Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 09:23 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 09:23

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Mar 2012
Posts: 83
Own Kudos [?]: 186 [54]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GPA: 3.1
WE:Accounting (Other)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 506
Own Kudos [?]: 640 [5]
Given Kudos: 61
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2013
Posts: 246
Own Kudos [?]: 945 [6]
Given Kudos: 410
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
WE:General Management (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
General Discussion
CEO
CEO
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Status: World Rank #4 MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 3187
Own Kudos [?]: 1585 [5]
Given Kudos: 33
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
3
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Lets look at each of the answer choices by turn.

[A]: Does a decline in market share necessarily mean a decline in sales? No! Even if the market share has decreased, the sales and therefore the profits may not necessarily decline. This seems to be our answer.
[B]: A ban on the sales of the ePod will definitely hit profits. This is a convincing explanation.
[C]: If the costs of producing the ePod went up, it can hit profits in spite of a price increase. This is a convincing explanation.
[D]: If the average customer purchased fewer ePods while the overall number of customers remained the same, then overall profits can fall in spite of the price increase.
[E]: The govt's imposition of taxes can mean a hit in profitability in spite of a price increase as this is also akin to a cost increase.

Judging from this, it should be A. However, this question is not watertight and needs be further thought through. For example, option E does not completely explain what the magnitude of taxes was. If it was more than additional profits gained from the price increase, then overall profits can decline, but if it was not, overall profits will still rise. Similarly, it needs to be noted in option A that the market itself did not remain static, because if it did then the loss in market share will also mean a drop in sales, which might mean a drop in profits.

Overall, this question could be worded in a much, much better way.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Status:GMAT Coach
Posts: 170
Own Kudos [?]: 284 [2]
Given Kudos: 65
Location: Peru
GPA: 3.98
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
2
Kudos
GyanOne wrote:
Lets look at each of the answer choices by turn.

[A]: Does a decline in market share necessarily mean a decline in sales? No! Even if the market share has decreased, the sales and therefore the profits may not necessarily decline. This seems to be our answer.
[B]: A ban on the sales of the ePod will definitely hit profits. This is a convincing explanation.
[C]: If the costs of producing the ePod went up, it can hit profits in spite of a price increase. This is a convincing explanation.
[D]: If the average customer purchased fewer ePods while the overall number of customers remained the same, then overall profits can fall in spite of the price increase.
[E]: The govt's imposition of taxes can mean a hit in profitability in spite of a price increase as this is also akin to a cost increase.

Judging from this, it should be A. However, this question is not watertight and needs be further thought through. For example, option E does not completely explain what the magnitude of taxes was. If it was more than additional profits gained from the price increase, then overall profits can decline, but if it was not, overall profits will still rise. Similarly, it needs to be noted in option A that the market itself did not remain static, because if it did then the loss in market share will also mean a drop in sales, which might mean a drop in profits.

Overall, this question could be worded in a much, much better way.


In addition to your comment, I must say that the increase in taxes was prior to the price increase, so we can assume that the analysts' prediction was made taking the tax increase into account. Then this option would not be an explanation to the decline in price.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Aug 2013
Posts: 46
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
mohnish104 wrote:
if market share decline, your profits are bound to decline... eg: apple is concerned that samsung is eating up its market share. why? decrease in market share -> decrease in revenues -> decrease in profits.


just an FYI. a decrease in revenue may not always lead to a decrease in profits. a company may have 1 bn dollars in revenue and still make only 1 mn dollars in profits. similarly a company may have 1 mn dollars in revenue but can have 800,000 dollars in profits. now in the argument, the narrator explicitly mentions that the company has ONLY 1 product. if the initial price of the product was lets say 1000 usd and the number of customers buying this product was 10, sales are 10000 usd and profits may be 8000 usd. now with the price appraisal, lets say the new price is 2000 usd but number of customers your company is catering to drops to 8. sales of 16000 usd and profits may still be greater than or equal to the previously 8000 usd. you see??? market share is the number of customers a company caters to. in this argument is it explicitly mentioned that the company caters to THESE MANY NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS???? NO!!! hence, A is correct because it doesnt explain the decline.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2014
Posts: 202
Own Kudos [?]: 361 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.76
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
samichange wrote:
KAS1 wrote:
Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently raised prices on its signature product, the ePod. Analysts had predicted that increased prices would translate into higher profits for Newtronics. However, Newtronix saw its profits decline after the price increase.

Each of the following, if true, is convincing as an explanation for the decline in Newtronix’s profit EXCEPT

A. Newtronix’s market share has declined since the price increase.
B. A recent patent dispute led to the ban of sales of ePods in several countries.
C. Materials necessary to the production of a necessary component of the ePod recently went up in price.
D. The average customer purchased fewer ePods as a result of the price increase, while the number of customers purchasing ePods remained the same.
E. The government imposed higher taxes on Newtronix just prior to the price increase.

New question! Didn't find it on the forum. Topic tested - explain the discrepancy.



A is correct

A decrease in market share does not necessarily mean that the profits will decline.e.g.
Year 2011-Apple sold 1 million iPhones and Samsung sold 1 million Galaxy notes - Apples market share is 50%
Year 2012-Apples raises the price and still manages to sell 1 million iPhones whereas Samsung manages to sell 1.5 million Galaxy notes- Apples market share is 33%

But is the above info. enough to conclude that the profits for Samsung have decreased , Instead profits may have increased due to price rise.



The above given illustration infact makes option A vulnerable
As assumed above Apple sells 1million ipods this year and has market share of 50%
next year it sells again 1million ipods but this time market share is 33%

My question here is company sold new 1million ipods at increased price this year and collects revenue greater than previous year , but still has decline in profits
this shows some other factor such as increase in raw material ( as indicated in Option C) must be cause of this.

Thus market share is irrelevant of the revenue generated by company .
IMO option C is correct
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2014
Posts: 202
Own Kudos [?]: 361 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.76
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
IMO C is correct
Find my explanation below

Year 2011-Apple sold 1 million iPhones and Samsung sold 1 million Galaxy notes - Apples market share is 50%
Year 2012-Apples raises the price and still manages to sell 1 million iPhones whereas Samsung manages to sell 1.5 million Galaxy notes- Apples market share is 33%

As assumed above Apple sells 1million ipods this year and has market share of 50%
next year it sells again 1million ipods but this time market share is 33%

My reasoning here is company sold new 1million ipods at increased price in 2012 and collects revenue greater than previous year , but still has decline in profits
this shows some other factor such as increase in raw material ( as indicated in Option C) must be cause of this.

Thus market share is irrelevant of the revenue generated by company .
IMO option C is correct

Kindly let me know if I am missing something
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Apr 2015
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 22 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Schools: ISB '16 (A)
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
kanigmat011 wrote:
IMO C is correct
Find my explanation below

Year 2011-Apple sold 1 million iPhones and Samsung sold 1 million Galaxy notes - Apples market share is 50%
Year 2012-Apples raises the price and still manages to sell 1 million iPhones whereas Samsung manages to sell 1.5 million Galaxy notes- Apples market share is 33%

As assumed above Apple sells 1million ipods this year and has market share of 50%
next year it sells again 1million ipods but this time market share is 33%

My reasoning here is company sold new 1million ipods at increased price in 2012 and collects revenue greater than previous year , but still has decline in profits
this shows some other factor such as increase in raw material ( as indicated in Option C) must be cause of this.

Thus market share is irrelevant of the revenue generated by company .
IMO option C is correct

Kindly let me know if I am missing something



Hi Kani,

The only issue seems to be that you just misread the question. The answer should be an option that is NOT a convincing explanation for the decline in Newtronix's profit. (notice the "EXCEPT")

Each of the following, if true, is convincing as an explanation for the decline in Newtronix’s profit EXCEPT

A. Newtronix’s market share has declined since the price increase.
B. A recent patent dispute led to the ban of sales of ePods in several countries.
C. Materials necessary to the production of a necessary component of the ePod recently went up in price.
D. The average customer purchased fewer ePods as a result of the price increase, while the number of customers purchasing ePods remained the same.
E. The government imposed higher taxes on Newtronix just prior to the price increase.

You were spot on in deducing that C is a valid explanation for the decline in profits while A is not. Like option C, options B, D and E are also valid explanations that could lead to the decline in profits. Hence, A should be our answer! :)

Hope that made it clear.

Cheers!
Current Student
Joined: 10 Jan 2016
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 57
Location: India
Schools: Cox (A$$$)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.2
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
The choices are ambiguous.
If the logic is like "A is wrong since Total market revenue before and after is not mentioned"..then all the other choices are equally vulnerable.
C-How can we decide total profit based on rise in cost of a single component. What if price of all other major components have gone down??
I mean to say ..these choices are equally good or bad.
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 4128
Own Kudos [?]: 9247 [2]
Given Kudos: 91
 Q51  V47
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
jithinkadayil wrote:
The choices are ambiguous.
If the logic is like "A is wrong since Total market revenue before and after is not mentioned"..then all the other choices are equally vulnerable.
C-How can we decide total profit based on rise in cost of a single component. What if price of all other major components have gone down??
I mean to say ..these choices are equally good or bad.


I agree with this. Normally if your market share declines, that's a bad thing. It can mean your sales have dropped, or that your competitors are selling more than before (or a combination of those two things). Of course, the fact alone that a company's market share has dropped doesn't guarantee that the company's profit has dropped, but none of the answer choices here guarantee that the company's profit drops. For any of the five answer choices to be "convincing as an explanation" for the drop in profit (which is what the question asks), we need more information. Was the tax increase mentioned in E large or small? Was the increase in the cost of the raw material mentioned in C large or small? And so on.

None of the answers is "convincing as an explanation" without additional assumptions, and any of them can be "convincing" if you do make assumptions. So how do we decide which assumptions we're supposed to make, and which we're not supposed to make? There's no way to tell. So I don't think this is a well-designed question.
Director
Director
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 552
Own Kudos [?]: 436 [0]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently raised prices on its signature product, the ePod. Analysts had predicted that increased prices would translate into higher profits for Newtronics. However, Newtronix saw its profits decline after the price increase.

Each of the following, if true, is convincing as an explanation for the decline in Newtronix’s profit EXCEPT

A. Newtronix’s market share has declined since the price increase.
B. A recent patent dispute led to the ban of sales of ePods in several countries.
C. Materials necessary to the production of a necessary component of the ePod recently went up in price.
D. The average customer purchased fewer ePods as a result of the price increase, while the number of customers purchasing ePods remained the same.
E. The government imposed higher taxes on Newtronix just prior to the price increase.


The choice that does not expalin why the profits declined is the correct choice.

A is the onl coice that does not help in the understanding of the decline in the profits adn thus is correct.
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 559
Own Kudos [?]: 933 [1]
Given Kudos: 632
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GPA: 3.6
WE:Operations (Consumer Products)
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
1
Kudos
As GMATNinja says " GMAC pays 1000-1500$ for each question and hence the sophistication is preserved."

Note: This question isnt poor (POOR ATLEAST HAS SOME POTENTIAL), it is USELESS

Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently raised prices on its signature product, the ePod. Analysts had predicted that increased prices would translate into higher profits for Newtronics. However, Newtronix saw its profits decline after the price increase.
I'll tell u thw flaws in answer choices
Each of the following, if true, is convincing as an explanation for the decline in Newtronix’s profit EXCEPT


(A) Newtronix’s market share has declined since the price increase.- Market share is judged by two entities : sales AND revenue - so if sales decreased , this option doesnt explain . BUT if revenue decreased then it does.

(B) A recent patent dispute led to the ban of sales of ePods in several countries.

(C) Materials necessary to the production of a necessary component of the ePod recently went up in price.- RECENTLY WENT UP. whereas we are talking about epods already on the market. SO CANNOT EXPLAIN DISCREPANCY

(D) The average customer purchased fewer ePods as a result of the price increase, while the number of customers purchasing ePods remained the same.- THS CHOICE DOES NOT MAKE SENSE

(E) The government imposed higher taxes on Newtronix just prior to the price increase. - PRIOR TO THE PRICE INCREASE. DId the company account for the taxes in its price increase? if it did then does NOT EXPLAIN

@nightblade345 lease remove this question
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 72
Own Kudos [?]: 337 [0]
Given Kudos: 95
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT Date: 09-28-2012
WE:Accounting (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
I understand why A is correct. It's because market share has declined. Which could mean that market share declined from say 75% to 70% while overall sales have increased. Decline in sales would result in decline in profits for sure and its ludicrous to assume that if sales decrease, costs might have too.

But I couldn't rule out D which makes a lot of sense. It states that a consumer has reduced his purchasing while the number of consumers remains same.
I know it's getting too much into details.
I mean let's say they doubled or tripled the price. Now if a consumer reduces his purchases, a consumer buying 3 last year now buys only 2. But considering the prices have tripled, the sales volume has increased. Lol. The option doesn't mention sales, only the number of ePods sold.

Anyway, straightforward A but D isnt watertight.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2020
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
VeritasKarishma

Both the fall in market share and the increase in prices are consistent with an increase in profits. Ex. if the components increase in price by 10$ and price goes up by 100, profits will increase. Similarly, market share can fall and profits still go up.
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13961
Own Kudos [?]: 32942 [1]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Official Explanation

(1) Identify the Question Type

We are asked about explanations for the decline in profits, so this question requires us to resolve a discrepancy. We will need to identify the apparent contradiction and consider what helps to explain why the information is not actually contradictory. Because the question uses the word EXCEPT, we need to find four options that appear to explain the decline in profits and select the remaining option.

(2) Deconstruct the Argument

We are given a company that sells only one product, which eliminates the need to complicate the argument with a varied product mix. Analysts thought raising prices would increase profits, but instead profits declined.

(3) State the Goal

We need to find four answer choices that could explain a decrease in profits and select the remaining option. Profit is calculated as revenue minus costs, so any direct increase in costs or decrease in revenue will tend to lower profits. We are looking to eliminate any options that increase costs, decrease revenue, or have no definite connection to either factor.

(4) Work from Wrong to Right

(A) CORRECT. The fact that Newtronix’s ePod sales represent a smaller portion of the total market revenue does not necessarily mean that Newtronix’s profits decreased. In fact, Newtronix’s revenues could even have gone up if the total market revenue increased by an even greater percentage.

(B) If sales were banned in several countries, there could be fewer customers, leading to a loss of revenue and lower profits.

(C) If the cost of a component has increased, then costs in general have increased, which can lead to lower profits.

(D) If the average customer purchased fewer ePods, and there is no increase in the total number of customers, this represents a loss of revenue.

(E) Increased taxes represent increased costs.

Answer: A
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
I marked this as D thinking : If number of customers purchasing remained same, and price increased, then that should mean profit did not decline? since units sold is same and price is more. revenue should increase, however we may not necessarily be able to deduce about profit? .. im a bit confused.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Sep 2018
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 279
Send PM
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
The answer is A, but i would say the question is not very clear, in real life, a higher tax is always ro the customers, there is base price and vat.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Newtronix, a technology company that sells only one product, recently [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne