Aristocrat wrote:
Lead water main pipes deliver water to homes and businesses all over the city of Redmond. Because of health concerns related to lead, specially trained workers are required to repair the water main pipes, and without repairs, the water main pipes would eventually cease to deliver water effectively. Therefore, taxpayers in the city of Redmond must continue to provide funds to train workers to repair lead-containing materials safely.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?
A) When water main pipes cease to function effectively, they can be left in place without raising health concerns.
B)Although lead water main pipes are a necessary part of the delivery of water in Redmond, some residents also obtain a portion of their water from wells.
C)In response to public demands, the Redmond city council has cut funding for the training of repair workers and increased spending on the city's mass transit system.
D)Repair of water main pipes requires workers to spend long periods of time underground, which increases the expense of training these workers.
E)The development of a safe and durable material for pipes has made repairing lead water main pipes more costly and less practical than replacing them.
First step in a Weaken Argument is to identify the conclusion. in this case it is that the city must continue to provide funds to train workers. The reasons for this conclusion is that the pipes need specially trained workers to repair them and that if they aren't repaired they will cease to deliver water. Since we are trying to weaken, we need to find an answer that gives a reason why we would not need to contine to provide training.
A) If we can leave the pipes in the ground that is great but doesn't address getting water if they break so it isn't the answer.
B) the word some means that this only applies to part of the population and can't be the answer because some people still need to get water from the pipes.
c) having to stop spending money somewhere else doesn't weaken the fact that you have to spend money in this case.
D) Increasing the expense does not change its necessity.
E) This weakens becuase if we can get water more cheaply without these pipes then we don't need to train new workers to repair them. it is the correct answer.