arjun221199 wrote:
KarishmaB wrote:
Let me add here that (E), if anything, is a strengthener. It definitely doesn't weaken the argument.
Let's put it in simple terms:
Say I tell you:
People believe that solving Math maintains mental sharpness. But actually social interaction is enough. A study showed that people with more social activity have better mental skills.
Now, A says, " Mental skills were measured by checking language skills."
and B says, "Mental skills were measured by checking Math skills."
- who is strengthening my argument and who is weakening it?
A is weakening my argument since if mental skills were measured by language skills, obviously people with more social activity will report higher skills. It doesn't need to imply that social interactions lead to sharper mental skills. If all you are going to check is how well people can interact, the study will show that social people will have higher mental skills.
B strengthens my argument that social activity actually increases even the quantitative ability - which is probably one of the measures of mental skills. Hence, it does make my argument stronger that social activity is enough to improve mental skills - no matter how you measure mental skills.
Option (E) says what B says in my example. Hence it is not a weakener; it is, perhaps, a wee bit of a strengthener.
karishma Can you please explain this relation how does B strengthen...... then in the same way A must also right...
I am assuming that you are discussing the A and B given in my example above.
People believe that solving MATH maintains MENTAL sharpness.
But actually SOCIAL interaction is enough to maintain MENTAL sharpness.
A study showed that people with more SOCIAL activity have better MENTAL skills.
So the argument says that people believe that one needs to work on MATH to maintain MENTAL sharpness but actually just some social interaction is enough to maintain MENTAL sharpness. You don't really have to do MATH to keep your mind sharp. A study showed that people who have more social activity have better mental skills.
Now here is the thing - what will better support the result from the study?
If the study tested people's MATH skills or LANGUAGE skills to test their mental skills? (Say to test how smart you are, did it test you on Quant or Verbal?)
The point is what do you call "smart?" Who are the smart people?
Say the study had measured people's LANGUAGE skills to test their mental skills and found that those with more SOCIAL activity had better LANGUAGE skills. Well, that's kind of expected, right? If you will measure mental skills on the basis of how good a person's language is, better social activity will obviously lead to better language skills and hence a higher score in the mental skills test. So it doesn't make a strong case for our argument. that social activity is enough.
But if the study tested MATH skills to decide whether the person has good mental skills, then it seems that social activity does support better mental skills. Social activity will anyway lead to better language skills but it leads to better Math skills too. Then our argument is supported.