Weaken QuestionSpringfield Central School District's new superintendent recently instituted a controversial new plan to reduce discipline problems and improve school spirit at the district's secondary schools. After observing that many East Asian countries require students to wear uniforms and that these schools also suffer from dramatically fewer discipline problems than do American schools, the superintendent instituted a mandatory uniform policy in all district secondary schools. Since all students are now required to wear a formal uniform to class, discipline problems should decrease and the students' morale should also improve.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the conclusion of the argument above?
First of all the argument relies heavily on the causal relationship and that is the area where it can be weakend.
A. Many elementary schools that have begun pilot programs with uniforms have seen significant gains in student test scores.
The aim of the school is not to Gain Test Scores.B. East Asian schools have, on average, no fewer students per instructor than do American schools.
It is a strenghtener but a very subtle strenghtener by eleminating one possible weakener.C. Springfield Central School District recently instituted a dress code and saw no meaningful improvements in student SAT scores.
SAT Scores is not the scope of the argument.D. According to the most recent survey, 80% of Springfield Central Secondary School students are against the uniform policy.
not a great weakener because even if the students dislike the uniform policy they wont be dont anything irrational to show their opinion.Also such thing is not specified in the arguement.E. Chinese, Japanese, and Korean schools use a different standard in their accounting of discipline problems than do American schools.
Correct weakener as it is the standards that are different and just by employing the uniform policy the goal will not be achieved.NEGATING THE CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP