GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Dec 2018, 19:38

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • $450 Tuition Credit & Official CAT Packs FREE

     December 15, 2018

     December 15, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Get the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299)
  • FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

     December 16, 2018

     December 16, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.

Scientists have recently discovered that the ultra thin, layered const

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 54
Scientists have recently discovered that the ultra thin, layered const  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 30 Nov 2018, 02:40
2
12
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (01:26) correct 33% (01:28) wrong based on 707 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Scientists have recently discovered that the ultra thin, layered construction of a butterfly's wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, are enabling the insect to control how much heat energy is absorbed by its wings and how much is reflected away.


(A) wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, are enabling

(B) wings, which is the same one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, that also enables

(C) wings is the same as the one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, enabling

(D) wings—the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence—also enables

(E) wings—of the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence—also enable

Originally posted by mba4me on 14 Sep 2004, 01:32.
Last edited by Bunuel on 30 Nov 2018, 02:40, edited 3 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 May 2010
Posts: 128
Re: Scientists have recently discovered that the ultra thin, layered const  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jun 2010, 05:37
2
2
mba4me wrote:
Scientists have recently discovered that the ultra thin, layered construction of a butterfly's wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, are enabling the insect to control how much heat energy is absorbed by its wings and how much is reflected away.
A.wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, are enabling
B: wings, which is the same one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, that also enables
C: wings is the same as the one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, enabling
D: wings the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence also enables
E: wings of the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence also enable


A.wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, are enabling
Take it one clause (subject+verb) at a time: scientists (subject) have discovered (verb) that the construction (subject) are enabling (verb). "Construction" is singular, and "are enabling" is plural.

B: wings, which is the same one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, that also enables
scientists (subject) have discovered (verb) that the construction (subject), but now where is the verb for 'construction'? You cannot complete the clause 'that construction..." with "that enables".

C: wings is the same as the one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, enabling
scientists (subject) have discovered (verb) that the construction (subject) is (verb) the same as the one (meaning 'construction') that makes butterflies shimmer. Your clauses have now ended! The 'enabling...' after the comma modifies (adds descriptive information to) the sentence and is not part of the clauses.
There is no grammatical error here; however, you must ask yourself whether this the intended meaning! Does the sentence mean to say that scientists have discovered that the the construction of the wings is the same as the one that makes butterflies shimmer? Let's look at D....

[/b]

D: wings the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence also enables
First of all, there should be a comma after "wings", but let's assume that this is a typo.

scientists (subject) have discovered (verb) that the construction (subject)[the same construction that makes butterflies shimmer] also enables(verb) the insect to control the absorption of heat. This is more likely the intended meaning, namely, that scientists have found a second purpose for the way butterflies' wings are constructed.


E: wings of the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence also enable
"the construction"... "enable"-- subject-verb agreement error.
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 146
Location: Toronto
Re: Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2010, 17:26
2
raghavs wrote:
Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin, layered construction of a butterfly’s
wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of
iridescence, are enabling
the insect to control how much heat energy is absorbed by its
wings and how much is reflected away.

A. wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon
of iridescence, are enabling
B. wings, which is the same one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence, that also enables
C. wings is the same as the one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence, enabling
D. wings—the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence—also enables
E. wings—of the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence—also enable


Hi!

I'm not sure if you have a specific question or are just wondering about the sentence in general, but we'll look at the whole thing.

A commonly tested grammar topic on the GMAT is modification. Here's the general rule:

Quote:
When a sentence includes a modifying word or phrase, that word or phrase must be placed as closely as possible to whatever it's modifying.


This particular sentence is all about modification - and we recognize that by the parenthetical comment in the middle:

Quote:
, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence,


(I included the commas because those are our signals that we're almost certainly being tested on modification).

So, whatever that phrase is modifying should be directly before or after the phrase.

In the original sentence, the subject of the modifying phrase isn't as clear as the GMAT demands; it could be the wings or the layered construction of the wings. When there's any kind of modification ambiguity, it's extremely unlikely that the choice will be correct.

Looking at the remaining choices:

B) has the same issue as (A) (adding "which is" doesn't make it any clearer) - eliminate.

C) has the same issue as (A) - eliminate.

D) begins with 'the same construction as' - this fixes the ambiguity issue as we now know that we're talking about the layered construction - looks good!

E) "of the same construction" doesn't make sense when read into the sentence - "of" messes up the meaning and flow - eliminate.

Choose (D)!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 119
Re: Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2010, 15:32
3
I picked "D" as the best choice out of all; however, I think that "also" is not needed before "enables" (because only one function of wing structure is mentioned).
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2013
Posts: 10
Re: Advanced SC: Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2015, 21:30
2
The original sentence wants to make a point about the construction of the butterfly's wings.

If we read the sentence from "layered construction of a butterfly’s wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, are enabling the insect to control how much heat energy is absorbed by its wings and how much is reflected away.".

We can eliminate the unbolded portion to see that the subject - "layered construction" and the verb "are" do not agree in number.

Choice B

B. wings, which is the same one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, that also enables

which refers to wings not the layered construction. Moreover, there is a meaning and agreement issue with this sentence. wings....is- agreement error
Meaning issue- It says that the wings is the same one- wings are compared to some other wing or what? not clear.
Moreover the sentence construction is bad... If we read it after removing the appositive, it reads as follows

Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin, layered construction of a butterfly’s wings that also enables the insect to control how much heat energy is absorbed by its wings and how much is reflected away. Upon closer examination the structure of the sentence is
Scientists have discovered the layered construction of X that also enables X to control Z . This thought is incomplete. Therefore, this choice is incorrect.

Choice C
C. wings is the same as the one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, enabling

This choice has a meaning error. The ques to be answered is Does the construction of the wings enable the butterfly to control how much heat energy is absorbed by its wings and how much is reflected away or the phenomenon of iridescence enables the butterfly to control how much heat energy is absorbed by its wings and how much is reflected away.

This choice suggests that the phenomenon is the reason for control. So the choice is incorrect.

Choice D
wings—the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence—also enables.

This seems to be a fair choice so far. Construction of butterfly's wings is compared to another kind of construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via some phenomenon. Moreover, construction also enables the insect to blah blah ..... the subject ultra-thin(modifier) construction (noun) agrees with the verb, enables. Also is an adverb (modifier)

Choice E has a subject verb agreement error. construction...enable. Therefore, it is incorrect.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 846
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jun 2016, 05:28
1
raghavs wrote:
Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin, layered construction of a butterfly’s
wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of
iridescence, are enabling
the insect to control how much heat energy is absorbed by its
wings and how much is reflected away.
A. wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon
of iridescence, are enabling.

B. wings, which is the same one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence, that also enables
C. wings is the same as the one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence, enabling
D. wings—the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence—also enables
E. wings—of the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence—also enable


A. wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon
of iridescence, are enabling. plural verb is not required for singular 'layered construction'

B. wings, which is the same one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence, that also enables 'which' incorrectly refers to 'wings'
C. wings is the same as the one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence, enabling replacing 'one' with 'construction' changes the meaning, stating two constructions to be different. However, intended meaning is that only one construction leads to control the energy and shimmer.
D. wings—the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence—also enables 'enables' is the right verb used for singular 'construction
E. wings—of the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence—also enable 'enable' is not right.
_________________

I welcome critical analysis of my post!! That will help me reach 700+

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2016
Posts: 37
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
WE: Other (Computer Software)
Re: Scientists have recently discovered that the ultra thin, layered const  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Oct 2016, 06:07
D is the correct answer.

Meaning is:

- Scientist have recently discovered something
- That something is - layered construction of butterfly enables the insect to control how much heat energy is absorbed by its wings and how much is reflected away; Here, construction is the subject and is singular

- The construction is same as the construction, that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence

combining all these points, D stands tall
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 628
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Mar 2017, 20:14
I don't know why but i think this problem is itself has wrong construction -that the ultrathin, I find this sentence incomplete.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4561
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Mar 2017, 23:34
2
Top Contributor
Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin, layered construction of a butterfly’s wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, are enabling the insect to control how much heat energy is absorbed by its wings and how much is reflected away.

Quote:
nightmare
I don't know why but i think this problem is itself has wrong construction -that the ultrathin, I find this sentence incomplete.


I am afraid that the sentence is being parsed wrongly down here. Let's not get into thinking that the ultrathin is any kind of a proper noun or specific name. It is just an adjective meaning extremely thin. The real subject of the sentence is the "construction" that is modified by two back - to - back coordinate adjectives namely ultrathin and layered. In the light of the fact that such a construction is making the butterflys shimmer and is enabling the butterflys to control the heat mechanism, "also enables" is good enough.

Now on to the choices.

A. wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, are enabling ---are enabling is SV error.

B. wings, which is the same one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence, that also enables -- 1. Which is wrongly modifying wings. 2. Wings, which is an awful SV error. 3. This sentence is a fragment.
C. wings is the same as the one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence, enabling ---- a subtle meaning issue here. This choice wrongfully makes the heat-control mechanism as an effect of the shimmering by placing the heat-controlling as a modifier of shimmering.
D. wings—the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence—also enables -- Correct choice.
E. wings—of the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence—also enable --- also enable is SV error.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 640
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Scientists have recently discovered that the ultra thin,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2017, 10:28
In A and E, "construction" (singular) does not agree with the plural verbs "are enabling" (in A) and "enable" (in E). Eliminate A and E.

In B, "construction" (subject) lacks a verb. The result is a sentence fragment. Eliminate B.

In C, "enabling" (COMMA + VERBing) should modify the NEAREST preceding clause. But it makes no sense to say the one that makes SOME BUTTERFLIES shimmer...enabling THE INSECT to control: the implication is that THE INSECT refers to SOME BUTTERFLIES. Eliminate C.

The correct answer is D.



A- "are enabling" is incorrect

B- I think the "which" is being used incorrectly here. It is attempting to modify "the layered construction", but it is placed next to wings.

C- This one was tough. I think this is incorrect because of "enabling". In this answer choice, it changes the meaning of the sentence.

D- Correct

E- this is just awkward. The "of the same construction" after the dash seems weird and is not the best way to state that clause.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2128
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Nov 2017, 20:46
daagh wrote:
Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin, layered construction of a butterfly’s wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, are enabling the insect to control how much heat energy is absorbed by its wings and how much is reflected away.

Quote:
nightmare
I don't know why but i think this problem is itself has wrong construction -that the ultrathin, I find this sentence incomplete.


I am afraid that the sentence is being parsed wrongly down here. Let's not get into thinking that the ultrathin is any kind of a proper noun or specific name. It is just an adjective meaning extremely thin. The real subject of the sentence is the "construction" that is modified by two back - to - back coordinate adjectives namely ultrathin and layered. In the light of the fact that such a construction is making the butterflys shimmer and is enabling the butterflys to control the heat mechanism, "also enables" is good enough.

Now on to the choices.

A. wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, are enabling ---are enabling is SV error.

B. wings, which is the same one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence, that also enables -- 1. Which is wrongly modifying wings. 2. Wings, which is an awful SV error. 3. This sentence is a fragment.
C. wings is the same as the one that makes some butterflies shimmer via the
phenomenon of iridescence, enabling ---- a subtle meaning issue here. This choice wrongfully makes the heat-control mechanism as an effect of the shimmering by placing the heat-controlling as a modifier of shimmering.
D. wings—the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence—also enables -- Correct choice.
E. wings—of the same construction that makes some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence—also enable --- also enable is SV error.


mikemcgarry ,sayantanc2k , RonPurewal , daagh ,GMATNinja ,egmat , other experts -- please englighten

1. In option A , if we change are enabling to enable , then option A will be correct ?

Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin, layered construction of a butterfly’s wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, are enabling the insect to control how much heat energy is absorbed by its wings and how much is reflected away.

2. Is the modifier "the same as the one making .. iridescence" an absolute phrase?

3. Though I was able to select the correct answer , i took longer than usual because of the presence of a comma in "ultrathin, layered construction of a butterfly’s wings" since initially, I assumed layered construction to be a modifier .
Is the presence of this comma okay here?
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4489
Re: Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2017, 10:45
Skywalker18 wrote:
please englighten

1. In option A , if we change are enabling to enable , then option A will be correct ?

Scientists have recently discovered that the ultrathin, layered construction of a butterfly’s wings, the same as the one making some butterflies shimmer via the phenomenon of iridescence, are enabling the insect to control how much heat energy is absorbed by its wings and how much is reflected away.

2. Is the modifier "the same as the one making .. iridescence" an absolute phrase?

3. Though I was able to select the correct answer , i took longer than usual because of the presence of a comma in "ultrathin, layered construction of a butterfly’s wings" since initially, I assumed layered construction to be a modifier .
Is the presence of this comma okay here?

Dear Skywalker18,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

This is a very good SC question, and very challenging, as MGMAT material often is. The adjective "ultrathin" is a very sophisticated adjective, not often seen in non-scientific writing. Thus, in the phrase "the ultrathin, layered construction of a butterfly’s wings," the adjectives "ultrathin" and "layered" are in parallel and, as is often the case in constructions in which a pair of parallel adjectives modifies a noun, the two adjectives are separated by a comma. If you didn't recognize "ultrathin" as a adjective, then I could see that this would make the sentence much more confusing. Any time we don't know the part of speech of a single word, it makes the sentence much harder to interpret.

The construction "the same as . . . " is a unmitigated disaster in this sentence. This construction is an appositive phrase and would be correct only if the target is absolutely unambiguous.
Humphrey Bogart achieve peak star status in the movie Casablanca, the same that earned him his first Oscar nomination.
There, the construction is 100% unambiguous. Even here, the construction is a bit casual, colloquial, journalistic, not typical of academic writing. It is definitely not the way a high-brow sophisticated writer would convey the information.

In (A), the phrase is a complete train wreck because we are wondering: the same as the wings? the same as the construction? Choice (D), the OA, cleans up this ambiguity. The verb at the end of (A) is the least of the problems with that choice.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3523
Premium Member
Re: Scientists have recently discovered that the ultra thin, layered const  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Nov 2018, 02:41
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

-
April 2018: New Forum dedicated to Verbal Strategies, Guides, and Resources

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Scientists have recently discovered that the ultra thin, layered const &nbs [#permalink] 30 Nov 2018, 02:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Scientists have recently discovered that the ultra thin, layered const

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.