M28-10

Question

What is the maximum value of  -3x^2 + 12x -2y^2 - 12y - 39  ?

A.  -39 
B.  -9 
C.  0 
D.  9 
E.  39

Bunuel · Answer

Official Solution:

What is the maximum value of  -3x^2 + 12x -2y^2 - 12y - 39  ?

A.  -39 
B.  -9 
C.  0 
D.  9 
E.  39

To find the maximum value of the expression  -3x^2 + 12x -2y^2 - 12y - 39 , we first rewrite it by completing the squares for both the  x  and  y  terms:
  
 -3x^2 + 12x -2y^2 - 12y - 39 =  
 
 =-3x^2 + 12x - 12 - 2y^2 - 12y - 18 - 9 = 
 
 = -3(x^2 - 4x + 4) - 2(y^2 + 6y + 9) - 9 = 
 
 = -3(x-2)^2 - 2(y+3)^2 - 9 .
  
So, we need to maximize the value of  -3(x-2)^2-2(y+3)^2-9 .
 
Since both  -3(x-2)^2  and  -2(y+3)^2  are of the form (negative number)*(non-negative number), their maximum values are zero. As a result, the maximum value of the entire expression is  0+0-9=-9 .

Answer: B

cyb · Answer

How did you know to split the -39 into 3 parts: -12, -18, and -9?

ENGRTOMBA2018 · Answer

The trick with these questions that ask you about max/min of a second degree polynomial is that you will invariably get a value of the form (a \pm b) wherein, the minimum value of any square = 0. Thus try to create perfect squares out of the given polynomials.

Realize that  (a\pm b)^2 = a^2 \pm 2*a*b + b^2 .

Given expression:  −3x^2+12x−2y^2−12y−39  ---> try to create perfect squares :

(-3x^2+12x) + (-2y^2-12y)-39 ---> -3 (x^2-4x) -2 (y^2+6y) -39 ----> 3 (x^2-4x+4-4) -2 (y^2+6y+9-9) -39

--->  3 (x^2-4x+4-4) -2 (y^2+6y+9-9) -39  --->  -3  -2  -39  ---->  -3(x-2)^2+12 -2(y+3)^2+18-39

---->  -3(x-2)^2+12 -2(y+3)^2+18-39  ---> -3(x-2)^2-2(y+3)^2-9

As mentioned above, the minimum value of a perfect square = 0 --> to maximize the given expression,

you need to put  (x-2)^2 =0  and (y+3)^2=0  ---> giving you 0+0-9=-9 as the maximum value.

Any other values of (x-3)^2  and  (y+3)^2 will give you a smaller negative value hence 'minimizing' instead of maximizing the expression.

Hope this helps.

GMChand · Answer

If you are familiar with basic differentiation, it would be very quick.

Solution: Let the given equation be 1.

Step 1.Find differentiation of equ 1 wr.to "X" and equate to "0" (This is the standard rule for a differentiation in order to get maximum value)
Hence, -6x+12=0 
therefore x=2

Step 2.Then differentiate the equ 1 wr.to "Y" and equate to "0" 
-4y-12=0
therefore y=-3

Step 3.Submit both x=2 and y=-3 in the equ. 1 to get the maximum value.
Therefore the answer is -9.

Differentiation approach can save lot of time while determining the maximum value of an expression.

HasnainAfxal · Answer

i solved this question in following way:
to maximize this expression, we need to maximize terms containing 'x', i.e
 −3x^2+12x 
and we need to maximize terms containing 'y', i.e
 −2y^2−12y 
So,
 −3x^2+12x  will be maximum when x is positive and  x=2 .
 −2y^2−12y  will be maximum when y is negative and  y=-3 
so by plugging in  x=2  and  y=-3  in given expression we get  -9  and that's the maximum value we can get from this expression.

ari.banerjee · Answer

Not sure if this approach helps but I kinda took the differential approach and found the answer in a minute...

d/dx(expression)= 0 to find the value of x and d/dy(expression)=0 to find the value of y. This is the way we determine maximas in differentiation. This is a basic second order differential and anyone who has been through grade 12 in science/Math/Physics should be able to solve this.

d/dx=-6x+12=0, x=2

Similarly, d/dy= -4y-12=0, y=-3,

Sub x and y in the equation and you get maximum value of the expression as -9.

Hope this helps and please give me a kudos if you relate to the approach!

TheModo · Answer

I found out why Bunuel breaks out the "-39", and have found a formula to find the maximum of a second degree polynomial. A detailed understanding and step-by-step walkthrough is included below. Disclaimer: This post is "wordy"; however, as any of us have likely determined throughout our studying, understanding the entire thought process, or logic, of how to arrive at a given answer is important.

Logic The key to this question is to recognize exactly what it is testing, which is: "how do you find the maximum of a second degree polynomial?" Upon recognizing this "task" that the question is testing, deciphering Bunuel's logic of breaking out the "-39" to multiple terms makes complete sense. As background, to find the maximum of a second degree polynomial (ax^2 + bx + c), the formula is: "(c - ((b^2) / (4a)))". More on that here: https://study.com/academy/lesson/find-the-maximum-value-of-a-function-lesson-practice-quiz.html . As a further note of background, if the 'a-coefficient' is positive, the polynomial will have a minimum, and if the 'a-coefficient' is negative, the polynomial will have a maximum. Regardless, the formula you use to find either maximum or minimum is the exact same: (c - ((b^2) / (4a))). Upon recognizing what the test is asking/testing, and knowing the formula stated above to find the maximum of a second degree polynomial, you can see why Bunuel breaks out the "-39" to create two separate second degree polynomials; as a way to create two polynomials that you can then find the respective maximum values for. Step-by-step 1.) -3x^2 + 12x - 2y^2 - 12y - 39 --> you should be able to recognize that there is a "complete" 2nd degree polynomial in "-2y^2 - 12y - 39"; however, the "-3x^2 + 12x" is "incomplete" as there is no "c" value. 2.) At this point, you need to ask yourself, "How can I make two complete 2nd degree polynomials?" Specifically, how can you write "-3x^2 + 12x +/- R " and "-2y^2 - 12y +/- S "?, R and S would be derived from -39. Note: "R" and "S" are term names that I made up to help distinguish in this post between the respective polynomials, as opposed to simply calling them both "c", which is technically their term name for a polynomial. 2a.) To find values for R and S, you need to ask yourself, "what two numbers that add up to -39 (either completely or with values left over) can I use that would 'complete' X's and Y's respective polynomials, and result in each polynomial to have the a-coefficient factored out?" For example, the "R" (or "c") value of the "-3x^2 + 12 +/- R" polynomial would have to be divisible by 3, since "-3" is the a-coefficient, in order to create ease of factoring. Similarly, the "S" (or "c") value of the "-2y^2 - 12y +/- S" polynomial would have to be divisible by 2, for the exact same reason. 2b.) If you're following up to this point, there are multiple ways to break out "-39" to be numbers that would "complete" each polynomial (e.g., (-12)+(-18)+(-9)=-39; (-3)+(-3)+(-33)=-39; etc.). Essentially, any of these numbers will work to aid you in arriving at the answer, just remember that the R and S terms should be divisible by their respective a-coefficient. 3.) For the sake of showing why/how Bunuel broke out -39 to -12, -18, and -9, we will do that here. 3a.) The new formula from the prompt is: -3x^2 + 12x - 12 - 2y^2 - 12y - 18 - 9 --> Do you see how you now have two "complete" polynomials" for X and Y with -9 left over? 3b.) Mark the polynomials with parentheses to distinguish between them... (-3x^2 + 12x - 12) + (-2y^2 - 12y - 18) - 9 Steps 4 and 5 are "new" compared to the previous posts I have seen on this question. 4.) Remember how I mentioned above how to find the maximum of a polynomial (c - ((b^2) / 4a)? Use this formula to find the maximum value for each newly created "complete" polynomial 4a.) For the X-polynomial, the maximum formula becomes: (-12 - ((12^2) / 4(-3))) --> (-12 - ((144) / (-12))) --> (-12 - (-12)) --> (-12 + 12) --> 0... the maximum value for the X-polynomial is "0" ... hold on to that thought 4b.) For the Y-polynomial, the maximum formula becomes: (-18 - ((-12^2) / 4(-2))) --> (-18 - ((144) / (-8))) --> (-18 - (-18)) --> (-18 + 18) --> 0... the maximum value for the Y-polynomial is "0" ... again, hold on to that though; we aren't done! 5.) Now, combine all of the new numbers. The new equation finally breaks down to: 0 + 0 - 9... which finally results in: -9 (answer B). As always, please feel free to share thoughts, questions, comments, and/or concerns. As you can likely understand, this question threw me for a while, and I did not understand Bunuel's logic of breaking out the "-39", thus I researched how to find the max of a second degree polynomial, did not see the affiliated logic shared throughout the thread, and felt compelled to share. Hope this helps!

Bunuel · Answer

I have edited the question and the solution by adding more details to enhance its clarity. I hope it is now easier to understand.

BottomJee · Answer

I think this is a  high-quality  question and I agree with explanation.

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

M28-10

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards