MBA Spotlight Virtual MBA Fair is Oct 13 – 21. Learn how to Register and Attend – it’s Free! New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video
close

It is currently 29 Sep 2020, 04:02
Register
GMAT Club Tests
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New comers' posts
New posts
Unanswered

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
PREVIOUS TOPIC
NEXT TOPIC
Professor A: The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) was originally
7 posts Go to First Unread Post
Print view
NEW TOPIC
POST REPLY
Downloads
My Bookmarks
Reviews
Tags :
Find Similar Topics 

Show Tags
Hide Tags

avatar
B
Aditi10
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2017
Posts: 11
Professor A: The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) was originally [#permalink] New post  Updated on: 15 Oct 2019, 07:29
8
Bookmarks
Project IR Butler 2019-20 - Get one IR Question Everyday
Question # 15, Date : 15-Oct-2019
This post is a part of Project IR Butler 2019-20. Click here for Details


Professor A: The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) was originally aimed exclusively at the construction of thinking machines, that is, computer systems with human like general intelligence. But the difficulty of this goal of general AI has led researchers to shift their focus to producing narrow AI systems: software displaying intelligence regarding specific tasks in relatively narrow domains such as chess. The problem is, narrow AI and general AI are fundamentally and entirely different pursuits. If modeling general intelligence is the objective, Al researchers must redirect themselves toward the original goals of the field and confront the more difficult issues of human-like intelligence.

Professor B: Narrow AI work is producing real results today, such as chess-playing programs that can defeat any human, programs that translate speech to text, and programs that can drive automated vehicles. Achievements in this field will continue to flow, and eventually narrow AI will lead to the creation of systems with general intelligence.


On the basis of the given information, select a claim that Professor A would most likely disagree with, and select a claim that Professor B would most likely disagree with. Select only two claims, one in each column.
See the attachment
Attachment:
IR.PNG
IR.PNG [ 147.42 KiB | Viewed 3911 times ]


Show: :: OA
Professor A Disagrees: The creation of systems that display intelligence regarding specific tasks is an especially important step toward the creation of systems with general
intelligence.

Professor B Disagrees: Research in the narrow AI field is not likely to lead to significant breakthroughs in the general AI field.

Originally posted by Aditi10 on 24 Jun 2018, 04:45.
Last edited by Sajjad1994 on 15 Oct 2019, 07:29, edited 4 times in total.
Updated - Complete topic (60).
User avatar
D
Kurtosis
Marshall & McDonough Moderator
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1660
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Professor A: The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) was originally [#permalink] New post  24 Jun 2018, 18:21
E is incorrect because the research on narrow AI may or may not benefit real people, but the research may be passively supporting general AI. If you select E, you are strengthening/agreeing to Prof. B

Aditi10 wrote:
This is more of a CR question but I got it in my GMAT prep pack.
Please see image attached, which has OA too.

I had chosen "The research into narrow AI is not producing results that real people can benefit from today." against Professor B disagrees. Is this incorrect because the results listed in the question stem are arguably not for "real people"?
Experts. please help.

Thanks.
avatar
B
ankur909090
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 May 2017
Posts: 16
Reviews Badge
Re: Professor A: The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) was originally [#permalink] New post  24 Jun 2018, 21:49
1
Bookmarks
Aditi10

Professor B didn't said anything about welfare of people.So it can't be the answer.

Such questions reasoning resonates with the idea from general thing to specific example to specific example to general thing .
In OG you can find a lot of question on this concept.
so coming back to question .
Professor A : against of general to specific .
Professor B : support specific example to general thing.
For solution just reverse their analogy and you can have your answer.
avatar
D
Apt0810
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Posts: 364
Re: Professor A: The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) was originally [#permalink] New post  15 Oct 2019, 08:28
1
Professor A Disagrees with the point B in the list : The creation of systems that display intelligence regarding specific tasks is an especially important step toward the creation of systems with general
intelligence.

Since for the Prof A general AI & narrow AI are two altogether different pursuits so anything which is coming from the narrow AI background does not suits Prof A

Professor B Disagrees with the point D in the list: Research in the narrow AI field is not likely to lead to significant breakthroughs in the general AI field.

Since Prof B is saying that research in narrow AI will ultimately lead to the development in the areas of general AI. In short both of these concepts are inter linked

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
B
Cellchat
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2020
Posts: 56
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
Re: Professor A: The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) was originally [#permalink] New post  24 May 2020, 13:26
I have a problem with the second column; the answer is out of the following IMO:

:- Research in the narrow AI field is not likely to lead to significant breakthroughs in the general AI field.

:-The research into narrow AI is not producing results that real people can benefit from today.

When in the stem does it talk about significant breakthroughs. Narrow AI could lead to small developments in the general AI field. You are inferring that the stem says significant.

And yes, you may also be doing some 'inferring' with the second statement. The statement talks about real people. But when does narrow AI do anything but benefit real people?! Chess, programs that translate speech to text, programs that can drive automated vehicles, all of these benefit real people. I feel as if this is even less of an inference step to make than the first (IMO).

Help would be appreciated.
avatar
B
altairahmad
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2017
Posts: 252
Re: Professor A: The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) was originally [#permalink] New post  26 Jun 2020, 03:38
(E) is more likely to be true.

'Significant breakthrough' is a bit extreme. There is nothing to suggest of the sort in the original para. It only says 'eventually narrow AI will lead to the creation of systems with general intelligence'. This 'eventually' can be through significant or unsignificant breakthroughs.

But the examples 'such as chess-playing programs that can defeat any human, programs that translate speech to text, and programs that can drive automated vehicles', all benefit 'real people'.

Expert opinion ?
avatar
B
exequielbl
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 May 2020
Posts: 3
Professor A: The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) was originally [#permalink] New post  08 Jul 2020, 16:45
Cellchat wrote:
I have a problem with the second column; the answer is out of the following IMO:

:- Research in the narrow AI field is not likely to lead to significant breakthroughs in the general AI field.

:-The research into narrow AI is not producing results that real people can benefit from today.

When in the stem does it talk about significant breakthroughs. Narrow AI could lead to small developments in the general AI field. You are inferring that the stem says significant.

And yes, you may also be doing some 'inferring' with the second statement. The statement talks about real people. But when does narrow AI do anything but benefit real people?! Chess, programs that translate speech to text, programs that can drive automated vehicles, all of these benefit real people. I feel as if this is even less of an inference step to make than the first (IMO).

Help would be appreciated.


I also had the last one for proffessor B.
Now I realize that the prompt never talks about real people nor people, but about "real results", therefore we can't assume that narrow AI is actually beneffiting real people.
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
[#permalink]
NEW TOPIC
POST REPLY
Downloads
My Bookmarks
Reviews
Moderators:
chetan2u
Math Expert
8857 posts
Bunuel
Math Expert
67053 posts
Sajjad1994
GMAT Club team member
6857 posts
Feedback

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Main navigation

GMAT Resources

Partners

MBA Resources

www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions