Join us for MBA Spotlight – The Top 20 MBA Fair      Schedule of Events | Register

 It is currently 06 Jun 2020, 00:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 03 Jun 2012
Posts: 39
Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 07 Aug 2019, 02:53
6
1
19
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

82% (01:29) correct 18% (01:47) wrong based on 2131 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a millionaire, and over half are in top management. Shouldn’t you subscribe to Financial Forecaster now?

A reader who is neither a millionaire nor in top management would be most likely to act in accordance with the advertisement’s suggestion if he or she drew which of the following questionable conclusions invited by the advertisement?

A. Among finance-related periodicals. Financial Forecaster provides the most detailed financial information.
B. Top managers cannot do their jobs properly without reading Financial Forecaster.
D. The subscribers mentioned were helped to become millionaires or join top management by reading Financial Forecaster.
E. Only those who will in fact become millionaires, or at least top managers, will read the advertisement.

Project CR Butler: Day 1:Critical Reasoning (CR1)

Originally posted by soniedarshan on 10 Jun 2013, 01:45.
Last edited by Bunuel on 07 Aug 2019, 02:53, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 10506
Location: Pune, India
Re: Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2018, 06:04
16
2
soniedarshan wrote:
Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a millionaire, and over half are in top management. Shouldn’t you subscribe to Financial Forecaster now?

A reader who is neither a millionaire nor in top management would be most likely to act in accordance with the advertisement’s suggestion if he or she drew which of the following questionable conclusions invited by the advertisement?

A. Among finance-related periodicals. Financial Forecaster provides the most detailed financial information.
B. Top managers cannot do their jobs properly without reading Financial Forecaster.
D. The subscribers mentioned were helped to become millionaires or join top management by reading Financial Forecaster.
E. Only those who will in fact become millionaires, or at least top managers, will read the advertisement.

In critical reasoning, our job is to read critically.

(1/3) of subscribers to Financial Forecaster are millionaires, and over 1/2 are in top management.
Shouldn’t you subscribe to Financial Forecaster now?

So the first thing that comes to my mind is that they are trying to sell FF to me by giving these stats. They are implying that people who subscribe to FF become millionaires and top managers. If I were gullible, I would perhaps deduce this and subscribe to FF.
But what if people who become millionaires and top managers subscribe to FF afterwards because it gives them some info they need in their roles? Then my subscribing to FF is unlikely to make me a millionaire/top manager.
Now I am happy with my analysis and move on to the question stem.

A reader who is neither a millionaire nor in top management would be most likely to act in accordance with the advertisement’s suggestion if he or she drew which of the following questionable conclusions invited by the advertisement?

So I think about it like this - I will act as per the ad's suggestion (subscribe to the FF) if I conclude what from the ad?

This is simple! I know they are implying that people who subscribe to FF become millionaires and top managers. If I believe in this, I will subscribe to FF. This is mentioned in (D)

A. Among finance-related periodicals. Financial Forecaster provides the most detailed financial information.
This is not a conclusion that one can draw from the ad. Hence not correct.

B. Top managers cannot do their jobs properly without reading Financial Forecaster.
This is the smart me thinking. That top managers subscribe to FF because they need to. They don't become top managers by subscribing to it. But what they are looking for is the conclusion of a gullible person. So not correct.

Another possibility of smart deduction. Perhaps the FF targets millionaires only and hence has millionaires as subscribers. But again, what they are looking for is the conclusion of a gullible person. So not correct.

E. Only those who will in fact become millionaires, or at least top managers, will read the advertisement.
Again, this says that it caters to the cream of the society - people who are likely to become millionaires or top managers. Again, this is not what we need. We need the conclusion of a person who falls for the ad, not the smart person.
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Retired Moderator
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 968
Location: United States
Re: Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2013, 00:19
5
soniedarshan wrote:
Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a millionaire, and over half are in top management.
Shouldn’t you subscribe to Financial Forecaster now?A reader who is neither a millionaire nor in top management would be most likely to act in accordance with the advertisement’s suggestion if he or she drew which of the following questionable conclusions invited by the advertisement?

A. Among finance-related periodicals. Financial Forecaster provides the most detailed financial information.
B. Top managers cannot do their jobs properly without reading Financial Forecaster.
D. The subscribers mentioned were helped to become millionaires or join top management by reading Financial Forecaster.
E. Only those who will in fact become millionaires, or at least top managers, will read the advertisement.

ANALYZE THE QUESTION STEM:

The most difficult part of this question is the "question stem". I would paraphrase it like:

A reader who is neither a millionaire nor in top management would be most likely to act in accordance with the advertisement’s suggestion if he or she believes that....?

But What is "act in accordance with the advertisement suggestion". It means "you should subscribe FF now"

==> The question stem will be: A reader who is neither a millionaire nor in top management would subscribe FF if he or she believes that....

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

The advertisement' FACT: 1/3 subscribers to FF are millionaires, and over 1/2 are in top management.

Because the advertisement used the word "subscribers" in order to make a new reader believes that "he/she will be a millionaire or top management IF he/she reads FF".

This is exactly what a new reader believes, ==> so he/she would subscribe FF.

Hence, D is correct.

Hope that helps.
##### General Discussion
Retired Moderator
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 1381
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2013, 04:09
soniedarshan wrote:
Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a millionaire, and over half are in top management.
Shouldn’t you subscribe to Financial Forecaster now?A reader who is neither a millionaire nor in top management would be most likely to act in accordance with the advertisement’s suggestion if he or she drew which of the following questionable conclusions invited by the advertisement?

A. Among finance-related periodicals. Financial Forecaster provides the most detailed financial information.
B. Top managers cannot do their jobs properly without reading Financial Forecaster.
D. The subscribers mentioned were helped to become millionaires or join top management by reading Financial Forecaster.
E. Only those who will in fact become millionaires, or at least top managers, will read the advertisement.

The reader who is neither a millionaire nor in top management would believe that the Financial forecaster has helped other people becoming millionaire and top management peoples, hence the option C
_________________
Intern
Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 47
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
Re: Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2013, 12:25
For me It´s D.

People who are neither a millionaire nor a top manager, are likely to read the Financial Forecaster, if reading the journal, would help them become a millionaire or a top manager.
_________________
MV
"Better to fight for something than live for nothing.” ― George S. Patton Jr
Board of Directors
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 5021
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Re: Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2018, 06:35
soniedarshan wrote:
Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a millionaire, and over half are in top management. Shouldn’t you subscribe to Financial Forecaster now?
A reader who is neither a millionaire nor in top management would be most likely to act in accordance with the advertisement’s suggestion if he or she drew which of the following questionable conclusions invited by the advertisement?

A. Among finance-related periodicals. Financial Forecaster provides the most detailed financial information.
B. Top managers cannot do their jobs properly without reading Financial Forecaster.
D. The subscribers mentioned were helped to become millionaires or join top management by reading Financial Forecaster.
E. Only those who will in fact become millionaires, or at least top managers, will read the advertisement.

The highlighted part of the question stem asks us to doubt the Argument presented in the stimulus...

The stimulus states -

1. 1/3 Subscribers to FF = Millionaire
2. > 50% are in top management.

And then appeals whether this is a sufficient reason to start subscribing to FF...

None but option (D) challenges the reasoning presented , it may be such that millionaires or top management personnel started reading FF after becoming millionaires or joining top Managerial positions.

Reading FF ≠ Becoming millionaires or join top management !!!, Hence Answer must be (D)
_________________
Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )
Manager
Joined: 31 May 2015
Posts: 157
Re: Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2018, 03:10
The wordin in answer E "Only those who will in fact become millionaires, or at least top managers, will read the advertisement" is too extreme correct or is there any other reason for which is considered and incorrect answer.
_________________
GMAT loosers are born not made !!!
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2018
Posts: 127
Location: India
GMAT 1: 460 Q42 V14
Re: Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Oct 2019, 09:51
Quote:
Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a millionaire, and over half are in top management. Shouldn’t you subscribe to Financial Forecaster now?

A reader who is neither a millionaire nor in top management would be most likely to act in accordance with the advertisement’s suggestion if he or she drew which of the following questionable conclusions invited by the advertisement?

Question: what is the secret ingredient that brings a person other than millionaire or top management guy to subscribe to Financial Forecaster?
Quote:
A. Among finance-related periodicals. Financial Forecaster provides the most detailed financial information.

So what, Why would i subscribe if it provides most detailed info.it is no way benificial to me.
Option A doesn't answer the question.
Quote:
B. Top managers cannot do their jobs properly without reading Financial Forecaster.

Who cares about top managers doing their jobs? There's nothing useful to me.
Option B doesn't answer the question.
Quote:

Well I'm not a millionaire so this ad is no way useful to me as I'm not a millionaire.
Option C doesn't Answer the question
Quote:
D. The subscribers mentioned were helped to become millionaires or join top management by reading Financial Forecaster.

Hmmm....I'll think of it because I might become a millionaire if i subscribe to it.
There's the catch...Keep it and check if there is something better than this.
Quote:
E. Only those who will in fact become millionaires, or at least top managers, will read the advertisement.

What nonsense?reading itself makes me millionaire means why would i subscribe to your magazine?
Option E doesn't answer the question
D is the Winner
Manager
Joined: 22 Sep 2018
Posts: 76
Re: Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2020, 03:09
This arguments is saying that , FF is the main reason for those people to become millionaires and to be in top management,

so the option which goes with the causality is the correct answer.
A. It gives the information about the content in the FF but nothing about the causality
B .It indirectly says that to work properly top managers subscribe FF , which is against the causality.
C it also says that , only millionaires can read the ad, so there is possibility that one who is already millionaire will subscribe
D This shows the correct causality .
E this option also says the reverse of the causality of the arguement.

So the option is D
Re: Nearly one in three subscribers to Financial Forecaster is a   [#permalink] 20 Jan 2020, 03:09