GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Sep 2018, 16:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Rev. Hayes says that an action is right if it benefits one or more oth

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SVP
SVP
User avatar
V
Status: Preparing for the GMAT
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 1668
Location: Pakistan
GPA: 3.39
Premium Member CAT Tests
Rev. Hayes says that an action is right if it benefits one or more oth  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2017, 11:32
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

44% (02:15) correct 56% (02:52) wrong based on 114 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Source: Nova GMAT

Rev. Hayes says that an action is right if it benefits one or more other people and an action is wrong if it harms anyone. Rev. Hayes says the action is wrong if the harm could have been seen with reasonable thought or whether or not harm was intended to anyone.

Which one of the following most clearly conforms to the principle cited above?

(A) Frank wrote a proposal attempting to cause trouble between Linda and Jane; this action was morally bad, even though, in fact, it had an opposite effect than the one intended.
(B) Giving a homeless man a ride to a local shelter, Fred was in a serious car accident that was not his fault. The homeless man, injured in the accident, received a settlement from the other driver’s insurance company. The settlement allowed him to get an apartment for him and his family; thus showing that a right action can have both bad and good consequences.
(C) Giving a homeless man a ride to a local shelter, George was in a serious car accident that was his fault. The homeless man, injured in the accident, received a settlement from George’s insurance company. The settlement allowed him to get an apartment for him and his family; thus showing that a right action can have both bad and good consequences.
(D) Linda agreed to watch her friend’s cat for two weeks at her home. Everything went fine for 10 days. Then, on the next day, when Linda opened the window and sat down to watch television, the cat fell out of the window and was injured. She took the cat to a local vet, paid the bill, and the cat was almost recovered by the time Linda’s friend returned. Even though she intended no harm, Linda’s action was wrong.
(E) Mary, a trained social worker, was asked by a homeless man for food. She walked with the man to the local shelter that runs a soup kitchen. There, the man choked while eating lunch and died. Thus, Mary performed a wrong action.

_________________

Official PS Practice Questions
Press +1 Kudos if this post is helpful

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Posts: 249
Reviews Badge
Rev. Hayes says that an action is right if it benefits one or more oth  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2017, 03:51
1
Rev. Hayes says that an action is right if it benefits one or more other people and an action is wrong if it harms anyone. Rev. Hayes says the action is wrong if the harm could have been seen with reasonable thought or whether or not harm was intended to anyone.

The statement says that an action if harms someone, be it intentional or not, is wrong. So we should have a statement, in which someone is harmed with intention or not.

We can easily boil down to A and D.

In A, though Frank's intention was bad, frank's action did not harm anyone. Wrong.
In D, though Linda's intention wasn't to hurt the cat, the cat did get hurt. Bingo. Correct choice.
_________________

P.S. Don't forget to give Kudos :)

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 573
Premium Member
Re: Rev. Hayes says that an action is right if it benefits one or more oth  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2017, 04:10
SajjadAhmad wrote:
Source: Nova GMAT

Rev. Hayes says that an action is right if it benefits one or more other people and an action is wrong if it harms anyone. Rev. Hayes says the action is wrong if the harm could have been seen with reasonable thought or whether or not harm was intended to anyone.

Which one of the following most clearly conforms to the principle cited above?

(A) Frank wrote a proposal attempting to cause trouble between Linda and Jane; this action was morally bad, even though, in fact, it had an opposite effect than the one intended.
(B) Giving a homeless man a ride to a local shelter, Fred was in a serious car accident that was not his fault. The homeless man, injured in the accident, received a settlement from the other driver’s insurance company. The settlement allowed him to get an apartment for him and his family; thus showing that a right action can have both bad and good consequences.
(C) Giving a homeless man a ride to a local shelter, George was in a serious car accident that was his fault. The homeless man, injured in the accident, received a settlement from George’s insurance company. The settlement allowed him to get an apartment for him and his family; thus showing that a right action can have both bad and good consequences.
(D) Linda agreed to watch her friend’s cat for two weeks at her home. Everything went fine for 10 days. Then, on the next day, when Linda opened the window and sat down to watch television, the cat fell out of the window and was injured. She took the cat to a local vet, paid the bill, and the cat was almost recovered by the time Linda’s friend returned. Even though she intended no harm, Linda’s action was wrong.
(E) Mary, a trained social worker, was asked by a homeless man for food. She walked with the man to the local shelter that runs a soup kitchen. There, the man choked while eating lunch and died. Thus, Mary performed a wrong action.


Not sure if I got this:
For an action to be bad there should be two criteria.

First: Action should harm someone.
Second: Intention to harm someone should be present.

Option A : Intention to harm is present but no one is harmed hence action cannot be wrong.
Option D : Intention to harm is NOT present but some one is harmed.

Since both intention to harm and actual harm is NOT present in option D how can option D be the answer?

Further insight will be highly appreciated.

Thank you.
_________________

- Stne

SVP
SVP
User avatar
V
Status: Preparing for the GMAT
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 1668
Location: Pakistan
GPA: 3.39
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Rev. Hayes says that an action is right if it benefits one or more oth  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2017, 04:16
stne wrote:
SajjadAhmad wrote:
Source: Nova GMAT

Rev. Hayes says that an action is right if it benefits one or more other people and an action is wrong if it harms anyone. Rev. Hayes says the action is wrong if the harm could have been seen with reasonable thought or whether or not harm was intended to anyone.

Which one of the following most clearly conforms to the principle cited above?

(A) Frank wrote a proposal attempting to cause trouble between Linda and Jane; this action was morally bad, even though, in fact, it had an opposite effect than the one intended.
(B) Giving a homeless man a ride to a local shelter, Fred was in a serious car accident that was not his fault. The homeless man, injured in the accident, received a settlement from the other driver’s insurance company. The settlement allowed him to get an apartment for him and his family; thus showing that a right action can have both bad and good consequences.
(C) Giving a homeless man a ride to a local shelter, George was in a serious car accident that was his fault. The homeless man, injured in the accident, received a settlement from George’s insurance company. The settlement allowed him to get an apartment for him and his family; thus showing that a right action can have both bad and good consequences.
(D) Linda agreed to watch her friend’s cat for two weeks at her home. Everything went fine for 10 days. Then, on the next day, when Linda opened the window and sat down to watch television, the cat fell out of the window and was injured. She took the cat to a local vet, paid the bill, and the cat was almost recovered by the time Linda’s friend returned. Even though she intended no harm, Linda’s action was wrong.
(E) Mary, a trained social worker, was asked by a homeless man for food. She walked with the man to the local shelter that runs a soup kitchen. There, the man choked while eating lunch and died. Thus, Mary performed a wrong action.


Not sure if I got this:
For an action to be bad there should be two criteria.

First: Action should harm someone.
Second: Intention to harm someone should be present.

Option A : Intention to harm is present but no one is harmed hence action cannot be wrong.
Option D : Intention to harm is NOT present but some one is harmed.

Since both intention to harm and actual harm is NOT present in option D how can option D be the answer?

Further insight will be highly appreciated.

Thank you.


The argument claims that an action is right
only if it meets both the following criteria:
(1) It benefits another person.
(2) It is performed with that intent.
The argument also claims that an action that
harms another person is wrong if it meets either
one of the following criteria:
(1) The harm was intended.
(2) Reasonable thought would show that the
action was likely to cause harm.
In choice (D), Linda should have realized that if
she was watching television and the window was
open, the cat might jump out. This satisfies the
second criteria for a wrong action. Reasonable
thought would have shown Linda the error of this
choice. The answer is (D)*

* Remember: Only one of the statements is an
either-or construction need be true for the whole
structure to be true.

As for the other choices, (A) is second best.
The first part of (A), “Frank wrote a proposal
attempting to cause trouble between Linda and
Jane,” meets the first criterion for a wrong
action. But, the remainder of the sentence
doesn’t relate to the second criterion.
In (B), even though the homeless man was
injured, both criteria of the right action are
satisfied. Who was at fault in the accident is
besides the point.
In (C), even though the homeless man was
injured, both criteria of the right action are satisfied. Again, who was at fault in the accident is
besides the point. Both Fred (in (B)) and George
performed actions that eventually met both criteria of a right action.
Choice (E) satisfies only the second criterion
for a right action. However, since no harm was
intended and could not be foreseen, this choice
does not satisfy either criteria for a wrong action.
_________________

Official PS Practice Questions
Press +1 Kudos if this post is helpful

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 671
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Rev. Hayes says that an action is right if it benefits one or more oth  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2017, 20:00
D is right because it clearly states that even though The actual harm to anyone(cat) is caused unintended The action is wrong. Same provided in as in stimulus.
Re: Rev. Hayes says that an action is right if it benefits one or more oth &nbs [#permalink] 30 Apr 2017, 20:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Rev. Hayes says that an action is right if it benefits one or more oth

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.