Last visit was: 04 Jun 2024, 10:44 It is currently 04 Jun 2024, 10:44
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 179
Own Kudos [?]: 2562 [41]
Given Kudos: 23
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14913
Own Kudos [?]: 65694 [5]
Given Kudos: 431
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93453
Own Kudos [?]: 629125 [1]
Given Kudos: 82102
Send PM
General Discussion
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1019
Own Kudos [?]: 1793 [0]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Re: Parent: The city education department is unable to distinguish between [#permalink]
I guess the argument structure is as followed:
1/ the first sentence is the main premise.
2/ prohibiting students from having cell phones is an overreaction (this gives more details for the premise)
3/ students use cell phone -> confiscate (example that supports the premise)
4/ need educational leadership that can solve problems, not create them. (conclusion)

Example is a key word b/c it is a transition word. Example indicates that more details are given for a premise.

Originally posted by chesstitans on 03 Jul 2017, 08:53.
Last edited by chesstitans on 10 Nov 2017, 19:49, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 57
Own Kudos [?]: 124 [0]
Given Kudos: 67
Send PM
Re: Parent: The city education department is unable to distinguish between [#permalink]
Parent: The city education department is unable to distinguish between annoyances and
important problems. For instance, prohibiting students from having cell phones is an
overreaction. If a student uses one and thus interferes with instruction, confiscate it. All in
all, we need educational leadership that can solve problems, not create them.

Which of the following is an assumption made by the parent?

A) Students having cell phones does not constitute an important problem for the city schools.
b) Students have no need for cell phones in school. Actually weakens parent's argument. Incorrect
c) Faculty and staff should be allowed to possess cell phones. Irrelevant. Out of scope. We are concerned with students having cellphones
d) Students need to have cell phones because some of them have no stay-at-home parent. So what? Students having a cellphones could still be an important problem for schools
e) An interest in solving problems is the most important attribute of an educational leader. Irrelevant. Not a necessary assumption.

Conclusion: CED is unable to distinguish between annoyances and important problems
Premise: For instance, prohibiting students from having cell phones is an overreaction.

BY POE, A is the answer. Negate A to check; Students having cell phones does constitute an important problem for the city schools. If student having cell phones causes problems for the schools, then the argument falls apart.

Kudos if you like the answer :-)
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1019
Own Kudos [?]: 1793 [0]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Re: Parent: The city education department is unable to distinguish between [#permalink]
zvazviri wrote:
Parent: The city education department is unable to distinguish between annoyances and
important problems. For instance, prohibiting students from having cell phones is an
overreaction. If a student uses one and thus interferes with instruction, confiscate it. All in
all, we need educational leadership that can solve problems, not create them.

Which of the following is an assumption made by the parent?

A) Students having cell phones does not constitute an important problem for the city schools.
b) Students have no need for cell phones in school. Actually weakens parent's argument. Incorrect
c) Faculty and staff should be allowed to possess cell phones. Irrelevant. Out of scope. We are concerned with students having cellphones
d) Students need to have cell phones because some of them have no stay-at-home parent. So what? Students having a cellphones could still be an important problem for schools
e) An interest in solving problems is the most important attribute of an educational leader. Irrelevant. Not a necessary assumption.

Conclusion: CED is unable to distinguish between annoyances and important problems
Premise: For instance, prohibiting students from having cell phones is an overreaction.

BY POE, A is the answer. Negate A to check; Students having cell phones does constitute an important problem for the city schools. If student having cell phones causes problems for the schools, then the argument falls apart.

Kudos if you like the answer :-)


I see that you have used 2 important techniques in GMAT. They are POE and negation.
There is also another technique; A is correct b/c A directly links with the argument.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17404
Own Kudos [?]: 854 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Parent: The city education department is unable to distinguish between [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Parent: The city education department is unable to distinguish between [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6954 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
820 posts