economically sound as they were not aware about the urban industrialized skills.

Do i get it right ?
According to this understanding only I was diverted to chose option B as answer for Q2.

Please let me know where am I going wrong.

Thanks in advance
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In the two decades between 1910 and 1930, over ten percent to the blac [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13961 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne