Last visit was: 27 Apr 2024, 12:40 It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 12:40

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Tags:
Difficulty: 805+ Levelx   Graphsx         
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 32977 [17]
Given Kudos: 5780
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 32977 [0]
Given Kudos: 5780
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Posts: 349
Own Kudos [?]: 418 [0]
Given Kudos: 94
Send PM
LBS Moderator
Joined: 30 Oct 2019
Posts: 836
Own Kudos [?]: 775 [2]
Given Kudos: 1577
Send PM
Re: Growth of International Immigrant Populations For selected countries [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Answers are in bold.

1. The information in the graph_______________the statement that the number of international immigrants in France did not change significantly during the period from 1980 to 2005.
A. directly affirms
B. directly contradicts
C. neither directly affirms nor directly contradicts

Explanation: the graph is the representing immigrants as a total percentage of population. Lets assume the population increased from 1980 to 2005, so the NUMBER of immigrants must also increase, but the graph which represents percentage of population may still stay the same.


2. During the interval________________the United States’ rate of growth in international immigrants as a percent of total population was less than that of at least one of the other countries included in the graph.

A. 1980–1995
B. 1980–2005
C. 1995–2005

Ireland's growth rate is tremendous. It has doubled, from 7 to 14. Whereas the growth rate of US is not as much only 10.5 to 13.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Posts: 790
Own Kudos [?]: 683 [2]
Given Kudos: 1316
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Growth of International Immigrant Populations For selected countries [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1.The information in the graph_______________the statement that the number of international immigrants in France did not change significantly during the period from 1980 to 2005.

The %age increase/decrease in the number of international immigrants in France during the period from 1980 to 2005: 11, 10.9, 10.2,10.3,10.3,11,but
we don't know the population of France at the start of 1998, so we cannot actually infer that the population increased or decreased, could be could not be.
So we have nothing to compare the increase/decrease in the above %ages.

Thus the information in the graph neither directly affirms nor directly contradicts.
Answer C.


2. During the interval________________the United States’ rate of growth in international immigrants as a percent of total population was less than that of at least one of the other countries included in the graph.

It can be easily inferred from the graph that for the period:
1980–1995 - US seems to higher growth as compared to other countries.
1980–2005 - US does have less growth for the given period, but its too long a period, US has higher growth in the middle years, in comparison to other countries.
1995–2005 - In this particular period, we see that Ireland has a better and visible growth than US.

Answer C.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Posts: 124
Own Kudos [?]: 101 [3]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.98
Send PM
Re: Growth of International Immigrant Populations For selected countries [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Question 1 : C
1. The information in the graph_______________the statement that the number of international immigrants in France did not change significantly during the period from 1980 to 2005.

A. directly affirms
B. directly contradicts
C. neither directly affirms nor directly contradicts


The graph represents the France % of total population, and that stays almost the same. But, we have to note here that the total population itself can go in either direction. Hence, we can't say anything about the number of international immigrants.

Question 2: C
2. During the interval________________the United States’ rate of growth in international immigrants as a percent of total population was less than that of at least one of the other countries included in the graph.

A. 1980–1995
B. 1980–2005
C. 1995–2005


In 1980-1985, US' rate of growth of population is from 6 to 7.2%. All other countries grow at a lesser % in these 5 yrs.
In 1985-1990, US' rate of growth of population is from 7.2 to 9%. All other countries grow at a lesser % in these 5 yrs. Ireland grows from 8-9% of total population.

In the other years, Ireland surpasses this %. Hence C.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Nov 2019
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 310
Send PM
Re: Growth of International Immigrant Populations For selected countries [#permalink]
In question 2,
For the interval 1980-2005

% change for US = 13-6 = 7%

% change for Ireland = 14-6 = 8%

In this interval too, the change is lower for US

So, B is also a valid answer.

Posted from my mobile device
VP
VP
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1262
Own Kudos [?]: 201 [0]
Given Kudos: 332
Send PM
Re: Growth of International Immigrant Populations For selected countries [#permalink]
Can someone explain Q2? Why can't A be the answer? US is clearly below at least one of France and Sweden during those 15 years.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2020
Posts: 386
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [0]
Given Kudos: 433
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Growth of International Immigrant Populations For selected countries [#permalink]
bm2201, GMATinsight
Sajjad1994
Hi,
In Q2 why cannot the period from 1980 to 2005 be the answer?
In 1980 to 2005 US grew by 7%, and Ireland by 8%.
So US is below at least one other country?

Please advise where I am going wrong.
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 32977 [1]
Given Kudos: 5780
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Growth of International Immigrant Populations For selected countries [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
krndatta wrote:
bm2201, GMATinsight
Sajjad1994
Hi,
In Q2 why cannot the period from 1980 to 2005 be the answer?
In 1980 to 2005 US grew by 7%, and Ireland by 8%.
So US is below at least one other country?

Please advise where I am going wrong.


The question is talking about the "rate of growth" and not the particular point of growth. So from the period of 1995-2000 Irelands rate of growth is more than the United states rate of growth. During the period 1980-2000, no other country has the greater rate of growth than the United State.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2024
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 94
Send PM
Growth of International Immigrant Populations For selected countries [#permalink]
Hey CEdward,

I have the same question, I also chose the A (1980-1985).
The only reason I can think is that the question asks for the rate of growth so in this way implies the change of international immigrants as a percent of total population.

Could somebody help us? Bunuel KarishmaB GMATNinja GMATinsight GMATCoachBen
CEdward wrote:
Can someone explain Q2? Why can't A be the answer? US is clearly below at least one of France and Sweden during those 15 years.

­

Originally posted by Gmatguy007 on 28 Mar 2024, 10:59.
Last edited by Gmatguy007 on 10 Apr 2024, 12:21, edited 1 time in total.
Tutor
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Status:Professional GMAT Trainer
Affiliations: GMAT Coach
Posts: 386
Own Kudos [?]: 860 [1]
Given Kudos: 198
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Send PM
Growth of International Immigrant Populations For selected countries [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
 
Gmatguy007 wrote:
Hey CEdward,

I have the same question, I also chose the A (1980-1985).
The only reason I can think is that the question asks for the rate of growth so in this way implies the change of international immigrants as a percent of total population.

Could somebody help us? Bunuel @KarishaB GMATNinja GMATinsight GMATCoachBen
CEdward wrote:
Can someone explain Q2? Why can't A be the answer? US is clearly below at least one of France and Sweden during those 15 years.

­

­Gmatguy007 Yes, exactly! The key is understanding that "RATE of growth" means the SLOPE of the line (change in Y / change in X). A rate of growth normally has the time frame in the denominator.

From 1995 to 2005, we see that the slope for the green line for the United States is lower (less steep) than the blue dashed line for Ireland:




 ­
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2024
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 94
Send PM
Re: Growth of International Immigrant Populations For selected countries [#permalink]
GMATCoachBen wrote:
Gmatguy007 wrote:
Hey CEdward,

I have the same question, I also chose the A (1980-1985).
The only reason I can think is that the question asks for the rate of growth so in this way implies the change of international immigrants as a percent of total population.

Could somebody help us? Bunuel @KarishaB GMATNinja GMATinsight GMATCoachBen
CEdward wrote:
Can someone explain Q2? Why can't A be the answer? US is clearly below at least one of France and Sweden during those 15 years.

­

­Gmatguy007 Yes, exactly! The key is understanding that "RATE of growth" means the SLOPE of the line (change in Y / change in X). A rate of growth normally has the time frame in the denominator.

From 1995 to 2005, we see that the slope for the green line for the United States is lower (less steep) than the blue dashed line for Ireland:




 ­

­Great, thank you GMATCoachBen !
Also, we can focus solely on the lines of USA and Ireland since both France and Sweden have relative constant rate of growth as we can see from the graph, right?

Thank you in advance 😀
Tutor
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Status:Professional GMAT Trainer
Affiliations: GMAT Coach
Posts: 386
Own Kudos [?]: 860 [2]
Given Kudos: 198
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Send PM
Growth of International Immigrant Populations For selected countries [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
 
Quote:
 
Quote:
Quote:
­

­Gmatguy007 Yes, exactly! The key is understanding that "RATE of growth" means the SLOPE of the line (change in Y / change in X). A rate of growth normally has the time frame in the denominator.

From 1995 to 2005, we see that the slope for the green line for the United States is lower (less steep) than the blue dashed line for Ireland:




 ­

­Great, thank you GMATCoachBen !
Also, we can focus solely on the lines of USA and Ireland since both France and Sweden have relative constant rate of growth as we can see from the graph, right?

Thank you in advance 😀

@Gmatguy007 ­We always focus on exactly what it's asking for!

The question says: 

2. During the interval _____ the United States’ rate of growth in international immigrants as a percent of total population was less than that of at least one of the other countries included in the graph.

So, we are looking for a part of a line that is STEEPER than the United States' line, so our eye should immediately focus on the steepest part of one of the lines -- we see that it's Ireland from 1995 to 2005. There can only be one answer, so we can stop there.

If we look at France and Sweden's lines, we can quickly see that they are not steeper than the United States' line. 

 ­
GMAT Club Bot
Growth of International Immigrant Populations For selected countries [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92955 posts
DI Forum Moderator
1030 posts
RC & DI Moderator
11182 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne